McAfee Secure

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle

Exam Code: MS-102

Exam Name Microsoft 365 Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft 365 Certified: Administrator Expert

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle $44.99
MS-102 Sample 1 MS-102 Sample 2 MS-102 Sample 3 MS-102 Sample 4 MS-102 Sample 5 MS-102 Sample 6 MS-102 Sample 7 MS-102 Sample 8 MS-102 Sample 9 MS-102 Sample 10

100% Microsoft MS-102 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real MS-102 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    MS-102 Questions & Answers

    473 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual MS-102 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • MS-102 Video Course

    MS-102 Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    MS-102 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the MS-102 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft 365 Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    MS-102 Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 298-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace MS-102 exam.

Microsoft 365 Administrator (MS-102) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    473 Questions

    $124.99
  • MS-102 Video Course

    Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft MS-102 Practice Test 36

Question 350

An administrator performs a Defender XDR isolate-device action without verifying that the target is a critical medical workstation. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Explain Defender XDR reporting scope and choose supported hunting or incident feeds for time-critical investigation.
  2. Use supported incident response actions with asset criticality and business-operations approval.
  3. Correlate the indicator with supported Defender Threat Intelligence reputation and infrastructure context.
  4. Use Defender XDR report details to distinguish newly detected attempts from actual successful compromises.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deciding issue is automated response actions can interrupt essential services when applied without impact analysis. The action 'Use supported incident response actions with asset criticality and business-operations approval.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: An isolated test endpoint stops unauthorized traffic while approved emergency access remains available.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Periodic analytical reports and real-time detection pipelines are different operational services. That concern does not account for the stated failure: Automated response actions can interrupt essential services when applied without impact analysis. The relevant design change is: Use supported incident response actions with asset criticality and business-operations approval.

C:

A bare IP address is insufficient to infer the infrastructure's threat relevance or intent. The problem described here is that automated response actions can interrupt essential services when applied without impact analysis.

D:

An increase in detections can represent improved visibility or attack volume rather than failed protection. The problem described here is that automated response actions can interrupt essential services when applied without impact analysis.

Question 351

A health provider's custom sensitive information type matches every ten-digit phone number but the policy intends only internal patient record identifiers. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Refine the custom Purview sensitive information type with suitable contextual keywords and confidence settings.
  2. Correlate Microsoft Purview label reports with labeling policy scope and Content explorer results.
  3. Configure supported container sensitivity labeling and separately validate file-level information protection requirements.
  4. Test supported sensitivity-label protection and inheritance for each export and file type.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The deciding issue is regular expressions without contextual conditions can overclassify unrelated data. The action 'Refine the custom Purview sensitive information type with suitable contextual keywords and confidence settings.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A seeded patient identifier matches under its expected context while ordinary phone numbers produce fewer false positives.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Label usage counts alone may reflect policy rollout gaps rather than the actual sensitivity of data. The problem described here is that regular expressions without contextual conditions can overclassify unrelated data.

C:

Container-level privacy controls are not identical to encryption of every contained file. The problem described here is that regular expressions without contextual conditions can overclassify unrelated data.

D:

Label metadata and protection propagation differ across file formats and workloads. The problem described here is that regular expressions without contextual conditions can overclassify unrelated data.

Question 352

A helpdesk analyst is made Global Administrator solely to reset passwords for regular employees. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Use a separately scoped workload identity or supported automation role rather than treating PIM user activation as perpetual service access.
  2. Scope supported Entra roles with an administrative unit containing the authorized regional users.
  3. Assign the least-privileged appropriate Microsoft Entra administrative role for authorized password-reset tasks.
  4. Activate the eligible PIM role through the required workflow and verify activation requirements.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The deciding issue is global Administrator has far broader powers than routine delegated helpdesk work requires. The action 'Assign the least-privileged appropriate Microsoft Entra administrative role for authorized password-reset tasks.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: The analyst resets a permitted account but cannot alter tenant-wide Conditional Access policies.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Just-in-time human role activation is not a substitute for managed service identity permissions. The problem described here is that global Administrator has far broader powers than routine delegated helpdesk work requires.

B:

Administrative units can constrain some role assignments rather than granting every role tenant-wide. The problem described here is that global Administrator has far broader powers than routine delegated helpdesk work requires.

D:

PIM eligibility is not the same state as an activated privileged role. The problem described here is that global Administrator has far broader powers than routine delegated helpdesk work requires.

Question 353

A security team wants to prioritize risky users but has no definition of which login anomalies trigger response. The change owner plans to: Plan Microsoft Entra risk-based identity protection with clear user and sign-in risk remediation thresholds. What is the highest-priority residual-risk control before rollout?

