McAfee Secure

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle

Exam Code: MS-102

Exam Name Microsoft 365 Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft 365 Certified: Administrator Expert

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle $44.99
MS-102 Sample 1 MS-102 Sample 2 MS-102 Sample 3 MS-102 Sample 4 MS-102 Sample 5 MS-102 Sample 6 MS-102 Sample 7 MS-102 Sample 8 MS-102 Sample 9 MS-102 Sample 10

100% Microsoft MS-102 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real MS-102 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    MS-102 Questions & Answers

    473 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual MS-102 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • MS-102 Video Course

    MS-102 Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    MS-102 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the MS-102 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft 365 Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    MS-102 Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 298-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace MS-102 exam.

Microsoft 365 Administrator (MS-102) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    473 Questions

    $124.99
  • MS-102 Video Course

    Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft MS-102 Practice Test 40

Question 390

A new department licenses 120 employees by hand and several required Exchange Online plans remain disabled. The administrator proposes: Assign a supported license bundle or group-based licensing policy with required service plans enabled. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. A pilot group exposes its supported shared calendar and SharePoint workspace to approved members.
  2. A pilot user receives the expected Exchange license and can open their mailbox.
  3. An authorized delegate opens the shared mailbox and sends a reply with the approved sender identity.
  4. A test auditor's message is delivered while an unauthorized address remains blocked as required.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The administrator plans 'Assign a supported license bundle or group-based licensing policy with required service plans enabled.' to correct the fact that an assigned SKU without the intended enabled service plan can leave a workload unavailable. The direct acceptance evidence is A pilot user receives the expected Exchange license and can open their mailbox. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A pilot group exposes its supported shared calendar and SharePoint workspace to approved members. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a pilot user receives the expected Exchange license and can open their mailbox.

C:

An authorized delegate opens the shared mailbox and sends a reply with the approved sender identity. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a pilot user receives the expected Exchange license and can open their mailbox.

D:

A test auditor's message is delivered while an unauthorized address remains blocked as required. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a pilot user receives the expected Exchange license and can open their mailbox.

Question 391

An administrator turns on authentication methods without limiting who can register them and discovers contractor accounts enroll privileged methods. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Combine Entra Password Protection with MFA and risk-based authentication controls for layered defense.
  2. Scope authentication method policies to approved users and groups with appropriate enrollment controls.
  3. Enable Microsoft Entra self-service password reset for authorized users with supported authentication methods.
  4. Analyze Microsoft Entra sign-in error codes, IP details and risk signals to identify affected principals.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deciding issue is available authentication methods must be governed by policy rather than enabled indiscriminately. The action 'Scope authentication method policies to approved users and groups with appropriate enrollment controls.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A regular employee can register the intended method while a restricted contractor is denied.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Banned password checking reduces guessing risk but cannot replace multi-factor protection. The problem described here is that available authentication methods must be governed by policy rather than enabled indiscriminately.

C:

An enabled cloud identity does not automatically imply SSPR is licensed and configured. The problem described here is that available authentication methods must be governed by policy rather than enabled indiscriminately.

D:

A failed sign-in event can represent invalid credentials, blocked policy, or benign noise. The problem described here is that available authentication methods must be governed by policy rather than enabled indiscriminately.

Question 392

A SOC sees an impossible-travel style anomaly but the app activity log shows a trusted corporate VPN exit point. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which misconception most directly led to the observed problem?

  1. Discovery identifies possible risk but does not by itself prove every instance is malicious.
  2. Broad cloud-app control rules can unintentionally interrupt routine business processes.
  3. Unspecific manual reporting cannot reliably detect defined high-risk cloud app activity.
  4. Network geolocation can be misleading when users share secure remote-access egress infrastructure.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The actual failure mechanism is Network geolocation can be misleading when users share secure remote-access egress infrastructure. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by interpret Cloud Apps activity and sign-in context before claiming account takeover. Then verify: The incident note explains VPN egress and whether any suspicious actions were actually observed.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Discovery identifies possible risk but does not by itself prove every instance is malicious. The stated symptoms instead indicate that network geolocation can be misleading when users share secure remote-access egress infrastructure.

B:

Broad cloud-app control rules can unintentionally interrupt routine business processes. The stated symptoms instead indicate that network geolocation can be misleading when users share secure remote-access egress infrastructure.

C:

Unspecific manual reporting cannot reliably detect defined high-risk cloud app activity. The stated symptoms instead indicate that network geolocation can be misleading when users share secure remote-access egress infrastructure.

