McAfee Secure

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle

Exam Code: MS-102

Exam Name Microsoft 365 Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft 365 Certified: Administrator Expert

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle $44.99
MS-102 Sample 1 MS-102 Sample 2 MS-102 Sample 3 MS-102 Sample 4 MS-102 Sample 5 MS-102 Sample 6 MS-102 Sample 7 MS-102 Sample 8 MS-102 Sample 9 MS-102 Sample 10

100% Microsoft MS-102 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real MS-102 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    MS-102 Questions & Answers

    473 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual MS-102 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • MS-102 Video Course

    MS-102 Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    MS-102 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the MS-102 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft 365 Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    MS-102 Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 298-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace MS-102 exam.

Microsoft 365 Administrator (MS-102) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    473 Questions

    $124.99
  • MS-102 Video Course

    Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft MS-102 Practice Test 27

Question 260

Cloud App Discovery flags an unapproved storage service and the helpdesk blocks its domain without checking business usage. The administrator proposes: Review discovered application usage, risk score, data sensitivity and sanctioned alternatives before enforcement. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. A documented business owner migrates needed data to an approved service and the risky app use declines.
  2. The reviewed activity record identifies the supported download event and principal.
  3. A controlled bulk download test triggers a useful alert tied to the right user and asset.
  4. The Cloud Apps activity view receives supported Microsoft 365 events for an approved test action.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Review discovered application usage, risk score, data sensitivity and sanctioned alternatives before enforcement.' to correct the fact that discovery identifies possible risk but does not by itself prove every instance is malicious. The direct acceptance evidence is A documented business owner migrates needed data to an approved service and the risky app use declines. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The reviewed activity record identifies the supported download event and principal. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a documented business owner migrates needed data to an approved service and the risky app use declines.

C:

A controlled bulk download test triggers a useful alert tied to the right user and asset. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a documented business owner migrates needed data to an approved service and the risky app use declines.

D:

The Cloud Apps activity view receives supported Microsoft 365 events for an approved test action. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a documented business owner migrates needed data to an approved service and the risky app use declines.

Question 261

During an investigation, an auditor wants to establish which account downloaded a protected file but reviews only the file's sharing link. The change owner plans to: Use Defender for Cloud Apps activity logs to investigate actor, time, IP and action metadata where available. What is the highest-priority residual-risk control before rollout?

  1. Correlate with Entra sign-ins and distinguish proxy or service accounts from actual end users.
  2. Record certification, contractual protection and data residency review before sanctioning.
  3. Document escalation thresholds and avoid revealing sensitive user activity in broad emails.
  4. Use supported service identity governance and monitor data gaps during connector outages.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The specific rollout control is Correlate with Entra sign-ins and distinguish proxy or service accounts from actual end users. It protects the proposed intervention 'Use Defender for Cloud Apps activity logs to investigate actor, time, IP and action metadata where available.' against the failure mode that a sharing link alone cannot prove which identity performed a specific cloud action. Success should also be checked through: The reviewed activity record identifies the supported download event and principal.

Incorrect Answers

B:

An unreviewed approval outside the security catalog does not automatically change app risk handling. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: A sharing link alone cannot prove which identity performed a specific cloud action. The applicable safeguard is: Correlate with Entra sign-ins and distinguish proxy or service accounts from actual end users.

C:

Anomaly detection is only useful if responses are directed to trained owners with context. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: A sharing link alone cannot prove which identity performed a specific cloud action. The applicable safeguard is: Correlate with Entra sign-ins and distinguish proxy or service accounts from actual end users.

D:

A previously configured connector can lose the permissions needed for continued ingestion. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: A sharing link alone cannot prove which identity performed a specific cloud action. The applicable safeguard is: Correlate with Entra sign-ins and distinguish proxy or service accounts from actual end users.

Question 262

A SOC finds a compromised mailbox in Microsoft 365 restricted entities but clears it immediately to reduce ticket volume. The change owner plans to: Require documented remediation and threat verification before removing the entity restriction. What is the highest-priority residual-risk control before rollout?

