McAfee Secure

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle

Exam Code: MS-102

Exam Name Microsoft 365 Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft 365 Certified: Administrator Expert

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle $44.99
MS-102 Sample 1 MS-102 Sample 2 MS-102 Sample 3 MS-102 Sample 4 MS-102 Sample 5 MS-102 Sample 6 MS-102 Sample 7 MS-102 Sample 8 MS-102 Sample 9 MS-102 Sample 10

100% Microsoft MS-102 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real MS-102 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    MS-102 Questions & Answers

    473 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual MS-102 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • MS-102 Video Course

    MS-102 Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    MS-102 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the MS-102 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft 365 Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    MS-102 Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 298-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace MS-102 exam.

Microsoft 365 Administrator (MS-102) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    473 Questions

    $124.99
  • MS-102 Video Course

    Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft MS-102 Practice Test 23

Question 220

An IT manager selects Microsoft 365 Backup for critical OneDrive users but forgets to include recently hired high-risk employees. The administrator proposes: Maintain the intended Microsoft 365 Backup protection scope and verify coverage when users or sites change. Which result most directly proves the proposed change worked?

  1. A pilot account signs in with the custom verified domain while its mailbox and assignments remain consistent.
  2. A representative managed device reports the approved app build and update deployment status within the expected window.
  3. A test or real targeted advisory reaches the owned distribution channel with actionable incident context.
  4. The protected-entity inventory includes the intended new employees and their recoverable content.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The administrator plans 'Maintain the intended Microsoft 365 Backup protection scope and verify coverage when users or sites change.' to correct the fact that a backup policy that omits newly created content does not meet the business recovery requirement. The direct acceptance evidence is The protected-entity inventory includes the intended new employees and their recoverable content. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A pilot account signs in with the custom verified domain while its mailbox and assignments remain consistent. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the protected-entity inventory includes the intended new employees and their recoverable content.

B:

A representative managed device reports the approved app build and update deployment status within the expected window. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the protected-entity inventory includes the intended new employees and their recoverable content.

C:

A test or real targeted advisory reaches the owned distribution channel with actionable incident context. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the protected-entity inventory includes the intended new employees and their recoverable content.

Question 221

An account signs in through a browser but the same user's legacy desktop client fails after modern-auth enforcement. The change owner plans to: Investigate application protocol support and sign-in logs before changing the user's account status. Which additional safeguard is most specific to this implementation?

  1. Plan recovery methods and enforce device key registration under tenant policy.
  2. Advise supported reauthentication and investigate persistence before repeated password changes.
  3. Pilot deployment across DCs and verify proxy health before enforcing broad password changes.
  4. Coordinate client upgrades and prevent accidental reenablement of legacy authentication.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The specific rollout control is Coordinate client upgrades and prevent accidental reenablement of legacy authentication. It protects the proposed intervention 'Investigate application protocol support and sign-in logs before changing the user's account status.' against the failure mode that different client authentication protocols can produce different access outcomes for the same identity. Success should also be checked through: The supported updated client signs in using an approved modern flow while the legacy client stays blocked.

Incorrect Answers

A:

SMS MFA does not provide the same phishing resistance as appropriately bound modern credentials. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Different client authentication protocols can produce different access outcomes for the same identity. The applicable safeguard is: Coordinate client upgrades and prevent accidental reenablement of legacy authentication.

B:

Resetting a password does not automatically refresh every device's stored credentials or existing session. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Different client authentication protocols can produce different access outcomes for the same identity. The applicable safeguard is: Coordinate client upgrades and prevent accidental reenablement of legacy authentication.

C:

Cloud-only password policy does not automatically execute on legacy on-premises domain controllers. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Different client authentication protocols can produce different access outcomes for the same identity. The applicable safeguard is: Coordinate client upgrades and prevent accidental reenablement of legacy authentication.

Question 222

A tenant enables Cloud Apps activity export but an analyst assumes every historic cloud event is retained indefinitely. Which administration change is MOST directly justified by the stated facts?

