McAfee Secure

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-300

Exam Name Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle $44.99
SC-300 Sample 1 SC-300 Sample 2 SC-300 Sample 3 SC-300 Sample 4 SC-300 Sample 5 SC-300 Sample 6 SC-300 Sample 7 SC-300 Sample 8 SC-300 Sample 9 SC-300 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-300 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-300 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-300 Questions & Answers

    490 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-300 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-300 Video Course

    SC-300 Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    SC-300 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-300 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-300 Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 599-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace SC-300 exam.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    490 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-300 Video Course

    Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 36

Question 350

After configuring: Build Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps, an engineer performs a targeted pilot for this objective: A team manages 70 enterprise applications and needs a curated app catalog without changing individual app authorization. What result constitutes a pass?

  1. Provisioning logs show create/update/disable operations with status and affected target object
  2. A support member manages the intended app but cannot alter unrelated tenant-wide security policies
  3. Users see the curated application collection while their actual access remains governed by each app's assignment
  4. Direct qualifying group members receive the intended app role, whereas users belonging only to a nested subgroup do not inherit that assignment

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. Users see the curated application collection while their actual access remains governed by each app's assignment. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if using Microsoft Entra enterprise app provisioning logs filtered by the application succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Users see the curated application collection while their actual access remains governed by each app's assignment.

B:

Even if assigning the least-privileged supported application administration role or application ownership as appropriate succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Users see the curated application collection while their actual access remains governed by each app's assignment.

D:

Even if assigning the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Users see the curated application collection while their actual access remains governed by each app's assignment.

Question 351

A team must isolate a broken configuration. Goal: A team manages 70 enterprise applications and needs a curated app catalog without changing individual app authorization. Symptom: The collection tile is visible but a user without app assignment receives access denied. Which hypothesis most precisely accounts for the observed result?

  1. The support account has only a reader role and lacks app management permissions
  2. The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments
  3. The analyst searched only interactive user sign-in logs instead of provisioning logs
  4. Admins used application collection membership as if it granted access to the underlying app

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct diagnosis. Admins used application collection membership as if it granted access to the underlying app. This fault explains the observed failure: The collection tile is visible but a user without app assignment receives access denied. The intended configuration would instead be: Build Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The support account has only a reader role and lacks app management permissions. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Admins used application collection membership as if it granted access to the underlying app. The corrective action is: Build Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps.

B:

The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Admins used application collection membership as if it granted access to the underlying app. The corrective action is: Build Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps.

C:

The analyst searched only interactive user sign-in logs instead of provisioning logs. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Admins used application collection membership as if it granted access to the underlying app. The corrective action is: Build Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps.

Question 352

A change request covers two Microsoft Entra needs. Requirement A: An internal enterprise application needs delegated administration by a support team without granting Global Administrator. Requirement B: An application owner needs to know why only some members of a group get assigned to a SaaS application's role. Select TWO actions, one for each requirement.

  1. Use Microsoft Entra enterprise app provisioning logs filtered by the application and target user
  2. Map the enterprise application's own app roles/group assignments to the SaaS authorization model
  3. Assign the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users and verify licensing; nested group membership does not inherit enterprise application assignments
  4. Publish the supported web app with Microsoft Entra Application Proxy connectors and assign the intended users
  5. Assign the least-privileged supported application administration role or application ownership as appropriate

Explanation

Correct Answers

C:

Correct for task 2. Assign the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users and verify licensing; nested group membership does not inherit enterprise application assignments. This addresses the independent second requirement: An application owner needs to know why only some members of a group get assigned to a SaaS application's role. Verify it by checking: Direct qualifying group members receive the intended app role, whereas users belonging only to a nested subgroup do not inherit that assignment.

