McAfee Secure

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle $23.86

100% Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course is developed by Amazon Professionals to help you pass the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.
  • Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 1066-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 62

Question 610

A deployed environment still does not meet the original requirement: An Aurora-backed API has too many queries on the writer and wants to distribute read-only reporting traffic. Which failure mechanism should the team correct?

  1. Every static asset fetch goes to a distant origin instead of the edge cache
  2. No event archive exists to replay notifications that failed during downstream processing
  3. Every reporting query was sent to the cluster writer endpoint despite available readers
  4. Unbounded request bursts overload backends because no gateway rate protection is configured

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the technical design error aligned with the unmet requirement. Aurora reader endpoints balance connections to read replicas for read workloads. The appropriate correction is: Send eligible reads through the Aurora reader endpoint and provision suitable replica capacity. The control should then be tested by verifying that Read latency and writer CPU improve under reporting load without routing writes to read replicas.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Every static asset fetch goes to a distant origin instead of the edge cache. The stated evidence instead indicates: Every reporting query was sent to the cluster writer endpoint despite available readers.

B:

No event archive exists to replay notifications that failed during downstream processing. The stated evidence instead indicates: Every reporting query was sent to the cluster writer endpoint despite available readers.

D:

Unbounded request bursts overload backends because no gateway rate protection is configured. The stated evidence instead indicates: Every reporting query was sent to the cluster writer endpoint despite available readers.

Question 611

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: Legal and nonproduction workloads require different organizational guardrails but must share central billing. Requirement B: Finance needs engineering costs apportioned by team using tags rather than guessed from account totals. Select TWO independent changes that meet the named requirements.

  1. Activate standardized cost allocation tags and enforce tagging through governance processes
  2. Use distinct AWS Organizations organizational units and apply targeted service control policies per OU
  3. Use AWS Organizations backup policies with verified account opt-in, vaults and access controls
  4. Introduce a centrally managed translation or proxy layer with nonoverlapping service endpoints rather than directly peering overlapping networks
  5. Set up AWS Cost Anomaly Detection with relevant monitors and alert subscriptions

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: Finance needs engineering costs apportioned by team using tags rather than guessed from account totals. Cost allocation tags must be activated before they appear in billing cost analytics. A direct acceptance check is: Cost and Usage Reports or Cost Explorer show tagged team spend after activation and reporting delay.

B:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: Legal and nonproduction workloads require different organizational guardrails but must share central billing. Organizational units help assign governance boundaries to related member accounts. A direct acceptance check is: Production account requests are governed by the intended production policy and sandbox accounts by their own boundaries.

Incorrect Answers

C:

This action targets a different technical need: Critical backups must be scheduled consistently across many application accounts and retained by policy. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Organization backup policies support common baseline definitions but still require functioning target configuration; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

D:

This action targets a different technical need: Two acquired subsidiaries have overlapping RFC1918 VPC CIDRs but must exchange traffic with a shared integration endpoint. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Overlapping address spaces require translation or service-level isolation rather than simple routed peering; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

E:

This action targets a different technical need: Variable monthly expenses must trigger alerts for unusual spending spikes without predefined per-service thresholds. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Cost Anomaly Detection learns spending patterns and flags unusual expenditures; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 612

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: A latency-sensitive API running in EKS cannot tolerate a single Availability Zone outage. Requirement B: A central networking account must share an existing Transit Gateway with application accounts without duplicating it. Choose TWO remedies that meet A and B respectively.

  1. Enable S3 Cross-Region Replication with correct versioning, role permissions and ownership controls
  2. Share the eligible Transit Gateway using AWS Resource Access Manager and explicit attachment routing permissions
  3. Analyze commitments then purchase an appropriate Compute Savings Plan based on supported usage coverage
  4. Use distinct AWS Organizations organizational units and apply targeted service control policies per OU
  5. Distribute worker nodes and eligible pods across multiple AZs with topology rules and disruption-aware service routing

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: A central networking account must share an existing Transit Gateway with application accounts without duplicating it. AWS RAM can share supported resources while ownership remains in a central account. A direct acceptance check is: Approved application accounts can create authorized attachments to the centrally owned gateway.

E:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: A latency-sensitive API running in EKS cannot tolerate a single Availability Zone outage. Multi-AZ Kubernetes workloads need scheduled replicas and correctly configured networking across zones. A direct acceptance check is: Draining all nodes in one zone still leaves enough healthy replicas serving traffic from others.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action targets a different technical need: Customer-uploaded S3 objects must appear in a second Region for durability and region-isolation objectives. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Cross-Region Replication asynchronously copies eligible objects between configured buckets; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

C:

This action targets a different technical need: Several accounts have steady EC2 and Fargate spend and need a commitment that applies to qualifying compute usage flexibly. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Compute Savings Plans apply eligible usage discounts across supported services and configurations; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

D:

This action targets a different technical need: Legal and nonproduction workloads require different organizational guardrails but must share central billing. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Organizational units help assign governance boundaries to related member accounts; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 613

An enterprise architecture team faces this design requirement: Two acquired subsidiaries have overlapping RFC1918 VPC CIDRs but must exchange traffic with a shared integration endpoint. Which selection is defensible under the given constraints?

  1. Use AWS Global Accelerator with endpoint groups and regional health-based routing
  2. Deploy organization-managed AWS Config rules and targeted auto-remediation through approved Systems Manager Automation
  3. Establish a Transit Gateway peering attachment and add the appropriate static routes in both Transit Gateway route tables
  4. Introduce a centrally managed translation or proxy layer with nonoverlapping service endpoints rather than directly peering overlapping networks

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Overlapping address spaces require translation or service-level isolation rather than simple routed peering. The required architecture outcome is: Two acquired subsidiaries have overlapping RFC1918 VPC CIDRs but must exchange traffic with a shared integration endpoint. Validate this choice by checking that Traffic uses translated unique endpoint addresses and return packets reach the original client correctly.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Ordinary regional endpoints offer neither the requested global anycast entry point nor accelerator health steering. The specific problem here is that overlapping network prefixes make ordinary VPC peering route selection ambiguous.

B:

Per-account one-off inspections do not continuously evaluate drift across accounts. The specific problem here is that overlapping network prefixes make ordinary VPC peering route selection ambiguous.

C:

The architecture assumes that Transit Gateway peering automatically propagates interregional routes. The specific problem here is that overlapping network prefixes make ordinary VPC peering route selection ambiguous.

Question 614

An enterprise architecture team faces this design requirement: A department must be notified promptly when monthly spending exceeds its threshold. Which option best aligns with the business and technical requirement?

  1. Activate standardized cost allocation tags and enforce tagging through governance processes
  2. Introduce a centrally managed translation or proxy layer with nonoverlapping service endpoints rather than directly peering overlapping networks
  3. Create an AWS Budget with defined threshold notification recipients and appropriate budget filters
  4. Analyze commitments then purchase an appropriate Compute Savings Plan based on supported usage coverage

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

AWS Budgets supports spend targets and notifications on actual or forecasted cost. The required architecture outcome is: A department must be notified promptly when monthly spending exceeds its threshold. Validate this choice by checking that A controlled threshold breach yields the expected forecast or actual spend notification.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Resource tags were never activated as billing cost allocation dimensions. The specific problem here is that the team relies exclusively on retrospective end-of-month billing statements.

B:

Overlapping network prefixes make ordinary VPC peering route selection ambiguous. The specific problem here is that the team relies exclusively on retrospective end-of-month billing statements.

D:

On-demand usage was left wholly uncommitted despite predictable baseline compute consumption. The specific problem here is that the team relies exclusively on retrospective end-of-month billing statements.

Question 615

An enterprise architecture team faces this design requirement: Audit findings in application accounts must trigger an event-driven central incident triage workflow. Which action would resolve the problem without adding unrelated capabilities?

  1. Configure a Config aggregator with organization or account sources and appropriate delegated read access
  2. Publish permitted events across account boundaries to a central EventBridge event bus with explicit resource policy
  3. Expose the provider through an endpoint service behind a Network Load Balancer and create consumer interface VPC endpoints
  4. Share the eligible Transit Gateway using AWS Resource Access Manager and explicit attachment routing permissions

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

EventBridge cross-account routing requires rules and resource-based permissions. The required architecture outcome is: Audit findings in application accounts must trigger an event-driven central incident triage workflow. Validate this choice by checking that Events from a test member account reach the central incident workflow and unauthorized senders are rejected.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Local Config assessments exist but no aggregation exposes cross-account status. The specific problem here is that events remain confined to local account buses because cross-account bus authorization is absent.

