McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-715 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-715

Exam Name Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Security

Cisco 300-715 Bundle $25.00
300-715 Sample 1 300-715 Sample 2 300-715 Sample 3 300-715 Sample 4 300-715 Sample 5 300-715 Sample 6 300-715 Sample 7 300-715 Sample 8 300-715 Sample 9 300-715 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-715 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-715 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-715 Questions & Answers

    433 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-715 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-715 Video Course

    300-715 Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    300-715 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-715 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) exam.

Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) (300-715) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    433 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-715 Video Course

    Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 58

Question 570

During a Cisco ISE postchange review, the following is observed: An enterprise needs to assess both managed Windows laptops and a supported agentless device group, but installs a desktop agent on every network device regardless of platform capability. Which platform distinction is decisive in this scenario?

  1. The posture assessment stage may fail independently after a successful RADIUS identity authentication.
  2. Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements.
  3. Posture requirements evaluate specified checks; a successful unrelated condition should not substitute for a missing mandated patch.
  4. Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Select supported agent-based or agentless posture techniques according to each endpoint platform and assessment requirement. The acceptance result is: A managed laptop and an eligible agentless test endpoint each complete their intended compliance check.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: the test client reports a completed posture state once agent and PSN communication is restored, with password validation unchanged. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: the unpatched test endpoint remains restricted while a fully patched counterpart becomes compliant. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 571

A security policy owner must resolve this specific case: An enterprise needs to assess both managed Windows laptops and a supported agentless device group, but installs a desktop agent on every network device regardless of platform capability. Which acceptance test would directly establish the desired state?

  1. A device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product.
  2. A managed laptop and an eligible agentless test endpoint each complete their intended compliance check.
  3. A noncompliant test client reaches remediation services but not the restricted finance application until compliance passes.
  4. The failing update or security-service condition appears in the client assessment and matches the enforced limited role.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A managed laptop and an eligible agentless test endpoint each complete their intended compliance check. The required remediation is: Select supported agent-based or agentless posture techniques according to each endpoint platform and assessment requirement. It works because posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. In the case being tested, Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. The necessary acceptance evidence is: A managed laptop and an eligible agentless test endpoint each complete their intended compliance check.

C:

ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. In the case being tested, Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. The necessary acceptance evidence is: A managed laptop and an eligible agentless test endpoint each complete their intended compliance check.

D:

Retain condition-level posture evidence with high-impact access-denial tickets. In the case being tested, Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. The necessary acceptance evidence is: A managed laptop and an eligible agentless test endpoint each complete their intended compliance check.

Question 572

A network identity engineer receives the following requirement: An enterprise needs to assess both managed Windows laptops and a supported agentless device group, but installs a desktop agent on every network device regardless of platform capability. Which governance step most directly targets the root cause?

  1. Version and periodically review every posture requirement against the organization's current baseline.
  2. Maintain an operating-system and device-type posture support matrix.
  3. Capture posture lifecycle logs and timeouts as part of NAC incident triage.
  4. Retain condition-level posture evidence with high-impact access-denial tickets.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Maintain an operating-system and device-type posture support matrix. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. The ongoing acceptance check remains: A managed laptop and an eligible agentless test endpoint each complete their intended compliance check.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. The repeat risk here is different: Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. A directly relevant preventive control is: Maintain an operating-system and device-type posture support matrix.

C:

The test client reports a completed posture state once agent and PSN communication is restored, with password validation unchanged. The repeat risk here is different: Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. A directly relevant preventive control is: Maintain an operating-system and device-type posture support matrix.

D:

Retain condition-level posture evidence with high-impact access-denial tickets. The repeat risk here is different: Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. A directly relevant preventive control is: Maintain an operating-system and device-type posture support matrix.

Question 573

A campus and branch network operator reports: Contractor devices should receive only patch servers while they repair a failed posture check, but the network returns a full corporate ACL immediately after 802.1X acceptance. Which change is justified by the observed evidence?

  1. Introduce an appropriate ISE posture assessment and authorization flow in addition to initial authentication.
  2. Design a posture-pending or noncompliant authorization role containing only the required remediation destinations.
  3. Inspect client provisioning, posture agent communication, and PSN reachability while preserving valid authentication credentials.
  4. Scope the compliance rules and provisioning resources to supported eligible endpoint categories and business requirements.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Design a posture-pending or noncompliant authorization role containing only the required remediation destinations. This is appropriate because iSE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. It should be verified by this evidence: A noncompliant test client reaches remediation services but not the restricted finance application until compliance passes.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. The needed response is: Design a posture-pending or noncompliant authorization role containing only the required remediation destinations.