  1. Review actual Defender for Cloud Apps activity log retention and export limitations.
  2. Review discovered application usage, risk score, data sensitivity and sanctioned alternatives before enforcement.
  3. Correlate Cloud Discovery activity, user behavior and data-classification context before incident escalation.
  4. Document supported Cloud Discovery signal sources and reconcile coverage with network and device inventory.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The deciding issue is activity logging coverage is bounded by product retention, permissions and available connectors. The action 'Review actual Defender for Cloud Apps activity log retention and export limitations.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: The report defines the supported investigation period and confirms records exist for a test date.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Discovery identifies possible risk but does not by itself prove every instance is malicious. The problem described here is that activity logging coverage is bounded by product retention, permissions and available connectors.

C:

Traffic volume and application risk do not independently establish intentional data theft. The problem described here is that activity logging coverage is bounded by product retention, permissions and available connectors.

D:

Cloud App Discovery can only assess traffic visible to its configured telemetry sources. The problem described here is that activity logging coverage is bounded by product retention, permissions and available connectors.

Question 223

A bank wants Microsoft Purview to detect customer account numbers in documents, but analysts search only for a generic phrase such as confidential. Which administration change is MOST directly justified by the stated facts?

  1. Correlate Microsoft Purview label reports with labeling policy scope and Content explorer results.
  2. Create or tune a supported sensitive information type using appropriate patterns, keywords and corroborating evidence.
  3. Apply approved Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with appropriate protection and sharing settings.
  4. Use Microsoft Purview Activity explorer and supported label activity reports to review historical labeling actions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deciding issue is plain keywords cannot reliably characterize structured sensitive identifiers with validation rules. The action 'Create or tune a supported sensitive information type using appropriate patterns, keywords and corroborating evidence.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A controlled document with valid account-number structure is detected and a benign lookalike is not misclassified.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Label usage counts alone may reflect policy rollout gaps rather than the actual sensitivity of data. The problem described here is that plain keywords cannot reliably characterize structured sensitive identifiers with validation rules.

C:

A naming convention is not a machine-enforceable sensitivity label with protection semantics. The problem described here is that plain keywords cannot reliably characterize structured sensitive identifiers with validation rules.

D:

Current label state does not explain the complete sequence of historical labeling events. The problem described here is that plain keywords cannot reliably characterize structured sensitive identifiers with validation rules.

Question 224

A forest has multiple accounts sharing the same proxy address and project owners expect Entra Connect to assign both correctly. The team believes no other action is necessary. What underlying technical or governance limitation explains this failure?

  1. Unmonitored sync errors can persist even when overall server availability appears normal.
  2. Cloud Sync and Connect Sync differ in supported topology and feature capabilities.
  3. A unique mail routing address cannot be reliably assigned to two separate synchronized recipients.
  4. Ambiguous source anchor or account matching can create duplicates during hybrid identity onboarding.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The actual failure mechanism is A unique mail routing address cannot be reliably assigned to two separate synchronized recipients. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by identify and resolve duplicate mail and proxyAddress attributes before directory synchronization. Then verify: The cleaned directory reports unique routable proxies and pilot users match intended Microsoft 365 recipients.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Unmonitored sync errors can persist even when overall server availability appears normal. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a unique mail routing address cannot be reliably assigned to two separate synchronized recipients.

B:

Cloud Sync and Connect Sync differ in supported topology and feature capabilities. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a unique mail routing address cannot be reliably assigned to two separate synchronized recipients.

D:

Ambiguous source anchor or account matching can create duplicates during hybrid identity onboarding. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a unique mail routing address cannot be reliably assigned to two separate synchronized recipients.

Question 225

After a certificate renewal, Cloud Sync agents show registration errors but the team resets every cloud user's password. The administrator proposes: Troubleshoot agent registration, outbound connectivity and service configuration for the failing Cloud Sync agent. Which result most directly proves the proposed change worked?

