McAfee Secure

Cisco 350-701 Bundle

Exam Code: 350-701

Exam Name Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certifications: CCIE Security , CCNP Security

Cisco 350-701 Bundle $44.99

100% Cisco 350-701 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 350-701 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    350-701 Questions & Answers

    789 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 350-701 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 350-701 Video Course

    350-701 Training Course

    299 Video Lectures

    350-701 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 350-701 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies exam.
  • Study Guide

    350-701 Study Guide

    701 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 701-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace 350-701 exam.

Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies (350-701) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    789 Questions

    $124.99
  • 350-701 Video Course

    Training Course

    299 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    701 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Cisco 350-701 Practice Test 34

Question 330

At the Claremont municipal government, network security events disappear when a collector certificate expires and devices silently stop forwarding. Which underlying issue most directly explains this situation?

  1. A successful request of one method does not prove a separate configuration mutation was committed
  2. Centralized configuration can amplify unauthorized changes without an explicit approval gate
  3. Secure log transport depends on valid trust and session maintenance
  4. Different authentication secrets prevent peers from proving a common trust relationship

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The strongest explanation is that secure log transport depends on valid trust and session maintenance. This accounts for the outcome and supports the action to renew trusted collector certificates and monitor reliable log delivery with alerting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The offered principle is: A successful request of one method does not prove a separate configuration mutation was committed. In the source material it is associated with: A successful request of one method does not prove a separate configuration mutation was committed. This case has a different controlling cause: Secure log transport depends on valid trust and session maintenance. Its keyed mechanism is: Secure log transport depends on valid trust and session maintenance.

B:

Centralized configuration can amplify unauthorized changes without an explicit approval gate. That is not the mechanism that accounts for the stated failure at the Claremont municipal government.

D:

Although different authentication secrets prevent peers from proving a common trust relationship, the presented symptoms do not support that as the primary cause; they indicate that secure log transport depends on valid trust and session maintenance. For the Claremont municipal government, the direct corrective action is to renew trusted collector certificates and monitor reliable log delivery with alerting.

Question 331

At the Claremont municipal government, network security events disappear when a collector certificate expires and devices silently stop forwarding. What evidence would justify considering this concern addressed?

  1. The automation reads and updates the intended YANG-backed configuration only over protected SSH
  2. A known security event is received by the approved collector after certificate replacement
  3. Operators reach the firewall management channel during a simulated data-plane routing outage
  4. Telnet attempts fail and approved SSH with central authorization works

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The intended correction is to renew trusted collector certificates and monitor reliable log delivery with alerting. The decisive verification is that a known security event is received by the approved collector after certificate replacement, rather than only confirming configuration was saved.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The automation reads and updates the intended YANG-backed configuration only over protected SSH. That result would test a control for this other failure: Unsecured management transport exposes device configuration and administrator privileges. The question instead requires evidence for: Secure log transport depends on valid trust and session maintenance. The direct outcome to verify is: A known security event is received by the approved collector after certificate replacement.

C:

Operators reach the firewall management channel during a simulated data-plane routing outage. That result would test a control for this other failure: In-band management shares the network dependencies being diagnosed. The question instead requires evidence for: Secure log transport depends on valid trust and session maintenance. The direct outcome to verify is: A known security event is received by the approved collector after certificate replacement.

D:

The offered observation is: Telnet attempts fail and approved SSH with central authorization works. It would support the separate mechanism: Legacy management services expose credentials and widen the device attack surface. In this case the decisive dependency is: Secure log transport depends on valid trust and session maintenance. The original keyed verification is: A known security event is received by the approved collector after certificate replacement.

Question 332

At the Claremont municipal government, network security events disappear when a collector certificate expires and devices silently stop forwarding. How should the organization sustain the improvement?

  1. Alert on certificate expiry and unexpected ingestion gaps
  2. Regression-test RESTCONF writes against controller software changes
  3. Audit port security limits when approved endpoint configurations change
  4. Review command accounting coverage after AAA modifications

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The team should alert on certificate expiry and unexpected ingestion gaps. That recurring practice targets the same weakness, namely that secure log transport depends on valid trust and session maintenance.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Regression-test RESTCONF writes against controller software changes. That safeguard would help prevent recurrence of: A successful request of one method does not prove a separate configuration mutation was committed. The risk being reviewed here is instead: Secure log transport depends on valid trust and session maintenance. The matching ongoing control is: Alert on certificate expiry and unexpected ingestion gaps.