C:

A device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. The needed response is: Design a posture-pending or noncompliant authorization role containing only the required remediation destinations.

D:

A known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. The needed response is: Design a posture-pending or noncompliant authorization role containing only the required remediation destinations.

Question 574

A Cisco ISE operations team investigates this site issue: Contractor devices should receive only patch servers while they repair a failed posture check, but the network returns a full corporate ACL immediately after 802.1X acceptance. What mechanism governs this authentication or management outcome?

  1. ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role.
  2. An endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result.
  3. Compliance is a set of configured health conditions; presence of one security application does not establish satisfaction of unrelated patch or encryption requirements.
  4. A posture rule must query the intended OS and data location; the same key path may not be valid across platforms.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Design a posture-pending or noncompliant authorization role containing only the required remediation destinations. The acceptance result is: A noncompliant test client reaches remediation services but not the restricted finance application until compliance passes.

Incorrect Answers

B:

ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: an endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: a device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Both positive and negative pilot machines return the expected posture verdicts for their actual settings. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 575

At a distributed Cisco ISE deployment, a security review finds: Contractor devices should receive only patch servers while they repair a failed posture check, but the network returns a full corporate ACL immediately after 802.1X acceptance. What is the strongest evidence that this requirement is met?

  1. The known workstation authenticates but receives only remediation access until its security condition becomes compliant.
  2. A noncompliant test client reaches remediation services but not the restricted finance application until compliance passes.
  3. The laptop receives a posture assessment and reaches a clear Compliant or NonCompliant state instead of indefinite Unknown.
  4. The endpoint downloads the missing approved remediation resource, passes posture, and reauthorizes without replacing valid certificates.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A noncompliant test client reaches remediation services but not the restricted finance application until compliance passes. The required remediation is: Design a posture-pending or noncompliant authorization role containing only the required remediation destinations. It works because iSE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. In the case being tested, ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. The necessary acceptance evidence is: A noncompliant test client reaches remediation services but not the restricted finance application until compliance passes.

C:

An endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. In the case being tested, ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. The necessary acceptance evidence is: A noncompliant test client reaches remediation services but not the restricted finance application until compliance passes.

D:

Use stage-specific posture error classification instead of broad credential resets. In the case being tested, ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. The necessary acceptance evidence is: A noncompliant test client reaches remediation services but not the restricted finance application until compliance passes.

Question 576

A network identity engineer receives the following requirement: A security dashboard labels endpoints compliant based on antivirus installation alone, even though required operating-system update levels and disk protection are also mandated. Which administrative action BEST addresses this specific situation?

  1. Introduce an appropriate ISE posture assessment and authorization flow in addition to initial authentication.
  2. Select supported agent-based or agentless posture techniques according to each endpoint platform and assessment requirement.
  3. Tune supported posture lease and reassessment settings according to security policy and observed operational behavior.
  4. Define separate supported posture checks for every required control and evaluate the combined health policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Define separate supported posture checks for every required control and evaluate the combined health policy. This is appropriate because compliance is a set of configured health conditions; presence of one security application does not establish satisfaction of unrelated patch or encryption requirements. It should be verified by this evidence: A device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. The repeat risk here is different: ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. A directly relevant preventive control is: Define separate supported posture checks for every required control and evaluate the combined health policy.

B:

Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. The repeat risk here is different: ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. A directly relevant preventive control is: Define separate supported posture checks for every required control and evaluate the combined health policy.

C:

Retain condition-level posture evidence with high-impact access-denial tickets. The repeat risk here is different: ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. A directly relevant preventive control is: Define separate supported posture checks for every required control and evaluate the combined health policy.

Question 577

An enterprise access-control incident describes: A security dashboard labels endpoints compliant based on antivirus installation alone, even though required operating-system update levels and disk protection are also mandated. Which architectural fact determines the appropriate fix?