  1. Set authorized unlock roles and escalation for repeat offending identities.
  2. Use distribution-group ownership and periodic delivery testing instead of sole-person recipients.
  3. Review custom URLs, logging and tenant consent before launching the campaign.
  4. Apply remediation permissions cautiously and preserve evidence before bulk deletion.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The specific rollout control is Set authorized unlock roles and escalation for repeat offending identities. It protects the proposed intervention 'Require documented remediation and threat verification before removing the entity restriction.' against the failure mode that restricted entities serve containment and should not be cleared without verifying the cause. Success should also be checked through: Audit notes show compromised credentials and suspicious forwarding were addressed prior to unblock.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Alert policies lose operational value when recipient lists are not maintained. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Restricted entities serve containment and should not be cleared without verifying the cause. The applicable safeguard is: Set authorized unlock roles and escalation for repeat offending identities.

C:

Phishing simulations must not expose passwords to uncontrolled third-party services. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Restricted entities serve containment and should not be cleared without verifying the cause. The applicable safeguard is: Set authorized unlock roles and escalation for repeat offending identities.

D:

A single deleted email does not remove other copies of the same phishing campaign. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Restricted entities serve containment and should not be cleared without verifying the cause. The applicable safeguard is: Set authorized unlock roles and escalation for repeat offending identities.

Question 263

A SaaS application is marked unsanctioned in Defender for Cloud Apps but continues to appear in endpoint network traces. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Interpret Cloud Apps activity and sign-in context before claiming account takeover.
  2. Investigate the supported enforcement integration and endpoint coverage for unsanctioned applications.
  3. Configure policy alert severity, recipient routing and incident ownership for actionable triage.
  4. Configure Cloud App Discovery through supported network or endpoint signals for the user population.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deciding issue is marking an app unsanctioned does not guarantee all devices or network paths are immediately blocked. The action 'Investigate the supported enforcement integration and endpoint coverage for unsanctioned applications.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A covered endpoint receives the intended blocking indicator while unsupported devices are identified separately.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Network geolocation can be misleading when users share secure remote-access egress infrastructure. The problem described here is that marking an app unsanctioned does not guarantee all devices or network paths are immediately blocked.

C:

Anomaly detection is only useful if responses are directed to trained owners with context. The problem described here is that marking an app unsanctioned does not guarantee all devices or network paths are immediately blocked.

D:

A Microsoft 365 tenant app list alone cannot enumerate shadow cloud use across endpoints. The problem described here is that marking an app unsanctioned does not guarantee all devices or network paths are immediately blocked.

Question 264

A risk committee combines Defender endpoint findings with cloud app risk indicators but treats the report as a real-time SIEM stream. The change owner plans to: Explain Defender XDR reporting scope and choose supported hunting or incident feeds for time-critical investigation. What is the highest-priority residual-risk control before rollout?

  1. Define refresh cadence and latency assumptions for any security KPI dashboard.
  2. Schedule follow-up verification and preserve evidence of exceptions or compensating controls.
  3. Preserve chain-of-custody details when using external intelligence in formal reports.
  4. Prioritize business-risk and operational impact rather than maximizing score without evaluation.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The specific rollout control is Define refresh cadence and latency assumptions for any security KPI dashboard. It protects the proposed intervention 'Explain Defender XDR reporting scope and choose supported hunting or incident feeds for time-critical investigation.' against the failure mode that periodic analytical reports and real-time detection pipelines are different operational services. Success should also be checked through: The committee receives trend reports while a separate alerting route handles timely critical incidents.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Administrative completion markers do not always demonstrate that the preventive control is effective. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Periodic analytical reports and real-time detection pipelines are different operational services. The applicable safeguard is: Define refresh cadence and latency assumptions for any security KPI dashboard.

C:

Threat intelligence associations and local confirmed incident behaviors are not interchangeable evidence. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Periodic analytical reports and real-time detection pipelines are different operational services. The applicable safeguard is: Define refresh cadence and latency assumptions for any security KPI dashboard.

D:

Secure Score reports posture improvement opportunities but is not an automatic remediation engine. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Periodic analytical reports and real-time detection pipelines are different operational services. The applicable safeguard is: Define refresh cadence and latency assumptions for any security KPI dashboard.

