McAfee Secure

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle

Exam Code: MS-102

Exam Name Microsoft 365 Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft 365 Certified: Administrator Expert

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle $44.99
MS-102 Sample 1 MS-102 Sample 2 MS-102 Sample 3 MS-102 Sample 4 MS-102 Sample 5 MS-102 Sample 6 MS-102 Sample 7 MS-102 Sample 8 MS-102 Sample 9 MS-102 Sample 10

100% Microsoft MS-102 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real MS-102 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    MS-102 Questions & Answers

    473 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual MS-102 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • MS-102 Video Course

    MS-102 Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    MS-102 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the MS-102 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft 365 Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    MS-102 Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 298-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace MS-102 exam.

Microsoft 365 Administrator (MS-102) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    473 Questions

    $124.99
  • MS-102 Video Course

    Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft MS-102 Practice Test 21

Question 200

A company applies an anti-malware policy to ordinary mailboxes but ignores policy coverage for shared mailboxes. The change owner plans to: Review Defender for Office 365 threat policy recipients and ensure required shared mailboxes are included. Which additional safeguard is most specific to this implementation?

  1. Review custom URLs, logging and tenant consent before launching the campaign.
  2. Inspect object type and review policy change logs before remediation.
  3. Audit policy priority and preservation of legitimate support mailbox workflows.
  4. Use distribution-group ownership and periodic delivery testing instead of sole-person recipients.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The specific rollout control is Audit policy priority and preservation of legitimate support mailbox workflows. It protects the proposed intervention 'Review Defender for Office 365 threat policy recipients and ensure required shared mailboxes are included.' against the failure mode that threat policies may be scoped to users, groups and domains and require explicit coverage verification. Success should also be checked through: A test addressed to the shared mailbox follows the intended malware detection response.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Phishing simulations must not expose passwords to uncontrolled third-party services. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Threat policies may be scoped to users, groups and domains and require explicit coverage verification. The applicable safeguard is: Audit policy priority and preservation of legitimate support mailbox workflows.

B:

Sender-specific outbound restrictions are different objects from tenant-wide inbound allow/block entries. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Threat policies may be scoped to users, groups and domains and require explicit coverage verification. The applicable safeguard is: Audit policy priority and preservation of legitimate support mailbox workflows.

D:

Alert policies lose operational value when recipient lists are not maintained. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Threat policies may be scoped to users, groups and domains and require explicit coverage verification. The applicable safeguard is: Audit policy priority and preservation of legitimate support mailbox workflows.

Question 201

An administrator removes a Purview retention label from a document and assumes its previously preserved copies disappear at once. The administrator proposes: Investigate retention and preservation behavior under the supported retention policy and item lifecycle. Which result most directly proves the proposed change worked?

  1. A normal user applies published labels while only an approved compliance role manages publication.
  2. A permitted export shows the documented protection behavior and unsupported formats are handled safely.
  3. A controlled deletion test confirms which copies remain preserved according to effective policy.
  4. An authorized explorer finds the expected sensitivity-classified SharePoint location without revealing unnecessary document bodies.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The administrator plans 'Investigate retention and preservation behavior under the supported retention policy and item lifecycle.' to correct the fact that removing a visible label does not necessarily erase retention-controlled content or preservation copies. The direct acceptance evidence is A controlled deletion test confirms which copies remain preserved according to effective policy. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A normal user applies published labels while only an approved compliance role manages publication. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a controlled deletion test confirms which copies remain preserved according to effective policy.

B:

A permitted export shows the documented protection behavior and unsupported formats are handled safely. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a controlled deletion test confirms which copies remain preserved according to effective policy.

D:

An authorized explorer finds the expected sensitivity-classified SharePoint location without revealing unnecessary document bodies. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a controlled deletion test confirms which copies remain preserved according to effective policy.

Question 202

An HR team offboards an employee but removes only a visible display name from a Teams channel. The change owner plans to: Block and deprovision the Microsoft Entra user account according to the approved offboarding workflow. Which additional safeguard is most specific to this implementation?

