McAfee Secure

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle

Exam Code: MS-102

Exam Name Microsoft 365 Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft 365 Certified: Administrator Expert

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle $44.99
MS-102 Sample 1 MS-102 Sample 2 MS-102 Sample 3 MS-102 Sample 4 MS-102 Sample 5 MS-102 Sample 6 MS-102 Sample 7 MS-102 Sample 8 MS-102 Sample 9 MS-102 Sample 10

100% Microsoft MS-102 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real MS-102 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    MS-102 Questions & Answers

    473 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual MS-102 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • MS-102 Video Course

    MS-102 Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    MS-102 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the MS-102 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft 365 Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    MS-102 Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 298-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace MS-102 exam.

Microsoft 365 Administrator (MS-102) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    473 Questions

    $124.99
  • MS-102 Video Course

    Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft MS-102 Practice Test 71

Question 700

Security deploys Endpoint DLP to Windows machines but says macOS contractors are covered with identical policy capabilities. What should the administrator do FIRST to correct the problem?

  1. Configure appropriate DLP alert triage ownership and integrate notifications into the staffed response process.
  2. Review supported Endpoint DLP platform capabilities and enroll eligible macOS devices separately.
  3. Configure an Exchange Online DLP policy using appropriate sensitive information types and an approved user action.
  4. Configure Microsoft Purview DLP coverage for OneDrive and SharePoint sharing activities.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deciding issue is endpoint DLP features and prerequisites can differ by operating system and device state. The action 'Review supported Endpoint DLP platform capabilities and enroll eligible macOS devices separately.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A macOS pilot demonstrates the specific configured control or its documented limitation.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A generated compliance alert is not meaningful incident response unless a responsible team acts. The problem described here is that endpoint DLP features and prerequisites can differ by operating system and device state.

C:

Content classification alone does not prevent external transmission without an applicable DLP policy. The problem described here is that endpoint DLP features and prerequisites can differ by operating system and device state.

D:

Email DLP does not necessarily enforce protection for cloud file collaboration locations. The problem described here is that endpoint DLP features and prerequisites can differ by operating system and device state.

Question 701

A company grants Global Administrator to every service owner because role descriptions seem complicated. What should the administrator do FIRST to correct the problem?

  1. Review administrative-unit-scoped role support and avoid assigning tenant-wide privileged roles for scoped tasks.
  2. Create a role matrix mapping Microsoft 365 administrative tasks to narrowly suitable built-in or custom roles.
  3. Maintain administrative unit membership with the supported rules or approved manual process.
  4. Use a separately scoped workload identity or supported automation role rather than treating PIM user activation as perpetual service access.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deciding issue is overprivileged tenant roles increase blast radius and complicate accountability. The action 'Create a role matrix mapping Microsoft 365 administrative tasks to narrowly suitable built-in or custom roles.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A role audit confirms application, messaging and identity owners have only required permissions.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Administrative units do not automatically narrow all highly privileged tenant-wide role assignments. The problem described here is that overprivileged tenant roles increase blast radius and complicate accountability.

C:

Administrative unit scope depends on accurate object membership, not merely branch naming conventions. The problem described here is that overprivileged tenant roles increase blast radius and complicate accountability.

D:

Just-in-time human role activation is not a substitute for managed service identity permissions. The problem described here is that overprivileged tenant roles increase blast radius and complicate accountability.

Question 702

A new department licenses 120 employees by hand and several required Exchange Online plans remain disabled. The change owner plans to: Assign a supported license bundle or group-based licensing policy with required service plans enabled. Which validation or governance guardrail is best suited to the proposed fix?