E:

Correct for task 1. Assign the least-privileged supported application administration role or application ownership as appropriate. This directly addresses the first requirement: An internal enterprise application needs delegated administration by a support team without granting Global Administrator. Verify it by checking: A support member manages the intended app but cannot alter unrelated tenant-wide security policies.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The analyst searched only interactive user sign-in logs instead of provisioning logs. To satisfy task 1, use: Assign the least-privileged supported application administration role or application ownership as appropriate. For task 2, use: Assign the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users and verify licensing; nested group membership does not inherit enterprise application assignments.

B:

The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role. To satisfy task 1, use: Assign the least-privileged supported application administration role or application ownership as appropriate. For task 2, use: Assign the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users and verify licensing; nested group membership does not inherit enterprise application assignments.

D:

The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint. To satisfy task 1, use: Assign the least-privileged supported application administration role or application ownership as appropriate. For task 2, use: Assign the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users and verify licensing; nested group membership does not inherit enterprise application assignments.

Question 353

The requirement is: An internal enterprise application needs delegated administration by a support team without granting Global Administrator. The technical change was: Assign the least-privileged supported application administration role or application ownership as appropriate. Which observation validates the intended boundary?

  1. An employee gains only the intended SaaS application role while directory admin privileges stay unchanged
  2. A support member manages the intended app but cannot alter unrelated tenant-wide security policies
  3. The auditor identifies the central application/client ID and the separate tenant-specific service principal object
  4. Users see the curated application collection while their actual access remains governed by each app's assignment

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. A support member manages the intended app but cannot alter unrelated tenant-wide security policies. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if mapping the enterprise application's own app roles/group assignments to the SaaS authorization model succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A support member manages the intended app but cannot alter unrelated tenant-wide security policies.

C:

Even if inspecting the app registration as the application definition succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A support member manages the intended app but cannot alter unrelated tenant-wide security policies.

D:

Even if building Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A support member manages the intended app but cannot alter unrelated tenant-wide security policies.

Question 354

The deployment owner asks why this identity requirement failed: An internal enterprise application needs delegated administration by a support team without granting Global Administrator. The test shows: The operator can inspect the enterprise application but cannot update its SSO configuration. Which fault is the best diagnosis?

  1. The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role
  2. Admins used application collection membership as if it granted access to the underlying app
  3. The analyst searched only interactive user sign-in logs instead of provisioning logs
  4. The support account has only a reader role and lacks app management permissions

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct diagnosis. The support account has only a reader role and lacks app management permissions. This fault explains the observed failure: The operator can inspect the enterprise application but cannot update its SSO configuration. The intended configuration would instead be: Assign the least-privileged supported application administration role or application ownership as appropriate.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The support account has only a reader role and lacks app management permissions. The corrective action is: Assign the least-privileged supported application administration role or application ownership as appropriate.

B:

Admins used application collection membership as if it granted access to the underlying app. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The support account has only a reader role and lacks app management permissions. The corrective action is: Assign the least-privileged supported application administration role or application ownership as appropriate.

C:

The analyst searched only interactive user sign-in logs instead of provisioning logs. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The support account has only a reader role and lacks app management permissions. The corrective action is: Assign the least-privileged supported application administration role or application ownership as appropriate.

Question 355

A team is reviewing its proposed Microsoft Entra change. The required outcome is: A SaaS product uses SCIM provisioning so HR group changes should create and disable vendor accounts automatically. What is the most suitable implementation?

  1. Assign the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users and verify licensing; nested group membership does not inherit enterprise application assignments
  2. Set User assignment required to Yes, approve administrator consent as needed, and assign permitted users or direct members of supported groups to the enterprise app or app roles; do not assume nested-group inheritance
  3. Map the enterprise application's own app roles/group assignments to the SaaS authorization model
  4. Configure automatic provisioning on the enterprise application, including SCIM endpoint, secret, mappings and assignment scope

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct implementation. Configure automatic provisioning on the enterprise application, including SCIM endpoint, secret, mappings and assignment scope. It meets the stated requirement: A SaaS product uses SCIM provisioning so HR group changes should create and disable vendor accounts automatically. Acceptance evidence is: An assigned test user provisions to the vendor; removal leads to the expected deprovisioning behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments. That condition is not the problem here: The SCIM provisioning connection secret is invalid or the connector is in a failed provisioning cycle. The targeted implementation is: Configure automatic provisioning on the enterprise application, including SCIM endpoint, secret, mappings and assignment scope.

