McAfee Secure

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle

Exam Code: MS-102

Exam Name Microsoft 365 Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft 365 Certified: Administrator Expert

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle $44.99
MS-102 Sample 1 MS-102 Sample 2 MS-102 Sample 3 MS-102 Sample 4 MS-102 Sample 5 MS-102 Sample 6 MS-102 Sample 7 MS-102 Sample 8 MS-102 Sample 9 MS-102 Sample 10

100% Microsoft MS-102 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real MS-102 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    MS-102 Questions & Answers

    473 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual MS-102 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • MS-102 Video Course

    MS-102 Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    MS-102 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the MS-102 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft 365 Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    MS-102 Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 298-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace MS-102 exam.

Microsoft 365 Administrator (MS-102) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    473 Questions

    $124.99
  • MS-102 Video Course

    Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft MS-102 Practice Test 26

Question 250

A campus wants to measure whether its Teams training improved file collaboration but counts only total user sign-ins. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Run a permitted Microsoft 365 Backup restoration exercise and validate the recovered content and access.
  2. Select adoption indicators tied to Teams collaboration and compare baselines with post-training reports.
  3. Remove conflicting uses and release the domain from the prior tenant before verifying it in the destination.
  4. Stage the update-channel change through a representative ring and review app update reports before expansion.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deciding issue is login events do not reliably measure how employees use particular productivity workloads. The action 'Select adoption indicators tied to Teams collaboration and compare baselines with post-training reports.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: The post-training report shows an attributable increase in active collaborative actions, not merely authentication.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A configured backup policy does not demonstrate successful restoration or adequate permissions. The problem described here is that login events do not reliably measure how employees use particular productivity workloads.

C:

A custom domain generally cannot be concurrently verified as an ordinary domain in two different Entra tenants. That concern does not account for the stated failure: Login events do not reliably measure how employees use particular productivity workloads. The relevant design change is: Select adoption indicators tied to Teams collaboration and compare baselines with post-training reports.

D:

Feature updates can change app behavior even when the cloud tenant service is healthy. The problem described here is that login events do not reliably measure how employees use particular productivity workloads.

Question 251

A data protection dashboard shows low sensitivity label usage and an analyst assumes documents are unclassified. The change owner plans to: Correlate Microsoft Purview label reports with labeling policy scope and Content explorer results. What is the highest-priority residual-risk control before rollout?

  1. Respect permissions and compare equivalent reporting windows before interpreting label changes.
  2. Test false positives and avoid storing real customer identifiers in classification test artifacts.
  3. Test site, group and document label semantics separately before organization-wide rollout.
  4. Review representative data variation and document test coverage for classification changes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The specific rollout control is Respect permissions and compare equivalent reporting windows before interpreting label changes. It protects the proposed intervention 'Correlate Microsoft Purview label reports with labeling policy scope and Content explorer results.' against the failure mode that label usage counts alone may reflect policy rollout gaps rather than the actual sensitivity of data. Success should also be checked through: A review distinguishes genuinely unlabeled items from workloads outside report coverage or adoption.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Plain keywords cannot reliably characterize structured sensitive identifiers with validation rules. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Label usage counts alone may reflect policy rollout gaps rather than the actual sensitivity of data. The applicable safeguard is: Respect permissions and compare equivalent reporting windows before interpreting label changes.

C:

Container-level privacy controls are not identical to encryption of every contained file. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Label usage counts alone may reflect policy rollout gaps rather than the actual sensitivity of data. The applicable safeguard is: Respect permissions and compare equivalent reporting windows before interpreting label changes.

D:

Regular expressions without contextual conditions can overclassify unrelated data. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Label usage counts alone may reflect policy rollout gaps rather than the actual sensitivity of data. The applicable safeguard is: Respect permissions and compare equivalent reporting windows before interpreting label changes.