  1. A pilot verifies the necessary attribute or device behavior with the selected sync topology.
  2. The operator correlates latency spikes with a specific connector or system bottleneck.
  3. Agent health returns to normal and a controlled source attribute change arrives in the cloud.
  4. A pilot joins the appropriate linked objects into one authorized cloud user without duplicate accounts.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The administrator plans 'Troubleshoot agent registration, outbound connectivity and service configuration for the failing Cloud Sync agent.' to correct the fact that an agent-to-service communication failure is distinct from user password quality or sign-in status. The direct acceptance evidence is Agent health returns to normal and a controlled source attribute change arrives in the cloud. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A pilot verifies the necessary attribute or device behavior with the selected sync topology. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: agent health returns to normal and a controlled source attribute change arrives in the cloud.

B:

The operator correlates latency spikes with a specific connector or system bottleneck. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: agent health returns to normal and a controlled source attribute change arrives in the cloud.

D:

A pilot joins the appropriate linked objects into one authorized cloud user without duplicate accounts. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: agent health returns to normal and a controlled source attribute change arrives in the cloud.

Question 226

A remote laptop is reimaged and disappears from Defender reporting because onboarding was performed only once manually. The administrator proposes: Deploy Defender for Endpoint onboarding through a persistent approved endpoint-management policy. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. A newly provisioned laptop automatically reappears in Defender after required policy processing.
  2. An eligible server reports the approved protection configuration and health state in the portal.
  3. Affected high-risk devices move to a mitigated or remediated state verified by a subsequent assessment.
  4. The team identifies a high-priority vulnerability path whose remediation materially reduces exposure.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Deploy Defender for Endpoint onboarding through a persistent approved endpoint-management policy.' to correct the fact that one-time manual onboarding is not a reliable fleet lifecycle process for reimaged devices. The direct acceptance evidence is A newly provisioned laptop automatically reappears in Defender after required policy processing. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

An eligible server reports the approved protection configuration and health state in the portal. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a newly provisioned laptop automatically reappears in Defender after required policy processing.

C:

Affected high-risk devices move to a mitigated or remediated state verified by a subsequent assessment. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a newly provisioned laptop automatically reappears in Defender after required policy processing.

D:

The team identifies a high-priority vulnerability path whose remediation materially reduces exposure. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a newly provisioned laptop automatically reappears in Defender after required policy processing.

Question 227

An administrator requires a compliant device and MFA simultaneously but uses an OR-style grant configuration unintentionally. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which misconception most directly led to the observed problem?

  1. Inconsistent per-user MFA configuration is not a substitute for coherent application access policy.
  2. Compromised passwords can be used from ordinary or previously seen network locations.
  3. Logical grant-control operators can materially change the strength of access enforcement.
  4. Physical location alone is not a reliable identity trust signal for modern hybrid work.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The actual failure mechanism is Logical grant-control operators can materially change the strength of access enforcement. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by configure Conditional Access grant controls to require the intended combination of device compliance and MFA. Then verify: A test passes only when both required conditions are met, not merely one.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inconsistent per-user MFA configuration is not a substitute for coherent application access policy. The stated symptoms instead indicate that logical grant-control operators can materially change the strength of access enforcement.

B:

Compromised passwords can be used from ordinary or previously seen network locations. The stated symptoms instead indicate that logical grant-control operators can materially change the strength of access enforcement.

D:

Physical location alone is not a reliable identity trust signal for modern hybrid work. The stated symptoms instead indicate that logical grant-control operators can materially change the strength of access enforcement.

Question 228

Defender for Office 365 reports a Safe Attachments malware verdict but the analyst assumes the attachment was executed on every recipient endpoint. The change owner plans to: Correlate email verdict and delivery status with actual endpoint and user interaction telemetry. What is the highest-priority residual-risk control before rollout?