B:

Assignment required was disabled, or a nested-only user was incorrectly assumed to inherit parent-group app assignment. That condition is not the problem here: The SCIM provisioning connection secret is invalid or the connector is in a failed provisioning cycle. The targeted implementation is: Configure automatic provisioning on the enterprise application, including SCIM endpoint, secret, mappings and assignment scope.

C:

The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role. That condition is not the problem here: The SCIM provisioning connection secret is invalid or the connector is in a failed provisioning cycle. The targeted implementation is: Configure automatic provisioning on the enterprise application, including SCIM endpoint, secret, mappings and assignment scope.

Question 356

The owner wants independent acceptance evidence after the team chose: Configure automatic provisioning on the enterprise application, including SCIM endpoint, secret, mappings and assignment scope. It was meant to solve: A SaaS product uses SCIM provisioning so HR group changes should create and disable vendor accounts automatically. Which result demonstrates success?

  1. Direct qualifying group members receive the intended app role, whereas users belonging only to a nested subgroup do not inherit that assignment
  2. The vendor accepts the signed assertion for an assigned employee and rejects a mismatched audience
  3. An assigned test user provisions to the vendor; removal leads to the expected deprovisioning behavior
  4. An authorized user reaches the app through the proxy and the backend receives the intended delegated identity

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. An assigned test user provisions to the vendor; removal leads to the expected deprovisioning behavior. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if assigning the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An assigned test user provisions to the vendor; removal leads to the expected deprovisioning behavior.

B:

Even if configuring the SaaS enterprise application's SAML SSO identifiers succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An assigned test user provisions to the vendor; removal leads to the expected deprovisioning behavior.

D:

Even if configuring Microsoft Entra Application Proxy with the appropriate preauthentication succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An assigned test user provisions to the vendor; removal leads to the expected deprovisioning behavior.

Question 357

The deployment was intended to satisfy: A SaaS product uses SCIM provisioning so HR group changes should create and disable vendor accounts automatically. During testing, this happened: Assigned users are present in Entra but absent from the SaaS user's directory. Which configuration defect best explains the failure?

  1. The SCIM provisioning connection secret is invalid or the connector is in a failed provisioning cycle
  2. The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role
  3. The connector's KCD/service principal name or delegation configuration is incomplete
  4. The analyst searched only interactive user sign-in logs instead of provisioning logs

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct diagnosis. The SCIM provisioning connection secret is invalid or the connector is in a failed provisioning cycle. This fault explains the observed failure: Assigned users are present in Entra but absent from the SaaS user's directory. The intended configuration would instead be: Configure automatic provisioning on the enterprise application, including SCIM endpoint, secret, mappings and assignment scope.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The SCIM provisioning connection secret is invalid or the connector is in a failed provisioning cycle. The corrective action is: Configure automatic provisioning on the enterprise application, including SCIM endpoint, secret, mappings and assignment scope.

C:

The connector's KCD/service principal name or delegation configuration is incomplete. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The SCIM provisioning connection secret is invalid or the connector is in a failed provisioning cycle. The corrective action is: Configure automatic provisioning on the enterprise application, including SCIM endpoint, secret, mappings and assignment scope.

D:

The analyst searched only interactive user sign-in logs instead of provisioning logs. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The SCIM provisioning connection secret is invalid or the connector is in a failed provisioning cycle. The corrective action is: Configure automatic provisioning on the enterprise application, including SCIM endpoint, secret, mappings and assignment scope.

Question 358

During an access-management pilot, the engineer is tasked with the following: A risk manager wants employee consent to high-risk API scopes blocked while allowing approved administrator review. Which action best addresses the requirement?

