McAfee Secure

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle

Exam Code: MS-102

Exam Name Microsoft 365 Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft 365 Certified: Administrator Expert

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle $44.99
MS-102 Sample 1 MS-102 Sample 2 MS-102 Sample 3 MS-102 Sample 4 MS-102 Sample 5 MS-102 Sample 6 MS-102 Sample 7 MS-102 Sample 8 MS-102 Sample 9 MS-102 Sample 10

100% Microsoft MS-102 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real MS-102 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    MS-102 Questions & Answers

    473 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual MS-102 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • MS-102 Video Course

    MS-102 Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    MS-102 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the MS-102 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft 365 Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    MS-102 Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 298-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace MS-102 exam.

Microsoft 365 Administrator (MS-102) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    473 Questions

    $124.99
  • MS-102 Video Course

    Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft MS-102 Practice Test 38

Question 370

An analyst sees Endpoint DLP events from a laptop but cannot determine whether upload blocking was enforced or merely audited. The administrator proposes: Review Endpoint DLP policy mode and activity-action configuration for the detected upload operation. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. A controlled upload produces the intended policy action and an event with the correct disposition.
  2. The investigation identifies approved test activity and remediates only confirmed unauthorized actions.
  3. A controlled external message containing test card patterns triggers the expected warning or block.
  4. A supervised test shows whether an override is permitted and records the justification as designed.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Review Endpoint DLP policy mode and activity-action configuration for the detected upload operation.' to correct the fact that endpoint DLP telemetry can record activities even when enforcement is in audit mode. The direct acceptance evidence is A controlled upload produces the intended policy action and an event with the correct disposition. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The investigation identifies approved test activity and remediates only confirmed unauthorized actions. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a controlled upload produces the intended policy action and an event with the correct disposition.

C:

A controlled external message containing test card patterns triggers the expected warning or block. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a controlled upload produces the intended policy action and an event with the correct disposition.

D:

A supervised test shows whether an override is permitted and records the justification as designed. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a controlled upload produces the intended policy action and an event with the correct disposition.

Question 371

A DLP administrator blocks any document containing a phone number even when the number is public, causing business disruptions. The administrator proposes: Tune policy conditions, confidence, location and approved exceptions to target actual protected information. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. A macOS pilot demonstrates the specific configured control or its documented limitation.
  2. The policy blocks controlled sensitive records but allows permitted public contact information.
  3. A verified permitted print path works while unauthorized sensitive document printing remains blocked.
  4. A controlled high-severity DLP event is assigned and investigated within the agreed response window.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The administrator plans 'Tune policy conditions, confidence, location and approved exceptions to target actual protected information.' to correct the fact that simple broad text matches can produce false positives that reduce DLP usability. The direct acceptance evidence is The policy blocks controlled sensitive records but allows permitted public contact information. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A macOS pilot demonstrates the specific configured control or its documented limitation. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the policy blocks controlled sensitive records but allows permitted public contact information.

C:

A verified permitted print path works while unauthorized sensitive document printing remains blocked. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the policy blocks controlled sensitive records but allows permitted public contact information.

D:

A controlled high-severity DLP event is assigned and investigated within the agreed response window. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the policy blocks controlled sensitive records but allows permitted public contact information.

Question 372

A department configures a DLP policy that warns users but leadership announces external transmission is impossible. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Validate the actual DLP policy action and escalation rules, distinguishing warn/override from hard block.
  2. Scope Endpoint DLP activity restrictions and controlled business exceptions to the actual data risk.
  3. Configure supported Microsoft Purview Endpoint DLP with enrolled and compatible devices and relevant file activities.
  4. Investigate Microsoft Purview DLP alerts and associated activity detail before final disposition.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The deciding issue is user-warning DLP actions are not equivalent to mandatory prevention of all transmission. The action 'Validate the actual DLP policy action and escalation rules, distinguishing warn/override from hard block.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A supervised test shows whether an override is permitted and records the justification as designed.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Overbroad endpoint actions can interrupt legitimate operating procedures. The problem described here is that user-warning DLP actions are not equivalent to mandatory prevention of all transmission.

C:

Cloud-location DLP rules alone do not govern all local endpoint file operations. The problem described here is that user-warning DLP actions are not equivalent to mandatory prevention of all transmission.

D:

A DLP alert is not conclusive proof that exfiltration succeeded. The problem described here is that user-warning DLP actions are not equivalent to mandatory prevention of all transmission.

Question 373

A data steward must configure Microsoft Purview retention policies but their Security Reader role permits only viewing. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which misconception most directly led to the observed problem?

