McAfee Secure

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle

Exam Code: MS-102

Exam Name Microsoft 365 Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft 365 Certified: Administrator Expert

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle $44.99
MS-102 Sample 1 MS-102 Sample 2 MS-102 Sample 3 MS-102 Sample 4 MS-102 Sample 5 MS-102 Sample 6 MS-102 Sample 7 MS-102 Sample 8 MS-102 Sample 9 MS-102 Sample 10

100% Microsoft MS-102 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real MS-102 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    MS-102 Questions & Answers

    473 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual MS-102 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • MS-102 Video Course

    MS-102 Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    MS-102 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the MS-102 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft 365 Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    MS-102 Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 298-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace MS-102 exam.

Microsoft 365 Administrator (MS-102) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    473 Questions

    $124.99
  • MS-102 Video Course

    Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft MS-102 Practice Test 79

Question 780

Remote workers cannot reset forgotten Microsoft 365 passwords without calling the helpdesk even though cloud sign-in is available. The administrator proposes: Enable Microsoft Entra self-service password reset for authorized users with supported authentication methods. What test distinguishes successful remediation from an unrelated improvement?

  1. A pilot employee completes the SSPR workflow and signs in with the new password.
  2. The log identifies the specific policy or registration requirement that caused the challenge.
  3. A worker completes permitted sign-in using an approved passwordless credential without exposing a shared secret.
  4. A permitted cross-tenant test succeeds while unapproved partners remain denied.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Enable Microsoft Entra self-service password reset for authorized users with supported authentication methods.' to correct the fact that an enabled cloud identity does not automatically imply SSPR is licensed and configured. The direct acceptance evidence is A pilot employee completes the SSPR workflow and signs in with the new password. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The log identifies the specific policy or registration requirement that caused the challenge. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a pilot employee completes the SSPR workflow and signs in with the new password.

C:

A worker completes permitted sign-in using an approved passwordless credential without exposing a shared secret. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a pilot employee completes the SSPR workflow and signs in with the new password.

D:

A permitted cross-tenant test succeeds while unapproved partners remain denied. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a pilot employee completes the SSPR workflow and signs in with the new password.

Question 781

After a certificate renewal, Cloud Sync agents show registration errors but the team resets every cloud user's password. What should the administrator do FIRST to correct the problem?

  1. Design a supported multi-forest object matching and synchronization approach for the documented identity topology.
  2. Troubleshoot agent registration, outbound connectivity and service configuration for the failing Cloud Sync agent.
  3. Identify and resolve duplicate mail and proxyAddress attributes before directory synchronization.
  4. Evaluate Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync agents and configuration for its supported directory topology and requirements.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deciding issue is an agent-to-service communication failure is distinct from user password quality or sign-in status. The action 'Troubleshoot agent registration, outbound connectivity and service configuration for the failing Cloud Sync agent.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: Agent health returns to normal and a controlled source attribute change arrives in the cloud.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Identity matching across complex forests requires explicit supported topology and join rules. The problem described here is that an agent-to-service communication failure is distinct from user password quality or sign-in status.

C:

A unique mail routing address cannot be reliably assigned to two separate synchronized recipients. That concern does not account for the stated failure: An agent-to-service communication failure is distinct from user password quality or sign-in status. The relevant design change is: Troubleshoot agent registration, outbound connectivity and service configuration for the failing Cloud Sync agent.

D:

Cloud Sync and Connect Sync differ in supported topology and feature capabilities. The problem described here is that an agent-to-service communication failure is distinct from user password quality or sign-in status.

Question 782

A security manager reads a low Microsoft Secure Score and assumes the score automatically applies every recommended tenant configuration. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which failure mechanism best matches the observed facts?

