McAfee Secure

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-300

Exam Name Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle $44.99

100% Microsoft SC-300 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-300 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-300 Questions & Answers

    490 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-300 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-300 Video Course

    SC-300 Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    SC-300 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-300 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-300 Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 599-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace SC-300 exam.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    490 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-300 Video Course

    Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 35

Question 340

An identity engineer has two independent tasks. Task 1: A vendor's SaaS application supports SAML SSO and company users must authenticate through Microsoft Entra. Task 2: A team manages 70 enterprise applications and needs a curated app catalog without changing individual app authorization. Which TWO configuration changes jointly meet both tasks?

  1. Configure the SaaS enterprise application's SAML SSO identifiers, reply URL, signing certificate and claims mapping
  2. Use Microsoft Entra enterprise app provisioning logs filtered by the application and target user
  3. Publish the supported web app with Microsoft Entra Application Proxy connectors and assign the intended users
  4. Stage the new SAML certificate and coordinate SP-side trust changes before switching the active signing certificate
  5. Build Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

Correct for task 1. Configure the SaaS enterprise application's SAML SSO identifiers, reply URL, signing certificate and claims mapping. This directly addresses the first requirement: A vendor's SaaS application supports SAML SSO and company users must authenticate through Microsoft Entra. Verify it by checking: The vendor accepts the signed assertion for an assigned employee and rejects a mismatched audience.

E:

Correct for task 2. Build Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps. This addresses the independent second requirement: A team manages 70 enterprise applications and needs a curated app catalog without changing individual app authorization. Verify it by checking: Users see the curated application collection while their actual access remains governed by each app's assignment.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The analyst searched only interactive user sign-in logs instead of provisioning logs. To satisfy task 1, use: Configure the SaaS enterprise application's SAML SSO identifiers, reply URL, signing certificate and claims mapping. For task 2, use: Build Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps.

C:

The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint. To satisfy task 1, use: Configure the SaaS enterprise application's SAML SSO identifiers, reply URL, signing certificate and claims mapping. For task 2, use: Build Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps.

D:

The signing certificate was activated before the service provider trusted its public key. To satisfy task 1, use: Configure the SaaS enterprise application's SAML SSO identifiers, reply URL, signing certificate and claims mapping. For task 2, use: Build Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps.

Question 341

After a deployment under this requirement — A vendor's SaaS application supports SAML SSO and company users must authenticate through Microsoft Entra — administrators claim the following solution is in place: Configure the SaaS enterprise application's SAML SSO identifiers, reply URL, signing certificate and claims mapping. Which pilot finding supports that claim?

  1. The vendor accepts the signed assertion for an assigned employee and rejects a mismatched audience
  2. An assigned test user provisions to the vendor; removal leads to the expected deprovisioning behavior
  3. Directly assigned users and supported directly assigned group members sign in; an unassigned or nested-only employee is denied
  4. The SaaS trusts the active signature after rollover and authentication does not fail from unknown-signature errors

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct acceptance check. The vendor accepts the signed assertion for an assigned employee and rejects a mismatched audience. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Even if configuring automatic provisioning on the enterprise application succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The vendor accepts the signed assertion for an assigned employee and rejects a mismatched audience.

C:

Even if setting User assignment required to Yes succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The vendor accepts the signed assertion for an assigned employee and rejects a mismatched audience.

D:

Even if staging the new SAML certificate succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The vendor accepts the signed assertion for an assigned employee and rejects a mismatched audience.

Question 342

A change appears correct at a glance, but the requirement is still unmet: A vendor's SaaS application supports SAML SSO and company users must authenticate through Microsoft Entra. The key observed symptom is: The vendor returns an invalid audience error after Entra signs the assertion. Which cause should be investigated first?

