McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-715 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-715

Exam Name Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Security

Cisco 300-715 Bundle $25.00
300-715 Sample 1 300-715 Sample 2 300-715 Sample 3 300-715 Sample 4 300-715 Sample 5 300-715 Sample 6 300-715 Sample 7 300-715 Sample 8 300-715 Sample 9 300-715 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-715 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-715 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-715 Questions & Answers

    433 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-715 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-715 Video Course

    300-715 Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    300-715 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-715 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) exam.

Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) (300-715) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    433 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-715 Video Course

    Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 57

Question 560

An enterprise access-control incident describes: A recovered personal phone was marked stolen, and its owner expects instant full access without confirming any required re-enrollment or credential state. What validation should be repeated before subsequent rollouts?

  1. Monitor device counts and periodically prompt employees to clean up unused registrations.
  2. Document recovered-device identity checks and credential reissuance criteria.
  3. Include BYOD ownership transfer in employee departure and asset handoff checklists.
  4. Test both unregistered and enrolled device states before enabling single-SSID BYOD.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Document recovered-device identity checks and credential reissuance criteria. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Recovering physical possession does not automatically restore every BYOD registration and certificate state altered by the loss response. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The verified owner completes any required re-registration and the phone regains only its proper BYOD policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The My Devices registration quota limits how many personal devices an employee may enroll; this is independent of general wireless capacity. The repeat risk here is different: Recovering physical possession does not automatically restore every BYOD registration and certificate state altered by the loss response. A directly relevant preventive control is: Document recovered-device identity checks and credential reissuance criteria.

C:

Resolve and verify the prior ownership and registration state through authorized endpoint management before allowing a new user to register it. The repeat risk here is different: Recovering physical possession does not automatically restore every BYOD registration and certificate state altered by the loss response. A directly relevant preventive control is: Document recovered-device identity checks and credential reissuance criteria.

D:

A new laptop completes enrollment and reconnects securely on the intended single SSID. The repeat risk here is different: Recovering physical possession does not automatically restore every BYOD registration and certificate state altered by the loss response. A directly relevant preventive control is: Document recovered-device identity checks and credential reissuance criteria.

Question 561

A Cisco ISE operations team investigates this site issue: A secured wired workstation is authenticated by 802.1X yet runs outdated endpoint protection, and the team assumes successful identity validation proves compliance. What should the team change before declaring this work complete?

  1. Introduce an appropriate ISE posture assessment and authorization flow in addition to initial authentication.
  2. Select supported agent-based or agentless posture techniques according to each endpoint platform and assessment requirement.
  3. Design a posture-pending or noncompliant authorization role containing only the required remediation destinations.
  4. Use a supported patch or OS-health condition within the appropriate posture requirement and combine conditions according to policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Introduce an appropriate ISE posture assessment and authorization flow in addition to initial authentication. This is appropriate because authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. It should be verified by this evidence: The known workstation authenticates but receives only remediation access until its security condition becomes compliant.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. The needed response is: Introduce an appropriate ISE posture assessment and authorization flow in addition to initial authentication.

C:

ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. The needed response is: Introduce an appropriate ISE posture assessment and authorization flow in addition to initial authentication.

D:

Both positive and negative pilot machines return the expected posture verdicts for their actual settings. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. The needed response is: Introduce an appropriate ISE posture assessment and authorization flow in addition to initial authentication.

Question 562

At a distributed Cisco ISE deployment, a security review finds: A secured wired workstation is authenticated by 802.1X yet runs outdated endpoint protection, and the team assumes successful identity validation proves compliance. What underlying Cisco ISE dependency explains this result?

  1. Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements.
  2. Compliance is a set of configured health conditions; presence of one security application does not establish satisfaction of unrelated patch or encryption requirements.
  3. An endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result.
  4. Posture lease and synchronization intervals influence when endpoints repeat health checks; excessively short intervals create avoidable churn.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Introduce an appropriate ISE posture assessment and authorization flow in addition to initial authentication. The acceptance result is: The known workstation authenticates but receives only remediation access until its security condition becomes compliant.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: a device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: an endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Retain condition-level posture evidence with high-impact access-denial tickets. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 563

An ISE administrator troubleshoots the following: A secured wired workstation is authenticated by 802.1X yet runs outdated endpoint protection, and the team assumes successful identity validation proves compliance. Which measurable outcome proves the intended behavior?