  1. Provide supported enrollment and exception governance rather than weakening the core rule silently.
  2. Review all applicable grant logic with security owners before switching from report-only.
  3. Validate licensing and false-positive handling before assigning high-impact enforcement.
  4. Avoid exposing breach detection details in end-user messages and retain audit history.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The specific rollout control is Validate licensing and false-positive handling before assigning high-impact enforcement. It protects the proposed intervention 'Plan Microsoft Entra risk-based identity protection with clear user and sign-in risk remediation thresholds.' against the failure mode that identity risk signals need policy and response decisions rather than automatic blanket account deletion. Success should also be checked through: A pilot risk event maps to the documented challenge or investigation action.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A technically correct device requirement can disrupt operations when endpoint readiness is unknown. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Identity risk signals need policy and response decisions rather than automatic blanket account deletion. The applicable safeguard is: Validate licensing and false-positive handling before assigning high-impact enforcement.

B:

Logical grant-control operators can materially change the strength of access enforcement. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Identity risk signals need policy and response decisions rather than automatic blanket account deletion. The applicable safeguard is: Validate licensing and false-positive handling before assigning high-impact enforcement.

D:

Compromised passwords can be used from ordinary or previously seen network locations. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Identity risk signals need policy and response decisions rather than automatic blanket account deletion. The applicable safeguard is: Validate licensing and false-positive handling before assigning high-impact enforcement.

Question 354

New Windows endpoints are protected by third-party antivirus but are absent from Microsoft Defender for Endpoint device inventory. The administrator proposes: Onboard the eligible devices to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint using the approved management method. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. The team identifies a high-priority vulnerability path whose remediation materially reduces exposure.
  2. A pilot endpoint appears as onboarded and sends the expected security telemetry.
  3. The device reports the intended managed policy after synchronization without unexpected local overrides.
  4. Affected high-risk devices move to a mitigated or remediated state verified by a subsequent assessment.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The administrator plans 'Onboard the eligible devices to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint using the approved management method.' to correct the fact that installing an unrelated antivirus product does not automatically enroll a device in Defender for Endpoint. The direct acceptance evidence is A pilot endpoint appears as onboarded and sends the expected security telemetry. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The team identifies a high-priority vulnerability path whose remediation materially reduces exposure. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a pilot endpoint appears as onboarded and sends the expected security telemetry.

C:

The device reports the intended managed policy after synchronization without unexpected local overrides. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a pilot endpoint appears as onboarded and sends the expected security telemetry.

D:

Affected high-risk devices move to a mitigated or remediated state verified by a subsequent assessment. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a pilot endpoint appears as onboarded and sends the expected security telemetry.

Question 355

Defender XDR groups alerts from an endpoint and mailbox in one incident, but an analyst opens two unrelated tickets. The change owner plans to: Investigate the correlated Defender XDR incident and its cross-workload evidence as one response case. What is the highest-priority residual-risk control before rollout?

  1. Preserve per-alert evidence and verify correlation before taking disruptive remediation actions.
  2. Respect intelligence confidence levels and corroborate with observed local telemetry.
  3. Validate product versions and protect production availability during urgent mitigations.
  4. Define refresh cadence and latency assumptions for any security KPI dashboard.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The specific rollout control is Preserve per-alert evidence and verify correlation before taking disruptive remediation actions. It protects the proposed intervention 'Investigate the correlated Defender XDR incident and its cross-workload evidence as one response case.' against the failure mode that cross-domain incident correlation helps identify one attack chain spread across multiple products. Success should also be checked through: The case timeline links the endpoint activity, affected user and suspicious message with one investigation owner.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A shared indicator can occur in unrelated activity and does not alone establish adversary identity. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Cross-domain incident correlation helps identify one attack chain spread across multiple products. The applicable safeguard is: Preserve per-alert evidence and verify correlation before taking disruptive remediation actions.

C:

External threat intelligence gains operational value only when matched to actual enterprise exposure. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Cross-domain incident correlation helps identify one attack chain spread across multiple products. The applicable safeguard is: Preserve per-alert evidence and verify correlation before taking disruptive remediation actions.

D:

Periodic analytical reports and real-time detection pipelines are different operational services. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Cross-domain incident correlation helps identify one attack chain spread across multiple products. The applicable safeguard is: Preserve per-alert evidence and verify correlation before taking disruptive remediation actions.

Question 356

A startup closes security improvement recommendations without checking whether users still have weak sign-in methods. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which misconception most directly led to the observed problem?

  1. Administrative completion markers do not always demonstrate that the preventive control is effective.
  2. Cross-domain incident correlation helps identify one attack chain spread across multiple products.
  3. Reports limited to onboarded devices can undercount unprotected inventory outside the sensor population.
  4. Periodic analytical reports and real-time detection pipelines are different operational services.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The actual failure mechanism is Administrative completion markers do not always demonstrate that the preventive control is effective. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by validate the actual tenant security control configuration associated with the Secure Score action. Then verify: A test sign-in confirms the required authentication strength rather than a checklist-only completion.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Cross-domain incident correlation helps identify one attack chain spread across multiple products. The stated symptoms instead indicate that administrative completion markers do not always demonstrate that the preventive control is effective.

C:

Reports limited to onboarded devices can undercount unprotected inventory outside the sensor population. The stated symptoms instead indicate that administrative completion markers do not always demonstrate that the preventive control is effective.