  1. Recheck nested groups and cached sessions to confirm effective permission removal.
  2. Revoke sessions, handle ownership transfers and preserve legal holds before deleting user data.
  3. Choose privacy and guest access settings before inviting external participants.
  4. Check inventory, plan dependencies and license assignment errors before bulk rollout.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The specific rollout control is Revoke sessions, handle ownership transfers and preserve legal holds before deleting user data. It protects the proposed intervention 'Block and deprovision the Microsoft Entra user account according to the approved offboarding workflow.' against the failure mode that removing a collaboration membership does not disable an identity or revoke every active session. Success should also be checked through: The former employee cannot sign in while approved mailbox and OneDrive retention actions are recorded.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Full Access and Send As grants have separate lifecycles and must both be audited. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Removing a collaboration membership does not disable an identity or revoke every active session. The applicable safeguard is: Revoke sessions, handle ownership transfers and preserve legal holds before deleting user data.

C:

A distribution list provides mail distribution, not the full Microsoft 365 Group collaboration experience. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Removing a collaboration membership does not disable an identity or revoke every active session. The applicable safeguard is: Revoke sessions, handle ownership transfers and preserve legal holds before deleting user data.

D:

An assigned SKU without the intended enabled service plan can leave a workload unavailable. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Removing a collaboration membership does not disable an identity or revoke every active session. The applicable safeguard is: Revoke sessions, handle ownership transfers and preserve legal holds before deleting user data.

Question 203

A PIM role has a four-hour activation limit but a change manager plans a recurring unattended overnight automation using user activation. The administrator proposes: Use a separately scoped workload identity or supported automation role rather than treating PIM user activation as perpetual service access. Which result most directly proves the proposed change worked?

  1. The steward creates a test retention policy but cannot administer unrelated Exchange transport settings.
  2. An assigned scoped operator is constrained to intended users while Global Admin remains separately governed.
  3. A staged new-hire object appears in the correct AU and delegated admins can operate on it.
  4. The scheduled automation completes with independently governed permissions without an expired human session.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The administrator plans 'Use a separately scoped workload identity or supported automation role rather than treating PIM user activation as perpetual service access.' to correct the fact that just-in-time human role activation is not a substitute for managed service identity permissions. The direct acceptance evidence is The scheduled automation completes with independently governed permissions without an expired human session. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The steward creates a test retention policy but cannot administer unrelated Exchange transport settings. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the scheduled automation completes with independently governed permissions without an expired human session.

B:

An assigned scoped operator is constrained to intended users while Global Admin remains separately governed. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the scheduled automation completes with independently governed permissions without an expired human session.

C:

A staged new-hire object appears in the correct AU and delegated admins can operate on it. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the scheduled automation completes with independently governed permissions without an expired human session.

Question 204

A company introduces Entra Cloud Sync agents in two locations but installs only one agent for a critical production sync process. The team believes no other action is necessary. What underlying technical or governance limitation explains this failure?

  1. Raw directory counts can differ by design because not every on-premises object should synchronize.
  2. Single-agent topology can make cloud synchronization dependent on one server's availability.
  3. A running local service is not proof that scheduled sync and identity exports succeed.
  4. Unmonitored sync errors can persist even when overall server availability appears normal.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The actual failure mechanism is Single-agent topology can make cloud synchronization dependent on one server's availability. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by deploy the supported agent redundancy and monitor each Cloud Sync configuration health. Then verify: A controlled agent outage does not stop eligible identities from syncing within the defined recovery objective.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Raw directory counts can differ by design because not every on-premises object should synchronize. The stated symptoms instead indicate that single-agent topology can make cloud synchronization dependent on one server's availability.

C:

A running local service is not proof that scheduled sync and identity exports succeed. The stated symptoms instead indicate that single-agent topology can make cloud synchronization dependent on one server's availability.

D:

Unmonitored sync errors can persist even when overall server availability appears normal. The stated symptoms instead indicate that single-agent topology can make cloud synchronization dependent on one server's availability.

