McAfee Secure

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-300

Exam Name Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle $44.99
SC-300 Sample 1 SC-300 Sample 2 SC-300 Sample 3 SC-300 Sample 4 SC-300 Sample 5 SC-300 Sample 6 SC-300 Sample 7 SC-300 Sample 8 SC-300 Sample 9 SC-300 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-300 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-300 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-300 Questions & Answers

    490 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-300 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-300 Video Course

    SC-300 Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    SC-300 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-300 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-300 Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 599-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace SC-300 exam.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    490 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-300 Video Course

    Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 37

Question 360

An engineer troubleshoots an identity solution for: A risk manager wants employee consent to high-risk API scopes blocked while allowing approved administrator review. The pilot result is: A standard user grants the high-risk API permission without administrator review. What is the most likely relevant fault?

  1. Tenant user consent was left unrestricted for the sensitive scope
  2. The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role
  3. The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint
  4. The auditor searches for a local app registration in the customer tenant where only a service principal exists

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct diagnosis. Tenant user consent was left unrestricted for the sensitive scope. This fault explains the observed failure: A standard user grants the high-risk API permission without administrator review. The intended configuration would instead be: Configure tenant user-consent settings and an admin-consent workflow with appropriate permission classification.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Tenant user consent was left unrestricted for the sensitive scope. The corrective action is: Configure tenant user-consent settings and an admin-consent workflow with appropriate permission classification.

C:

The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Tenant user consent was left unrestricted for the sensitive scope. The corrective action is: Configure tenant user-consent settings and an admin-consent workflow with appropriate permission classification.

D:

The auditor searches for a local app registration in the customer tenant where only a service principal exists. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Tenant user consent was left unrestricted for the sensitive scope. The corrective action is: Configure tenant user-consent settings and an admin-consent workflow with appropriate permission classification.

Question 361

Select the most appropriate first configuration decision for this scenario: An application owner needs to know why only some members of a group get assigned to a SaaS application's role.

  1. Map the enterprise application's own app roles/group assignments to the SaaS authorization model
  2. Assign the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users and verify licensing; nested group membership does not inherit enterprise application assignments
  3. Publish the supported web app with Microsoft Entra Application Proxy connectors and assign the intended users
  4. Build Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct implementation. Assign the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users and verify licensing; nested group membership does not inherit enterprise application assignments. It meets the stated requirement: An application owner needs to know why only some members of a group get assigned to a SaaS application's role. Acceptance evidence is: Direct qualifying group members receive the intended app role, whereas users belonging only to a nested subgroup do not inherit that assignment.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role. That condition is not the problem here: The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments. The targeted implementation is: Assign the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users and verify licensing; nested group membership does not inherit enterprise application assignments.

C:

The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint. That condition is not the problem here: The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments. The targeted implementation is: Assign the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users and verify licensing; nested group membership does not inherit enterprise application assignments.

D:

Admins used application collection membership as if it granted access to the underlying app. That condition is not the problem here: The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments. The targeted implementation is: Assign the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users and verify licensing; nested group membership does not inherit enterprise application assignments.

Question 362

After a deployment under this requirement — An application owner needs to know why only some members of a group get assigned to a SaaS application's role — administrators claim the following solution is in place: Assign the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users and verify licensing; nested group membership does not inherit enterprise application assignments. Which pilot finding supports that claim?

  1. Provisioning logs show create/update/disable operations with status and affected target object
  2. Direct qualifying group members receive the intended app role, whereas users belonging only to a nested subgroup do not inherit that assignment
  3. An employee gains only the intended SaaS application role while directory admin privileges stay unchanged
  4. Directly assigned users and supported directly assigned group members sign in; an unassigned or nested-only employee is denied

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. Direct qualifying group members receive the intended app role, whereas users belonging only to a nested subgroup do not inherit that assignment. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if using Microsoft Entra enterprise app provisioning logs filtered by the application succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Direct qualifying group members receive the intended app role, whereas users belonging only to a nested subgroup do not inherit that assignment.