  1. The SAML audience/identifier configured in Entra does not match the SaaS service provider
  2. The SCIM provisioning connection secret is invalid or the connector is in a failed provisioning cycle
  3. The signing certificate was activated before the service provider trusted its public key
  4. The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct diagnosis. The SAML audience/identifier configured in Entra does not match the SaaS service provider. This fault explains the observed failure: The vendor returns an invalid audience error after Entra signs the assertion. The intended configuration would instead be: Configure the SaaS enterprise application's SAML SSO identifiers, reply URL, signing certificate and claims mapping.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The SCIM provisioning connection secret is invalid or the connector is in a failed provisioning cycle. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The SAML audience/identifier configured in Entra does not match the SaaS service provider. The corrective action is: Configure the SaaS enterprise application's SAML SSO identifiers, reply URL, signing certificate and claims mapping.

C:

The signing certificate was activated before the service provider trusted its public key. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The SAML audience/identifier configured in Entra does not match the SaaS service provider. The corrective action is: Configure the SaaS enterprise application's SAML SSO identifiers, reply URL, signing certificate and claims mapping.

D:

The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The SAML audience/identifier configured in Entra does not match the SaaS service provider. The corrective action is: Configure the SaaS enterprise application's SAML SSO identifiers, reply URL, signing certificate and claims mapping.

Question 343

The security architect is given this constraint: An on-premises browser app must be made accessible to authorized remote workers without opening inbound firewall ports. Which technical approach meets it without relying on unrelated controls?

  1. Publish the supported web app with Microsoft Entra Application Proxy connectors and assign the intended users
  2. Build Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps
  3. Set User assignment required to Yes, approve administrator consent as needed, and assign permitted users or direct members of supported groups to the enterprise app or app roles; do not assume nested-group inheritance
  4. Configure Microsoft Entra Application Proxy with the appropriate preauthentication and Kerberos Constrained Delegation setup

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct implementation. Publish the supported web app with Microsoft Entra Application Proxy connectors and assign the intended users. It meets the stated requirement: An on-premises browser app must be made accessible to authorized remote workers without opening inbound firewall ports. Acceptance evidence is: An authorized remote employee opens the published external URL and a nonassigned employee is denied.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Admins used application collection membership as if it granted access to the underlying app. That condition is not the problem here: The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint. The targeted implementation is: Publish the supported web app with Microsoft Entra Application Proxy connectors and assign the intended users.

C:

Assignment required was disabled, or a nested-only user was incorrectly assumed to inherit parent-group app assignment. That condition is not the problem here: The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint. The targeted implementation is: Publish the supported web app with Microsoft Entra Application Proxy connectors and assign the intended users.

D:

The connector's KCD/service principal name or delegation configuration is incomplete. That condition is not the problem here: The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint. The targeted implementation is: Publish the supported web app with Microsoft Entra Application Proxy connectors and assign the intended users.

Question 344

The team implemented the following change: Publish the supported web app with Microsoft Entra Application Proxy connectors and assign the intended users. The acceptance requirement was: An on-premises browser app must be made accessible to authorized remote workers without opening inbound firewall ports. Which observed outcome most directly proves the change works?

  1. An employee gains only the intended SaaS application role while directory admin privileges stay unchanged
  2. A standard employee cannot grant a prohibited scope and an approved request can be reviewed by an authorized admin
  3. An authorized remote employee opens the published external URL and a nonassigned employee is denied
  4. Directly assigned users and supported directly assigned group members sign in; an unassigned or nested-only employee is denied

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. An authorized remote employee opens the published external URL and a nonassigned employee is denied. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if mapping the enterprise application's own app roles/group assignments to the SaaS authorization model succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An authorized remote employee opens the published external URL and a nonassigned employee is denied.

B:

Even if configuring tenant user-consent settings succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An authorized remote employee opens the published external URL and a nonassigned employee is denied.

D:

Even if setting User assignment required to Yes succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An authorized remote employee opens the published external URL and a nonassigned employee is denied.

Question 345

The service desk escalates the following unsuccessful identity rollout. Requirement: An on-premises browser app must be made accessible to authorized remote workers without opening inbound firewall ports. Observed: The external authentication works but the connector reports backend unavailability. Which underlying misconfiguration is most consistent?

