McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-715 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-715

Exam Name Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Security

Cisco 300-715 Bundle $25.00
300-715 Sample 1 300-715 Sample 2 300-715 Sample 3 300-715 Sample 4 300-715 Sample 5 300-715 Sample 6 300-715 Sample 7 300-715 Sample 8 300-715 Sample 9 300-715 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-715 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-715 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-715 Questions & Answers

    433 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-715 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-715 Video Course

    300-715 Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    300-715 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-715 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) exam.

Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) (300-715) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    433 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-715 Video Course

    Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 55

Question 540

During a Cisco ISE postchange review, the following is observed: An administrator selects the HTTPS portal certificate as the only identity trusted for BYOD client EAP, confusing server authentication and personal device enrollment. Which observation would BEST verify successful remediation?

  1. The device presents a current certificate and receives its intended BYOD authorization while expired certificates are rejected.
  2. A browser trusts the portal hostname and the same device separately authenticates with its valid enrolled client credential.
  3. A newly issued certificate shows the required purpose and the supported client completes EAP-TLS.
  4. The personal laptop provisions on the enrollment SSID and then authenticates to the secure SSID with the approved certificate.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A browser trusts the portal hostname and the same device separately authenticates with its valid enrolled client credential. The required remediation is: Configure the proper separate trust relationships for portal HTTPS identity, EAP server identity, and issued client certificates. It works because the certificate protecting a portal web session serves a different role from the client certificate used as an EAP-TLS identity.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Renew or reprovision a valid approved certificate and verify the permitted trust chain and identity mapping before reauthorizing the device. The repeat risk here is different: Configure the proper separate trust relationships for portal HTTPS identity, EAP server identity, and issued client certificates. A directly relevant preventive control is: A browser trusts the portal hostname and the same device separately authenticates with its valid enrolled client credential.

C:

Adjust the supported CA certificate template and issuance policy to include required client-authentication usages and compatible key constraints. The repeat risk here is different: Configure the proper separate trust relationships for portal HTTPS identity, EAP server identity, and issued client certificates. A directly relevant preventive control is: A browser trusts the portal hostname and the same device separately authenticates with its valid enrolled client credential.

D:

The personal laptop provisions on the enrollment SSID and then authenticates to the secure SSID with the approved certificate. The repeat risk here is different: Configure the proper separate trust relationships for portal HTTPS identity, EAP server identity, and issued client certificates. A directly relevant preventive control is: A browser trusts the portal hostname and the same device separately authenticates with its valid enrolled client credential.

Question 541

A security policy owner must resolve this specific case: An administrator selects the HTTPS portal certificate as the only identity trusted for BYOD client EAP, confusing server authentication and personal device enrollment. What should be incorporated into the change checklist?

  1. Maintain distinct inventories for portal, EAP service, and BYOD client certificate lifecycles.
  2. Test certificate principal uniqueness before rolling out new BYOD templates.
  3. Check platform certificate requirements when changing BYOD CA templates.
  4. Test every BYOD state transition with the actual wireless or wired access device.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Maintain distinct inventories for portal, EAP service, and BYOD client certificate lifecycles. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: The certificate protecting a portal web session serves a different role from the client certificate used as an EAP-TLS identity. The ongoing acceptance check remains: A browser trusts the portal hostname and the same device separately authenticates with its valid enrolled client credential.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Adjust the supported CA certificate template and issuance policy to include required client-authentication usages and compatible key constraints. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements. The needed response is: Maintain distinct inventories for portal, EAP service, and BYOD client certificate lifecycles.

C:

Configure supported revocation validation and reachable CRL or OCSP services according to policy. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements. The needed response is: Maintain distinct inventories for portal, EAP service, and BYOD client certificate lifecycles.

D:

Test every BYOD state transition with the actual wireless or wired access device. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements. The needed response is: Maintain distinct inventories for portal, EAP service, and BYOD client certificate lifecycles.

