McAfee Secure

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle

Exam Code: MS-102

Exam Name Microsoft 365 Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft 365 Certified: Administrator Expert

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle $44.99

100% Microsoft MS-102 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real MS-102 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    MS-102 Questions & Answers

    473 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual MS-102 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • MS-102 Video Course

    MS-102 Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    MS-102 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the MS-102 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft 365 Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    MS-102 Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 298-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace MS-102 exam.

Microsoft 365 Administrator (MS-102) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    473 Questions

    $124.99
  • MS-102 Video Course

    Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft MS-102 Practice Test 7

Question 60

An administrator confuses a restricted sender with a blocked domain list entry and edits the global anti-spam policy. The administrator proposes: Manage the actual restricted entity record in the correct Defender or Exchange workflow. Which result most directly proves the proposed change worked?

  1. The confirmed indicator set identifies malicious variants without matching legitimate unrelated messages.
  2. The targeted sender status changes without broad changes to inbound domain blocking.
  3. A permitted simulated malicious URL produces the required time-of-click protection result.
  4. The analyst links the event to a specific policy condition and affected sending identity.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The administrator plans 'Manage the actual restricted entity record in the correct Defender or Exchange workflow.' to correct the fact that sender-specific outbound restrictions are different objects from tenant-wide inbound allow/block entries. The direct acceptance evidence is The targeted sender status changes without broad changes to inbound domain blocking. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The confirmed indicator set identifies malicious variants without matching legitimate unrelated messages. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the targeted sender status changes without broad changes to inbound domain blocking.

C:

A permitted simulated malicious URL produces the required time-of-click protection result. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the targeted sender status changes without broad changes to inbound domain blocking.

D:

The analyst links the event to a specific policy condition and affected sending identity. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the targeted sender status changes without broad changes to inbound domain blocking.

Question 61

A vendor should appear in the company address book for employees but must never sign into company services. The administrator proposes: Create an appropriate mail contact in the Microsoft 365 admin center instead of a licensed user account. Which result most directly proves the proposed change worked?

  1. An unrelated test user cannot discover or join restricted resources without appropriate approval.
  2. Employees resolve the vendor's external address in the directory while the contact has no sign-in identity.
  3. A test auditor's message is delivered while an unauthorized address remains blocked as required.
  4. An effective-access test grants the new department resources and denies prior finance content.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The administrator plans 'Create an appropriate mail contact in the Microsoft 365 admin center instead of a licensed user account.' to correct the fact that mail contacts are address-book objects and are not equivalent to interactive Entra workforce accounts. The direct acceptance evidence is Employees resolve the vendor's external address in the directory while the contact has no sign-in identity. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An unrelated test user cannot discover or join restricted resources without appropriate approval. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: employees resolve the vendor's external address in the directory while the contact has no sign-in identity.

C:

A test auditor's message is delivered while an unauthorized address remains blocked as required. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: employees resolve the vendor's external address in the directory while the contact has no sign-in identity.

D:

An effective-access test grants the new department resources and denies prior finance content. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: employees resolve the vendor's external address in the directory while the contact has no sign-in identity.

Question 62

Defender Vulnerability Management reports an actively exploitable browser vulnerability but IT patches unrelated low-risk apps first. The administrator proposes: Prioritize supported vulnerability recommendations using exposure, affected devices and exploitability context. Which result most directly proves the proposed change worked?

  1. A newly provisioned laptop automatically reappears in Defender after required policy processing.
  2. An eligible server reports the approved protection configuration and health state in the portal.
  3. A helpdesk technician can view approved device status without arbitrary remote response execution.
  4. Affected high-risk devices move to a mitigated or remediated state verified by a subsequent assessment.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The administrator plans 'Prioritize supported vulnerability recommendations using exposure, affected devices and exploitability context.' to correct the fact that raw vulnerability counts do not rank the practical business impact of each exposure. The direct acceptance evidence is Affected high-risk devices move to a mitigated or remediated state verified by a subsequent assessment. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A newly provisioned laptop automatically reappears in Defender after required policy processing. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: affected high-risk devices move to a mitigated or remediated state verified by a subsequent assessment.

B:

An eligible server reports the approved protection configuration and health state in the portal. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: affected high-risk devices move to a mitigated or remediated state verified by a subsequent assessment.

C:

A helpdesk technician can view approved device status without arbitrary remote response execution. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: affected high-risk devices move to a mitigated or remediated state verified by a subsequent assessment.

Question 63

A helpdesk analyst is made Global Administrator solely to reset passwords for regular employees. The change owner plans to: Assign the least-privileged appropriate Microsoft Entra administrative role for authorized password-reset tasks. Which additional safeguard is most specific to this implementation?

