McAfee Secure

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle

Exam Code: MS-102

Exam Name Microsoft 365 Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft 365 Certified: Administrator Expert

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle $44.99
MS-102 Sample 1 MS-102 Sample 2 MS-102 Sample 3 MS-102 Sample 4 MS-102 Sample 5 MS-102 Sample 6 MS-102 Sample 7 MS-102 Sample 8 MS-102 Sample 9 MS-102 Sample 10

100% Microsoft MS-102 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real MS-102 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    MS-102 Questions & Answers

    473 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual MS-102 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • MS-102 Video Course

    MS-102 Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    MS-102 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the MS-102 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft 365 Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    MS-102 Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 298-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace MS-102 exam.

Microsoft 365 Administrator (MS-102) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    473 Questions

    $124.99
  • MS-102 Video Course

    Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft MS-102 Practice Test 78

Question 770

A SOC sees an impossible-travel style anomaly but the app activity log shows a trusted corporate VPN exit point. What should the administrator do FIRST to correct the problem?

  1. Configure Cloud App Discovery through supported network or endpoint signals for the user population.
  2. Configure an appropriate Defender for Cloud Apps activity policy with scoped conditions and alerts.
  3. Interpret Cloud Apps activity and sign-in context before claiming account takeover.
  4. Scope the policy to the approved user, app, activity and sensitivity conditions with appropriate governance.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The deciding issue is network geolocation can be misleading when users share secure remote-access egress infrastructure. The action 'Interpret Cloud Apps activity and sign-in context before claiming account takeover.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: The incident note explains VPN egress and whether any suspicious actions were actually observed.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A Microsoft 365 tenant app list alone cannot enumerate shadow cloud use across endpoints. The problem described here is that network geolocation can be misleading when users share secure remote-access egress infrastructure.

B:

Unspecific manual reporting cannot reliably detect defined high-risk cloud app activity. The problem described here is that network geolocation can be misleading when users share secure remote-access egress infrastructure.

D:

Broad cloud-app control rules can unintentionally interrupt routine business processes. The problem described here is that network geolocation can be misleading when users share secure remote-access egress infrastructure.

Question 771

An administrator performs a Defender XDR isolate-device action without verifying that the target is a critical medical workstation. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which failure mechanism best matches the observed facts?

  1. Alert volume can fall because detection coverage is missing, not because risk disappeared.
  2. Automated response actions can interrupt essential services when applied without impact analysis.
  3. Threat intelligence associations and local confirmed incident behaviors are not interchangeable evidence.
  4. Global indicators can have context and false positives that make unconditional blocking harmful.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The actual failure mechanism is Automated response actions can interrupt essential services when applied without impact analysis. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by use supported incident response actions with asset criticality and business-operations approval. Then verify: An isolated test endpoint stops unauthorized traffic while approved emergency access remains available.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Alert volume can fall because detection coverage is missing, not because risk disappeared. The stated symptoms instead indicate that automated response actions can interrupt essential services when applied without impact analysis.

C:

Threat intelligence associations and local confirmed incident behaviors are not interchangeable evidence. The stated symptoms instead indicate that automated response actions can interrupt essential services when applied without impact analysis.

D:

Global indicators can have context and false positives that make unconditional blocking harmful. The stated symptoms instead indicate that automated response actions can interrupt essential services when applied without impact analysis.

Question 772

A factory sends sensitive source files to a required print workflow but Endpoint DLP blocks all printing and production halts. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which failure mechanism best matches the observed facts?

  1. A DLP alert is not conclusive proof that exfiltration succeeded.
  2. Power BI data flows and semantic models have distinct DLP capabilities and prerequisites.
  3. Overbroad endpoint actions can interrupt legitimate operating procedures.
  4. DLP policies target supported workload locations; SharePoint scope does not automatically include Teams chat.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The actual failure mechanism is Overbroad endpoint actions can interrupt legitimate operating procedures. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by scope Endpoint DLP activity restrictions and controlled business exceptions to the actual data risk. Then verify: A verified permitted print path works while unauthorized sensitive document printing remains blocked.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A DLP alert is not conclusive proof that exfiltration succeeded. The stated symptoms instead indicate that overbroad endpoint actions can interrupt legitimate operating procedures.