Question 542

An identity and device-administration engineer evaluates: An employee reports a stolen personal laptop but the ISE My Devices portal still lists it as Registered and its current EAP authorization remains active. What is the most suitable solution within these constraints?

  1. Review the approved global employee device-registration limit and retire or remove obsolete registrations before selectively changing policy.
  2. Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required.
  3. Create explicit BYOD authorization conditions and enforce a limited role or dACL at the NAD.
  4. Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements. This is appropriate because bYOD lifecycle status can place an endpoint into a Blocked List policy; keeping it registered and authorized leaves continued access risk. It should be verified by this evidence: The reported device is denied access and the case record identifies any required certificate remediation.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: the My Devices registration quota limits how many personal devices an employee may enroll; this is independent of general wireless capacity. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Test every BYOD state transition with the actual wireless or wired access device. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 543

A campus and branch network operator reports: An employee reports a stolen personal laptop but the ISE My Devices portal still lists it as Registered and its current EAP authorization remains active. Which platform distinction is decisive in this scenario?

  1. The My Devices registration quota limits how many personal devices an employee may enroll; this is independent of general wireless capacity.
  2. BYOD lifecycle status can place an endpoint into a Blocked List policy; keeping it registered and authorized leaves continued access risk.
  3. Deleting a personal device from the employee portal can disassociate it without permanently deleting the ISE endpoint inventory record.
  4. The browser's trust decision is based on TLS certificate identity and chain, independently of subsequent EAP-TLS enrollment.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

BYOD lifecycle status can place an endpoint into a Blocked List policy; keeping it registered and authorized leaves continued access risk. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements. The acceptance result is: The reported device is denied access and the case record identifies any required certificate remediation.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The My Devices registration quota limits how many personal devices an employee may enroll; this is independent of general wireless capacity. In the case being tested, Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements. The necessary acceptance evidence is: BYOD lifecycle status can place an endpoint into a Blocked List policy; keeping it registered and authorized leaves continued access risk.

C:

Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. In the case being tested, Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements. The necessary acceptance evidence is: BYOD lifecycle status can place an endpoint into a Blocked List policy; keeping it registered and authorized leaves continued access risk.

D:

Configure a portal certificate chain and hostname that match the published onboarding FQDN. In the case being tested, Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements. The necessary acceptance evidence is: BYOD lifecycle status can place an endpoint into a Blocked List policy; keeping it registered and authorized leaves continued access risk.

Question 544

A Cisco ISE operations team investigates this site issue: An employee reports a stolen personal laptop but the ISE My Devices portal still lists it as Registered and its current EAP authorization remains active. Which acceptance test would directly establish the desired state?

  1. The user can register after decommissioning an old device while another user cannot exceed the approved quota.
  2. The legitimate new owner registers the console only after prior association is properly resolved.
  3. The reported device is denied access and the case record identifies any required certificate remediation.
  4. The secure SSID uses EAP-TLS and grants the registered device its intended limited employee access.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The reported device is denied access and the case record identifies any required certificate remediation. The required remediation is: Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements. It works because bYOD lifecycle status can place an endpoint into a Blocked List policy; keeping it registered and authorized leaves continued access risk.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The My Devices registration quota limits how many personal devices an employee may enroll; this is independent of general wireless capacity. The repeat risk here is different: Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements. A directly relevant preventive control is: The reported device is denied access and the case record identifies any required certificate remediation.

B:

The offered option specifies “The legitimate new owner registers the console only after prior association is properly resolved”. The question requires “The reported device is denied access and the case record identifies any required certificate remediation”: Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements. These are not equivalent responses to the stated requirement.

D:

Test registered-state policy-set selection after every SSID configuration change. The repeat risk here is different: Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements. A directly relevant preventive control is: The reported device is denied access and the case record identifies any required certificate remediation.

