McAfee Secure

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle

Exam Code: MS-102

Exam Name Microsoft 365 Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft 365 Certified: Administrator Expert

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle $44.99
MS-102 Sample 1 MS-102 Sample 2 MS-102 Sample 3 MS-102 Sample 4 MS-102 Sample 5 MS-102 Sample 6 MS-102 Sample 7 MS-102 Sample 8 MS-102 Sample 9 MS-102 Sample 10

100% Microsoft MS-102 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real MS-102 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    MS-102 Questions & Answers

    473 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual MS-102 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • MS-102 Video Course

    MS-102 Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    MS-102 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the MS-102 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft 365 Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    MS-102 Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 298-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace MS-102 exam.

Microsoft 365 Administrator (MS-102) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    473 Questions

    $124.99
  • MS-102 Video Course

    Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft MS-102 Practice Test 9

Question 80

An Exchange administrator expects their Exchange role group to grant all Microsoft Purview eDiscovery privileges automatically. The change owner plans to: Grant task-specific Microsoft Purview compliance role group membership separately from Exchange administration. Which additional safeguard is most specific to this implementation?

  1. Document cross-workload role dependencies and review eligibility quarterly.
  2. Review application permissions and credential rotation separately from human privileged roles.
  3. Test dynamic membership delays and protect attributes used by scoping rules.
  4. Require MFA, justification and approval for sensitive eligible role activation where supported.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The specific rollout control is Document cross-workload role dependencies and review eligibility quarterly. It protects the proposed intervention 'Grant task-specific Microsoft Purview compliance role group membership separately from Exchange administration.' against the failure mode that workload role groups are distinct authorization planes and do not grant every adjacent service role. Success should also be checked through: The operator performs only the approved compliance operation while Exchange administration remains scoped.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Just-in-time human role activation is not a substitute for managed service identity permissions. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Workload role groups are distinct authorization planes and do not grant every adjacent service role. The applicable safeguard is: Document cross-workload role dependencies and review eligibility quarterly.

C:

Administrative unit scope depends on accurate object membership, not merely branch naming conventions. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Workload role groups are distinct authorization planes and do not grant every adjacent service role. The applicable safeguard is: Document cross-workload role dependencies and review eligibility quarterly.

D:

Permanent privileged standing access expands compromise risk beyond the actual maintenance period. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Workload role groups are distinct authorization planes and do not grant every adjacent service role. The applicable safeguard is: Document cross-workload role dependencies and review eligibility quarterly.

Question 81

Security enables Safe Attachments Dynamic Delivery but executives interpret temporary document previews as the final attachment being safe. Which administration change is MOST directly justified by the stated facts?

  1. Explain and validate Safe Attachments scanning and dynamic-delivery behavior before attachment release.
  2. Correlate email verdict and delivery status with actual endpoint and user interaction telemetry.
  3. Configure a Microsoft Defender attack simulation training campaign with approved benign payloads.
  4. Use supported Defender for Office 365 collaboration threat investigation across the relevant workloads.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The deciding issue is a temporary attachment placeholder is not proof the attachment has passed scanning. The action 'Explain and validate Safe Attachments scanning and dynamic-delivery behavior before attachment release.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A controlled attachment test shows the placeholder and later delivery or blocking outcome after scan.

Incorrect Answers

B:

An email detection verdict does not alone prove payload execution or endpoint compromise. The problem described here is that a temporary attachment placeholder is not proof the attachment has passed scanning.

C:

Real malicious payloads are unnecessary and unsafe for a security awareness measurement. The problem described here is that a temporary attachment placeholder is not proof the attachment has passed scanning.

D:

Email-only filters can omit collaboration content protected by supported threat controls. The problem described here is that a temporary attachment placeholder is not proof the attachment has passed scanning.

Question 82

A managed endpoint fleet submits Cloud App Discovery telemetry but staff assume all unmanaged contractor devices are covered. The team believes no other action is necessary. What underlying technical or governance limitation explains this failure?