C:

A broad VPC peering link was used where a service-scoped private access path was needed. The specific problem here is that events remain confined to local account buses because cross-account bus authorization is absent.

D:

Each application team is provisioning its own disconnected backbone gateway. The specific problem here is that events remain confined to local account buses because cross-account bus authorization is absent.

Question 616

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: An EC2 application requires private access to AWS Secrets Manager and S3 without traversing public network routes. Requirement B: An internet service must survive one Availability Zone failure while adjusting to fluctuating weekday usage. Select TWO independent changes that meet the named requirements.

  1. Use the applicable interface and gateway VPC endpoints and restrict endpoint policies and subnet routes as needed
  2. Configure CloudFront caching with appropriate TTL, cache keys and regional origin controls
  3. Deploy a supported RDS Multi-AZ configuration and verify connection retry and DNS handling
  4. Use an Application Load Balancer with Auto Scaling groups spanning multiple AZs and health checks
  5. Update the KMS key policy or grants alongside the principal's IAM permissions as required

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: An EC2 application requires private access to AWS Secrets Manager and S3 without traversing public network routes. VPC endpoints provide private connectivity to supported AWS services inside defined network and policy controls. A direct acceptance check is: Cloud instances access approved services privately while disallowed API paths are rejected.

D:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: An internet service must survive one Availability Zone failure while adjusting to fluctuating weekday usage. Multi-AZ target placement and health-driven scaling provide elastic zonal resilience. A direct acceptance check is: Terminating all instances in one zone leaves healthy targets and Auto Scaling replaces lost capacity.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This action targets a different technical need: A global static web application experiences high latency because users repeatedly fetch unchanged assets from one Region. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. CloudFront edge caching reduces origin fetches for cacheable content; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

C:

This action targets a different technical need: A transactional RDS workload must automatically fail over within the Region on an AZ failure. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. RDS Multi-AZ provides standby capacity for automated intra-Region failover, not read scaling by itself; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

E:

This action targets a different technical need: An AWS KMS-encrypted data key is shared with a role but decrypts still fail because the key's resource policy grants no access. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. KMS key authorization depends on the owning key policy as well as applicable principal policies; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 617

For the enterprise requirement "A mission-critical RDS instance is single-AZ and routine maintenance causes extended application downtime", the team implemented this change: Design a supported Multi-AZ deployment with reconnection handling and execute maintenance drills. Which result specifically demonstrates the fix works?

  1. Database failover restarts service within the tested objective after a zone loss
  2. Candidates for removal have verified inactivity context and revocation tests do not break approved workflows
  3. Restoring a suitable past timestamp creates a usable table with correct records
  4. Unhealthy containers leave active target selection promptly while healthy targets continue receiving requests

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. RDS Multi-AZ maintains standby capacity for high availability and managed failover. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: A mission-critical RDS instance is single-AZ and routine maintenance causes extended application downtime.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence is associated with a separate architecture requirement: A company wants to identify IAM permissions that have not been used recently before removing high-risk privileges. It does not prove that this case was remediated. The relevant observation must be: Database failover restarts service within the tested objective after a zone loss. The associated design principle is: RDS Multi-AZ maintains standby capacity for high availability and managed failover.

C:

That evidence is associated with a separate architecture requirement: A DynamoDB application requires recovery from accidental writes to an earlier point within a month. It does not prove that this case was remediated. The relevant observation must be: Database failover restarts service within the tested objective after a zone loss. The associated design principle is: RDS Multi-AZ maintains standby capacity for high availability and managed failover.

D:

That evidence is associated with a separate architecture requirement: An Application Load Balancer intermittently forwards traffic to unhealthy containers after their readiness endpoint fails. It does not prove that this case was remediated. The relevant observation must be: Database failover restarts service within the tested objective after a zone loss. The associated design principle is: RDS Multi-AZ maintains standby capacity for high availability and managed failover.

Question 618

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: A large S3 estate has unknown replication, storage-class, and lifecycle patterns that drive storage expense. Requirement B: Many workload VPCs need access to a privately published service without opening routing to the provider's whole VPC. Select TWO independent changes that meet the named requirements.