C:

Even if mapping the enterprise application's own app roles/group assignments to the SaaS authorization model succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Direct qualifying group members receive the intended app role, whereas users belonging only to a nested subgroup do not inherit that assignment.

D:

Even if setting User assignment required to Yes succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Direct qualifying group members receive the intended app role, whereas users belonging only to a nested subgroup do not inherit that assignment.

Question 363

A change appears correct at a glance, but the requirement is still unmet: An application owner needs to know why only some members of a group get assigned to a SaaS application's role. The key observed symptom is: A user in only a nested child group is denied even though the parent group is assigned. Which cause should be investigated first?

  1. The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments
  2. Admins used application collection membership as if it granted access to the underlying app
  3. The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint
  4. The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct diagnosis. The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments. This fault explains the observed failure: A user in only a nested child group is denied even though the parent group is assigned. The intended configuration would instead be: Assign the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users and verify licensing; nested group membership does not inherit enterprise application assignments.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Admins used application collection membership as if it granted access to the underlying app. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments. The corrective action is: Assign the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users and verify licensing; nested group membership does not inherit enterprise application assignments.

C:

The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments. The corrective action is: Assign the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users and verify licensing; nested group membership does not inherit enterprise application assignments.

D:

The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments. The corrective action is: Assign the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users and verify licensing; nested group membership does not inherit enterprise application assignments.

Question 364

Two teams share the same release window but not the same access policy. Team A needs: A legacy on-premises app uses Integrated Windows Authentication and employees need SSO through a supported proxy. Team B needs: Auditors need to trace which enterprise application provisioned and later disabled an external SaaS identity. Which TWO implementations should be included?

  1. Publish the supported web app with Microsoft Entra Application Proxy connectors and assign the intended users
  2. Configure automatic provisioning on the enterprise application, including SCIM endpoint, secret, mappings and assignment scope
  3. Configure Microsoft Entra Application Proxy with the appropriate preauthentication and Kerberos Constrained Delegation setup
  4. Use Microsoft Entra enterprise app provisioning logs filtered by the application and target user
  5. Assign the least-privileged supported application administration role or application ownership as appropriate

Explanation

Correct Answers

C:

Correct for task 1. Configure Microsoft Entra Application Proxy with the appropriate preauthentication and Kerberos Constrained Delegation setup. This directly addresses the first requirement: A legacy on-premises app uses Integrated Windows Authentication and employees need SSO through a supported proxy. Verify it by checking: An authorized user reaches the app through the proxy and the backend receives the intended delegated identity.

D:

Correct for task 2. Use Microsoft Entra enterprise app provisioning logs filtered by the application and target user. This addresses the independent second requirement: Auditors need to trace which enterprise application provisioned and later disabled an external SaaS identity. Verify it by checking: Provisioning logs show create/update/disable operations with status and affected target object.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint. To satisfy task 1, use: Configure Microsoft Entra Application Proxy with the appropriate preauthentication and Kerberos Constrained Delegation setup. For task 2, use: Use Microsoft Entra enterprise app provisioning logs filtered by the application and target user.

B:

The SCIM provisioning connection secret is invalid or the connector is in a failed provisioning cycle. To satisfy task 1, use: Configure Microsoft Entra Application Proxy with the appropriate preauthentication and Kerberos Constrained Delegation setup. For task 2, use: Use Microsoft Entra enterprise app provisioning logs filtered by the application and target user.

E:

The support account has only a reader role and lacks app management permissions. To satisfy task 1, use: Configure Microsoft Entra Application Proxy with the appropriate preauthentication and Kerberos Constrained Delegation setup. For task 2, use: Use Microsoft Entra enterprise app provisioning logs filtered by the application and target user.