Question 252

An organization onboards Linux servers to Defender for Endpoint using a Windows-only onboarding script. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Reconcile Vulnerability Management coverage with onboarded devices and supported software inventory.
  2. Investigate remaining critical exposures and their impact rather than optimizing patch counts alone.
  3. Choose the supported Microsoft Defender for Endpoint onboarding package and deployment workflow for Linux.
  4. Scope Defender automation levels by device groups and criticality after business approval.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The deciding issue is endpoint onboarding methods differ by platform and cannot be blindly reused across OS families. The action 'Choose the supported Microsoft Defender for Endpoint onboarding package and deployment workflow for Linux.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: The Linux test host reports healthy onboarded status and detections under the intended tenant.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An unassessed device is not equivalent to an assessed device with no findings. The problem described here is that endpoint onboarding methods differ by platform and cannot be blindly reused across OS families.

B:

Quantity of patch actions is not a proxy for the risk removed from critical assets. The problem described here is that endpoint onboarding methods differ by platform and cannot be blindly reused across OS families.

D:

Automated endpoint actions can interrupt high-availability or safety-sensitive systems. The problem described here is that endpoint onboarding methods differ by platform and cannot be blindly reused across OS families.

Question 253

An organization receives many unsuccessful sign-ins with unknown locations and immediately resets every user's account. The change owner plans to: Analyze Microsoft Entra sign-in error codes, IP details and risk signals to identify affected principals. What is the highest-priority residual-risk control before rollout?

  1. Protect event evidence and use proportionate remediation with false-positive review.
  2. Confirm required licenses, permissions and password policy alignment before enabling writeback.
  3. Plan recovery methods and enforce device key registration under tenant policy.
  4. Assess shared-device session isolation and recovery when credentials are lost.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The specific rollout control is Protect event evidence and use proportionate remediation with false-positive review. It protects the proposed intervention 'Analyze Microsoft Entra sign-in error codes, IP details and risk signals to identify affected principals.' against the failure mode that a failed sign-in event can represent invalid credentials, blocked policy, or benign noise. Success should also be checked through: The investigation isolates actual risky accounts and confirms benign traffic does not trigger mass remediation.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Cloud password reset does not automatically update on-premises AD DS without writeback support. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: A failed sign-in event can represent invalid credentials, blocked policy, or benign noise. The applicable safeguard is: Protect event evidence and use proportionate remediation with false-positive review.

C:

SMS MFA does not provide the same phishing resistance as appropriately bound modern credentials. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: A failed sign-in event can represent invalid credentials, blocked policy, or benign noise. The applicable safeguard is: Protect event evidence and use proportionate remediation with false-positive review.

D:

Shared reusable passwords undermine accountability and phishing resistance. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: A failed sign-in event can represent invalid credentials, blocked policy, or benign noise. The applicable safeguard is: Protect event evidence and use proportionate remediation with false-positive review.

Question 254

A procurement team approves a new cloud app but the Defender discovery report still lists it as risky and unsanctioned. The change owner plans to: Update app sanctioning decisions only after documented security review and confirm catalog metadata. What is the highest-priority residual-risk control before rollout?

  1. Avoid collecting unnecessary personal details and tune thresholds for normal workload behavior.
  2. Record certification, contractual protection and data residency review before sanctioning.
  3. Preserve risk evidence and require corroboration before high-impact containment.
  4. Review consent and credential owner whenever app connector permissions change.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The specific rollout control is Record certification, contractual protection and data residency review before sanctioning. It protects the proposed intervention 'Update app sanctioning decisions only after documented security review and confirm catalog metadata.' against the failure mode that an unreviewed approval outside the security catalog does not automatically change app risk handling. Success should also be checked through: The app's approved status and governance owner match the procurement decision and observed use.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Unspecific manual reporting cannot reliably detect defined high-risk cloud app activity. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: An unreviewed approval outside the security catalog does not automatically change app risk handling. The applicable safeguard is: Record certification, contractual protection and data residency review before sanctioning.

C:

Network geolocation can be misleading when users share secure remote-access egress infrastructure. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: An unreviewed approval outside the security catalog does not automatically change app risk handling. The applicable safeguard is: Record certification, contractual protection and data residency review before sanctioning.