  1. Cloud App Discovery can only assess traffic visible to its configured telemetry sources.
  2. Discovery identifies possible risk but does not by itself prove every instance is malicious.
  3. Broad cloud-app control rules can unintentionally interrupt routine business processes.
  4. A previously configured connector can lose the permissions needed for continued ingestion.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The actual failure mechanism is Cloud App Discovery can only assess traffic visible to its configured telemetry sources. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by document supported Cloud Discovery signal sources and reconcile coverage with network and device inventory. Then verify: The report clearly identifies the unobserved contractor population instead of labeling it safe.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Discovery identifies possible risk but does not by itself prove every instance is malicious. The stated symptoms instead indicate that cloud App Discovery can only assess traffic visible to its configured telemetry sources.

C:

Broad cloud-app control rules can unintentionally interrupt routine business processes. The stated symptoms instead indicate that cloud App Discovery can only assess traffic visible to its configured telemetry sources.

D:

A previously configured connector can lose the permissions needed for continued ingestion. The stated symptoms instead indicate that cloud App Discovery can only assess traffic visible to its configured telemetry sources.

Question 83

A security team imports firewall traffic logs to Cloud App Discovery but provides a malformed source format. The administrator proposes: Use a supported log collector and correctly formatted network traffic data for Cloud Discovery. Which result most directly proves the proposed change worked?

  1. The portal parses a test log batch and identifies the expected cloud applications.
  2. A simulated eligible event reaches the SOC queue at the agreed priority without excessive notifications.
  3. The report defines the supported investigation period and confirms records exist for a test date.
  4. The app's approved status and governance owner match the procurement decision and observed use.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Use a supported log collector and correctly formatted network traffic data for Cloud Discovery.' to correct the fact that unsupported or malformed traffic logs do not yield reliable app identification. The direct acceptance evidence is The portal parses a test log batch and identifies the expected cloud applications. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A simulated eligible event reaches the SOC queue at the agreed priority without excessive notifications. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the portal parses a test log batch and identifies the expected cloud applications.

C:

The report defines the supported investigation period and confirms records exist for a test date. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the portal parses a test log batch and identifies the expected cloud applications.

D:

The app's approved status and governance owner match the procurement decision and observed use. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the portal parses a test log batch and identifies the expected cloud applications.

Question 84

A company assumes Microsoft Defender for Endpoint antivirus policies automatically cover every Windows server simply because its license was purchased. The team believes no other action is necessary. What underlying technical or governance limitation explains this failure?

  1. One-time manual onboarding is not a reliable fleet lifecycle process for reimaged devices.
  2. License entitlement alone does not deploy or enforce device security settings.
  3. Quantity of patch actions is not a proxy for the risk removed from critical assets.
  4. A device inventory limited to onboarded assets cannot establish whole-fleet security coverage.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The actual failure mechanism is License entitlement alone does not deploy or enforce device security settings. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by configure supported endpoint protection settings and deployment assignments for the managed server population. Then verify: An eligible server reports the approved protection configuration and health state in the portal.

Incorrect Answers

A:

One-time manual onboarding is not a reliable fleet lifecycle process for reimaged devices. The stated symptoms instead indicate that license entitlement alone does not deploy or enforce device security settings.

C:

Quantity of patch actions is not a proxy for the risk removed from critical assets. The stated symptoms instead indicate that license entitlement alone does not deploy or enforce device security settings.

D:

A device inventory limited to onboarded assets cannot establish whole-fleet security coverage. The stated symptoms instead indicate that license entitlement alone does not deploy or enforce device security settings.

Question 85

A SOC sees an impossible-travel style anomaly but the app activity log shows a trusted corporate VPN exit point. The administrator proposes: Interpret Cloud Apps activity and sign-in context before claiming account takeover. Which result most directly proves the proposed change worked?