Question 545

At a distributed Cisco ISE deployment, a security review finds: An employee reports a stolen personal laptop but the ISE My Devices portal still lists it as Registered and its current EAP authorization remains active. Which governance step most directly targets the root cause?

  1. Include BYOD ownership transfer in employee departure and asset handoff checklists.
  2. Distinguish portal disassociation from database deletion in device-offboarding procedures.
  3. Include immediate network access revocation in personal-device loss procedures.
  4. Prefer supported BYOD enrollment over broad personal-device MAC exceptions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Include immediate network access revocation in personal-device loss procedures. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: BYOD lifecycle status can place an endpoint into a Blocked List policy; keeping it registered and authorized leaves continued access risk. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The reported device is denied access and the case record identifies any required certificate remediation.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Resolve and verify the prior ownership and registration state through authorized endpoint management before allowing a new user to register it. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. The needed response is: Include immediate network access revocation in personal-device loss procedures.

B:

Resolve and verify the prior ownership and registration state through authorized endpoint management before allowing a new user to register it. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. The needed response is: Include immediate network access revocation in personal-device loss procedures.

D:

The phone completes guided enrollment and uses the required EAP-TLS connection without relying on an employee-wide MAC whitelist. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. The needed response is: Include immediate network access revocation in personal-device loss procedures.

Question 546

A security policy owner must resolve this specific case: An employee removes an obsolete printer from My Devices, then assumes the device was erased from ISE's endpoint database and could never be seen again. Which change is justified by the observed evidence?

  1. Review the approved global employee device-registration limit and retire or remove obsolete registrations before selectively changing policy.
  2. Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements.
  3. Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required.
  4. Install and validate the authorized CA chain and appropriate certificate authentication profile across participating PSNs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. This is appropriate because deleting a personal device from the employee portal can disassociate it without permanently deleting the ISE endpoint inventory record. It should be verified by this evidence: The old device loses registered status and the retained endpoint record is handled under the intended retention policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: the My Devices registration quota limits how many personal devices an employee may enroll; this is independent of general wireless capacity. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Install and validate the authorized CA chain and appropriate certificate authentication profile across participating PSNs. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 547

A network identity engineer receives the following requirement: An employee removes an obsolete printer from My Devices, then assumes the device was erased from ISE's endpoint database and could never be seen again. What mechanism governs this authentication or management outcome?

  1. ISE My Devices ownership controls prevent two employees from simply attaching one endpoint identity to conflicting accounts.
  2. Recovering physical possession does not automatically restore every BYOD registration and certificate state altered by the loss response.
  3. Deleting a personal device from the employee portal can disassociate it without permanently deleting the ISE endpoint inventory record.
  4. A certificate may remain correctly signed after revocation; authorization should consider its current validity status when policy requires it.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Deleting a personal device from the employee portal can disassociate it without permanently deleting the ISE endpoint inventory record. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. The acceptance result is: The old device loses registered status and the retained endpoint record is handled under the intended retention policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Resolve and verify the prior ownership and registration state through authorized endpoint management before allowing a new user to register it. In the case being tested, Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Deleting a personal device from the employee portal can disassociate it without permanently deleting the ISE endpoint inventory record.

B:

Recovering physical possession does not automatically restore every BYOD registration and certificate state altered by the loss response. In the case being tested, Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Deleting a personal device from the employee portal can disassociate it without permanently deleting the ISE endpoint inventory record.

D:

Configure supported revocation validation and reachable CRL or OCSP services according to policy. In the case being tested, Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Deleting a personal device from the employee portal can disassociate it without permanently deleting the ISE endpoint inventory record.

Question 548

An enterprise access-control incident describes: An employee removes an obsolete printer from My Devices, then assumes the device was erased from ISE's endpoint database and could never be seen again. What is the strongest evidence that this requirement is met?