  1. The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments
  2. The support account has only a reader role and lacks app management permissions
  3. The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint
  4. The connector's KCD/service principal name or delegation configuration is incomplete

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint. This fault explains the observed failure: The external authentication works but the connector reports backend unavailability. The intended configuration would instead be: Publish the supported web app with Microsoft Entra Application Proxy connectors and assign the intended users.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint. The corrective action is: Publish the supported web app with Microsoft Entra Application Proxy connectors and assign the intended users.

B:

The support account has only a reader role and lacks app management permissions. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint. The corrective action is: Publish the supported web app with Microsoft Entra Application Proxy connectors and assign the intended users.

D:

The connector's KCD/service principal name or delegation configuration is incomplete. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint. The corrective action is: Publish the supported web app with Microsoft Entra Application Proxy connectors and assign the intended users.

Question 346

Which implementation fits the following specific identity problem? An enterprise application should accept only the people selected by its owner, not every tenant member by default.

  1. Use Microsoft Entra enterprise app provisioning logs filtered by the application and target user
  2. Assign the least-privileged supported application administration role or application ownership as appropriate
  3. Set User assignment required to Yes, approve administrator consent as needed, and assign permitted users or direct members of supported groups to the enterprise app or app roles; do not assume nested-group inheritance
  4. Assign the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users and verify licensing; nested group membership does not inherit enterprise application assignments

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct implementation. Set User assignment required to Yes, approve administrator consent as needed, and assign permitted users or direct members of supported groups to the enterprise app or app roles; do not assume nested-group inheritance. It meets the stated requirement: An enterprise application should accept only the people selected by its owner, not every tenant member by default. Acceptance evidence is: Directly assigned users and supported directly assigned group members sign in; an unassigned or nested-only employee is denied.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The analyst searched only interactive user sign-in logs instead of provisioning logs. That condition is not the problem here: Assignment required was disabled, or a nested-only user was incorrectly assumed to inherit parent-group app assignment. The targeted implementation is: Set User assignment required to Yes, approve administrator consent as needed, and assign permitted users or direct members of supported groups to the enterprise app or app roles; do not assume nested-group inheritance.

B:

The support account has only a reader role and lacks app management permissions. That condition is not the problem here: Assignment required was disabled, or a nested-only user was incorrectly assumed to inherit parent-group app assignment. The targeted implementation is: Set User assignment required to Yes, approve administrator consent as needed, and assign permitted users or direct members of supported groups to the enterprise app or app roles; do not assume nested-group inheritance.

D:

The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments. That condition is not the problem here: Assignment required was disabled, or a nested-only user was incorrectly assumed to inherit parent-group app assignment. The targeted implementation is: Set User assignment required to Yes, approve administrator consent as needed, and assign permitted users or direct members of supported groups to the enterprise app or app roles; do not assume nested-group inheritance.

Question 347

An auditor must verify this deployment decision: Set User assignment required to Yes, approve administrator consent as needed, and assign permitted users or direct members of supported groups to the enterprise app or app roles; do not assume nested-group inheritance. Its purpose was: An enterprise application should accept only the people selected by its owner, not every tenant member by default. Which test result is the strongest evidence?

  1. Directly assigned users and supported directly assigned group members sign in; an unassigned or nested-only employee is denied
  2. An authorized remote employee opens the published external URL and a nonassigned employee is denied
  3. An employee gains only the intended SaaS application role while directory admin privileges stay unchanged
  4. A tenant verifies that an app has admin consent, but unassigned users can still sign in through it.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct acceptance check. Directly assigned users and supported directly assigned group members sign in; an unassigned or nested-only employee is denied. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Even if publishing the supported web app with Microsoft Entra Application Proxy connectors succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Directly assigned users and supported directly assigned group members sign in; an unassigned or nested-only employee is denied.

C:

Even if mapping the enterprise application's own app roles/group assignments to the SaaS authorization model succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Directly assigned users and supported directly assigned group members sign in; an unassigned or nested-only employee is denied.

D:

Admin consent only grants approved permissions to the application; it does not replace enforced user assignments. The test must prove that directly assigned principals can sign in and unassigned or nested-only users cannot.