Question 265

A simulation campaign has realistic phishing pages but its tracking redirects users to an unrelated unapproved external domain. The change owner plans to: Use supported Defender attack simulation payload and landing-page configuration approved by the organization. What is the highest-priority residual-risk control before rollout?

  1. Use distribution-group ownership and periodic delivery testing instead of sole-person recipients.
  2. Test provider access scopes and contractual notification boundaries before activation.
  3. Inspect object type and review policy change logs before remediation.
  4. Review custom URLs, logging and tenant consent before launching the campaign.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The specific rollout control is Review custom URLs, logging and tenant consent before launching the campaign. It protects the proposed intervention 'Use supported Defender attack simulation payload and landing-page configuration approved by the organization.' against the failure mode that phishing simulations must not expose passwords to uncontrolled third-party services. Success should also be checked through: A test recipient completes the exercise through the intended training environment without external credential capture.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Alert policies lose operational value when recipient lists are not maintained. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Phishing simulations must not expose passwords to uncontrolled third-party services. The applicable safeguard is: Review custom URLs, logging and tenant consent before launching the campaign.

B:

Security notification workflows must meet their own data-sharing and privacy requirements. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Phishing simulations must not expose passwords to uncontrolled third-party services. The applicable safeguard is: Review custom URLs, logging and tenant consent before launching the campaign.

C:

Sender-specific outbound restrictions are different objects from tenant-wide inbound allow/block entries. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Phishing simulations must not expose passwords to uncontrolled third-party services. The applicable safeguard is: Review custom URLs, logging and tenant consent before launching the campaign.

Question 266

A SOC investigates a phishing campaign but overlooks Teams chat links because it filters only Exchange message threats. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which misconception most directly led to the observed problem?

  1. Security notification workflows must meet their own data-sharing and privacy requirements.
  2. Threat policies may be scoped to users, groups and domains and require explicit coverage verification.
  3. Uncontrolled sampling and timing can misrepresent user training effectiveness.
  4. Email-only filters can omit collaboration content protected by supported threat controls.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The actual failure mechanism is Email-only filters can omit collaboration content protected by supported threat controls. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by use supported Defender for Office 365 collaboration threat investigation across the relevant workloads. Then verify: The campaign review includes suspicious collaboration links alongside affected mail messages.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Security notification workflows must meet their own data-sharing and privacy requirements. The stated symptoms instead indicate that email-only filters can omit collaboration content protected by supported threat controls.

B:

Threat policies may be scoped to users, groups and domains and require explicit coverage verification. The stated symptoms instead indicate that email-only filters can omit collaboration content protected by supported threat controls.

C:

Uncontrolled sampling and timing can misrepresent user training effectiveness. The stated symptoms instead indicate that email-only filters can omit collaboration content protected by supported threat controls.

Question 267

An organization with one on-premises AD DS forest needs synchronized users and password hash synchronization in Microsoft Entra ID. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Identify the conflicting source object and correct the address uniqueness violation in the authoritative directory.
  2. Use supported Connect Health monitoring of the chosen hybrid identity configuration and server telemetry.
  3. Deploy Microsoft Entra Connect Sync with an approved sign-in method and supported organizational unit scoping.
  4. Review Entra Connect Health in the context of intended OU filtering and actual sync object errors.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The deciding issue is hybrid users need a supported sync pipeline; merely connecting two directory consoles does not copy identities. The action 'Deploy Microsoft Entra Connect Sync with an approved sign-in method and supported organizational unit scoping.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: An in-scope employee is created or matched in Entra ID and an eligible password update propagates.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Export cannot safely assign one proxy address to multiple different recipients. That concern does not account for the stated failure: Hybrid users need a supported sync pipeline; merely connecting two directory consoles does not copy identities. The relevant design change is: Deploy Microsoft Entra Connect Sync with an approved sign-in method and supported organizational unit scoping.

B:

Password propagation and object sync can degrade without an obvious user-visible service crash. The problem described here is that hybrid users need a supported sync pipeline; merely connecting two directory consoles does not copy identities.

D:

Raw directory counts can differ by design because not every on-premises object should synchronize. The problem described here is that hybrid users need a supported sync pipeline; merely connecting two directory consoles does not copy identities.