B:

Power BI data flows and semantic models have distinct DLP capabilities and prerequisites. The stated symptoms instead indicate that overbroad endpoint actions can interrupt legitimate operating procedures.

D:

DLP policies target supported workload locations; SharePoint scope does not automatically include Teams chat. The stated symptoms instead indicate that overbroad endpoint actions can interrupt legitimate operating procedures.

Question 773

A synchronized user appears twice in Entra ID after a migration because an existing cloud identity did not match the source anchor. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which failure mechanism best matches the observed facts?

  1. Cloud Sync and Connect Sync differ in supported topology and feature capabilities.
  2. Ambiguous source anchor or account matching can create duplicates during hybrid identity onboarding.
  3. Single-agent topology can make cloud synchronization dependent on one server's availability.
  4. Source-authoritative attributes can overwrite or prevent cloud-side manual changes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The actual failure mechanism is Ambiguous source anchor or account matching can create duplicates during hybrid identity onboarding. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by investigate hard or soft matching using supported identifiers and repair identity join issues safely. Then verify: The corrected sync yields one intended cloud identity with preserved authorized service associations.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Cloud Sync and Connect Sync differ in supported topology and feature capabilities. The stated symptoms instead indicate that ambiguous source anchor or account matching can create duplicates during hybrid identity onboarding.

C:

Single-agent topology can make cloud synchronization dependent on one server's availability. The stated symptoms instead indicate that ambiguous source anchor or account matching can create duplicates during hybrid identity onboarding.

D:

Source-authoritative attributes can overwrite or prevent cloud-side manual changes. The stated symptoms instead indicate that ambiguous source anchor or account matching can create duplicates during hybrid identity onboarding.

Question 774

An account signs in through a browser but the same user's legacy desktop client fails after modern-auth enforcement. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which failure mechanism best matches the observed facts?

  1. An enabled cloud identity does not automatically imply SSPR is licensed and configured.
  2. Different client authentication protocols can produce different access outcomes for the same identity.
  3. Banned password checking reduces guessing risk but cannot replace multi-factor protection.
  4. SSPR is a cloud recovery process whose eligibility depends on policy, not only office LAN access.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The actual failure mechanism is Different client authentication protocols can produce different access outcomes for the same identity. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by investigate application protocol support and sign-in logs before changing the user's account status. Then verify: The supported updated client signs in using an approved modern flow while the legacy client stays blocked.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An enabled cloud identity does not automatically imply SSPR is licensed and configured. The stated symptoms instead indicate that different client authentication protocols can produce different access outcomes for the same identity.

C:

Banned password checking reduces guessing risk but cannot replace multi-factor protection. The stated symptoms instead indicate that different client authentication protocols can produce different access outcomes for the same identity.

D:

SSPR is a cloud recovery process whose eligibility depends on policy, not only office LAN access. The stated symptoms instead indicate that different client authentication protocols can produce different access outcomes for the same identity.

Question 775

A suspicious message is delivered to hundreds of recipients and support manually deletes one copy from a single mailbox. What should the administrator do FIRST to correct the problem?

  1. Use Defender for Office 365 Threat Explorer or supported investigation to scope and remediate the campaign.
  2. Use supported Defender attack simulation payload and landing-page configuration approved by the organization.
  3. Review Microsoft Defender attack simulation outcomes including user reporting and remediation learning.
  4. Configure Defender for Office 365 anti-phishing impersonation protection using supported identity and domain intelligence.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The deciding issue is a single deleted email does not remove other copies of the same phishing campaign. The action 'Use Defender for Office 365 Threat Explorer or supported investigation to scope and remediate the campaign.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: The investigation finds affected recipients and tracks authorized mail remediation status.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Phishing simulations must not expose passwords to uncontrolled third-party services. The problem described here is that a single deleted email does not remove other copies of the same phishing campaign.