  1. Administrative units do not automatically narrow all highly privileged tenant-wide role assignments.
  2. Security and compliance role groups are not interchangeable with read-only directory roles.
  3. Visibility into role assignments is different from authorization to change assignments.
  4. Administrative units can constrain some role assignments rather than granting every role tenant-wide.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The actual failure mechanism is Security and compliance role groups are not interchangeable with read-only directory roles. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by assign a supported Microsoft Purview role group with the required compliance management capability. Then verify: The steward creates a test retention policy but cannot administer unrelated Exchange transport settings.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Administrative units do not automatically narrow all highly privileged tenant-wide role assignments. The stated symptoms instead indicate that security and compliance role groups are not interchangeable with read-only directory roles.

C:

Visibility into role assignments is different from authorization to change assignments. The stated symptoms instead indicate that security and compliance role groups are not interchangeable with read-only directory roles.

D:

Administrative units can constrain some role assignments rather than granting every role tenant-wide. The stated symptoms instead indicate that security and compliance role groups are not interchangeable with read-only directory roles.

Question 374

A company imports external supplier phone and email details as internal users solely for directory discoverability. The administrator proposes: Use mail contacts for external directory recipients that do not require login or hosted mailboxes. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. A sample message resolves the supplier contact and no unnecessary Microsoft 365 license is allocated.
  2. The contractor authenticates with their external identity and cannot access unrelated internal workloads.
  3. A staged user attribute change leads to the expected group membership update after processing.
  4. An unrelated test user cannot discover or join restricted resources without appropriate approval.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Use mail contacts for external directory recipients that do not require login or hosted mailboxes.' to correct the fact that creating user principals for address-only contacts introduces needless identity and license exposure. The direct acceptance evidence is A sample message resolves the supplier contact and no unnecessary Microsoft 365 license is allocated. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The contractor authenticates with their external identity and cannot access unrelated internal workloads. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a sample message resolves the supplier contact and no unnecessary Microsoft 365 license is allocated.

C:

A staged user attribute change leads to the expected group membership update after processing. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a sample message resolves the supplier contact and no unnecessary Microsoft 365 license is allocated.

D:

An unrelated test user cannot discover or join restricted resources without appropriate approval. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a sample message resolves the supplier contact and no unnecessary Microsoft 365 license is allocated.

Question 375

A contact's display name is changed but internal users still receive email at an obsolete supplier address. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Update and verify the contact's external email address and directory properties in Microsoft 365.
  2. Configure the correct group delivery-management and sender restrictions for the authorized external mail flow.
  3. Define a supported dynamic Entra group membership rule for the intended eligible identities.
  4. Adjust the Microsoft 365 Group privacy and membership governance to meet the approved collaboration boundary.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The deciding issue is a friendly display name is not a substitute for the externally routed recipient address. The action 'Update and verify the contact's external email address and directory properties in Microsoft 365.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A recipient resolution and delivery test reaches the supplier's active external mailbox.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Group existence alone does not imply that all external senders are allowed. The problem described here is that a friendly display name is not a substitute for the externally routed recipient address.

C:

Group membership is not automatically attribute-driven without the proper group type and rule. The problem described here is that a friendly display name is not a substitute for the externally routed recipient address.

D:

Group visibility and membership determine broad collaboration exposure across related workloads. The problem described here is that a friendly display name is not a substitute for the externally routed recipient address.

Question 376

Security enables Safe Attachments Dynamic Delivery but executives interpret temporary document previews as the final attachment being safe. The administrator proposes: Explain and validate Safe Attachments scanning and dynamic-delivery behavior before attachment release. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. A controlled attachment test shows the placeholder and later delivery or blocking outcome after scan.
  2. A supervised campaign collects participation results without delivering real credential theft or malware.
  3. The targeted sender status changes without broad changes to inbound domain blocking.
  4. Audit notes show compromised credentials and suspicious forwarding were addressed prior to unblock.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Explain and validate Safe Attachments scanning and dynamic-delivery behavior before attachment release.' to correct the fact that a temporary attachment placeholder is not proof the attachment has passed scanning. The direct acceptance evidence is A controlled attachment test shows the placeholder and later delivery or blocking outcome after scan. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A supervised campaign collects participation results without delivering real credential theft or malware. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a controlled attachment test shows the placeholder and later delivery or blocking outcome after scan.

C:

The targeted sender status changes without broad changes to inbound domain blocking. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a controlled attachment test shows the placeholder and later delivery or blocking outcome after scan.

D:

Audit notes show compromised credentials and suspicious forwarding were addressed prior to unblock. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a controlled attachment test shows the placeholder and later delivery or blocking outcome after scan.

Question 377

A partner's guest access is revoked from SharePoint, but the administrator forgets the guest has other Entra app assignments. The change owner plans to: Perform a cross-workload review of the external Entra user and revoke all no-longer-approved permissions. What is the highest-priority residual-risk control before rollout?