  1. The incident note explains VPN egress and whether any suspicious actions were actually observed.
  2. The discovery dashboard identifies candidate cloud services and relevant risk indicators from real usage.
  3. A simulated eligible event reaches the SOC queue at the agreed priority without excessive notifications.
  4. A covered endpoint receives the intended blocking indicator while unsupported devices are identified separately.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Interpret Cloud Apps activity and sign-in context before claiming account takeover.' to correct the fact that network geolocation can be misleading when users share secure remote-access egress infrastructure. The direct acceptance evidence is The incident note explains VPN egress and whether any suspicious actions were actually observed. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The discovery dashboard identifies candidate cloud services and relevant risk indicators from real usage. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the incident note explains VPN egress and whether any suspicious actions were actually observed.

C:

A simulated eligible event reaches the SOC queue at the agreed priority without excessive notifications. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the incident note explains VPN egress and whether any suspicious actions were actually observed.

D:

A covered endpoint receives the intended blocking indicator while unsupported devices are identified separately. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the incident note explains VPN egress and whether any suspicious actions were actually observed.

Question 86

A security manager reads a low Microsoft Secure Score and assumes the score automatically applies every recommended tenant configuration. The change owner plans to: Review Microsoft Secure Score improvement actions and implement prioritized approved hardening changes. Which additional safeguard is most specific to this implementation?

  1. Prioritize business-risk and operational impact rather than maximizing score without evaluation.
  2. Cross-check onboarded asset counts and policy health when comparing report periods.
  3. Set query time windows, role permissions and safe evidence handling before large hunts.
  4. Define refresh cadence and latency assumptions for any security KPI dashboard.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The specific rollout control is Prioritize business-risk and operational impact rather than maximizing score without evaluation. It protects the proposed intervention 'Review Microsoft Secure Score improvement actions and implement prioritized approved hardening changes.' against the failure mode that secure Score reports posture improvement opportunities but is not an automatic remediation engine. Success should also be checked through: A targeted security control changes state and its improvement action is evidenced in the updated score.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Alert volume can fall because detection coverage is missing, not because risk disappeared. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Secure Score reports posture improvement opportunities but is not an automatic remediation engine. The applicable safeguard is: Prioritize business-risk and operational impact rather than maximizing score without evaluation.

C:

Incident summaries may omit the detailed event relationships required for broad threat scoping. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Secure Score reports posture improvement opportunities but is not an automatic remediation engine. The applicable safeguard is: Prioritize business-risk and operational impact rather than maximizing score without evaluation.

D:

Periodic analytical reports and real-time detection pipelines are different operational services. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Secure Score reports posture improvement opportunities but is not an automatic remediation engine. The applicable safeguard is: Prioritize business-risk and operational impact rather than maximizing score without evaluation.

Question 87

An organization wants to enforce stronger controls only for highly privileged directory roles but scopes CA to a manually maintained list of ten admins. The administrator proposes: Use supported directory-role targeting for appropriate privileged Conditional Access policies. Which result most directly proves the proposed change worked?

  1. A newly eligible privileged admin receives the required challenge without manual list edits.
  2. A test passes only when both required conditions are met, not merely one.
  3. The user's risk state and recent sign-ins are reviewed and the account passes a clean recovery test.
  4. The test prompts for the required factor or shows a previously satisfied claim with exact evaluation context.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Use supported directory-role targeting for appropriate privileged Conditional Access policies.' to correct the fact that manually enumerated privileged users can omit new or rotated administrators. The direct acceptance evidence is A newly eligible privileged admin receives the required challenge without manual list edits. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A test passes only when both required conditions are met, not merely one. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a newly eligible privileged admin receives the required challenge without manual list edits.

C:

The user's risk state and recent sign-ins are reviewed and the account passes a clean recovery test. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a newly eligible privileged admin receives the required challenge without manual list edits.