D:

Connected app monitoring is not an excuse for unrestricted tenant-wide API permissions. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: An unreviewed approval outside the security catalog does not automatically change app risk handling. The applicable safeguard is: Record certification, contractual protection and data residency review before sanctioning.

Question 255

A security engineer sets a Defender for Endpoint scan exclusion for an entire system drive to speed up backups. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which misconception most directly led to the observed problem?

  1. Device telemetry enrollment and advanced endpoint response administration are different permissions.
  2. Broad exclusions can create blind spots far larger than the original performance problem.
  3. A device inventory limited to onboarded assets cannot establish whole-fleet security coverage.
  4. Security patching can create application incompatibility even when the patch is technically necessary.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The actual failure mechanism is Broad exclusions can create blind spots far larger than the original performance problem. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by review and narrow Defender endpoint protection exclusions to documented necessary paths and processes. Then verify: A test workload functions while the system drive remains subject to intended malware protection.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Device telemetry enrollment and advanced endpoint response administration are different permissions. The stated symptoms instead indicate that broad exclusions can create blind spots far larger than the original performance problem.

C:

A device inventory limited to onboarded assets cannot establish whole-fleet security coverage. The stated symptoms instead indicate that broad exclusions can create blind spots far larger than the original performance problem.

D:

Security patching can create application incompatibility even when the patch is technically necessary. The stated symptoms instead indicate that broad exclusions can create blind spots far larger than the original performance problem.

Question 256

A new group is missing after synchronization while its members have synced successfully. The administrator proposes: Check group filtering, supported group types and sync errors before recreating the group in Entra ID. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. Each pilot identity is processed by the intended sync configuration without duplicate or conflicting writes.
  2. The operator correlates latency spikes with a specific connector or system bottleneck.
  3. The reconciliation explains intentionally excluded identities and isolates unexpected failures.
  4. The intended source group appears without a conflicting cloud-only duplicate after correcting scope.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The administrator plans 'Check group filtering, supported group types and sync errors before recreating the group in Entra ID.' to correct the fact that object synchronization scope may differ for groups and their member user objects. The direct acceptance evidence is The intended source group appears without a conflicting cloud-only duplicate after correcting scope. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Each pilot identity is processed by the intended sync configuration without duplicate or conflicting writes. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the intended source group appears without a conflicting cloud-only duplicate after correcting scope.

B:

The operator correlates latency spikes with a specific connector or system bottleneck. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the intended source group appears without a conflicting cloud-only duplicate after correcting scope.

C:

The reconciliation explains intentionally excluded identities and isolates unexpected failures. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the intended source group appears without a conflicting cloud-only duplicate after correcting scope.

Question 257

A managed endpoint fleet submits Cloud App Discovery telemetry but staff assume all unmanaged contractor devices are covered. The change owner plans to: Document supported Cloud Discovery signal sources and reconcile coverage with network and device inventory. What is the highest-priority residual-risk control before rollout?

  1. Record certification, contractual protection and data residency review before sanctioning.
  2. Avoid universal coverage claims and choose lawful, supported sources for non-managed assets.
  3. Avoid collecting unnecessary personal details and tune thresholds for normal workload behavior.
  4. Review consent and credential owner whenever app connector permissions change.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The specific rollout control is Avoid universal coverage claims and choose lawful, supported sources for non-managed assets. It protects the proposed intervention 'Document supported Cloud Discovery signal sources and reconcile coverage with network and device inventory.' against the failure mode that cloud App Discovery can only assess traffic visible to its configured telemetry sources. Success should also be checked through: The report clearly identifies the unobserved contractor population instead of labeling it safe.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An unreviewed approval outside the security catalog does not automatically change app risk handling. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Cloud App Discovery can only assess traffic visible to its configured telemetry sources. The applicable safeguard is: Avoid universal coverage claims and choose lawful, supported sources for non-managed assets.

C:

Unspecific manual reporting cannot reliably detect defined high-risk cloud app activity. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Cloud App Discovery can only assess traffic visible to its configured telemetry sources. The applicable safeguard is: Avoid universal coverage claims and choose lawful, supported sources for non-managed assets.