  1. A shared indicator can occur in unrelated activity and does not alone establish adversary identity.
  2. External threat intelligence gains operational value only when matched to actual enterprise exposure.
  3. Current incident status is not equivalent to the full historical incident workload.
  4. Secure Score reports posture improvement opportunities but is not an automatic remediation engine.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The actual failure mechanism is Secure Score reports posture improvement opportunities but is not an automatic remediation engine. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by review Microsoft Secure Score improvement actions and implement prioritized approved hardening changes. Then verify: A targeted security control changes state and its improvement action is evidenced in the updated score.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A shared indicator can occur in unrelated activity and does not alone establish adversary identity. The stated symptoms instead indicate that secure Score reports posture improvement opportunities but is not an automatic remediation engine.

B:

External threat intelligence gains operational value only when matched to actual enterprise exposure. The stated symptoms instead indicate that secure Score reports posture improvement opportunities but is not an automatic remediation engine.

C:

Current incident status is not equivalent to the full historical incident workload. The stated symptoms instead indicate that secure Score reports posture improvement opportunities but is not an automatic remediation engine.

Question 783

A business creates a retention policy requiring deletion after two years but legal hold applies to some of the same emails. The administrator proposes: Evaluate Microsoft Purview retention principles and applicable hold priority before configuring disposal. What test distinguishes successful remediation from an unrelated improvement?

  1. A held test message remains preserved according to legal requirements despite the ordinary deletion schedule.
  2. A seeded patient identifier matches under its expected context while ordinary phone numbers produce fewer false positives.
  3. A normal user applies published labels while only an approved compliance role manages publication.
  4. An authorized explorer finds the expected sensitivity-classified SharePoint location without revealing unnecessary document bodies.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Evaluate Microsoft Purview retention principles and applicable hold priority before configuring disposal.' to correct the fact that competing retention and hold requirements cannot be reduced to one simple earliest-delete timer. The direct acceptance evidence is A held test message remains preserved according to legal requirements despite the ordinary deletion schedule. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A seeded patient identifier matches under its expected context while ordinary phone numbers produce fewer false positives. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a held test message remains preserved according to legal requirements despite the ordinary deletion schedule.

C:

A normal user applies published labels while only an approved compliance role manages publication. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a held test message remains preserved according to legal requirements despite the ordinary deletion schedule.

D:

An authorized explorer finds the expected sensitivity-classified SharePoint location without revealing unnecessary document bodies. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a held test message remains preserved according to legal requirements despite the ordinary deletion schedule.

Question 784

An admin sees user complaints immediately after a service advisory is resolved and closes the ticket without validating recovery. The administrator proposes: Use Service health incident status together with representative workload acceptance tests before closing an incident. What test distinguishes successful remediation from an unrelated improvement?

  1. Accounting add-ins pass acceptance tests in the pilot and the deployed build matches the approved version.
  2. The post-training report shows an attributable increase in active collaborative actions, not merely authentication.
  3. Mail, meetings and sign-in test cases pass after the provider reports the service restored.
  4. The tenant organization profile displays approved support contacts and newly issued notices use intended branding.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The administrator plans 'Use Service health incident status together with representative workload acceptance tests before closing an incident.' to correct the fact that a provider resolution notice does not prove all customer-side configuration and client dependencies have recovered. The direct acceptance evidence is Mail, meetings and sign-in test cases pass after the provider reports the service restored. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Accounting add-ins pass acceptance tests in the pilot and the deployed build matches the approved version. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: mail, meetings and sign-in test cases pass after the provider reports the service restored.

B:

The post-training report shows an attributable increase in active collaborative actions, not merely authentication. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: mail, meetings and sign-in test cases pass after the provider reports the service restored.

D:

The tenant organization profile displays approved support contacts and newly issued notices use intended branding. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: mail, meetings and sign-in test cases pass after the provider reports the service restored.

Question 785

A user has registered the Microsoft Authenticator app but sign-in still falls back to password-only because no enforcing policy applies. The administrator proposes: Configure authentication method availability and a supported access policy requiring the intended factor. What test distinguishes successful remediation from an unrelated improvement?