  1. Map the enterprise application's own app roles/group assignments to the SaaS authorization model
  2. Configure tenant user-consent settings and an admin-consent workflow with appropriate permission classification
  3. Set User assignment required to Yes, approve administrator consent as needed, and assign permitted users or direct members of supported groups to the enterprise app or app roles; do not assume nested-group inheritance
  4. Use Microsoft Entra enterprise app provisioning logs filtered by the application and target user

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct implementation. Configure tenant user-consent settings and an admin-consent workflow with appropriate permission classification. It meets the stated requirement: A risk manager wants employee consent to high-risk API scopes blocked while allowing approved administrator review. Acceptance evidence is: A standard employee cannot grant a prohibited scope and an approved request can be reviewed by an authorized admin.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role. That condition is not the problem here: Tenant user consent was left unrestricted for the sensitive scope. The targeted implementation is: Configure tenant user-consent settings and an admin-consent workflow with appropriate permission classification.

C:

Assignment required was disabled, or a nested-only user was incorrectly assumed to inherit parent-group app assignment. That condition is not the problem here: Tenant user consent was left unrestricted for the sensitive scope. The targeted implementation is: Configure tenant user-consent settings and an admin-consent workflow with appropriate permission classification.

D:

The analyst searched only interactive user sign-in logs instead of provisioning logs. That condition is not the problem here: Tenant user consent was left unrestricted for the sensitive scope. The targeted implementation is: Configure tenant user-consent settings and an admin-consent workflow with appropriate permission classification.

Question 359

An operational review checks whether the change “Configure tenant user-consent settings and an admin-consent workflow with appropriate permission classification” meets this need: A risk manager wants employee consent to high-risk API scopes blocked while allowing approved administrator review. Which finding supports acceptance?

  1. Direct qualifying group members receive the intended app role, whereas users belonging only to a nested subgroup do not inherit that assignment
  2. An authorized remote employee opens the published external URL and a nonassigned employee is denied
  3. A standard employee cannot grant a prohibited scope and an approved request can be reviewed by an authorized admin
  4. An employee gains only the intended SaaS application role while directory admin privileges stay unchanged

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. A standard employee cannot grant a prohibited scope and an approved request can be reviewed by an authorized admin. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if assigning the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A standard employee cannot grant a prohibited scope and an approved request can be reviewed by an authorized admin.

B:

Even if publishing the supported web app with Microsoft Entra Application Proxy connectors succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A standard employee cannot grant a prohibited scope and an approved request can be reviewed by an authorized admin.

D:

Even if mapping the enterprise application's own app roles/group assignments to the SaaS authorization model succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A standard employee cannot grant a prohibited scope and an approved request can be reviewed by an authorized admin.

Question 360

An engineer troubleshoots an identity solution for: A risk manager wants employee consent to high-risk API scopes blocked while allowing approved administrator review. The pilot result is: A standard user grants the high-risk API permission without administrator review. What is the most likely relevant fault?

  1. Tenant user consent was left unrestricted for the sensitive scope
  2. The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role
  3. The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint
  4. The auditor searches for a local app registration in the customer tenant where only a service principal exists

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct diagnosis. Tenant user consent was left unrestricted for the sensitive scope. This fault explains the observed failure: A standard user grants the high-risk API permission without administrator review. The intended configuration would instead be: Configure tenant user-consent settings and an admin-consent workflow with appropriate permission classification.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Tenant user consent was left unrestricted for the sensitive scope. The corrective action is: Configure tenant user-consent settings and an admin-consent workflow with appropriate permission classification.

C:

The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Tenant user consent was left unrestricted for the sensitive scope. The corrective action is: Configure tenant user-consent settings and an admin-consent workflow with appropriate permission classification.

D:

The auditor searches for a local app registration in the customer tenant where only a service principal exists. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Tenant user consent was left unrestricted for the sensitive scope. The corrective action is: Configure tenant user-consent settings and an admin-consent workflow with appropriate permission classification.