C:

Click totals alone do not capture security reporting behavior or learning progress. The problem described here is that a single deleted email does not remove other copies of the same phishing campaign.

D:

SPF authorization alone cannot establish that a display name represents the claimed executive. The problem described here is that a single deleted email does not remove other copies of the same phishing campaign.

Question 776

An automation script invokes old AzureAD PowerShell cmdlets that are unsupported in the tenant's managed environment. The administrator proposes: Migrate approved directory automation to current supported Microsoft Graph PowerShell or Entra PowerShell operations. What test distinguishes successful remediation from an unrelated improvement?

  1. A read-only validation lists the intended users and a test write completes with scoped permissions.
  2. A sample message resolves the supplier contact and no unnecessary Microsoft 365 license is allocated.
  3. A pilot group exposes its supported shared calendar and SharePoint workspace to approved members.
  4. A pilot user receives the planned Teams entitlement after the correct supported service plan is enabled.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Migrate approved directory automation to current supported Microsoft Graph PowerShell or Entra PowerShell operations.' to correct the fact that deprecated modules or command families may not support modern Microsoft Entra administration. The direct acceptance evidence is A read-only validation lists the intended users and a test write completes with scoped permissions. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A sample message resolves the supplier contact and no unnecessary Microsoft 365 license is allocated. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a read-only validation lists the intended users and a test write completes with scoped permissions.

C:

A pilot group exposes its supported shared calendar and SharePoint workspace to approved members. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a read-only validation lists the intended users and a test write completes with scoped permissions.

D:

A pilot user receives the planned Teams entitlement after the correct supported service plan is enabled. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a read-only validation lists the intended users and a test write completes with scoped permissions.

Question 777

A Teams operator needs to manage Teams calling settings but cannot see the controls with a general Reader role. The administrator proposes: Assign a supported workload-specific administrator role such as Teams Administrator when warranted. What test distinguishes successful remediation from an unrelated improvement?

  1. Effective permission testing matches the designated incident response duties without unexpected broad powers.
  2. The investigation identifies the actor, activation time, justification and approval record where captured.
  3. The operator changes the approved Teams setting without acquiring unrelated Exchange or tenant Global Admin rights.
  4. A staged new-hire object appears in the correct AU and delegated admins can operate on it.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The administrator plans 'Assign a supported workload-specific administrator role such as Teams Administrator when warranted.' to correct the fact that read-only access does not grant role-specific management permissions for collaboration workloads. The direct acceptance evidence is The operator changes the approved Teams setting without acquiring unrelated Exchange or tenant Global Admin rights. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Effective permission testing matches the designated incident response duties without unexpected broad powers. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the operator changes the approved Teams setting without acquiring unrelated Exchange or tenant Global Admin rights.

B:

The investigation identifies the actor, activation time, justification and approval record where captured. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the operator changes the approved Teams setting without acquiring unrelated Exchange or tenant Global Admin rights.

D:

A staged new-hire object appears in the correct AU and delegated admins can operate on it. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the operator changes the approved Teams setting without acquiring unrelated Exchange or tenant Global Admin rights.

Question 778

A SOC analyst finds an unfamiliar malware indicator but treats the filename alone as definitive proof of a specific threat actor. The change owner plans to: Use Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence context to assess indicators and associated campaigns before attribution. Which validation or governance guardrail is best suited to the proposed fix?