  1. A staged password change rejects variants of the restricted organizational terms.
  2. The log identifies the specific policy or registration requirement that caused the challenge.
  3. The test sign-in invokes an approved verification method and blocks password-only completion.
  4. The investigation isolates actual risky accounts and confirms benign traffic does not trigger mass remediation.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The administrator plans 'Configure authentication method availability and a supported access policy requiring the intended factor.' to correct the fact that authentication method registration alone does not require using MFA for every application. The direct acceptance evidence is The test sign-in invokes an approved verification method and blocks password-only completion. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A staged password change rejects variants of the restricted organizational terms. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the test sign-in invokes an approved verification method and blocks password-only completion.

B:

The log identifies the specific policy or registration requirement that caused the challenge. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the test sign-in invokes an approved verification method and blocks password-only completion.

D:

The investigation isolates actual risky accounts and confirms benign traffic does not trigger mass remediation. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the test sign-in invokes an approved verification method and blocks password-only completion.

Question 786

Procurement believes assigning more Microsoft 365 licenses than purchased simply queues users for future entitlement. The administrator proposes: Check available SKU quantities and resolve licensing failures before provisioning eligible users. What test distinguishes successful remediation from an unrelated improvement?

  1. The contractor authenticates with their external identity and cannot access unrelated internal workloads.
  2. A pilot group exposes its supported shared calendar and SharePoint workspace to approved members.
  3. The guest cannot access the project app, document library or Teams resource after revocation.
  4. The assignment report shows no failed entitlements and purchased capacity covers the active population.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The administrator plans 'Check available SKU quantities and resolve licensing failures before provisioning eligible users.' to correct the fact that license allocation is constrained by purchased capacity and supported assignment rules. The direct acceptance evidence is The assignment report shows no failed entitlements and purchased capacity covers the active population. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The contractor authenticates with their external identity and cannot access unrelated internal workloads. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the assignment report shows no failed entitlements and purchased capacity covers the active population.

B:

A pilot group exposes its supported shared calendar and SharePoint workspace to approved members. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the assignment report shows no failed entitlements and purchased capacity covers the active population.

C:

The guest cannot access the project app, document library or Teams resource after revocation. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the assignment report shows no failed entitlements and purchased capacity covers the active population.

Question 787

A SaaS application is marked unsanctioned in Defender for Cloud Apps but continues to appear in endpoint network traces. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which failure mechanism best matches the observed facts?

  1. Marking an app unsanctioned does not guarantee all devices or network paths are immediately blocked.
  2. Unspecific manual reporting cannot reliably detect defined high-risk cloud app activity.
  3. Unsupported or malformed traffic logs do not yield reliable app identification.
  4. Activity logging coverage is bounded by product retention, permissions and available connectors.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The actual failure mechanism is Marking an app unsanctioned does not guarantee all devices or network paths are immediately blocked. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by investigate the supported enforcement integration and endpoint coverage for unsanctioned applications. Then verify: A covered endpoint receives the intended blocking indicator while unsupported devices are identified separately.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Unspecific manual reporting cannot reliably detect defined high-risk cloud app activity. The stated symptoms instead indicate that marking an app unsanctioned does not guarantee all devices or network paths are immediately blocked.

C:

Unsupported or malformed traffic logs do not yield reliable app identification. The stated symptoms instead indicate that marking an app unsanctioned does not guarantee all devices or network paths are immediately blocked.

D:

Activity logging coverage is bounded by product retention, permissions and available connectors. The stated symptoms instead indicate that marking an app unsanctioned does not guarantee all devices or network paths are immediately blocked.

Question 788

Security operations closes a confirmed compromised account incident but leaves the risky user state unresolved in Entra. What should the administrator do FIRST to correct the problem?