  1. Validate external email routing and anti-spoofing controls for the contact domain.
  2. Audit existing members and linked SharePoint permissions when changing public/private status.
  3. Validate anti-spam policy and approved external sender scope before enabling internet delivery.
  4. Check inventory, plan dependencies and license assignment errors before bulk rollout.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The specific rollout control is Check inventory, plan dependencies and license assignment errors before bulk rollout. It protects the proposed intervention 'Assign a supported license bundle or group-based licensing policy with required service plans enabled.' against the failure mode that an assigned SKU without the intended enabled service plan can leave a workload unavailable. Success should also be checked through: A pilot user receives the expected Exchange license and can open their mailbox.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Creating user principals for address-only contacts introduces needless identity and license exposure. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: An assigned SKU without the intended enabled service plan can leave a workload unavailable. The applicable safeguard is: Check inventory, plan dependencies and license assignment errors before bulk rollout.

B:

Group visibility and membership determine broad collaboration exposure across related workloads. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: An assigned SKU without the intended enabled service plan can leave a workload unavailable. The applicable safeguard is: Check inventory, plan dependencies and license assignment errors before bulk rollout.

C:

Group existence alone does not imply that all external senders are allowed. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: An assigned SKU without the intended enabled service plan can leave a workload unavailable. The applicable safeguard is: Check inventory, plan dependencies and license assignment errors before bulk rollout.

Question 703

A SOC analyst needs to triage Defender XDR incidents but is incorrectly granted Global Administrator. The administrator proposes: Assign an appropriate Microsoft Defender XDR security role or supported unified RBAC permission set. What test distinguishes successful remediation from an unrelated improvement?

  1. The analyst can manage approved incidents but cannot modify unrelated Microsoft 365 tenant settings.
  2. The investigation identifies the actor, activation time, justification and approval record where captured.
  3. The analyst resets a permitted account but cannot alter tenant-wide Conditional Access policies.
  4. A role audit confirms application, messaging and identity owners have only required permissions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Assign an appropriate Microsoft Defender XDR security role or supported unified RBAC permission set.' to correct the fact that defender workload permissions can be narrower than broad Entra directory administration. The direct acceptance evidence is The analyst can manage approved incidents but cannot modify unrelated Microsoft 365 tenant settings. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The investigation identifies the actor, activation time, justification and approval record where captured. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the analyst can manage approved incidents but cannot modify unrelated Microsoft 365 tenant settings.

C:

The analyst resets a permitted account but cannot alter tenant-wide Conditional Access policies. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the analyst can manage approved incidents but cannot modify unrelated Microsoft 365 tenant settings.

D:

A role audit confirms application, messaging and identity owners have only required permissions. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the analyst can manage approved incidents but cannot modify unrelated Microsoft 365 tenant settings.

Question 704

Security enables Safe Attachments Dynamic Delivery but executives interpret temporary document previews as the final attachment being safe. The change owner plans to: Explain and validate Safe Attachments scanning and dynamic-delivery behavior before attachment release. Which validation or governance guardrail is best suited to the proposed fix?

  1. Revoke sessions and validate mailbox forwarding or inbox rules during containment.
  2. Get stakeholder approval and preserve employee privacy in simulation reporting.
  3. Avoid overclaiming impact and perform additional endpoint investigation where warranted.
  4. Communicate scan delays and validate behavior for mail flow rules and encrypted attachments.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The specific rollout control is Communicate scan delays and validate behavior for mail flow rules and encrypted attachments. It protects the proposed intervention 'Explain and validate Safe Attachments scanning and dynamic-delivery behavior before attachment release.' against the failure mode that a temporary attachment placeholder is not proof the attachment has passed scanning. Success should also be checked through: A controlled attachment test shows the placeholder and later delivery or blocking outcome after scan.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Email account compromise can propagate through collaboration workflows without a detected local malware file. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: A temporary attachment placeholder is not proof the attachment has passed scanning. The applicable safeguard is: Communicate scan delays and validate behavior for mail flow rules and encrypted attachments.

B:

Real malicious payloads are unnecessary and unsafe for a security awareness measurement. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: A temporary attachment placeholder is not proof the attachment has passed scanning. The applicable safeguard is: Communicate scan delays and validate behavior for mail flow rules and encrypted attachments.

C:

An email detection verdict does not alone prove payload execution or endpoint compromise. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: A temporary attachment placeholder is not proof the attachment has passed scanning. The applicable safeguard is: Communicate scan delays and validate behavior for mail flow rules and encrypted attachments.