C:

That routine supports port security mac count, but the relevant ongoing risk requires the team to alert on certificate expiry and unexpected ingestion gaps. For the Claremont municipal government, the direct corrective action is to renew trusted collector certificates and monitor reliable log delivery with alerting.

D:

Review command accounting coverage after AAA modifications. That safeguard would help prevent recurrence of: Untracked privileged changes prevent reliable configuration forensics. The risk being reviewed here is instead: Secure log transport depends on valid trust and session maintenance. The matching ongoing control is: Alert on certificate expiry and unexpected ingestion gaps.

Question 333

At the Redhaven automotive supplier, network devices accept time from an untrusted peer and incident timestamps suddenly shift. Which approach best resolves the described issue?

  1. Use approved authenticated NTP sources and secure management-plane reachability
  2. Migrate to SNMPv3 with authenticated encrypted sessions and role-limited views
  3. Check routes NAT exemption traffic selectors and access control policy for the new network
  4. Adopt centralized multi-device policy management with governed deployment and shared objects

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The reported facts support this change rather than a general platform replacement. The team should use approved authenticated NTP sources and secure management-plane reachability because time injection can corrupt security-event sequence and certificate checks. A suitable test confirms that the device rejects untrusted time updates and maintains synchronized timestamps.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The offered action is: Migrate to SNMPv3 with authenticated encrypted sessions and role-limited views. It is associated with this separate technical condition: SNMPv2c community strings do not provide strong confidentiality or user authentication. The actual incident concerns a different dependency: Time injection can corrupt security-event sequence and certificate checks. The corresponding change is: Use approved authenticated NTP sources and secure management-plane reachability.

C:

This alternative would be suitable where tunnel established status alone does not establish permitted forwarding for every destination. It does not by itself resolve the need to use approved authenticated NTP sources and secure management-plane reachability. For the Redhaven automotive supplier, the direct corrective action is to use approved authenticated NTP sources and secure management-plane reachability.

D:

Adopt centralized multi-device policy management with governed deployment and shared objects addresses a different kind of problem: independent device edits increase inconsistency and make change audit difficult. Here the reported weakness is that time injection can corrupt security-event sequence and certificate checks. For the Redhaven automotive supplier, the direct corrective action is to use approved authenticated NTP sources and secure management-plane reachability.

Question 334

At the Redhaven automotive supplier, network devices accept time from an untrusted peer and incident timestamps suddenly shift. Which explanation best accounts for the concern?

  1. SNMPv2c community strings do not provide strong confidentiality or user authentication
  2. A valid IKE control channel does not guarantee compatible traffic-protection proposals
  3. Time injection can corrupt security-event sequence and certificate checks
  4. Cloud-delivered management does not eliminate the need for role and device boundary enforcement

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The situation shows that time injection can corrupt security-event sequence and certificate checks, rather than merely a monitoring or presentation issue. Remediation is to use approved authenticated NTP sources and secure management-plane reachability.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The offered principle is: SNMPv2c community strings do not provide strong confidentiality or user authentication. In the source material it is associated with: SNMPv2c community strings do not provide strong confidentiality or user authentication. This case has a different controlling cause: Time injection can corrupt security-event sequence and certificate checks. Its keyed mechanism is: Time injection can corrupt security-event sequence and certificate checks.

B:

Although a valid IKE control channel does not guarantee compatible traffic-protection proposals, the presented symptoms do not support that as the primary cause; they indicate that time injection can corrupt security-event sequence and certificate checks. For the Redhaven automotive supplier, the direct corrective action is to use approved authenticated NTP sources and secure management-plane reachability.

D:

Cloud-delivered management does not eliminate the need for role and device boundary enforcement. That may occur elsewhere, but the evidence at the Redhaven automotive supplier instead points to the fact that time injection can corrupt security-event sequence and certificate checks.

Question 335

At the Redhaven automotive supplier, network devices accept time from an untrusted peer and incident timestamps suddenly shift. Which test result best shows the requirement is met?

