McAfee Secure

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle $23.86

100% Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course is developed by Amazon Professionals to help you pass the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.
  • Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 1066-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 41

Question 400

An enterprise architecture team faces this design requirement: Large fault-tolerant batch analytics jobs can be interrupted and resumed while the team pays full on-demand prices. What is the most appropriate design for this workload?

  1. Use EC2 Spot capacity with checkpointing and interruption-aware retry mechanisms
  2. Configure S3 lifecycle transitions to a suitable archival storage class and test retrieval times
  3. Add an S3 gateway VPC endpoint and route supported S3 traffic privately rather than through NAT
  4. Configure protected AWS Backup Vault Lock compliance settings with appropriate retention and access governance

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Spot Instances optimize interruptible capacity costs when jobs tolerate reclaim events. The required architecture outcome is: Large fault-tolerant batch analytics jobs can be interrupted and resumed while the team pays full on-demand prices. Validate this choice by checking that A simulated interruption causes bounded rework and lowers total compute cost without losing final results.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Objects remain indefinitely in higher-cost storage despite a proven low-access retention pattern. The specific problem here is that the workload uses only on-demand capacity despite safe restart or checkpoint semantics.

C:

S3 calls egress through NAT because no supported endpoint route was configured. The specific problem here is that the workload uses only on-demand capacity despite safe restart or checkpoint semantics.

D:

Backup administrators can freely delete critical recovery points despite required immutability. The specific problem here is that the workload uses only on-demand capacity despite safe restart or checkpoint semantics.

Question 401

For the enterprise requirement "Governance wants one AWS Config compliance view from many accounts and Regions", the team implemented this change: Configure a Config aggregator with organization or account sources and appropriate delegated read access. Which observation should be required before the change is approved?

  1. Central compliance dashboards include resource findings from configured participating accounts and Regions
  2. A new workload account's API activity appears in the central log bucket and member administrators cannot erase it
  3. Cost and Usage Reports or Cost Explorer show tagged team spend after activation and reporting delay
  4. Approved application accounts can create authorized attachments to the centrally owned gateway

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. AWS Config aggregators consolidate configuration and compliance data without changing source resources. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: Governance wants one AWS Config compliance view from many accounts and Regions.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A new workload account's API activity appears in the central log bucket and member administrators cannot erase it. However, this does not establish the required outcome: central compliance dashboards include resource findings from configured participating accounts and Regions.

C:

Cost and Usage Reports or Cost Explorer show tagged team spend after activation and reporting delay. However, this does not establish the required outcome: central compliance dashboards include resource findings from configured participating accounts and Regions.

D:

Approved application accounts can create authorized attachments to the centrally owned gateway. However, this does not establish the required outcome: central compliance dashboards include resource findings from configured participating accounts and Regions.

Question 402

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: A DynamoDB table receives unpredictable read request bursts causing throttling during seasonal peaks. Requirement B: An Application Load Balancer intermittently forwards traffic to unhealthy containers after their readiness endpoint fails. Which TWO controls should be used together for these separate scenarios?

  1. Run controlled AWS Fault Injection Service scenarios with safety guardrails and predeclared stop conditions
  2. Inventory unattached EBS volumes and delete or archive approved volumes after snapshot and ownership checks
  3. Use enhanced fan-out for supported registered consumers or otherwise allocate read capacity explicitly
  4. Correct target group health checks and deployment deregistration timing based on actual readiness semantics
  5. Evaluate on-demand capacity or auto scaling where appropriate and check hot partition keys

Explanation

Correct Answers

D:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: An Application Load Balancer intermittently forwards traffic to unhealthy containers after their readiness endpoint fails. Load balancer health checks must match actual application readiness rather than superficial liveness. A direct acceptance check is: Unhealthy containers leave active target selection promptly while healthy targets continue receiving requests.

E:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: A DynamoDB table receives unpredictable read request bursts causing throttling during seasonal peaks. DynamoDB throughput requires sufficient mode capacity and key-distribution design. A direct acceptance check is: Burst replay avoids throttling while partition-level demand remains within supported constraints.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action targets a different technical need: A multi-AZ production stack has never been tested with a failed Availability Zone during working hours. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Fault injection validates real system behavior within approved experiment boundaries; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

B:

This action targets a different technical need: Operations retains detached EBS volumes after instance termination and pays for unused storage for months. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. EBS storage billing continues for allocated volumes until they are deleted or otherwise changed; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

C:

This action targets a different technical need: A Kinesis stream has adequate shard write capacity but multiple consumers compete for read throughput and fall behind. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Kinesis enhanced fan-out provides dedicated consumer read throughput within service limits; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 403

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: Regulators require consistent detection and correction of publicly accessible S3 buckets across a multi-account organization. Requirement B: Globally dispersed users require low-latency local writes to the same DynamoDB dataset with multi-Region availability. Select TWO actions, one for each independently scoped requirement.

  1. Set up IAM Identity Center account assignments with role-scoped permission sets and centralized joiner-leaver management
  2. Consider DynamoDB global tables with application-safe conflict semantics and tested replication behavior
  3. Adopt an Aurora Global Database topology where supported and rehearse cross-Region failover or switchover
  4. Deploy organization-managed AWS Config rules and targeted auto-remediation through approved Systems Manager Automation
  5. Enable IAM Access Analyzer for the relevant zone of trust and evaluate the external-access finding

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: Globally dispersed users require low-latency local writes to the same DynamoDB dataset with multi-Region availability. Global tables provide multi-Region replication with eventual cross-Region convergence semantics. A direct acceptance check is: Writes in either Region replicate to the other and conflict handling matches the business design.

D:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: Regulators require consistent detection and correction of publicly accessible S3 buckets across a multi-account organization. Organization-level Config rules continuously evaluate configuration and can launch controlled remediations. A direct acceptance check is: A noncompliant test bucket is flagged and the remediation removes its unauthorized public exposure.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action targets a different technical need: Business units need temporary developer access to multiple accounts but not permanent local IAM users. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Central identity assignments reduce stale credentials and standardize workforce access; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

C:

This action targets a different technical need: A customer database needs a near-real-time cross-Region read replica and an established disaster recovery promotion procedure. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Aurora Global Database supports low-latency crossregional replication with explicit recovery operations; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

E:

This action targets a different technical need: A bucket policy accidentally grants an external AWS account access and the owner needs a provable cross-account finding. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. IAM Access Analyzer analyzes resource-based policies for external access outside the chosen trust zone; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 404

A deployed environment still does not meet the original requirement: Executives request one default migration method for every workload regardless of technical debt or value. Which root cause is most consistent with the observation?

  1. Manual one-time disk copying cannot keep hundreds of moving workloads synchronized until cutover
  2. All assets are scheduled for direct rehost even when some are obsolete or unsuitable
  3. Migration estimates are based solely on outdated procurement records rather than measured workload behavior
  4. Migration tasks are tracked in separate team documents with no common portfolio state

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the technical design error aligned with the unmet requirement. The 7 Rs decision framework matches migration strategy to application context. The appropriate correction is: Classify applications through a defined 7 Rs migration assessment with business value, risk and retirement criteria. The control should then be tested by verifying that Each workload has justified retire, retain, relocate, rehost, replatform, repurchase or refactor decision.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Manual one-time disk copying cannot keep hundreds of moving workloads synchronized until cutover. The stated evidence instead indicates: All assets are scheduled for direct rehost even when some are obsolete or unsuitable.

C:

Migration estimates are based solely on outdated procurement records rather than measured workload behavior. The stated evidence instead indicates: All assets are scheduled for direct rehost even when some are obsolete or unsuitable.

D:

Migration tasks are tracked in separate team documents with no common portfolio state. The stated evidence instead indicates: All assets are scheduled for direct rehost even when some are obsolete or unsuitable.

Question 405

An architecture review recommends this solution: Design a supported Multi-AZ deployment with reconnection handling and execute maintenance drills. The motivating situation is: A mission-critical RDS instance is single-AZ and routine maintenance causes extended application downtime. Which statement explains why the recommendation solves the specific problem?