Question 268

An administrator sees Password Protection DC agent errors but responds by changing every user's passwords. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which misconception most directly led to the observed problem?

  1. A broken local policy enforcement agent is an infrastructure issue, not proof all existing passwords are compromised.
  2. SSPR is a cloud recovery process whose eligibility depends on policy, not only office LAN access.
  3. Authentication proves identity; it does not confer permission to every protected resource.
  4. A failed sign-in event can represent invalid credentials, blocked policy, or benign noise.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The actual failure mechanism is A broken local policy enforcement agent is an infrastructure issue, not proof all existing passwords are compromised. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by check domain-controller agent and proxy health to restore on-premises Password Protection enforcement. Then verify: A test password change is checked by the agent and diagnostics show a healthy policy path.

Incorrect Answers

B:

SSPR is a cloud recovery process whose eligibility depends on policy, not only office LAN access. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a broken local policy enforcement agent is an infrastructure issue, not proof all existing passwords are compromised.

C:

Authentication proves identity; it does not confer permission to every protected resource. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a broken local policy enforcement agent is an infrastructure issue, not proof all existing passwords are compromised.

D:

A failed sign-in event can represent invalid credentials, blocked policy, or benign noise. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a broken local policy enforcement agent is an infrastructure issue, not proof all existing passwords are compromised.

Question 269

Remote workers cannot reset forgotten Microsoft 365 passwords without calling the helpdesk even though cloud sign-in is available. The change owner plans to: Enable Microsoft Entra self-service password reset for authorized users with supported authentication methods. What is the highest-priority residual-risk control before rollout?

  1. Check registration requirements and exclude high-privilege identities from weak recovery paths.
  2. Prevent lockouts by excluding emergency accounts from fragile registration dependencies.
  3. Tune the custom list without exposing protected terms in user-facing error messages.
  4. Use a pilot policy exclusion or report-only assessment rather than disabling tenant-wide protections.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The specific rollout control is Check registration requirements and exclude high-privilege identities from weak recovery paths. It protects the proposed intervention 'Enable Microsoft Entra self-service password reset for authorized users with supported authentication methods.' against the failure mode that an enabled cloud identity does not automatically imply SSPR is licensed and configured. Success should also be checked through: A pilot employee completes the SSPR workflow and signs in with the new password.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Authentication method registration alone does not require using MFA for every application. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: An enabled cloud identity does not automatically imply SSPR is licensed and configured. The applicable safeguard is: Check registration requirements and exclude high-privilege identities from weak recovery paths.

C:

Generic complexity rules may allow easily guessed organization-related password patterns. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: An enabled cloud identity does not automatically imply SSPR is licensed and configured. The applicable safeguard is: Check registration requirements and exclude high-privilege identities from weak recovery paths.

D:

MFA prompts and conditional access failures are not necessarily password validation errors. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: An enabled cloud identity does not automatically imply SSPR is licensed and configured. The applicable safeguard is: Check registration requirements and exclude high-privilege identities from weak recovery paths.

Question 270

An executive wants a plan to improve Microsoft 365 protection but the team selects only the recommendations that are easiest to implement. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Reconcile protected-device reporting with the full authorized device inventory and excluded assets.
  2. Rank Microsoft Secure Score and exposure improvement actions by threat relevance, coverage and change feasibility.
  3. Investigate the correlated Defender XDR incident and its cross-workload evidence as one response case.
  4. Evaluate actionable threat intelligence against local evidence and scope prevention rules precisely.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deciding issue is scoring and security value are related but not identical for all enterprise risk contexts. The action 'Rank Microsoft Secure Score and exposure improvement actions by threat relevance, coverage and change feasibility.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: The approved plan first addresses a high-impact identity weakness even if another action offers more points.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Reports limited to onboarded devices can undercount unprotected inventory outside the sensor population. The problem described here is that scoring and security value are related but not identical for all enterprise risk contexts.

C:

Cross-domain incident correlation helps identify one attack chain spread across multiple products. The problem described here is that scoring and security value are related but not identical for all enterprise risk contexts.

D:

Global indicators can have context and false positives that make unconditional blocking harmful. The problem described here is that scoring and security value are related but not identical for all enterprise risk contexts.