  1. The automation reads and updates the intended YANG-backed configuration only over protected SSH
  2. A regional operator edits approved devices but is denied another region's firewalls
  3. A test user receives the intended VLAN or group policy after authorization correction
  4. The device rejects untrusted time updates and maintains synchronized timestamps

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The team can confirm the fix by showing that the device rejects untrusted time updates and maintains synchronized timestamps. This aligns with the corrective design to use approved authenticated NTP sources and secure management-plane reachability.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The automation reads and updates the intended YANG-backed configuration only over protected SSH. That result would test a control for this other failure: Unsecured management transport exposes device configuration and administrator privileges. The question instead requires evidence for: Time injection can corrupt security-event sequence and certificate checks. The direct outcome to verify is: The device rejects untrusted time updates and maintains synchronized timestamps.

B:

The offered observation is: A regional operator edits approved devices but is denied another region's firewalls. It would support the separate mechanism: Cloud-delivered management does not eliminate the need for role and device boundary enforcement. In this case the decisive dependency is: Time injection can corrupt security-event sequence and certificate checks. The original keyed verification is: The device rejects untrusted time updates and maintains synchronized timestamps.

C:

A test user receives the intended VLAN or group policy after authorization correction. That result would test a control for this other failure: Authentication success does not guarantee correct network authorization attributes. The question instead requires evidence for: Time injection can corrupt security-event sequence and certificate checks. The direct outcome to verify is: The device rejects untrusted time updates and maintains synchronized timestamps.

Question 336

At the Redhaven automotive supplier, network devices accept time from an untrusted peer and incident timestamps suddenly shift. Which ongoing control best prevents this issue from recurring?

  1. Monitor NTP peer identity and clock offset
  2. Recertify integration API scopes when reports expand
  3. Reevaluate device hardening baseline after feature enablement
  4. Reassess manager selection when additional firewalls are introduced

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The continuing safeguard is to monitor NTP peer identity and clock offset. It helps avoid the original condition: time injection can corrupt security-event sequence and certificate checks.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Recertify integration API scopes when reports expand. That safeguard would help prevent recurrence of: A convenience superuser credential grants dangerous mutation rights to a reporting workload. The risk being reviewed here is instead: Time injection can corrupt security-event sequence and certificate checks. The matching ongoing control is: Monitor NTP peer identity and clock offset.

C:

Reevaluate device hardening baseline after feature enablement is not the primary recurring safeguard for this problem. The team should monitor NTP peer identity and clock offset. For the Redhaven automotive supplier, the direct corrective action is to use approved authenticated NTP sources and secure management-plane reachability.

D:

Reassess manager selection when additional firewalls are introduced. That safeguard would help prevent recurrence of: A full multi-site manager can add needless complexity for one isolated appliance. The risk being reviewed here is instead: Time injection can corrupt security-event sequence and certificate checks. The matching ongoing control is: Monitor NTP peer identity and clock offset.

Question 337

At the Elmhurst municipal government, a reporting integration uses full administrator rights to query firewall device inventory. Which implementation choice best addresses the situation?

  1. Renew trusted collector certificates and monitor reliable log delivery with alerting
  2. Grant an API identity read-only permissions limited to the needed managed resources
  3. Perform repeatable hardening compliance assessment and approved exception handling
  4. Align protected network selection and routes across both VPN peers

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Grant an API identity read-only permissions limited to the needed managed resources is the best response because a convenience superuser credential grants dangerous mutation rights to a reporting workload. A focused validation would establish that the service can enumerate approved assets but a configuration write returns authorization denial.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative would be suitable where secure log transport depends on valid trust and session maintenance. It does not by itself resolve the need to grant an API identity read-only permissions limited to the needed managed resources. For the Elmhurst municipal government, the direct corrective action is to grant an API identity read-only permissions limited to the needed managed resources.

C:

The option addresses the separate situation where one-time compliance does not detect later insecure configuration drift. For this case, the more appropriate response is to grant an API identity read-only permissions limited to the needed managed resources. For the Elmhurst municipal government, the direct corrective action is to grant an API identity read-only permissions limited to the needed managed resources.

D:

The offered alternative is: Align protected network selection and routes across both VPN peers. It addresses this separate failure mode: Successful IKE establishment does not ensure every intended traffic selector is negotiated. In the current case, the observed mechanism is: A convenience superuser credential grants dangerous mutation rights to a reporting workload. The keyed action, Grant an API identity read-only permissions limited to the needed managed resources., targets that condition more directly.

Question 338

At the Elmhurst municipal government, a reporting integration uses full administrator rights to query firewall device inventory. What risk should the team identify as the primary issue?