Question 393

The security team wants to inspect Microsoft 365 connected-app activity in Defender for Cloud Apps but has not connected its Microsoft 365 environment. The administrator proposes: Configure the supported Microsoft 365 app connector in Defender for Cloud Apps and verify integration. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. The reviewed activity record identifies the supported download event and principal.
  2. An authorized benign download continues while the defined risky test is detected or controlled.
  3. The Cloud Apps activity view receives supported Microsoft 365 events for an approved test action.
  4. A controlled bulk download test triggers a useful alert tied to the right user and asset.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The administrator plans 'Configure the supported Microsoft 365 app connector in Defender for Cloud Apps and verify integration.' to correct the fact that defender for Cloud Apps requires appropriate connectivity and permissions to analyze connected app events. The direct acceptance evidence is The Cloud Apps activity view receives supported Microsoft 365 events for an approved test action. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The reviewed activity record identifies the supported download event and principal. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the Cloud Apps activity view receives supported Microsoft 365 events for an approved test action.

B:

An authorized benign download continues while the defined risky test is detected or controlled. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the Cloud Apps activity view receives supported Microsoft 365 events for an approved test action.

D:

A controlled bulk download test triggers a useful alert tied to the right user and asset. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the Cloud Apps activity view receives supported Microsoft 365 events for an approved test action.

Question 394

A company applies an anti-malware policy to ordinary mailboxes but ignores policy coverage for shared mailboxes. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Update Defender for Office 365 alert recipient configuration and verify routing to a maintained group.
  2. Configure the appropriate Defender for Office 365 alert policy and notification recipients.
  3. Review Defender for Office 365 threat policy recipients and ensure required shared mailboxes are included.
  4. Target training simulations using an approved audience and baseline measurement plan.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The deciding issue is threat policies may be scoped to users, groups and domains and require explicit coverage verification. The action 'Review Defender for Office 365 threat policy recipients and ensure required shared mailboxes are included.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A test addressed to the shared mailbox follows the intended malware detection response.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Alert policies lose operational value when recipient lists are not maintained. The problem described here is that threat policies may be scoped to users, groups and domains and require explicit coverage verification.

B:

Historical reports do not automatically route real-time operational notifications. The problem described here is that threat policies may be scoped to users, groups and domains and require explicit coverage verification.

D:

Uncontrolled sampling and timing can misrepresent user training effectiveness. The problem described here is that threat policies may be scoped to users, groups and domains and require explicit coverage verification.

Question 395

A SOC analyst finds an unfamiliar malware indicator but treats the filename alone as definitive proof of a specific threat actor. The administrator proposes: Use Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence context to assess indicators and associated campaigns before attribution. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. The incident report distinguishes indicator confidence from confirmed malicious behavior and actor attribution.
  2. A test sign-in confirms the required authentication strength rather than a checklist-only completion.
  3. The case timeline links the endpoint activity, affected user and suspicious message with one investigation owner.
  4. A test query returns the affected host IDs, timestamps and matching process indicators.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Use Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence context to assess indicators and associated campaigns before attribution.' to correct the fact that a shared indicator can occur in unrelated activity and does not alone establish adversary identity. The direct acceptance evidence is The incident report distinguishes indicator confidence from confirmed malicious behavior and actor attribution. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A test sign-in confirms the required authentication strength rather than a checklist-only completion. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the incident report distinguishes indicator confidence from confirmed malicious behavior and actor attribution.

C:

The case timeline links the endpoint activity, affected user and suspicious message with one investigation owner. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the incident report distinguishes indicator confidence from confirmed malicious behavior and actor attribution.

D:

A test query returns the affected host IDs, timestamps and matching process indicators. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the incident report distinguishes indicator confidence from confirmed malicious behavior and actor attribution.

Question 396

A company receives malicious attachment campaigns but its Defender for Office 365 policies use only default allowlists. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Require documented remediation and threat verification before removing the entity restriction.
  2. Review and configure appropriate anti-phishing, Safe Attachments and Safe Links policies for the risk profile.
  3. Review Microsoft Defender attack simulation outcomes including user reporting and remediation learning.
  4. Update Defender for Office 365 alert recipient configuration and verify routing to a maintained group.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deciding issue is unrestricted allowlists can reduce the effectiveness of otherwise enabled mail protection. The action 'Review and configure appropriate anti-phishing, Safe Attachments and Safe Links policies for the risk profile.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A safe test attachment or link follows the intended inspection and protection route.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Restricted entities serve containment and should not be cleared without verifying the cause. The problem described here is that unrestricted allowlists can reduce the effectiveness of otherwise enabled mail protection.

C:

Click totals alone do not capture security reporting behavior or learning progress. The problem described here is that unrestricted allowlists can reduce the effectiveness of otherwise enabled mail protection.

D:

Alert policies lose operational value when recipient lists are not maintained. The problem described here is that unrestricted allowlists can reduce the effectiveness of otherwise enabled mail protection.