  1. Respect intelligence confidence levels and corroborate with observed local telemetry.
  2. Compare common time windows and detection rule changes before claiming a security trend.
  3. Set query time windows, role permissions and safe evidence handling before large hunts.
  4. Do not isolate production assets solely from risk scoring without response criteria.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The specific rollout control is Respect intelligence confidence levels and corroborate with observed local telemetry. It protects the proposed intervention 'Use Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence context to assess indicators and associated campaigns before attribution.' against the failure mode that a shared indicator can occur in unrelated activity and does not alone establish adversary identity. Success should also be checked through: The incident report distinguishes indicator confidence from confirmed malicious behavior and actor attribution.

Incorrect Answers

B:

An increase in detections can represent improved visibility or attack volume rather than failed protection. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: A shared indicator can occur in unrelated activity and does not alone establish adversary identity. The applicable safeguard is: Respect intelligence confidence levels and corroborate with observed local telemetry.

C:

Incident summaries may omit the detailed event relationships required for broad threat scoping. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: A shared indicator can occur in unrelated activity and does not alone establish adversary identity. The applicable safeguard is: Respect intelligence confidence levels and corroborate with observed local telemetry.

D:

Security exposure posture evaluates potential risk, whereas incidents describe observed malicious activity. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: A shared indicator can occur in unrelated activity and does not alone establish adversary identity. The applicable safeguard is: Respect intelligence confidence levels and corroborate with observed local telemetry.

Question 779

A tenant's security team focuses only on vulnerability counts and ignores exposure paths linking privileged users to risky endpoints. The administrator proposes: Use Microsoft Security Exposure Management insights to investigate critical assets and attack paths. What test distinguishes successful remediation from an unrelated improvement?

  1. The coverage report identifies unmanaged endpoints instead of implying they have passed protection checks.
  2. The committee receives trend reports while a separate alerting route handles timely critical incidents.
  3. The report shows blocked malicious mail increased while confirmed compromise outcomes remained limited.
  4. The team identifies a concrete exposure path and documents the control that removes its highest-risk link.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The administrator plans 'Use Microsoft Security Exposure Management insights to investigate critical assets and attack paths.' to correct the fact that security exposure is driven by exploitable relationships and asset importance, not raw finding totals alone. The direct acceptance evidence is The team identifies a concrete exposure path and documents the control that removes its highest-risk link. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The coverage report identifies unmanaged endpoints instead of implying they have passed protection checks. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the team identifies a concrete exposure path and documents the control that removes its highest-risk link.

B:

The committee receives trend reports while a separate alerting route handles timely critical incidents. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the team identifies a concrete exposure path and documents the control that removes its highest-risk link.

C:

The report shows blocked malicious mail increased while confirmed compromise outcomes remained limited. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the team identifies a concrete exposure path and documents the control that removes its highest-risk link.

Question 780

Remote workers cannot reset forgotten Microsoft 365 passwords without calling the helpdesk even though cloud sign-in is available. The administrator proposes: Enable Microsoft Entra self-service password reset for authorized users with supported authentication methods. What test distinguishes successful remediation from an unrelated improvement?

  1. A pilot employee completes the SSPR workflow and signs in with the new password.
  2. The log identifies the specific policy or registration requirement that caused the challenge.
  3. A worker completes permitted sign-in using an approved passwordless credential without exposing a shared secret.
  4. A permitted cross-tenant test succeeds while unapproved partners remain denied.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Enable Microsoft Entra self-service password reset for authorized users with supported authentication methods.' to correct the fact that an enabled cloud identity does not automatically imply SSPR is licensed and configured. The direct acceptance evidence is A pilot employee completes the SSPR workflow and signs in with the new password. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The log identifies the specific policy or registration requirement that caused the challenge. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a pilot employee completes the SSPR workflow and signs in with the new password.

C:

A worker completes permitted sign-in using an approved passwordless credential without exposing a shared secret. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a pilot employee completes the SSPR workflow and signs in with the new password.

D:

A permitted cross-tenant test succeeds while unapproved partners remain denied. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a pilot employee completes the SSPR workflow and signs in with the new password.