Question 348

During post-change review of the requirement “An enterprise application should accept only the people selected by its owner, not every tenant member by default,” an auditor observes: Any standard member can sign in even though the app owner listed only three approved teams. Which root-cause finding would explain that symptom?

  1. Assignment required was disabled, or a nested-only user was incorrectly assumed to inherit parent-group app assignment
  2. The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments
  3. The auditor searches for a local app registration in the customer tenant where only a service principal exists
  4. The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct diagnosis. Assignment required was disabled, or a nested-only user was incorrectly assumed to inherit parent-group app assignment. This fault explains the observed failure: Any standard member can sign in even though the app owner listed only three approved teams. The intended configuration would instead be: Set User assignment required to Yes, approve administrator consent as needed, and assign permitted users or direct members of supported groups to the enterprise app or app roles; do not assume nested-group inheritance.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Assignment required was disabled, or a nested-only user was incorrectly assumed to inherit parent-group app assignment. The corrective action is: Set User assignment required to Yes, approve administrator consent as needed, and assign permitted users or direct members of supported groups to the enterprise app or app roles; do not assume nested-group inheritance.

C:

The auditor searches for a local app registration in the customer tenant where only a service principal exists. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Assignment required was disabled, or a nested-only user was incorrectly assumed to inherit parent-group app assignment. The corrective action is: Set User assignment required to Yes, approve administrator consent as needed, and assign permitted users or direct members of supported groups to the enterprise app or app roles; do not assume nested-group inheritance.

D:

The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Assignment required was disabled, or a nested-only user was incorrectly assumed to inherit parent-group app assignment. The corrective action is: Set User assignment required to Yes, approve administrator consent as needed, and assign permitted users or direct members of supported groups to the enterprise app or app roles; do not assume nested-group inheritance.

Question 349

A change board will approve one identity configuration to satisfy: A team manages 70 enterprise applications and needs a curated app catalog without changing individual app authorization. Which change should it approve?

  1. Build Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps
  2. Assign the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users and verify licensing; nested group membership does not inherit enterprise application assignments
  3. Configure Microsoft Entra Application Proxy with the appropriate preauthentication and Kerberos Constrained Delegation setup
  4. Publish the supported web app with Microsoft Entra Application Proxy connectors and assign the intended users

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct implementation. Build Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps. It meets the stated requirement: A team manages 70 enterprise applications and needs a curated app catalog without changing individual app authorization. Acceptance evidence is: Users see the curated application collection while their actual access remains governed by each app's assignment.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments. That condition is not the problem here: Admins used application collection membership as if it granted access to the underlying app. The targeted implementation is: Build Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps.

C:

The connector's KCD/service principal name or delegation configuration is incomplete. That condition is not the problem here: Admins used application collection membership as if it granted access to the underlying app. The targeted implementation is: Build Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps.

D:

The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint. That condition is not the problem here: Admins used application collection membership as if it granted access to the underlying app. The targeted implementation is: Build Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps.

Question 350

After configuring: Build Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps, an engineer performs a targeted pilot for this objective: A team manages 70 enterprise applications and needs a curated app catalog without changing individual app authorization. What result constitutes a pass?

  1. Provisioning logs show create/update/disable operations with status and affected target object
  2. A support member manages the intended app but cannot alter unrelated tenant-wide security policies
  3. Users see the curated application collection while their actual access remains governed by each app's assignment
  4. Direct qualifying group members receive the intended app role, whereas users belonging only to a nested subgroup do not inherit that assignment

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. Users see the curated application collection while their actual access remains governed by each app's assignment. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if using Microsoft Entra enterprise app provisioning logs filtered by the application succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Users see the curated application collection while their actual access remains governed by each app's assignment.

B:

Even if assigning the least-privileged supported application administration role or application ownership as appropriate succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Users see the curated application collection while their actual access remains governed by each app's assignment.

D:

Even if assigning the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Users see the curated application collection while their actual access remains governed by each app's assignment.