Question 397

Security operations closes a confirmed compromised account incident but leaves the risky user state unresolved in Entra. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which misconception most directly led to the observed problem?

  1. Tenant-wide access control errors can lock out normal administrators without a recovery path.
  2. Incident closure in a separate portal does not necessarily clear the directory's risk state.
  3. User-focused interactive Conditional Access can affect service principals differently from human sign-in flows.
  4. Logical grant-control operators can materially change the strength of access enforcement.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The actual failure mechanism is Incident closure in a separate portal does not necessarily clear the directory's risk state. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by complete supported risk remediation or administrator confirmation workflows after a verified investigation. Then verify: The risk record is resolved with attributable evidence and new sign-ins meet protected policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Tenant-wide access control errors can lock out normal administrators without a recovery path. The stated symptoms instead indicate that incident closure in a separate portal does not necessarily clear the directory's risk state.

C:

User-focused interactive Conditional Access can affect service principals differently from human sign-in flows. The stated symptoms instead indicate that incident closure in a separate portal does not necessarily clear the directory's risk state.

D:

Logical grant-control operators can materially change the strength of access enforcement. The stated symptoms instead indicate that incident closure in a separate portal does not necessarily clear the directory's risk state.

Question 398

Security turns on a Defender for Cloud Apps policy that blocks every file download from all Microsoft 365 apps during business hours. The administrator proposes: Scope the policy to the approved user, app, activity and sensitivity conditions with appropriate governance. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. The incident note explains VPN egress and whether any suspicious actions were actually observed.
  2. The report defines the supported investigation period and confirms records exist for a test date.
  3. An authorized benign download continues while the defined risky test is detected or controlled.
  4. A documented business owner migrates needed data to an approved service and the risky app use declines.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The administrator plans 'Scope the policy to the approved user, app, activity and sensitivity conditions with appropriate governance.' to correct the fact that broad cloud-app control rules can unintentionally interrupt routine business processes. The direct acceptance evidence is An authorized benign download continues while the defined risky test is detected or controlled. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The incident note explains VPN egress and whether any suspicious actions were actually observed. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: an authorized benign download continues while the defined risky test is detected or controlled.

B:

The report defines the supported investigation period and confirms records exist for a test date. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: an authorized benign download continues while the defined risky test is detected or controlled.

D:

A documented business owner migrates needed data to an approved service and the risky app use declines. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: an authorized benign download continues while the defined risky test is detected or controlled.

Question 399

During password-policy rollout, audit logs show weak password attempts but the organization incorrectly declares them blocked. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Check SSPR policy scope, method registration and policy eligibility before treating location as the cause.
  2. Set Microsoft Entra Password Protection from audit to the approved enforcement mode when the rollout is ready.
  3. Migrate the integration to supported modern authentication and enforce policy against legacy protocols.
  4. Inspect sign-in logs, authentication details and Conditional Access results for the affected identity.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deciding issue is audit-only reporting records weak attempts but does not necessarily prevent them. The action 'Set Microsoft Entra Password Protection from audit to the approved enforcement mode when the rollout is ready.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A previously audited weak password is rejected during a permitted test reset.

Incorrect Answers

A:

SSPR is a cloud recovery process whose eligibility depends on policy, not only office LAN access. The problem described here is that audit-only reporting records weak attempts but does not necessarily prevent them.

C:

Legacy authentication protocols may bypass stronger interactive sign-in protections. The problem described here is that audit-only reporting records weak attempts but does not necessarily prevent them.

D:

MFA prompts and conditional access failures are not necessarily password validation errors. The problem described here is that audit-only reporting records weak attempts but does not necessarily prevent them.

Question 400

A regional SOC creates security reports by exporting only incidents whose status is Active and misses resolved severe cases. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Join or correlate relevant Defender XDR telemetry across mail, identity and device tables where supported.
  2. Use exposure metrics for risk prioritization and correlate actual alert telemetry before asserting an intrusion.
  3. Use consistent Defender XDR reporting filters covering appropriate statuses, dates and severity.
  4. Use supported incident response actions with asset criticality and business-operations approval.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The deciding issue is current incident status is not equivalent to the full historical incident workload. The action 'Use consistent Defender XDR reporting filters covering appropriate statuses, dates and severity.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A month-end report includes severe incidents closed during the period alongside active cases.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Single-workload hunting can miss subsequent activity that occurs in other Microsoft security products. The problem described here is that current incident status is not equivalent to the full historical incident workload.

B:

Security exposure posture evaluates potential risk, whereas incidents describe observed malicious activity. The problem described here is that current incident status is not equivalent to the full historical incident workload.

D:

Automated response actions can interrupt essential services when applied without impact analysis. The problem described here is that current incident status is not equivalent to the full historical incident workload.