Question 705

An executive wants a plan to improve Microsoft 365 protection but the team selects only the recommendations that are easiest to implement. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which failure mechanism best matches the observed facts?

  1. Automated response actions can interrupt essential services when applied without impact analysis.
  2. Reports limited to onboarded devices can undercount unprotected inventory outside the sensor population.
  3. A bare IP address is insufficient to infer the infrastructure's threat relevance or intent.
  4. Scoring and security value are related but not identical for all enterprise risk contexts.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The actual failure mechanism is Scoring and security value are related but not identical for all enterprise risk contexts. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by rank Microsoft Secure Score and exposure improvement actions by threat relevance, coverage and change feasibility. Then verify: The approved plan first addresses a high-impact identity weakness even if another action offers more points.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Automated response actions can interrupt essential services when applied without impact analysis. The stated symptoms instead indicate that scoring and security value are related but not identical for all enterprise risk contexts.

B:

Reports limited to onboarded devices can undercount unprotected inventory outside the sensor population. The stated symptoms instead indicate that scoring and security value are related but not identical for all enterprise risk contexts.

C:

A bare IP address is insufficient to infer the infrastructure's threat relevance or intent. The stated symptoms instead indicate that scoring and security value are related but not identical for all enterprise risk contexts.

Question 706

An AU contains a dynamic workforce group but newly hired regional staff are missing from the delegated team's scope. What should the administrator do FIRST to correct the problem?

  1. Assign a supported workload-specific administrator role such as Teams Administrator when warranted.
  2. Assign the least-privileged appropriate Microsoft Entra administrative role for authorized password-reset tasks.
  3. Maintain administrative unit membership with the supported rules or approved manual process.
  4. Assign an appropriate Microsoft Defender XDR security role or supported unified RBAC permission set.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The deciding issue is administrative unit scope depends on accurate object membership, not merely branch naming conventions. The action 'Maintain administrative unit membership with the supported rules or approved manual process.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A staged new-hire object appears in the correct AU and delegated admins can operate on it.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Read-only access does not grant role-specific management permissions for collaboration workloads. The problem described here is that administrative unit scope depends on accurate object membership, not merely branch naming conventions.

B:

Global Administrator has far broader powers than routine delegated helpdesk work requires. The problem described here is that administrative unit scope depends on accurate object membership, not merely branch naming conventions.

D:

Defender workload permissions can be narrower than broad Entra directory administration. The problem described here is that administrative unit scope depends on accurate object membership, not merely branch naming conventions.

Question 707

A new contractor needs temporary access to one project and finance proposes creating a full internal employee identity. The administrator proposes: Invite an authorized Microsoft Entra B2B guest and scope the guest to the project resources. What test distinguishes successful remediation from an unrelated improvement?

  1. A reconciliation shows the expected identities with accurate UPNs, departments and manager attributes.
  2. The contractor authenticates with their external identity and cannot access unrelated internal workloads.
  3. A test auditor's message is delivered while an unauthorized address remains blocked as required.
  4. A controlled dry run identifies only the approved offboarding objects and leaves a namesake active.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The administrator plans 'Invite an authorized Microsoft Entra B2B guest and scope the guest to the project resources.' to correct the fact that a guest collaboration model can avoid unnecessary provisioning of internal workforce accounts. The direct acceptance evidence is The contractor authenticates with their external identity and cannot access unrelated internal workloads. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A reconciliation shows the expected identities with accurate UPNs, departments and manager attributes. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the contractor authenticates with their external identity and cannot access unrelated internal workloads.

C:

A test auditor's message is delivered while an unauthorized address remains blocked as required. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the contractor authenticates with their external identity and cannot access unrelated internal workloads.

D:

A controlled dry run identifies only the approved offboarding objects and leaves a namesake active. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the contractor authenticates with their external identity and cannot access unrelated internal workloads.