D:

The test prompts for the required factor or shows a previously satisfied claim with exact evaluation context. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a newly eligible privileged admin receives the required challenge without manual list edits.

Question 88

An on-premises hybrid environment needs cloud banned-password protection but assumes the cloud toggle automatically filters AD DS domain controller password changes. Which administration change is MOST directly justified by the stated facts?

  1. Investigate application protocol support and sign-in logs before changing the user's account status.
  2. Configure authentication method availability and a supported access policy requiring the intended factor.
  3. Scope authentication method policies to approved users and groups with appropriate enrollment controls.
  4. Deploy supported Microsoft Entra Password Protection proxy and DC agents for on-premises AD DS.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The deciding issue is cloud-only password policy does not automatically execute on legacy on-premises domain controllers. The action 'Deploy supported Microsoft Entra Password Protection proxy and DC agents for on-premises AD DS.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A controlled domain password reset is evaluated against the intended banned-password policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Different client authentication protocols can produce different access outcomes for the same identity. The problem described here is that cloud-only password policy does not automatically execute on legacy on-premises domain controllers.

B:

Authentication method registration alone does not require using MFA for every application. The problem described here is that cloud-only password policy does not automatically execute on legacy on-premises domain controllers.

C:

Available authentication methods must be governed by policy rather than enabled indiscriminately. The problem described here is that cloud-only password policy does not automatically execute on legacy on-premises domain controllers.

Question 89

An analyst sees Endpoint DLP events from a laptop but cannot determine whether upload blocking was enforced or merely audited. Which administration change is MOST directly justified by the stated facts?

  1. Review Endpoint DLP policy mode and activity-action configuration for the detected upload operation.
  2. Review DLP event and alert reports to distinguish sanctioned tests, false positives and actual violations.
  3. Configure supported Power BI DLP policy location and sensitivity conditions where available.
  4. Configure appropriate DLP alert triage ownership and integrate notifications into the staffed response process.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The deciding issue is endpoint DLP telemetry can record activities even when enforcement is in audit mode. The action 'Review Endpoint DLP policy mode and activity-action configuration for the detected upload operation.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A controlled upload produces the intended policy action and an event with the correct disposition.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Sensitive-information matches can arise from legitimate test data and do not automatically prove misconduct. The problem described here is that endpoint DLP telemetry can record activities even when enforcement is in audit mode.

C:

Power BI data flows and semantic models have distinct DLP capabilities and prerequisites. The problem described here is that endpoint DLP telemetry can record activities even when enforcement is in audit mode.

D:

A generated compliance alert is not meaningful incident response unless a responsible team acts. The problem described here is that endpoint DLP telemetry can record activities even when enforcement is in audit mode.

Question 90

A company wants safe phishing-awareness training but the security team considers sending live malicious attachments to employees. Which administration change is MOST directly justified by the stated facts?

  1. Configure a Microsoft Defender attack simulation training campaign with approved benign payloads.
  2. Explain and validate Safe Attachments scanning and dynamic-delivery behavior before attachment release.
  3. Consolidate or tune supported alert policy conditions, thresholds and severity based on triage need.
  4. Configure a compliant Defender alert notification route and minimize sensitive content in outbound messages.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The deciding issue is real malicious payloads are unnecessary and unsafe for a security awareness measurement. The action 'Configure a Microsoft Defender attack simulation training campaign with approved benign payloads.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A supervised campaign collects participation results without delivering real credential theft or malware.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A temporary attachment placeholder is not proof the attachment has passed scanning. The problem described here is that real malicious payloads are unnecessary and unsafe for a security awareness measurement.

C:

Poorly tuned alert logic creates fatigue without necessarily increasing detection quality. The problem described here is that real malicious payloads are unnecessary and unsafe for a security awareness measurement.

D:

Security notification workflows must meet their own data-sharing and privacy requirements. The problem described here is that real malicious payloads are unnecessary and unsafe for a security awareness measurement.