  1. Load balancer health checks must match actual application readiness rather than superficial liveness
  2. RDS Multi-AZ maintains standby capacity for high availability and managed failover
  3. WAF logs provide request and rule evaluation evidence for security tuning
  4. Recovery objectives require tested restore outcomes, not merely completed backups

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This principle explains why the prescribed control is appropriate for the described requirement. The matching design action is: Design a supported Multi-AZ deployment with reconnection handling and execute maintenance drills. The expected supporting evidence is: Database failover restarts service within the tested objective after a zone loss.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Health checks use an unrelated always-200 endpoint that does not reflect the service readiness. The stated evidence instead indicates: The application is exposed to one database host or zonal compute failure.

C:

WAF rules are deployed without visibility into which requests they affect. The stated evidence instead indicates: The application is exposed to one database host or zonal compute failure.

D:

Snapshot creation is mistaken for proof the application can actually be restored. The stated evidence instead indicates: The application is exposed to one database host or zonal compute failure.

Question 406

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: External trading partners depend on SFTP interfaces, but the receiving application will store files in S3. Requirement B: A message-processing application still uses an on-premises ActiveMQ-compatible broker and cannot immediately rewrite producers. Choose TWO remedies that meet A and B respectively.

  1. Use AWS Transfer Family with a supported SFTP endpoint and appropriate identity and S3 permissions
  2. Evaluate Amazon MQ with an appropriate compatible engine and migrate broker connections in stages
  3. Classify applications through a defined 7 Rs migration assessment with business value, risk and retirement criteria
  4. Reserve an AWS Data Transfer Terminal session and bring compatible encrypted storage to upload through its high-bandwidth AWS connection
  5. Build a governed S3-centered data lake with AWS Glue metadata and appropriate analytics services

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: External trading partners depend on SFTP interfaces, but the receiving application will store files in S3. AWS Transfer Family exposes managed file-transfer protocols to supported AWS storage. A direct acceptance check is: Partners connect over SFTP and transferred objects appear in assigned bucket prefixes.

B:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: A message-processing application still uses an on-premises ActiveMQ-compatible broker and cannot immediately rewrite producers. Amazon MQ can support compatible managed message brokers when protocol continuity matters. A direct acceptance check is: Existing clients publish and consume messages with acceptable protocol compatibility after controlled cutover.

Incorrect Answers

C:

This action targets a different technical need: Executives request one default migration method for every workload regardless of technical debt or value. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. The 7 Rs decision framework matches migration strategy to application context; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

D:

This action targets a different technical need: An AWS Enterprise Support research customer needs to migrate tens of terabytes from a remote site with unreliable network links and can bring storage to a nearby AWS transfer facility. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. AWS Data Transfer Terminal allows eligible Enterprise Support customers to bring storage to an AWS transfer site; AWS Snowball Edge is no longer available to new customers; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

E:

This action targets a different technical need: A legacy reporting ETL cluster requires durable raw data sharing and easier scale-out queries across departments. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. A shared governed object-storage lake decouples data retention from individual processing engines; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 407

A deployed environment still does not meet the original requirement: Dozens of overprovisioned EC2 instances need evidence-based CPU and memory sizing recommendations before changing families. Which missing control accounts for the continuing issue?

  1. Teams have only aggregate bills and cannot locate the source of inefficient storage usage
  2. Resource tags were never activated as billing cost allocation dimensions
  3. Instances were resized from average CPU alone despite memory or traffic constraints
  4. Disjoint local-account trails leave central auditors with incomplete visibility

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the technical design error aligned with the unmet requirement. Compute Optimizer uses resource metrics and recommendations but must be checked against workload SLOs. The appropriate correction is: Use Compute Optimizer and validate monitoring data before right-sizing eligible instances. The control should then be tested by verifying that Tested resized instances meet p95 latency goals while recommended savings are observed.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Teams have only aggregate bills and cannot locate the source of inefficient storage usage. The stated evidence instead indicates: Instances were resized from average CPU alone despite memory or traffic constraints.

B:

Resource tags were never activated as billing cost allocation dimensions. The stated evidence instead indicates: Instances were resized from average CPU alone despite memory or traffic constraints.

D:

Disjoint local-account trails leave central auditors with incomplete visibility. The stated evidence instead indicates: Instances were resized from average CPU alone despite memory or traffic constraints.