Question 205

A tenant's on-call group discovers planned Microsoft 365 maintenance only when users contact the helpdesk. The change owner plans to: Configure relevant Service health notification preferences and recipient routing for the tenant. Which additional safeguard is most specific to this implementation?

  1. Document tenant IDs and use a controlled migration plan for any existing trial data or workloads.
  2. Review alert recipient ownership and distinguish advisory notifications from tenant-specific security alerts.
  3. Publish rollback and compatibility guidance before promoting the update ring to all users.
  4. Check supported device management method, network reachability and deferral windows before forcing updates.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The specific rollout control is Review alert recipient ownership and distinguish advisory notifications from tenant-specific security alerts. It protects the proposed intervention 'Configure relevant Service health notification preferences and recipient routing for the tenant.' against the failure mode that service-health details are not useful operationally if no responsible team receives relevant notifications. Success should also be checked through: A test or real targeted advisory reaches the owned distribution channel with actionable incident context.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Tenant and subscription identifiers govern ownership and access relationships that are not interchangeable labels. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Service-health details are not useful operationally if no responsible team receives relevant notifications. The applicable safeguard is: Review alert recipient ownership and distinguish advisory notifications from tenant-specific security alerts.

C:

Feature updates can change app behavior even when the cloud tenant service is healthy. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Service-health details are not useful operationally if no responsible team receives relevant notifications. The applicable safeguard is: Review alert recipient ownership and distinguish advisory notifications from tenant-specific security alerts.

D:

An update channel policy determines servicing behavior but is not proof that every endpoint installed it. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Service-health details are not useful operationally if no responsible team receives relevant notifications. The applicable safeguard is: Review alert recipient ownership and distinguish advisory notifications from tenant-specific security alerts.

Question 206

A suspicious message is delivered to hundreds of recipients and support manually deletes one copy from a single mailbox. The administrator proposes: Use Defender for Office 365 Threat Explorer or supported investigation to scope and remediate the campaign. Which result most directly proves the proposed change worked?

  1. An eligible new test alert reaches the staffed incident-response queue.
  2. The targeted sender status changes without broad changes to inbound domain blocking.
  3. A supervised campaign collects participation results without delivering real credential theft or malware.
  4. The investigation finds affected recipients and tracks authorized mail remediation status.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The administrator plans 'Use Defender for Office 365 Threat Explorer or supported investigation to scope and remediate the campaign.' to correct the fact that a single deleted email does not remove other copies of the same phishing campaign. The direct acceptance evidence is The investigation finds affected recipients and tracks authorized mail remediation status. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An eligible new test alert reaches the staffed incident-response queue. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the investigation finds affected recipients and tracks authorized mail remediation status.

B:

The targeted sender status changes without broad changes to inbound domain blocking. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the investigation finds affected recipients and tracks authorized mail remediation status.

C:

A supervised campaign collects participation results without delivering real credential theft or malware. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the investigation finds affected recipients and tracks authorized mail remediation status.

Question 207

A compliance team sees repeated DLP alerts for test credit-card numbers and automatically suspends every affected employee. The administrator proposes: Review DLP event and alert reports to distinguish sanctioned tests, false positives and actual violations. Which result most directly proves the proposed change worked?

  1. The investigation identifies approved test activity and remediates only confirmed unauthorized actions.
  2. A controlled external message containing test card patterns triggers the expected warning or block.
  3. A verified permitted print path works while unauthorized sensitive document printing remains blocked.
  4. A labeled or classified model triggers the documented Power BI DLP alert or policy action.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Review DLP event and alert reports to distinguish sanctioned tests, false positives and actual violations.' to correct the fact that sensitive-information matches can arise from legitimate test data and do not automatically prove misconduct. The direct acceptance evidence is The investigation identifies approved test activity and remediates only confirmed unauthorized actions. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A controlled external message containing test card patterns triggers the expected warning or block. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the investigation identifies approved test activity and remediates only confirmed unauthorized actions.

C:

A verified permitted print path works while unauthorized sensitive document printing remains blocked. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the investigation identifies approved test activity and remediates only confirmed unauthorized actions.