  1. Check which role operations and target resources actually honor administrative-unit restrictions.
  2. Document cross-workload role dependencies and review eligibility quarterly.
  3. Test which targets the role can reset and protect emergency-access accounts separately.
  4. Verify scope, distribution of permissions and approvals for high-impact compliance changes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The specific rollout control is Test which targets the role can reset and protect emergency-access accounts separately. It protects the proposed intervention 'Assign the least-privileged appropriate Microsoft Entra administrative role for authorized password-reset tasks.' against the failure mode that global Administrator has far broader powers than routine delegated helpdesk work requires. Success should also be checked through: The analyst resets a permitted account but cannot alter tenant-wide Conditional Access policies.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Administrative units can constrain some role assignments rather than granting every role tenant-wide. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Global Administrator has far broader powers than routine delegated helpdesk work requires. The applicable safeguard is: Test which targets the role can reset and protect emergency-access accounts separately.

B:

Workload role groups are distinct authorization planes and do not grant every adjacent service role. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Global Administrator has far broader powers than routine delegated helpdesk work requires. The applicable safeguard is: Test which targets the role can reset and protect emergency-access accounts separately.

D:

Security and compliance role groups are not interchangeable with read-only directory roles. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Global Administrator has far broader powers than routine delegated helpdesk work requires. The applicable safeguard is: Test which targets the role can reset and protect emergency-access accounts separately.

Question 64

The security team wants to inspect Microsoft 365 connected-app activity in Defender for Cloud Apps but has not connected its Microsoft 365 environment. Which administration change is MOST directly justified by the stated facts?

  1. Correlate Cloud Discovery activity, user behavior and data-classification context before incident escalation.
  2. Document supported Cloud Discovery signal sources and reconcile coverage with network and device inventory.
  3. Configure the supported Microsoft 365 app connector in Defender for Cloud Apps and verify integration.
  4. Investigate the supported enforcement integration and endpoint coverage for unsanctioned applications.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The deciding issue is defender for Cloud Apps requires appropriate connectivity and permissions to analyze connected app events. The action 'Configure the supported Microsoft 365 app connector in Defender for Cloud Apps and verify integration.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: The Cloud Apps activity view receives supported Microsoft 365 events for an approved test action.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Traffic volume and application risk do not independently establish intentional data theft. The problem described here is that defender for Cloud Apps requires appropriate connectivity and permissions to analyze connected app events.

B:

Cloud App Discovery can only assess traffic visible to its configured telemetry sources. The problem described here is that defender for Cloud Apps requires appropriate connectivity and permissions to analyze connected app events.

D:

Marking an app unsanctioned does not guarantee all devices or network paths are immediately blocked. The problem described here is that defender for Cloud Apps requires appropriate connectivity and permissions to analyze connected app events.

Question 65

A company disables legacy authentication in its cloud applications but one old integration continues submitting basic-auth credentials. The administrator proposes: Migrate the integration to supported modern authentication and enforce policy against legacy protocols. Which result most directly proves the proposed change worked?

  1. The upgraded client obtains the required token while the legacy attempt is rejected.
  2. The log identifies the specific policy or registration requirement that caused the challenge.
  3. A test user resets via SSPR and the same password authenticates to the authoritative on-premises directory.
  4. A previously audited weak password is rejected during a permitted test reset.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Migrate the integration to supported modern authentication and enforce policy against legacy protocols.' to correct the fact that legacy authentication protocols may bypass stronger interactive sign-in protections. The direct acceptance evidence is The upgraded client obtains the required token while the legacy attempt is rejected. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The log identifies the specific policy or registration requirement that caused the challenge. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the upgraded client obtains the required token while the legacy attempt is rejected.

C:

A test user resets via SSPR and the same password authenticates to the authoritative on-premises directory. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the upgraded client obtains the required token while the legacy attempt is rejected.

D:

A previously audited weak password is rejected during a permitted test reset. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the upgraded client obtains the required token while the legacy attempt is rejected.

Question 66

An admin removes an employee from a shared mailbox but the employee retains independent Send As delegation. The administrator proposes: Review and remove both mailbox access and separate recipient delegation permissions during offboarding. Which result most directly proves the proposed change worked?

  1. The departed employee cannot open the mailbox or submit messages as that shared sender.
  2. A reconciliation shows the expected identities with accurate UPNs, departments and manager attributes.
  3. An entitlement audit explains every effective license and updates correctly after group membership changes.
  4. A pilot user receives the planned Teams entitlement after the correct supported service plan is enabled.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Review and remove both mailbox access and separate recipient delegation permissions during offboarding.' to correct the fact that full Access and Send As grants have separate lifecycles and must both be audited. The direct acceptance evidence is The departed employee cannot open the mailbox or submit messages as that shared sender. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A reconciliation shows the expected identities with accurate UPNs, departments and manager attributes. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the departed employee cannot open the mailbox or submit messages as that shared sender.

C:

An entitlement audit explains every effective license and updates correctly after group membership changes. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the departed employee cannot open the mailbox or submit messages as that shared sender.

D:

A pilot user receives the planned Teams entitlement after the correct supported service plan is enabled. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the departed employee cannot open the mailbox or submit messages as that shared sender.

Question 67

A regional SOC creates security reports by exporting only incidents whose status is Active and misses resolved severe cases. The change owner plans to: Use consistent Defender XDR reporting filters covering appropriate statuses, dates and severity. Which additional safeguard is most specific to this implementation?