Question 408

For the enterprise requirement "A container service must restore capacity after an AZ outage without manually replacing individual EC2 instances", the team implemented this change: Run service tasks across multiple AZs with compatible load balancing and spare or scaling capacity. What observed result would demonstrate successful delivery of the requested capability?

  1. Read replica lag is measured and promotion produces a usable independent writer during a DR drill
  2. The load balancer continues serving from healthy remaining tasks during a forced zone failure
  3. Failure of one Region does not interrupt healthy remaining regional capacity under synthetic load
  4. Cloud instances access approved services privately while disallowed API paths are rejected

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Multi-AZ task placement and auto healing support zonal continuity for stateless applications. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: A container service must restore capacity after an AZ outage without manually replacing individual EC2 instances.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Read replica lag is measured and promotion produces a usable independent writer during a DR drill. However, this does not establish the required outcome: the load balancer continues serving from healthy remaining tasks during a forced zone failure.

C:

Failure of one Region does not interrupt healthy remaining regional capacity under synthetic load. However, this does not establish the required outcome: the load balancer continues serving from healthy remaining tasks during a forced zone failure.

D:

Cloud instances access approved services privately while disallowed API paths are rejected. However, this does not establish the required outcome: the load balancer continues serving from healthy remaining tasks during a forced zone failure.

Question 409

For the enterprise requirement "An EKS service experiences 503 errors during rolling updates because pods accept traffic before dependencies initialize", the team implemented this change: Configure readiness probes, deployment surge policy and graceful termination semantics. Which test result proves this architecture satisfies its stated constraint?

  1. Load tests show traffic reaches only ready pods and terminating pods finish work before deletion
  2. Database failover restarts service within the tested objective after a zone loss
  3. Restored datasets pass consistency and application startup checks within the recovery target
  4. Origin request count drops under a multi-edge cache miss test while freshness remains correct

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Readiness and graceful termination controls reduce errors during normal rolling changes. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: An EKS service experiences 503 errors during rolling updates because pods accept traffic before dependencies initialize.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence is associated with a separate architecture requirement: A mission-critical RDS instance is single-AZ and routine maintenance causes extended application downtime. It does not prove that this case was remediated. The relevant observation must be: Load tests show traffic reaches only ready pods and terminating pods finish work before deletion. The associated design principle is: Readiness and graceful termination controls reduce errors during normal rolling changes.

C:

Restored datasets pass consistency and application startup checks within the recovery target. However, this does not establish the required outcome: load tests show traffic reaches only ready pods and terminating pods finish work before deletion.

D:

Origin request count drops under a multi-edge cache miss test while freshness remains correct. However, this does not establish the required outcome: load tests show traffic reaches only ready pods and terminating pods finish work before deletion.

Question 410

An architecture review recommends this solution: Use S3 Storage Lens or inventory analytics and implement targeted lifecycle cleanup rules. The motivating situation is: A shared S3 estate has ballooning noncurrent versions, incomplete multipart uploads and forgotten small objects. Which principle would a reviewer use to defend this design?

  1. Database performance diagnostics should identify the specific bottleneck before scaling
  2. S3 analytics and lifecycle rules target recoverable storage waste when retention is respected
  3. EBS storage billing continues for allocated volumes until they are deleted or otherwise changed
  4. Placement and traffic pattern matter to data transfer costs as much as raw compute prices

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This principle explains why the prescribed control is appropriate for the described requirement. The matching design action is: Use S3 Storage Lens or inventory analytics and implement targeted lifecycle cleanup rules. The expected supporting evidence is: Identified buckets show smaller unnecessary version and multipart storage after retention-safe cleanup.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Engineers scale CPU without analyzing database lock waits or expensive SQL. The stated evidence instead indicates: Dormant storage versions and partial uploads accumulate without inventory or lifecycle governance.

C:

Unattached volumes are treated as free merely because they are not mounted. The stated evidence instead indicates: Dormant storage versions and partial uploads accumulate without inventory or lifecycle governance.

D:

Workload service calls repeatedly cross paid network boundaries without quantified need. The stated evidence instead indicates: Dormant storage versions and partial uploads accumulate without inventory or lifecycle governance.