McAfee Secure

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle $23.86

100% Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course is developed by Amazon Professionals to help you pass the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.
  • Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 1066-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 80

Question 790

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: A business database needs a low-downtime migration from on-premises PostgreSQL to Amazon RDS PostgreSQL. Requirement B: A monolithic Windows process has been decomposed into HTTP services that can run in managed containers without operating its own servers. Choose TWO actions that directly address these separate problems.

  1. Modernize to an appropriately configured Amazon Aurora cluster with multi-AZ storage and tested failover
  2. Introduce change data capture and an event stream or bus with replay and idempotent consumers
  3. Package services into supported containers and deploy with ECS on Fargate and scalable load balancing
  4. Reserve an AWS Data Transfer Terminal session and bring compatible encrypted storage to upload through its high-bandwidth AWS connection
  5. Use AWS DMS full load plus change data capture with compatible schema and monitored replication task

Explanation

Correct Answers

C:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: A monolithic Windows process has been decomposed into HTTP services that can run in managed containers without operating its own servers. Fargate can run supported ECS container tasks without customer-managed worker hosts. A direct acceptance check is: Services scale independently and teams do not manage EC2 container worker hosts.

E:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: A business database needs a low-downtime migration from on-premises PostgreSQL to Amazon RDS PostgreSQL. AWS DMS can move data using full load and ongoing CDC for supported sources. A direct acceptance check is: Destination rows converge with source changes and validated CDC lag allows the final switchover.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action targets a different technical need: A legacy database must meet high transactional availability and can accept conversion to an Aurora-compatible engine. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Aurora offers managed high availability features for supported relational engines; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

B:

This action targets a different technical need: A legacy billing system runs nightly ETL and downstream consumers need near-real-time invoice changes. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. CDC-based event distribution can modernize delayed batch data propagation; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

D:

This action targets a different technical need: An AWS Enterprise Support research customer needs to migrate tens of terabytes from a remote site with unreliable network links and can bring storage to a nearby AWS transfer facility. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. AWS Data Transfer Terminal allows eligible Enterprise Support customers to bring storage to an AWS transfer site; AWS Snowball Edge is no longer available to new customers; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 791

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: A source MySQL workload must migrate to Amazon RDS MySQL without an engine conversion project. Requirement B: An order-processing system uses synchronous downstream calls and fails completely whenever one notification provider is slow. Which TWO recommendations jointly satisfy requirements A and B?

  1. Classify applications through a defined 7 Rs migration assessment with business value, risk and retirement criteria
  2. Evaluate AWS Storage Gateway file or volume gateway mode against existing file protocol and caching requirements
  3. Redesign notifications into event-driven processing using EventBridge or SQS with idempotent consumers
  4. Prefer a supported homogeneous DMS migration or native replication pattern with CDC where suitable
  5. Use AWS DataSync agents and tasks with scheduling and integrity validation

Explanation

Correct Answers

C:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: An order-processing system uses synchronous downstream calls and fails completely whenever one notification provider is slow. Event-driven boundaries isolate failure but require idempotency and message-delivery governance. A direct acceptance check is: Orders complete independently of notification delays, while consumers process retries and duplicate deliveries safely.

D:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: A source MySQL workload must migrate to Amazon RDS MySQL without an engine conversion project. Homogeneous migrations usually focus on data replication, compatibility details and cutover rather than engine-language rewrite. A direct acceptance check is: Destination table state stays synchronized and the application passes a reversible cutover test.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action targets a different technical need: Executives request one default migration method for every workload regardless of technical debt or value. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. The 7 Rs decision framework matches migration strategy to application context; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

B:

This action targets a different technical need: Branch offices retain file shares locally but need backup and tiered cloud-backed storage without replacing every client. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Storage Gateway helps bridge supported on-premises storage protocols to AWS-backed storage; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

E:

This action targets a different technical need: A company must perform recurring secure file synchronization from on-premises NAS into Amazon S3 with minimal custom scripting. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. AWS DataSync automates supported file and object movement with verification features; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 792

An architecture review recommends this solution: Configure protected AWS Backup Vault Lock compliance settings with appropriate retention and access governance. The motivating situation is: Business records must remain tamper-resistant during the retention period even if a security administrator compromises a backup account. Which statement explains why the recommendation solves the specific problem?

  1. Cross-Region read replicas are asynchronous and may require explicit promotion in recovery
  2. Lambda aliases support weighted traffic between published versions with monitored promotion
  3. Backup-and-restore DR suits longer RTO targets when restore execution is practiced
  4. Backup Vault Lock compliance controls can enforce retained recovery-point immutability

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This principle explains why the prescribed control is appropriate for the described requirement. The matching design action is: Configure protected AWS Backup Vault Lock compliance settings with appropriate retention and access governance. The expected supporting evidence is: An unauthorized attempt to delete a protected recovery point is denied before retention expires.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A standard read replica is assumed to be a synchronous multi-Region failover mechanism without promotion. The stated evidence instead indicates: Backup administrators can freely delete critical recovery points despite required immutability.

B:

The function's unqualified ARN always invokes latest code for all users, bypassing version routing. The stated evidence instead indicates: Backup administrators can freely delete critical recovery points despite required immutability.

C:

A backup exists but no restore procedure or measured restore duration has been proven. The stated evidence instead indicates: Backup administrators can freely delete critical recovery points despite required immutability.