D:

Periodic analytical reports and real-time detection pipelines are different operational services. The reported symptoms instead follow this mechanism: Administrative completion markers do not always demonstrate that the preventive control is effective. The targeted correction is: Validate the actual tenant security control configuration associated with the Secure Score action.

Question 357

A legal department must keep certain contracts for seven years but the IT team configures a seven-day mailbox delete rule. The administrator proposes: Create the appropriate Microsoft Purview retention label or retention policy with the approved regulatory retention period. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. The investigation identifies the who and when of a controlled label change.
  2. A test message is classified and the separately configured DLP rule applies the intended action.
  3. A test record remains preserved through a simulated ordinary deletion and shows its required retention setting.
  4. A review distinguishes genuinely unlabeled items from workloads outside report coverage or adoption.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The administrator plans 'Create the appropriate Microsoft Purview retention label or retention policy with the approved regulatory retention period.' to correct the fact that retention obligations differ from mailbox cleanup preferences and need explicit governance configuration. The direct acceptance evidence is A test record remains preserved through a simulated ordinary deletion and shows its required retention setting. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The investigation identifies the who and when of a controlled label change. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a test record remains preserved through a simulated ordinary deletion and shows its required retention setting.

B:

A test message is classified and the separately configured DLP rule applies the intended action. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a test record remains preserved through a simulated ordinary deletion and shows its required retention setting.

D:

A review distinguishes genuinely unlabeled items from workloads outside report coverage or adoption. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a test record remains preserved through a simulated ordinary deletion and shows its required retention setting.

Question 358

An HR team offboards an employee but removes only a visible display name from a Teams channel. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Create an appropriate mail contact in the Microsoft 365 admin center instead of a licensed user account.
  2. Block and deprovision the Microsoft Entra user account according to the approved offboarding workflow.
  3. Define a supported dynamic Entra group membership rule for the intended eligible identities.
  4. Review and remove both mailbox access and separate recipient delegation permissions during offboarding.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deciding issue is removing a collaboration membership does not disable an identity or revoke every active session. The action 'Block and deprovision the Microsoft Entra user account according to the approved offboarding workflow.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: The former employee cannot sign in while approved mailbox and OneDrive retention actions are recorded.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Mail contacts are address-book objects and are not equivalent to interactive Entra workforce accounts. The problem described here is that removing a collaboration membership does not disable an identity or revoke every active session.

C:

Group membership is not automatically attribute-driven without the proper group type and rule. The problem described here is that removing a collaboration membership does not disable an identity or revoke every active session.

D:

Full Access and Send As grants have separate lifecycles and must both be audited. The problem described here is that removing a collaboration membership does not disable an identity or revoke every active session.

Question 359

An endpoint response policy enables automatic remediation for all devices including production safety controllers. The administrator proposes: Scope Defender automation levels by device groups and criticality after business approval. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. The affected device no longer shows the specific vulnerable software build after evaluation.
  2. The audit identifies devices lacking vulnerability visibility rather than classifying them as clean.
  3. A pilot response remediates eligible workstations without automatically disrupting protected critical controllers.
  4. A newly provisioned laptop automatically reappears in Defender after required policy processing.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The administrator plans 'Scope Defender automation levels by device groups and criticality after business approval.' to correct the fact that automated endpoint actions can interrupt high-availability or safety-sensitive systems. The direct acceptance evidence is A pilot response remediates eligible workstations without automatically disrupting protected critical controllers. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The affected device no longer shows the specific vulnerable software build after evaluation. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a pilot response remediates eligible workstations without automatically disrupting protected critical controllers.

B:

The audit identifies devices lacking vulnerability visibility rather than classifying them as clean. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a pilot response remediates eligible workstations without automatically disrupting protected critical controllers.

D:

A newly provisioned laptop automatically reappears in Defender after required policy processing. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a pilot response remediates eligible workstations without automatically disrupting protected critical controllers.

Question 360

A company marks sensitive financial reports with a filename prefix SECRET but users can still share them without classification controls. The administrator proposes: Apply approved Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with appropriate protection and sharing settings. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. A sample file containing approved case variants of project terms produces the intended detection.
  2. A labeled test report displays the intended classification and supported access restrictions follow it.
  3. A held test message remains preserved according to legal requirements despite the ordinary deletion schedule.
  4. The investigation identifies the who and when of a controlled label change.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The administrator plans 'Apply approved Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with appropriate protection and sharing settings.' to correct the fact that a naming convention is not a machine-enforceable sensitivity label with protection semantics. The direct acceptance evidence is A labeled test report displays the intended classification and supported access restrictions follow it. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A sample file containing approved case variants of project terms produces the intended detection. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a labeled test report displays the intended classification and supported access restrictions follow it.

C:

A held test message remains preserved according to legal requirements despite the ordinary deletion schedule. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a labeled test report displays the intended classification and supported access restrictions follow it.

D:

The investigation identifies the who and when of a controlled label change. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a labeled test report displays the intended classification and supported access restrictions follow it.