Question 708

An alert policy reports suspicious outbound mail but responders cannot identify which rule generated the warning. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which failure mechanism best matches the observed facts?

  1. An alert label alone is insufficient to understand why detection logic fired.
  2. Restoring a password does not automatically remove every Defender or Exchange outbound sending restriction.
  3. Threat policies may be scoped to users, groups and domains and require explicit coverage verification.
  4. Unrestricted allowlists can reduce the effectiveness of otherwise enabled mail protection.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The actual failure mechanism is An alert label alone is insufficient to understand why detection logic fired. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by review Defender for Office 365 alert policy details and correlate policy identifiers with the triggered event. Then verify: The analyst links the event to a specific policy condition and affected sending identity.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Restoring a password does not automatically remove every Defender or Exchange outbound sending restriction. The stated symptoms instead indicate that an alert label alone is insufficient to understand why detection logic fired.

C:

Threat policies may be scoped to users, groups and domains and require explicit coverage verification. The stated symptoms instead indicate that an alert label alone is insufficient to understand why detection logic fired.

D:

Unrestricted allowlists can reduce the effectiveness of otherwise enabled mail protection. The stated symptoms instead indicate that an alert label alone is insufficient to understand why detection logic fired.

Question 709

Microsoft Entra Connect reports a duplicate proxyAddress conflict for one synchronized employee and export repeatedly fails. The administrator proposes: Identify the conflicting source object and correct the address uniqueness violation in the authoritative directory. What test distinguishes successful remediation from an unrelated improvement?

  1. The export error clears and the intended recipient retains the unique mail alias.
  2. A pilot verifies the necessary attribute or device behavior with the selected sync topology.
  3. An in-scope employee is created or matched in Entra ID and an eligible password update propagates.
  4. The operator correlates latency spikes with a specific connector or system bottleneck.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Identify the conflicting source object and correct the address uniqueness violation in the authoritative directory.' to correct the fact that export cannot safely assign one proxy address to multiple different recipients. The direct acceptance evidence is The export error clears and the intended recipient retains the unique mail alias. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A pilot verifies the necessary attribute or device behavior with the selected sync topology. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the export error clears and the intended recipient retains the unique mail alias.

C:

An in-scope employee is created or matched in Entra ID and an eligible password update propagates. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the export error clears and the intended recipient retains the unique mail alias.

D:

The operator correlates latency spikes with a specific connector or system bottleneck. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the export error clears and the intended recipient retains the unique mail alias.

Question 710

A remote laptop is reimaged and disappears from Defender reporting because onboarding was performed only once manually. The change owner plans to: Deploy Defender for Endpoint onboarding through a persistent approved endpoint-management policy. Which validation or governance guardrail is best suited to the proposed fix?

  1. Test representative devices before broad security profile changes.
  2. Create exception owners and review automated action outcomes regularly.
  3. Schedule patches with application owner testing and a defined emergency process.
  4. Test duplicate device identities and offboarding of obsolete records.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The specific rollout control is Test duplicate device identities and offboarding of obsolete records. It protects the proposed intervention 'Deploy Defender for Endpoint onboarding through a persistent approved endpoint-management policy.' against the failure mode that one-time manual onboarding is not a reliable fleet lifecycle process for reimaged devices. Success should also be checked through: A newly provisioned laptop automatically reappears in Defender after required policy processing.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Overlapping local and centrally managed security controls can cause conflicting effective settings. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: One-time manual onboarding is not a reliable fleet lifecycle process for reimaged devices. The applicable safeguard is: Test duplicate device identities and offboarding of obsolete records.

B:

Automated endpoint actions can interrupt high-availability or safety-sensitive systems. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: One-time manual onboarding is not a reliable fleet lifecycle process for reimaged devices. The applicable safeguard is: Test duplicate device identities and offboarding of obsolete records.

C:

Raw vulnerability counts do not rank the practical business impact of each exposure. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: One-time manual onboarding is not a reliable fleet lifecycle process for reimaged devices. The applicable safeguard is: Test duplicate device identities and offboarding of obsolete records.