D:

Connected app monitoring is not an excuse for unrestricted tenant-wide API permissions. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Cloud App Discovery can only assess traffic visible to its configured telemetry sources. The applicable safeguard is: Avoid universal coverage claims and choose lawful, supported sources for non-managed assets.

Question 258

A firm enables Microsoft 365 Copilot for sales staff and assumes confidential prompt responses are outside all information-protection governance. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which misconception most directly led to the observed problem?

  1. A generated compliance alert is not meaningful incident response unless a responsible team acts.
  2. A DLP alert is not conclusive proof that exfiltration succeeded.
  3. Endpoint DLP telemetry can record activities even when enforcement is in audit mode.
  4. AI-assisted collaboration does not automatically exempt accessible data from protection policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The actual failure mechanism is AI-assisted collaboration does not automatically exempt accessible data from protection policy. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by apply supported Microsoft Purview DLP and protection rules to eligible Copilot interactions and data sources. Then verify: A controlled prompt involving protected test data follows the tenant's supported DLP response.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A generated compliance alert is not meaningful incident response unless a responsible team acts. The stated symptoms instead indicate that aI-assisted collaboration does not automatically exempt accessible data from protection policy.

B:

A DLP alert is not conclusive proof that exfiltration succeeded. The stated symptoms instead indicate that aI-assisted collaboration does not automatically exempt accessible data from protection policy.

C:

Endpoint DLP telemetry can record activities even when enforcement is in audit mode. The stated symptoms instead indicate that aI-assisted collaboration does not automatically exempt accessible data from protection policy.

Question 259

An account signs in through a browser but the same user's legacy desktop client fails after modern-auth enforcement. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Investigate application protocol support and sign-in logs before changing the user's account status.
  2. Combine Entra Password Protection with MFA and risk-based authentication controls for layered defense.
  3. Check SSPR policy scope, method registration and policy eligibility before treating location as the cause.
  4. Troubleshoot credential synchronization, cached sessions and writeback state after the documented reset.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The deciding issue is different client authentication protocols can produce different access outcomes for the same identity. The action 'Investigate application protocol support and sign-in logs before changing the user's account status.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: The supported updated client signs in using an approved modern flow while the legacy client stays blocked.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Banned password checking reduces guessing risk but cannot replace multi-factor protection. The problem described here is that different client authentication protocols can produce different access outcomes for the same identity.

C:

SSPR is a cloud recovery process whose eligibility depends on policy, not only office LAN access. The problem described here is that different client authentication protocols can produce different access outcomes for the same identity.

D:

Resetting a password does not automatically refresh every device's stored credentials or existing session. The problem described here is that different client authentication protocols can produce different access outcomes for the same identity.

Question 260

Cloud App Discovery flags an unapproved storage service and the helpdesk blocks its domain without checking business usage. The administrator proposes: Review discovered application usage, risk score, data sensitivity and sanctioned alternatives before enforcement. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. A documented business owner migrates needed data to an approved service and the risky app use declines.
  2. The reviewed activity record identifies the supported download event and principal.
  3. A controlled bulk download test triggers a useful alert tied to the right user and asset.
  4. The Cloud Apps activity view receives supported Microsoft 365 events for an approved test action.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Review discovered application usage, risk score, data sensitivity and sanctioned alternatives before enforcement.' to correct the fact that discovery identifies possible risk but does not by itself prove every instance is malicious. The direct acceptance evidence is A documented business owner migrates needed data to an approved service and the risky app use declines. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The reviewed activity record identifies the supported download event and principal. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a documented business owner migrates needed data to an approved service and the risky app use declines.

C:

A controlled bulk download test triggers a useful alert tied to the right user and asset. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a documented business owner migrates needed data to an approved service and the risky app use declines.

D:

The Cloud Apps activity view receives supported Microsoft 365 events for an approved test action. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a documented business owner migrates needed data to an approved service and the risky app use declines.