  1. Review spoof intelligence, DKIM and DMARC alignment before tightening domain restrictions.
  2. Avoid overclaiming impact and perform additional endpoint investigation where warranted.
  3. Confirm session revocation, malware cleanup and mailbox rule inspection before unblocking.
  4. Preserve high-severity escalation paths while adjusting duplicate suppression.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The specific rollout control is Avoid overclaiming impact and perform additional endpoint investigation where warranted. It protects the proposed intervention 'Correlate email verdict and delivery status with actual endpoint and user interaction telemetry.' against the failure mode that an email detection verdict does not alone prove payload execution or endpoint compromise. Success should also be checked through: The incident distinguishes blocked attachments from verified execution on a specific device.

Incorrect Answers

A:

SPF authorization alone cannot establish that a display name represents the claimed executive. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: An email detection verdict does not alone prove payload execution or endpoint compromise. The applicable safeguard is: Avoid overclaiming impact and perform additional endpoint investigation where warranted.

C:

Restoring a password does not automatically remove every Defender or Exchange outbound sending restriction. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: An email detection verdict does not alone prove payload execution or endpoint compromise. The applicable safeguard is: Avoid overclaiming impact and perform additional endpoint investigation where warranted.

D:

Poorly tuned alert logic creates fatigue without necessarily increasing detection quality. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: An email detection verdict does not alone prove payload execution or endpoint compromise. The applicable safeguard is: Avoid overclaiming impact and perform additional endpoint investigation where warranted.

Question 229

DLP policy owners want to know whether a newly introduced Teams policy reduces attempted disclosure, but compare reports over different time periods. The administrator proposes: Analyze Microsoft Purview DLP reports over comparable scope and reporting windows with correct enforcement metrics. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. The trend separates blocked attempts, user overrides and policy matches under consistent time windows.
  2. A supervised test shows whether an override is permitted and records the justification as designed.
  3. A controlled upload produces the intended policy action and an event with the correct disposition.
  4. A controlled external message containing test card patterns triggers the expected warning or block.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Analyze Microsoft Purview DLP reports over comparable scope and reporting windows with correct enforcement metrics.' to correct the fact that raw alert counts can shift with policy rollout and coverage changes rather than behavior alone. The direct acceptance evidence is The trend separates blocked attempts, user overrides and policy matches under consistent time windows. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A supervised test shows whether an override is permitted and records the justification as designed. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the trend separates blocked attempts, user overrides and policy matches under consistent time windows.

C:

A controlled upload produces the intended policy action and an event with the correct disposition. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the trend separates blocked attempts, user overrides and policy matches under consistent time windows.

D:

A controlled external message containing test card patterns triggers the expected warning or block. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the trend separates blocked attempts, user overrides and policy matches under consistent time windows.

Question 230

A factory sends sensitive source files to a required print workflow but Endpoint DLP blocks all printing and production halts. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Explicitly include supported Microsoft Teams locations in an appropriate Microsoft Purview DLP policy.
  2. Configure appropriate DLP alert triage ownership and integrate notifications into the staffed response process.
  3. Analyze Microsoft Purview DLP reports over comparable scope and reporting windows with correct enforcement metrics.
  4. Scope Endpoint DLP activity restrictions and controlled business exceptions to the actual data risk.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The deciding issue is overbroad endpoint actions can interrupt legitimate operating procedures. The action 'Scope Endpoint DLP activity restrictions and controlled business exceptions to the actual data risk.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A verified permitted print path works while unauthorized sensitive document printing remains blocked.

Incorrect Answers

A:

DLP policies target supported workload locations; SharePoint scope does not automatically include Teams chat. The problem described here is that overbroad endpoint actions can interrupt legitimate operating procedures.

B:

A generated compliance alert is not meaningful incident response unless a responsible team acts. The problem described here is that overbroad endpoint actions can interrupt legitimate operating procedures.

C:

Raw alert counts can shift with policy rollout and coverage changes rather than behavior alone. The problem described here is that overbroad endpoint actions can interrupt legitimate operating procedures.