D:

A labeled or classified model triggers the documented Power BI DLP alert or policy action. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the investigation identifies approved test activity and remediates only confirmed unauthorized actions.

Question 208

An analyst sees increased upload traffic to an unsanctioned app but mistakes normal backup traffic for exfiltration. The administrator proposes: Correlate Cloud Discovery activity, user behavior and data-classification context before incident escalation. Which result most directly proves the proposed change worked?

  1. An authorized benign download continues while the defined risky test is detected or controlled.
  2. The review distinguishes an approved service backup from actual policy-violating upload activity.
  3. A simulated eligible event reaches the SOC queue at the agreed priority without excessive notifications.
  4. The discovery dashboard identifies candidate cloud services and relevant risk indicators from real usage.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The administrator plans 'Correlate Cloud Discovery activity, user behavior and data-classification context before incident escalation.' to correct the fact that traffic volume and application risk do not independently establish intentional data theft. The direct acceptance evidence is The review distinguishes an approved service backup from actual policy-violating upload activity. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An authorized benign download continues while the defined risky test is detected or controlled. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the review distinguishes an approved service backup from actual policy-violating upload activity.

C:

A simulated eligible event reaches the SOC queue at the agreed priority without excessive notifications. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the review distinguishes an approved service backup from actual policy-violating upload activity.

D:

The discovery dashboard identifies candidate cloud services and relevant risk indicators from real usage. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the review distinguishes an approved service backup from actual policy-violating upload activity.

Question 209

A tenant sends high-priority email threat alerts to a departed administrator's personal address. The administrator proposes: Update Defender for Office 365 alert recipient configuration and verify routing to a maintained group. Which result most directly proves the proposed change worked?

  1. Audit notes show compromised credentials and suspicious forwarding were addressed prior to unblock.
  2. The investigation finds affected recipients and tracks authorized mail remediation status.
  3. An eligible new test alert reaches the staffed incident-response queue.
  4. The campaign measures a meaningful comparison population and appropriate learning outcomes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The administrator plans 'Update Defender for Office 365 alert recipient configuration and verify routing to a maintained group.' to correct the fact that alert policies lose operational value when recipient lists are not maintained. The direct acceptance evidence is An eligible new test alert reaches the staffed incident-response queue. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Audit notes show compromised credentials and suspicious forwarding were addressed prior to unblock. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: an eligible new test alert reaches the staffed incident-response queue.

B:

The investigation finds affected recipients and tracks authorized mail remediation status. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: an eligible new test alert reaches the staffed incident-response queue.

D:

The campaign measures a meaningful comparison population and appropriate learning outcomes. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: an eligible new test alert reaches the staffed incident-response queue.

Question 210

A legal department must keep certain contracts for seven years but the IT team configures a seven-day mailbox delete rule. Which administration change is MOST directly justified by the stated facts?

  1. Refine the custom Purview sensitive information type with suitable contextual keywords and confidence settings.
  2. Configure supported keyword lists and matching behavior in the appropriate Purview sensitive information type.
  3. Configure sensitivity label publishing scope and administer label policy changes through authorized roles.
  4. Create the appropriate Microsoft Purview retention label or retention policy with the approved regulatory retention period.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The deciding issue is retention obligations differ from mailbox cleanup preferences and need explicit governance configuration. The action 'Create the appropriate Microsoft Purview retention label or retention policy with the approved regulatory retention period.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A test record remains preserved through a simulated ordinary deletion and shows its required retention setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Regular expressions without contextual conditions can overclassify unrelated data. The problem described here is that retention obligations differ from mailbox cleanup preferences and need explicit governance configuration.

B:

Ad hoc case-sensitive searches can miss supported alternative forms of classified keywords. The problem described here is that retention obligations differ from mailbox cleanup preferences and need explicit governance configuration.

C:

Applying a published label and administering tenant-wide label policy are separate privileges. That concern does not account for the stated failure: Retention obligations differ from mailbox cleanup preferences and need explicit governance configuration. The relevant design change is: Create the appropriate Microsoft Purview retention label or retention policy with the approved regulatory retention period.