  1. The laptop receives a posture assessment and reaches a clear Compliant or NonCompliant state instead of indefinite Unknown.
  2. A device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product.
  3. The test endpoint successfully completes posture against a reachable supported PSN after primary failure.
  4. The known workstation authenticates but receives only remediation access until its security condition becomes compliant.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The known workstation authenticates but receives only remediation access until its security condition becomes compliant. The required remediation is: Introduce an appropriate ISE posture assessment and authorization flow in addition to initial authentication. It works because authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. In the case being tested, Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. The necessary acceptance evidence is: The known workstation authenticates but receives only remediation access until its security condition becomes compliant.

B:

A device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. In the case being tested, Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. The necessary acceptance evidence is: The known workstation authenticates but receives only remediation access until its security condition becomes compliant.

C:

Simulate posture PSN loss during high-availability acceptance testing. In the case being tested, Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. The necessary acceptance evidence is: The known workstation authenticates but receives only remediation access until its security condition becomes compliant.

Question 564

An access-security change request states: A secured wired workstation is authenticated by 802.1X yet runs outdated endpoint protection, and the team assumes successful identity validation proves compliance. Which ongoing practice is most appropriate for this failure mode?

  1. Monitor posture-assessment completion separately from compliance failure rates.
  2. Treat identity assurance and endpoint health as independent authorization inputs.
  3. Capture posture lifecycle logs and timeouts as part of NAC incident triage.
  4. Review posture refresh timings against endpoint update and security response objectives.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Treat identity assurance and endpoint health as independent authorization inputs. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The known workstation authenticates but receives only remediation access until its security condition becomes compliant.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. The repeat risk here is different: Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. A directly relevant preventive control is: Treat identity assurance and endpoint health as independent authorization inputs.

C:

The test client reports a completed posture state once agent and PSN communication is restored, with password validation unchanged. The repeat risk here is different: Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. A directly relevant preventive control is: Treat identity assurance and endpoint health as independent authorization inputs.

D:

Review posture refresh timings against endpoint update and security response objectives. The repeat risk here is different: Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. A directly relevant preventive control is: Treat identity assurance and endpoint health as independent authorization inputs.

Question 565

An enterprise access-control incident describes: A new laptop has no posture module and stays in the Unknown posture state, but administrators classify it as NonCompliant without checking whether an assessment ever ran. Which response most directly corrects the described failure?

  1. Inspect client provisioning, posture agent communication, and PSN reachability while preserving valid authentication credentials.
  2. Select supported agent-based or agentless posture techniques according to each endpoint platform and assessment requirement.
  3. Use posture diagnostics to separate certificate authentication, compliance condition evaluation, and remediation-service connectivity.
  4. Distinguish Unknown, Pending, Compliant, and NonCompliant states, then provide the supported client provisioning and assessment path.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Distinguish Unknown, Pending, Compliant, and NonCompliant states, then provide the supported client provisioning and assessment path. This is appropriate because an endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. It should be verified by this evidence: The laptop receives a posture assessment and reaches a clear Compliant or NonCompliant state instead of indefinite Unknown.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: an endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. The needed response is: Distinguish Unknown, Pending, Compliant, and NonCompliant states, then provide the supported client provisioning and assessment path.

B:

Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: an endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. The needed response is: Distinguish Unknown, Pending, Compliant, and NonCompliant states, then provide the supported client provisioning and assessment path.

C:

Simulate posture PSN loss during high-availability acceptance testing. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: an endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. The needed response is: Distinguish Unknown, Pending, Compliant, and NonCompliant states, then provide the supported client provisioning and assessment path.

Question 566

In a staged Cisco ISE network access rollout, the team observes: A new laptop has no posture module and stays in the Unknown posture state, but administrators classify it as NonCompliant without checking whether an assessment ever ran. Which statement best explains why the correct response works?

  1. The posture assessment stage may fail independently after a successful RADIUS identity authentication.
  2. An endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result.
  3. ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role.
  4. ISE authorization uses the matched policy result; correct posture detection does not protect the network if the wrong rule wins.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

An endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Distinguish Unknown, Pending, Compliant, and NonCompliant states, then provide the supported client provisioning and assessment path. The acceptance result is: The laptop receives a posture assessment and reaches a clear Compliant or NonCompliant state instead of indefinite Unknown.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: the test client reports a completed posture state once agent and PSN communication is restored, with password validation unchanged. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

An endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

An endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: a known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 567

An identity and device-administration engineer evaluates: A new laptop has no posture module and stays in the Unknown posture state, but administrators classify it as NonCompliant without checking whether an assessment ever ran. Which observation would BEST verify successful remediation?