  1. Unsecured management transport exposes device configuration and administrator privileges
  2. A valid IKE control channel does not guarantee compatible traffic-protection proposals
  3. A convenience superuser credential grants dangerous mutation rights to a reporting workload
  4. Unlimited learned MAC addresses can defeat intended endpoint admission restrictions

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The evidence indicates that a convenience superuser credential grants dangerous mutation rights to a reporting workload. The appropriate response is to grant an API identity read-only permissions limited to the needed managed resources and demonstrate that the service can enumerate approved assets but a configuration write returns authorization denial.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The offered action is: Unsecured management transport exposes device configuration and administrator privileges. It is associated with this separate technical condition: Unsecured management transport exposes device configuration and administrator privileges. The actual incident concerns a different dependency: A convenience superuser credential grants dangerous mutation rights to a reporting workload. The corresponding change is: A convenience superuser credential grants dangerous mutation rights to a reporting workload.

B:

A valid IKE control channel does not guarantee compatible traffic-protection proposals. That may occur elsewhere, but the evidence at the Elmhurst municipal government instead points to the fact that a convenience superuser credential grants dangerous mutation rights to a reporting workload.

D:

Unlimited learned MAC addresses can defeat intended endpoint admission restrictions. That is not the mechanism that accounts for the stated failure at the Elmhurst municipal government.

Question 339

At the Elmhurst municipal government, a reporting integration uses full administrator rights to query firewall device inventory. What is the strongest acceptance test for this change?

  1. The automation reads and updates the intended YANG-backed configuration only over protected SSH
  2. An invalid ARP reply is rejected while a legitimate bound host continues forwarding
  3. A TLS flow is characterized by endpoints timing and volume without falsely claiming plaintext visibility
  4. The service can enumerate approved assets but a configuration write returns authorization denial

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The intended correction is to grant an API identity read-only permissions limited to the needed managed resources. The decisive verification is that the service can enumerate approved assets but a configuration write returns authorization denial, rather than only confirming configuration was saved.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The automation reads and updates the intended YANG-backed configuration only over protected SSH. That result would test a control for this other failure: Unsecured management transport exposes device configuration and administrator privileges. The question instead requires evidence for: A convenience superuser credential grants dangerous mutation rights to a reporting workload. The direct outcome to verify is: The service can enumerate approved assets but a configuration write returns authorization denial.

B:

At the Elmhurst municipal government, a result about dynamic arp inspection binding would not show that the team corrected the failure where a convenience superuser credential grants dangerous mutation rights to a reporting workload.

C:

A TLS flow is characterized by endpoints timing and volume without falsely claiming plaintext visibility. That result would test a control for this other failure: Encryption conceals payload content even though network metadata remains observable. The question instead requires evidence for: A convenience superuser credential grants dangerous mutation rights to a reporting workload. The direct outcome to verify is: The service can enumerate approved assets but a configuration write returns authorization denial.

Question 340

At the Elmhurst municipal government, a reporting integration uses full administrator rights to query firewall device inventory. Which setting or practice should be reviewed in future?

  1. Monitor NTP peer identity and clock offset
  2. Use controlled secret rotation and monitor failed IKE authentication
  3. Retain diagnostic correlation fields during log schema changes
  4. Recertify integration API scopes when reports expand

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

For the Elmhurst municipal government, this maintenance action preserves the fix: recertify integration API scopes when reports expand. It should be revisited as the workload evolves.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Monitor NTP peer identity and clock offset is not the primary recurring safeguard for this problem. The team should recertify integration API scopes when reports expand. For the Elmhurst municipal government, the direct corrective action is to grant an API identity read-only permissions limited to the needed managed resources.

B:

Use controlled secret rotation and monitor failed IKE authentication. That safeguard would help prevent recurrence of: Different authentication secrets prevent peers from proving a common trust relationship. The risk being reviewed here is instead: A convenience superuser credential grants dangerous mutation rights to a reporting workload. The matching ongoing control is: Recertify integration API scopes when reports expand.

C:

The suggested preventive check is: Retain diagnostic correlation fields during log schema changes. Its technical scope concerns: Policy decisions need matching packet and rule context to identify the actual failure. This question asks how to sustain control over: A convenience superuser credential grants dangerous mutation rights to a reporting workload. The more targeted safeguard is: Recertify integration API scopes when reports expand.