  1. Use supported workload identity policies and exclude or redesign noninteractive flows from user interactive conditions.
  2. Complete supported risk remediation or administrator confirmation workflows after a verified investigation.
  3. Plan a staged compliant-device policy using report-only data and a documented remediation path.
  4. Remediate authentication method registration and use time-limited exception procedures instead of permanent blanket exclusions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deciding issue is incident closure in a separate portal does not necessarily clear the directory's risk state. The action 'Complete supported risk remediation or administrator confirmation workflows after a verified investigation.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: The risk record is resolved with attributable evidence and new sign-ins meet protected policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

User-focused interactive Conditional Access can affect service principals differently from human sign-in flows. The problem described here is that incident closure in a separate portal does not necessarily clear the directory's risk state.

C:

A technically correct device requirement can disrupt operations when endpoint readiness is unknown. The problem described here is that incident closure in a separate portal does not necessarily clear the directory's risk state.

D:

Permanent exclusions create access paths that no longer enforce the intended MFA requirement. The problem described here is that incident closure in a separate portal does not necessarily clear the directory's risk state.

Question 789

A company imports external supplier phone and email details as internal users solely for directory discoverability. The change owner plans to: Use mail contacts for external directory recipients that do not require login or hosted mailboxes. Which validation or governance guardrail is best suited to the proposed fix?

  1. Check UPN suffix availability and dependent workload implications before changes.
  2. Validate external email routing and anti-spoofing controls for the contact domain.
  3. Choose privacy and guest access settings before inviting external participants.
  4. Account for trial expiry, guest policies and service-specific licensing prerequisites.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The specific rollout control is Validate external email routing and anti-spoofing controls for the contact domain. It protects the proposed intervention 'Use mail contacts for external directory recipients that do not require login or hosted mailboxes.' against the failure mode that creating user principals for address-only contacts introduces needless identity and license exposure. Success should also be checked through: A sample message resolves the supplier contact and no unnecessary Microsoft 365 license is allocated.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Cloud-only edits to source-authoritative synchronized attributes may be overwritten or blocked. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Creating user principals for address-only contacts introduces needless identity and license exposure. The applicable safeguard is: Validate external email routing and anti-spoofing controls for the contact domain.

C:

A distribution list provides mail distribution, not the full Microsoft 365 Group collaboration experience. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Creating user principals for address-only contacts introduces needless identity and license exposure. The applicable safeguard is: Validate external email routing and anti-spoofing controls for the contact domain.

D:

License allocation is constrained by purchased capacity and supported assignment rules. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Creating user principals for address-only contacts introduces needless identity and license exposure. The applicable safeguard is: Validate external email routing and anti-spoofing controls for the contact domain.

Question 790

An analyst sees Endpoint DLP events from a laptop but cannot determine whether upload blocking was enforced or merely audited. The change owner plans to: Review Endpoint DLP policy mode and activity-action configuration for the detected upload operation. Which validation or governance guardrail is best suited to the proposed fix?

  1. Begin in audit or test mode and review false positives with data owners before enforcing.
  2. Use a staged deployment and verify permitted business transfers before moving to block.
  3. Preserve relevant audit evidence and restrict access to exposed sensitive content.
  4. Validate supported Copilot locations, permissions, and sensitivity-label integration before broad rollout.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The specific rollout control is Use a staged deployment and verify permitted business transfers before moving to block. It protects the proposed intervention 'Review Endpoint DLP policy mode and activity-action configuration for the detected upload operation.' against the failure mode that endpoint DLP telemetry can record activities even when enforcement is in audit mode. Success should also be checked through: A controlled upload produces the intended policy action and an event with the correct disposition.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Simple broad text matches can produce false positives that reduce DLP usability. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Endpoint DLP telemetry can record activities even when enforcement is in audit mode. The applicable safeguard is: Use a staged deployment and verify permitted business transfers before moving to block.

C:

A DLP alert is not conclusive proof that exfiltration succeeded. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Endpoint DLP telemetry can record activities even when enforcement is in audit mode. The applicable safeguard is: Use a staged deployment and verify permitted business transfers before moving to block.

D:

AI-assisted collaboration does not automatically exempt accessible data from protection policy. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Endpoint DLP telemetry can record activities even when enforcement is in audit mode. The applicable safeguard is: Use a staged deployment and verify permitted business transfers before moving to block.