  1. The reported device is denied access and the case record identifies any required certificate remediation.
  2. The user can register after decommissioning an old device while another user cannot exceed the approved quota.
  3. A newly provisioned device authenticates through either intended PSN and an unknown CA is rejected.
  4. The old device loses registered status and the retained endpoint record is handled under the intended retention policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The old device loses registered status and the retained endpoint record is handled under the intended retention policy. The required remediation is: Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. It works because deleting a personal device from the employee portal can disassociate it without permanently deleting the ISE endpoint inventory record.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements. The repeat risk here is different: Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. A directly relevant preventive control is: The old device loses registered status and the retained endpoint record is handled under the intended retention policy.

B:

The My Devices registration quota limits how many personal devices an employee may enroll; this is independent of general wireless capacity. The repeat risk here is different: Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. A directly relevant preventive control is: The old device loses registered status and the retained endpoint record is handled under the intended retention policy.

C:

Install and validate the authorized CA chain and appropriate certificate authentication profile across participating PSNs. The repeat risk here is different: Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. A directly relevant preventive control is: The old device loses registered status and the retained endpoint record is handled under the intended retention policy.

Question 549

In a staged Cisco ISE network access rollout, the team observes: An employee removes an obsolete printer from My Devices, then assumes the device was erased from ISE's endpoint database and could never be seen again. Which recurring operational control would reduce this risk?

  1. Include immediate network access revocation in personal-device loss procedures.
  2. Include BYOD ownership transfer in employee departure and asset handoff checklists.
  3. Distinguish portal disassociation from database deletion in device-offboarding procedures.
  4. Test registered-state policy-set selection after every SSID configuration change.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Distinguish portal disassociation from database deletion in device-offboarding procedures. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Deleting a personal device from the employee portal can disassociate it without permanently deleting the ISE endpoint inventory record. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The old device loses registered status and the retained endpoint record is handled under the intended retention policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Resolve and verify the prior ownership and registration state through authorized endpoint management before allowing a new user to register it. The needed response is: Distinguish portal disassociation from database deletion in device-offboarding procedures.

B:

The offered option specifies “Include BYOD ownership transfer in employee departure and asset handoff checklists”. The question requires “Distinguish portal disassociation from database deletion in device-offboarding procedures”: Resolve and verify the prior ownership and registration state through authorized endpoint management before allowing a new user to register it. These are not equivalent responses to the stated requirement.

D:

Test registered-state policy-set selection after every SSID configuration change. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Resolve and verify the prior ownership and registration state through authorized endpoint management before allowing a new user to register it. The needed response is: Distinguish portal disassociation from database deletion in device-offboarding procedures.

Question 550

At a distributed Cisco ISE deployment, a security review finds: A user tries to register a personal game console already claimed by a former employee, but ISE refuses the second ownership claim. Which administrative action BEST addresses this specific situation?

  1. Review the approved global employee device-registration limit and retire or remove obsolete registrations before selectively changing policy.
  2. Resolve and verify the prior ownership and registration state through authorized endpoint management before allowing a new user to register it.
  3. Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required.
  4. Renew or reprovision a valid approved certificate and verify the permitted trust chain and identity mapping before reauthorizing the device.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Resolve and verify the prior ownership and registration state through authorized endpoint management before allowing a new user to register it. This is appropriate because iSE My Devices ownership controls prevent two employees from simply attaching one endpoint identity to conflicting accounts. It should be verified by this evidence: The legitimate new owner registers the console only after prior association is properly resolved.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Resolve and verify the prior ownership and registration state through authorized endpoint management before allowing a new user to register it. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: the My Devices registration quota limits how many personal devices an employee may enroll; this is independent of general wireless capacity. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Resolve and verify the prior ownership and registration state through authorized endpoint management before allowing a new user to register it. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Resolve and verify the prior ownership and registration state through authorized endpoint management before allowing a new user to register it. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Renew or reprovision a valid approved certificate and verify the permitted trust chain and identity mapping before reauthorizing the device. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.