  1. A noncompliant test client reaches remediation services but not the restricted finance application until compliance passes.
  2. The laptop receives a posture assessment and reaches a clear Compliant or NonCompliant state instead of indefinite Unknown.
  3. The known workstation authenticates but receives only remediation access until its security condition becomes compliant.
  4. The test endpoint fails while the service is stopped and passes after approved operation resumes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The laptop receives a posture assessment and reaches a clear Compliant or NonCompliant state instead of indefinite Unknown. The required remediation is: Distinguish Unknown, Pending, Compliant, and NonCompliant states, then provide the supported client provisioning and assessment path. It works because an endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result.

Incorrect Answers

A:

ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. In the case being tested, an endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. The necessary acceptance evidence is: The laptop receives a posture assessment and reaches a clear Compliant or NonCompliant state instead of indefinite Unknown.

C:

Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. In the case being tested, an endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. The necessary acceptance evidence is: The laptop receives a posture assessment and reaches a clear Compliant or NonCompliant state instead of indefinite Unknown.

D:

The test endpoint fails while the service is stopped and passes after approved operation resumes. In the case being tested, an endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. The necessary acceptance evidence is: The laptop receives a posture assessment and reaches a clear Compliant or NonCompliant state instead of indefinite Unknown.

Question 568

A campus and branch network operator reports: A new laptop has no posture module and stays in the Unknown posture state, but administrators classify it as NonCompliant without checking whether an assessment ever ran. What should be incorporated into the change checklist?

  1. Monitor posture-assessment completion separately from compliance failure rates.
  2. Treat identity assurance and endpoint health as independent authorization inputs.
  3. Verify least-privilege access in every posture state before production rollout.
  4. Test full remediation-to-reauthorization sequences, not only patch delivery.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Monitor posture-assessment completion separately from compliance failure rates. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: An endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The laptop receives a posture assessment and reaches a clear Compliant or NonCompliant state instead of indefinite Unknown.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. The repeat risk here is different: an endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. A directly relevant preventive control is: Monitor posture-assessment completion separately from compliance failure rates.

C:

The offered option specifies “Verify least-privilege access in every posture state before production rollout”. The question requires “Monitor posture-assessment completion separately from compliance failure rates”: an endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. These are not equivalent responses to the stated requirement.

D:

After patch installation and a successful rescan, the endpoint receives its compliant authorization profile. The repeat risk here is different: an endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. A directly relevant preventive control is: Monitor posture-assessment completion separately from compliance failure rates.

Question 569

An access-security change request states: An enterprise needs to assess both managed Windows laptops and a supported agentless device group, but installs a desktop agent on every network device regardless of platform capability. What is the most suitable solution within these constraints?

  1. Select supported agent-based or agentless posture techniques according to each endpoint platform and assessment requirement.
  2. Define separate supported posture checks for every required control and evaluate the combined health policy.
  3. Inspect client provisioning, posture agent communication, and PSN reachability while preserving valid authentication credentials.
  4. Configure an eligible supported Secure Client posture provisioning resource with the correct OS matching conditions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Select supported agent-based or agentless posture techniques according to each endpoint platform and assessment requirement. This is appropriate because posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. It should be verified by this evidence: A managed laptop and an eligible agentless test endpoint each complete their intended compliance check.

Incorrect Answers

B:

ISE can use posture state in authorization; secure identity validation alone should not imply an unrestricted network role. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. The needed response is: Select supported agent-based or agentless posture techniques according to each endpoint platform and assessment requirement.

C:

A device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. The needed response is: Select supported agent-based or agentless posture techniques according to each endpoint platform and assessment requirement.

D:

The unpatched test endpoint remains restricted while a fully patched counterpart becomes compliant. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. The needed response is: Select supported agent-based or agentless posture techniques according to each endpoint platform and assessment requirement.

Question 570

During a Cisco ISE postchange review, the following is observed: An enterprise needs to assess both managed Windows laptops and a supported agentless device group, but installs a desktop agent on every network device regardless of platform capability. Which platform distinction is decisive in this scenario?

  1. The posture assessment stage may fail independently after a successful RADIUS identity authentication.
  2. Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements.
  3. Posture requirements evaluate specified checks; a successful unrelated condition should not substitute for a missing mandated patch.
  4. Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Select supported agent-based or agentless posture techniques according to each endpoint platform and assessment requirement. The acceptance result is: A managed laptop and an eligible agentless test endpoint each complete their intended compliance check.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: the test client reports a completed posture state once agent and PSN communication is restored, with password validation unchanged. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: the unpatched test endpoint remains restricted while a fully patched counterpart becomes compliant. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.