  1. An endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result.
  2. Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements.
  3. RADIUS authentication visibility alone does not prove posture workflows were invoked or completed.
  4. Compliance is a set of configured health conditions; presence of one security application does not establish satisfaction of unrelated patch or encryption requirements.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Compliance is a set of configured health conditions; presence of one security application does not establish satisfaction of unrelated patch or encryption requirements. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Define separate supported posture checks for every required control and evaluate the combined health policy. The acceptance result is: A device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: a device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. The needed response is: Compliance is a set of configured health conditions; presence of one security application does not establish satisfaction of unrelated patch or encryption requirements.

B:

Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: a device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. The needed response is: Compliance is a set of configured health conditions; presence of one security application does not establish satisfaction of unrelated patch or encryption requirements.

C:

The offered option specifies “RADIUS authentication visibility alone does not prove posture workflows were invoked or completed”. The question requires “Compliance is a set of configured health conditions; presence of one security application does not establish satisfaction of unrelated patch or encryption requirements”: a device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. These are not equivalent responses to the stated requirement.

Question 578

In a staged Cisco ISE network access rollout, the team observes: A security dashboard labels endpoints compliant based on antivirus installation alone, even though required operating-system update levels and disk protection are also mandated. Which postchange outcome demonstrates correct implementation?

  1. A noncompliant test client reaches remediation services but not the restricted finance application until compliance passes.
  2. The test endpoint successfully completes posture against a reachable supported PSN after primary failure.
  3. A device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product.
  4. The test endpoint fails while the service is stopped and passes after approved operation resumes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

A device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. The required remediation is: Define separate supported posture checks for every required control and evaluate the combined health policy. It works because compliance is a set of configured health conditions; presence of one security application does not establish satisfaction of unrelated patch or encryption requirements.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

A device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Simulate posture PSN loss during high-availability acceptance testing. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

A device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: the test endpoint fails while the service is stopped and passes after approved operation resumes. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 579

An identity and device-administration engineer evaluates: A security dashboard labels endpoints compliant based on antivirus installation alone, even though required operating-system update levels and disk protection are also mandated. What should be added to the maintenance or security review?

  1. Treat identity assurance and endpoint health as independent authorization inputs.
  2. Capture posture lifecycle logs and timeouts as part of NAC incident triage.
  3. Version and periodically review every posture requirement against the organization's current baseline.
  4. Retain condition-level posture evidence with high-impact access-denial tickets.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Version and periodically review every posture requirement against the organization's current baseline. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Compliance is a set of configured health conditions; presence of one security application does not establish satisfaction of unrelated patch or encryption requirements. The ongoing acceptance check remains: A device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. In the case being tested, a device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Version and periodically review every posture requirement against the organization's current baseline.

B:

The test client reports a completed posture state once agent and PSN communication is restored, with password validation unchanged. In the case being tested, a device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Version and periodically review every posture requirement against the organization's current baseline.

D:

Retain condition-level posture evidence with high-impact access-denial tickets. In the case being tested, a device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Version and periodically review every posture requirement against the organization's current baseline.

Question 580

An ISE administrator troubleshoots the following: A post-login client waits indefinitely for a posture result and the helpdesk immediately changes user passwords without inspecting the posture service path. What is the most appropriate next configuration or repair?

  1. Introduce an appropriate ISE posture assessment and authorization flow in addition to initial authentication.
  2. Inspect client provisioning, posture agent communication, and PSN reachability while preserving valid authentication credentials.
  3. Select supported agent-based or agentless posture techniques according to each endpoint platform and assessment requirement.
  4. Configure a supported posture reassessment and authorization transition after remediation completes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Inspect client provisioning, posture agent communication, and PSN reachability while preserving valid authentication credentials. This is appropriate because the posture assessment stage may fail independently after a successful RADIUS identity authentication. It should be verified by this evidence: The test client reports a completed posture state once agent and PSN communication is restored, with password validation unchanged.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. The repeat risk here is different: a device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. A directly relevant preventive control is: Inspect client provisioning, posture agent communication, and PSN reachability while preserving valid authentication credentials.

C:

Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. The repeat risk here is different: a device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. A directly relevant preventive control is: Inspect client provisioning, posture agent communication, and PSN reachability while preserving valid authentication credentials.

D:

The pilot laptop downloads the intended module, installs it, and completes the configured posture checks. The repeat risk here is different: a device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. A directly relevant preventive control is: Inspect client provisioning, posture agent communication, and PSN reachability while preserving valid authentication credentials.