  1. Check duplicate aliases and remove stale address-book entries after the update.
  2. Choose privacy and guest access settings before inviting external participants.
  3. Include group-based entitlements and audit evidence in the guest offboarding checklist.
  4. Use idempotent scripts, dry runs and per-record error reporting before large changes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The specific rollout control is Include group-based entitlements and audit evidence in the guest offboarding checklist. It protects the proposed intervention 'Perform a cross-workload review of the external Entra user and revoke all no-longer-approved permissions.' against the failure mode that one resource-level share removal does not remove independent directory and app grants. Success should also be checked through: The guest cannot access the project app, document library or Teams resource after revocation.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A friendly display name is not a substitute for the externally routed recipient address. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: One resource-level share removal does not remove independent directory and app grants. The applicable safeguard is: Include group-based entitlements and audit evidence in the guest offboarding checklist.

B:

A distribution list provides mail distribution, not the full Microsoft 365 Group collaboration experience. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: One resource-level share removal does not remove independent directory and app grants. The applicable safeguard is: Include group-based entitlements and audit evidence in the guest offboarding checklist.

D:

Manual repetitive changes raise the risk of inconsistent user provisioning at scale. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: One resource-level share removal does not remove independent directory and app grants. The applicable safeguard is: Include group-based entitlements and audit evidence in the guest offboarding checklist.

Question 378

A company adds a custom sign-in domain but users still authenticate using an unexpected default onmicrosoft.com suffix. The administrator proposes: Add and verify the custom domain, then set the approved user principal names where appropriate. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. A representative managed device reports the approved app build and update deployment status within the expected window.
  2. The subsidiary can administer its own tenant without granting administrators access to the parent company's directory.
  3. A pilot account signs in with the custom verified domain while its mailbox and assignments remain consistent.
  4. The tenant organization profile displays approved support contacts and newly issued notices use intended branding.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The administrator plans 'Add and verify the custom domain, then set the approved user principal names where appropriate.' to correct the fact that an added domain does not automatically rewrite every existing user's sign-in name or primary email address. The direct acceptance evidence is A pilot account signs in with the custom verified domain while its mailbox and assignments remain consistent. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A representative managed device reports the approved app build and update deployment status within the expected window. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a pilot account signs in with the custom verified domain while its mailbox and assignments remain consistent.

B:

The subsidiary can administer its own tenant without granting administrators access to the parent company's directory. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a pilot account signs in with the custom verified domain while its mailbox and assignments remain consistent.

D:

The tenant organization profile displays approved support contacts and newly issued notices use intended branding. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a pilot account signs in with the custom verified domain while its mailbox and assignments remain consistent.

Question 379

A sensitive Teams group is configured as public and employees from unrelated divisions join without approval. The administrator proposes: Adjust the Microsoft 365 Group privacy and membership governance to meet the approved collaboration boundary. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. Employees resolve the vendor's external address in the directory while the contact has no sign-in identity.
  2. The partner uses one supported identity with the intended project access and the duplicate grants are removed.
  3. An unrelated test user cannot discover or join restricted resources without appropriate approval.
  4. The guest cannot access the project app, document library or Teams resource after revocation.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The administrator plans 'Adjust the Microsoft 365 Group privacy and membership governance to meet the approved collaboration boundary.' to correct the fact that group visibility and membership determine broad collaboration exposure across related workloads. The direct acceptance evidence is An unrelated test user cannot discover or join restricted resources without appropriate approval. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Employees resolve the vendor's external address in the directory while the contact has no sign-in identity. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: an unrelated test user cannot discover or join restricted resources without appropriate approval.

B:

The partner uses one supported identity with the intended project access and the duplicate grants are removed. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: an unrelated test user cannot discover or join restricted resources without appropriate approval.

D:

The guest cannot access the project app, document library or Teams resource after revocation. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: an unrelated test user cannot discover or join restricted resources without appropriate approval.

Question 380

Users click rewritten URLs in Outlook, but the tenant's Safe Links policy excludes a relevant recipient group. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which misconception most directly led to the observed problem?

  1. Sender-specific outbound restrictions are different objects from tenant-wide inbound allow/block entries.
  2. Safe Links cannot protect users omitted by its effective policy coverage.
  3. Email-only filters can omit collaboration content protected by supported threat controls.
  4. Uncontrolled sampling and timing can misrepresent user training effectiveness.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The actual failure mechanism is Safe Links cannot protect users omitted by its effective policy coverage. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by correct Safe Links coverage and supported user or group policy scoping. Then verify: A permitted simulated malicious URL produces the required time-of-click protection result.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Sender-specific outbound restrictions are different objects from tenant-wide inbound allow/block entries. The stated symptoms instead indicate that safe Links cannot protect users omitted by its effective policy coverage.

C:

Email-only filters can omit collaboration content protected by supported threat controls. The stated symptoms instead indicate that safe Links cannot protect users omitted by its effective policy coverage.

D:

Uncontrolled sampling and timing can misrepresent user training effectiveness. The stated symptoms instead indicate that safe Links cannot protect users omitted by its effective policy coverage.