  1. Analyze organization-wide RI utilization and coverage using consolidated billing reports
  2. Provision redundant Direct Connect connections and a Direct Connect gateway associated with appropriate transit or virtual private gateways
  3. Use S3 Storage Lens metrics to identify expensive bucket-level and organization-wide storage trends
  4. Use Route 53 failover records with health checks and independently deployed regional stacks
  5. Expose the provider through an endpoint service behind a Network Load Balancer and create consumer interface VPC endpoints

Explanation

Correct Answers

C:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: A large S3 estate has unknown replication, storage-class, and lifecycle patterns that drive storage expense. S3 Storage Lens supports visibility into storage activity and efficiency metrics. A direct acceptance check is: Dashboards identify targeted buckets with abnormal storage patterns and lifecycle candidates.

E:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: Many workload VPCs need access to a privately published service without opening routing to the provider's whole VPC. AWS PrivateLink exposes a selected service to consumers without full network-to-network reachability. A direct acceptance check is: Consumer instances reach only the approved PrivateLink service while unrelated provider subnets remain unreachable.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action targets a different technical need: A company has shared Reserved Instances in its payer organization and wants to quantify benefit distribution across linked accounts. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Consolidated billing can share eligible reservations across member accounts subject to sharing settings; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

B:

This action targets a different technical need: A headquarters requires a resilient private link to workloads in two Regions and must avoid routing all traffic over the public internet. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Independent Direct Connect circuits and correctly associated gateways improve hybrid-path resiliency; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

D:

This action targets a different technical need: A global web application must fail over to a secondary Region if the primary public endpoint becomes unhealthy. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Route 53 health-check failover can redirect future DNS resolutions between operational regional endpoints; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 619

For the enterprise requirement "A high-traffic EC2 service must release a risky version while keeping a rapid rollback path and without terminating all healthy targets at once", the team implemented this change: Use CodeDeploy blue-green deployment with alternate load balancer target groups and rollback alarms. What observed result would demonstrate successful delivery of the requested capability?

  1. The alias sends the intended approximate percentage to the canary version and reverts after a simulated alarm
  2. Read latency and writer CPU improve under reporting load without routing writes to read replicas
  3. Failed security or smoke tests prevent production deployment while passing builds can be promoted
  4. Requests switch to the replacement environment only after health tests pass, and rollback returns traffic to old targets

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Blue-green deployment separates old and new environments to support safe traffic shifting. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: A high-traffic EC2 service must release a risky version while keeping a rapid rollback path and without terminating all healthy targets at once.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The alias sends the intended approximate percentage to the canary version and reverts after a simulated alarm. However, this does not establish the required outcome: requests switch to the replacement environment only after health tests pass, and rollback returns traffic to old targets.

B:

Read latency and writer CPU improve under reporting load without routing writes to read replicas. However, this does not establish the required outcome: requests switch to the replacement environment only after health tests pass, and rollback returns traffic to old targets.

C:

Failed security or smoke tests prevent production deployment while passing builds can be promoted. However, this does not establish the required outcome: requests switch to the replacement environment only after health tests pass, and rollback returns traffic to old targets.

Question 620

An architecture review recommends this solution: Redesign notifications into event-driven processing using EventBridge or SQS with idempotent consumers. The motivating situation is: An order-processing system uses synchronous downstream calls and fails completely whenever one notification provider is slow. Which technical principle most strongly justifies this recommendation?

  1. Amazon MQ can support compatible managed message brokers when protocol continuity matters
  2. Managed workflow orchestration makes retries, errors and compensation explicit
  3. Fargate can run supported ECS container tasks without customer-managed worker hosts
  4. Event-driven boundaries isolate failure but require idempotency and message-delivery governance

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This principle explains why the prescribed control is appropriate for the described requirement. The matching design action is: Redesign notifications into event-driven processing using EventBridge or SQS with idempotent consumers. The expected supporting evidence is: Orders complete independently of notification delays, while consumers process retries and duplicate deliveries safely.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Developers assume SQS has identical JMS or broker feature semantics to the source stack. The stated evidence instead indicates: Tight synchronous coupling propagates a noncritical downstream failure to the primary transaction.

B:

Workflow state and failure recovery are hidden in fragile custom imperative scripts. The stated evidence instead indicates: Tight synchronous coupling propagates a noncritical downstream failure to the primary transaction.

C:

Dedicated EC2 servers remain the scaling bottleneck for stateless containerized workloads. The stated evidence instead indicates: Tight synchronous coupling propagates a noncritical downstream failure to the primary transaction.