  1. Require a documented false-positive rationale and escalation triggers for privileged identities.
  2. Validate product versions and protect production availability during urgent mitigations.
  3. Respect intelligence confidence levels and corroborate with observed local telemetry.
  4. Protect sensitive incident exports and annotate any retention or reporting gaps.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The specific rollout control is Protect sensitive incident exports and annotate any retention or reporting gaps. It protects the proposed intervention 'Use consistent Defender XDR reporting filters covering appropriate statuses, dates and severity.' against the failure mode that current incident status is not equivalent to the full historical incident workload. Success should also be checked through: A month-end report includes severe incidents closed during the period alongside active cases.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Alert severity alone is not a reliable substitute for investigation of correlated activity. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Current incident status is not equivalent to the full historical incident workload. The applicable safeguard is: Protect sensitive incident exports and annotate any retention or reporting gaps.

B:

External threat intelligence gains operational value only when matched to actual enterprise exposure. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Current incident status is not equivalent to the full historical incident workload. The applicable safeguard is: Protect sensitive incident exports and annotate any retention or reporting gaps.

C:

A shared indicator can occur in unrelated activity and does not alone establish adversary identity. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Current incident status is not equivalent to the full historical incident workload. The applicable safeguard is: Protect sensitive incident exports and annotate any retention or reporting gaps.

Question 68

Security analysts confuse Defender for Cloud Apps tenant connector setup with granting every app full Microsoft 365 Graph access. The team believes no other action is necessary. What underlying technical or governance limitation explains this failure?

  1. Connected app monitoring is not an excuse for unrestricted tenant-wide API permissions.
  2. Unsupported or malformed traffic logs do not yield reliable app identification.
  3. Discovery identifies possible risk but does not by itself prove every instance is malicious.
  4. Broad cloud-app control rules can unintentionally interrupt routine business processes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The actual failure mechanism is Connected app monitoring is not an excuse for unrestricted tenant-wide API permissions. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by grant only supported minimum connector permissions and validate the exact app integration flow. Then verify: The intended activity telemetry arrives while unrelated high-privilege Graph scopes remain ungranted.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Unsupported or malformed traffic logs do not yield reliable app identification. The stated symptoms instead indicate that connected app monitoring is not an excuse for unrestricted tenant-wide API permissions.

C:

Discovery identifies possible risk but does not by itself prove every instance is malicious. The stated symptoms instead indicate that connected app monitoring is not an excuse for unrestricted tenant-wide API permissions.

D:

Broad cloud-app control rules can unintentionally interrupt routine business processes. The stated symptoms instead indicate that connected app monitoring is not an excuse for unrestricted tenant-wide API permissions.

Question 69

A user sign-in is flagged as risky by unfamiliar travel but a supervisor automatically blocks it without checking supporting evidence. The team believes no other action is necessary. What underlying technical or governance limitation explains this failure?

  1. Automated risk scoring can produce signals requiring investigation and proportional response.
  2. Tenant-wide access control errors can lock out normal administrators without a recovery path.
  3. Different identity populations may require different access controls and device trust models.
  4. A technically correct device requirement can disrupt operations when endpoint readiness is unknown.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The actual failure mechanism is Automated risk scoring can produce signals requiring investigation and proportional response. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by review Identity Protection detection details and decide remediation according to validated risk context. Then verify: The action record explains whether the sign-in was confirmed malicious or legitimately challenged.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Tenant-wide access control errors can lock out normal administrators without a recovery path. The stated symptoms instead indicate that automated risk scoring can produce signals requiring investigation and proportional response.

C:

Different identity populations may require different access controls and device trust models. The stated symptoms instead indicate that automated risk scoring can produce signals requiring investigation and proportional response.

D:

A technically correct device requirement can disrupt operations when endpoint readiness is unknown. The stated symptoms instead indicate that automated risk scoring can produce signals requiring investigation and proportional response.

Question 70

An admin sees user complaints immediately after a service advisory is resolved and closes the ticket without validating recovery. The team believes no other action is necessary. What underlying technical or governance limitation explains this failure?

  1. A custom domain generally cannot be concurrently verified as an ordinary domain in two different Entra tenants.
  2. Feature updates can change app behavior even when the cloud tenant service is healthy.
  3. A provider resolution notice does not prove all customer-side configuration and client dependencies have recovered.
  4. An update channel policy determines servicing behavior but is not proof that every endpoint installed it.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The actual failure mechanism is A provider resolution notice does not prove all customer-side configuration and client dependencies have recovered. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by use Service health incident status together with representative workload acceptance tests before closing an incident. Then verify: Mail, meetings and sign-in test cases pass after the provider reports the service restored.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A custom domain generally cannot be concurrently verified as an ordinary domain in two different Entra tenants. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a provider resolution notice does not prove all customer-side configuration and client dependencies have recovered.

B:

Feature updates can change app behavior even when the cloud tenant service is healthy. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a provider resolution notice does not prove all customer-side configuration and client dependencies have recovered.

D:

An update channel policy determines servicing behavior but is not proof that every endpoint installed it. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a provider resolution notice does not prove all customer-side configuration and client dependencies have recovered.