Question 365

The team implemented the following change: Configure Microsoft Entra Application Proxy with the appropriate preauthentication and Kerberos Constrained Delegation setup. The acceptance requirement was: A legacy on-premises app uses Integrated Windows Authentication and employees need SSO through a supported proxy. Which observed outcome most directly proves the change works?

  1. The SaaS trusts the active signature after rollover and authentication does not fail from unknown-signature errors
  2. An authorized remote employee opens the published external URL and a nonassigned employee is denied
  3. An authorized user reaches the app through the proxy and the backend receives the intended delegated identity
  4. Provisioning logs show create/update/disable operations with status and affected target object

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. An authorized user reaches the app through the proxy and the backend receives the intended delegated identity. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if staging the new SAML certificate succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An authorized user reaches the app through the proxy and the backend receives the intended delegated identity.

B:

Even if publishing the supported web app with Microsoft Entra Application Proxy connectors succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An authorized user reaches the app through the proxy and the backend receives the intended delegated identity.

D:

Even if using Microsoft Entra enterprise app provisioning logs filtered by the application succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An authorized user reaches the app through the proxy and the backend receives the intended delegated identity.

Question 366

The service desk escalates the following unsuccessful identity rollout. Requirement: A legacy on-premises app uses Integrated Windows Authentication and employees need SSO through a supported proxy. Observed: Proxy login succeeds but the backend shows an IWA authentication error. Which underlying misconfiguration is most consistent?

  1. The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint
  2. The connector's KCD/service principal name or delegation configuration is incomplete
  3. The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments
  4. The signing certificate was activated before the service provider trusted its public key

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct diagnosis. The connector's KCD/service principal name or delegation configuration is incomplete. This fault explains the observed failure: Proxy login succeeds but the backend shows an IWA authentication error. The intended configuration would instead be: Configure Microsoft Entra Application Proxy with the appropriate preauthentication and Kerberos Constrained Delegation setup.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The Application Proxy connector is not registered or cannot reach the on-premises app endpoint. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The connector's KCD/service principal name or delegation configuration is incomplete. The corrective action is: Configure Microsoft Entra Application Proxy with the appropriate preauthentication and Kerberos Constrained Delegation setup.

C:

The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The connector's KCD/service principal name or delegation configuration is incomplete. The corrective action is: Configure Microsoft Entra Application Proxy with the appropriate preauthentication and Kerberos Constrained Delegation setup.

D:

The signing certificate was activated before the service provider trusted its public key. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The connector's KCD/service principal name or delegation configuration is incomplete. The corrective action is: Configure Microsoft Entra Application Proxy with the appropriate preauthentication and Kerberos Constrained Delegation setup.

Question 367

Which implementation fits the following specific identity problem? An application assigned to a global staff group should not grant every user a tenant directory administrator role.

  1. Map the enterprise application's own app roles/group assignments to the SaaS authorization model
  2. Assign the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users and verify licensing; nested group membership does not inherit enterprise application assignments
  3. Assign the least-privileged supported application administration role or application ownership as appropriate
  4. Configure automatic provisioning on the enterprise application, including SCIM endpoint, secret, mappings and assignment scope

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct implementation. Map the enterprise application's own app roles/group assignments to the SaaS authorization model. It meets the stated requirement: An application assigned to a global staff group should not grant every user a tenant directory administrator role. Acceptance evidence is: An employee gains only the intended SaaS application role while directory admin privileges stay unchanged.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments. That condition is not the problem here: The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role. The targeted implementation is: Map the enterprise application's own app roles/group assignments to the SaaS authorization model.

C:

The support account has only a reader role and lacks app management permissions. That condition is not the problem here: The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role. The targeted implementation is: Map the enterprise application's own app roles/group assignments to the SaaS authorization model.

D:

The SCIM provisioning connection secret is invalid or the connector is in a failed provisioning cycle. That condition is not the problem here: The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role. The targeted implementation is: Map the enterprise application's own app roles/group assignments to the SaaS authorization model.

Question 368

An auditor must verify this deployment decision: Map the enterprise application's own app roles/group assignments to the SaaS authorization model. Its purpose was: An application assigned to a global staff group should not grant every user a tenant directory administrator role. Which test result is the strongest evidence?

  1. The auditor identifies the central application/client ID and the separate tenant-specific service principal object
  2. Direct qualifying group members receive the intended app role, whereas users belonging only to a nested subgroup do not inherit that assignment
  3. An employee gains only the intended SaaS application role while directory admin privileges stay unchanged
  4. A support member manages the intended app but cannot alter unrelated tenant-wide security policies

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. An employee gains only the intended SaaS application role while directory admin privileges stay unchanged. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if inspecting the app registration as the application definition succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An employee gains only the intended SaaS application role while directory admin privileges stay unchanged.

B:

Even if assigning the enterprise app role to an eligible directly populated security group or individual users succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An employee gains only the intended SaaS application role while directory admin privileges stay unchanged.

D:

Even if assigning the least-privileged supported application administration role or application ownership as appropriate succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An employee gains only the intended SaaS application role while directory admin privileges stay unchanged.

Question 369

During post-change review of the requirement “An application assigned to a global staff group should not grant every user a tenant directory administrator role,” an auditor observes: The user can modify tenant settings but the SaaS app still reports no required app role. Which root-cause finding would explain that symptom?

  1. The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role
  2. The support account has only a reader role and lacks app management permissions
  3. Tenant user consent was left unrestricted for the sensitive scope
  4. The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct diagnosis. The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role. This fault explains the observed failure: The user can modify tenant settings but the SaaS app still reports no required app role. The intended configuration would instead be: Map the enterprise application's own app roles/group assignments to the SaaS authorization model.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The support account has only a reader role and lacks app management permissions. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role. The corrective action is: Map the enterprise application's own app roles/group assignments to the SaaS authorization model.

C:

Tenant user consent was left unrestricted for the sensitive scope. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role. The corrective action is: Map the enterprise application's own app roles/group assignments to the SaaS authorization model.

D:

The app owner relied on nested child-group memberships, which are not transitive for enterprise app group assignments. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The admin granted a privileged Entra directory role instead of an enterprise application role. The corrective action is: Map the enterprise application's own app roles/group assignments to the SaaS authorization model.

Question 370

A change board will approve one identity configuration to satisfy: An enterprise must periodically rotate a SAML signing certificate without breaking partner SSO. Which change should it approve?

  1. Configure Microsoft Entra Application Proxy with the appropriate preauthentication and Kerberos Constrained Delegation setup
  2. Stage the new SAML certificate and coordinate SP-side trust changes before switching the active signing certificate
  3. Configure the SaaS enterprise application's SAML SSO identifiers, reply URL, signing certificate and claims mapping
  4. Build Microsoft Entra application collections for the appropriate groups of apps

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct implementation. Stage the new SAML certificate and coordinate SP-side trust changes before switching the active signing certificate. It meets the stated requirement: An enterprise must periodically rotate a SAML signing certificate without breaking partner SSO. Acceptance evidence is: The SaaS trusts the active signature after rollover and authentication does not fail from unknown-signature errors.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The connector's KCD/service principal name or delegation configuration is incomplete. That condition is not the problem here: The signing certificate was activated before the service provider trusted its public key. The targeted implementation is: Stage the new SAML certificate and coordinate SP-side trust changes before switching the active signing certificate.

C:

The SAML audience/identifier configured in Entra does not match the SaaS service provider. That condition is not the problem here: The signing certificate was activated before the service provider trusted its public key. The targeted implementation is: Stage the new SAML certificate and coordinate SP-side trust changes before switching the active signing certificate.

D:

Admins used application collection membership as if it granted access to the underlying app. That condition is not the problem here: The signing certificate was activated before the service provider trusted its public key. The targeted implementation is: Stage the new SAML certificate and coordinate SP-side trust changes before switching the active signing certificate.