Question 793

An architecture review recommends this solution: Use compatible enhanced networking drivers and appropriately sized instance network bandwidth. The motivating situation is: A high-throughput EC2 network service shows packet processing CPU saturation and must exploit modern instance network acceleration. Which statement explains why the recommendation solves the specific problem?

  1. CloudFront Origin Shield can consolidate cache misses through an additional regional layer
  2. ECS placement depends on available per-host resources and declared capacity-provider strategy
  3. Fault injection validates real system behavior within approved experiment boundaries
  4. Enhanced networking capabilities require compatible instance types and operating-system drivers

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This principle explains why the prescribed control is appropriate for the described requirement. The matching design action is: Use compatible enhanced networking drivers and appropriately sized instance network bandwidth. The expected supporting evidence is: Representative traffic reaches required throughput with improved CPU efficiency and no driver errors.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Misses from different edge caches repeatedly burden the same origin. The stated evidence instead indicates: Unsupported drivers or unsuitable instance networking features cap throughput.

B:

Cluster compute totals are misleading because the needed task resources are not schedulable. The stated evidence instead indicates: Unsupported drivers or unsuitable instance networking features cap throughput.

C:

Availability claims rest only on architecture diagrams, not controlled chaos evidence. The stated evidence instead indicates: Unsupported drivers or unsuitable instance networking features cap throughput.

Question 794

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: A managed relational database continuously exceeds planned storage allocation but manual overprovisioning wastes capacity. Requirement B: A payment service must block production release if vulnerability and smoke-test gates fail, even though the build itself succeeded. Which TWO architecture changes cover both acceptance criteria?

  1. Enable and configure supported RDS storage autoscaling limits and monitor growth patterns
  2. Use CodeDeploy blue-green deployment with alternate load balancer target groups and rollback alarms
  3. Send eligible reads through the Aurora reader endpoint and provision suitable replica capacity
  4. Use EC2 Spot capacity with checkpointing and interruption-aware retry mechanisms
  5. Add pipeline quality gates and explicit approval conditions prior to production deployment

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: A managed relational database continuously exceeds planned storage allocation but manual overprovisioning wastes capacity. RDS storage autoscaling can add storage within configured limits but does not automatically shrink it. A direct acceptance check is: Free storage stays above emergency thresholds while capacity grows within policy rather than being oversized initially.

E:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: A payment service must block production release if vulnerability and smoke-test gates fail, even though the build itself succeeded. Release pipelines should verify deployment risk and acceptance criteria beyond build success. A direct acceptance check is: Failed security or smoke tests prevent production deployment while passing builds can be promoted.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This action targets a different technical need: A high-traffic EC2 service must release a risky version while keeping a rapid rollback path and without terminating all healthy targets at once. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Blue-green deployment separates old and new environments to support safe traffic shifting; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

C:

This action targets a different technical need: An Aurora-backed API has too many queries on the writer and wants to distribute read-only reporting traffic. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Aurora reader endpoints balance connections to read replicas for read workloads; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

D:

This action targets a different technical need: Large fault-tolerant batch analytics jobs can be interrupted and resumed while the team pays full on-demand prices. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Spot Instances optimize interruptible capacity costs when jobs tolerate reclaim events; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 795

An architecture review recommends this solution: Analyze commitments then purchase an appropriate Compute Savings Plan based on supported usage coverage. The motivating situation is: Several accounts have steady EC2 and Fargate spend and need a commitment that applies to qualifying compute usage flexibly. Why does this approach fit the stated design constraints?

  1. Consolidated billing can share eligible reservations across member accounts subject to sharing settings
  2. Architecture forecasts require explicit usage assumptions rather than extrapolation without design changes
  3. Compute Savings Plans apply eligible usage discounts across supported services and configurations
  4. Service-specific delegated administration provides controlled cross-account security operations

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This principle explains why the prescribed control is appropriate for the described requirement. The matching design action is: Analyze commitments then purchase an appropriate Compute Savings Plan based on supported usage coverage. The expected supporting evidence is: Eligible compute charges reflect the planned commitment discount and remaining coverage is visible.

Incorrect Answers

A:

RI purchases are evaluated only in the purchasing account without considering shared billing treatment. The stated evidence instead indicates: On-demand usage was left wholly uncommitted despite predictable baseline compute consumption.

B:

Previous-month charges were presented as accurate forecasts for an expanded future footprint. The stated evidence instead indicates: On-demand usage was left wholly uncommitted despite predictable baseline compute consumption.

D:

Management-account-only operations were mistaken for necessary daily centralized security administration. The stated evidence instead indicates: On-demand usage was left wholly uncommitted despite predictable baseline compute consumption.

Question 796

A deployed environment still does not meet the original requirement: An AWS Enterprise Support research customer needs to migrate tens of terabytes from a remote site with unreliable network links and can bring storage to a nearby AWS transfer facility. What explains why the stated requirement was not met?

  1. Manual one-time disk copying cannot keep hundreds of moving workloads synchronized until cutover
  2. Mainframe batch and transaction semantics were treated as if they were ordinary Linux workloads
  3. The migration plan assumes a new AWS Snowball Edge device can still be ordered even though new-customer ordering is unavailable
  4. Dedicated EC2 servers remain the scaling bottleneck for stateless containerized workloads

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the technical design error aligned with the unmet requirement. AWS Data Transfer Terminal allows eligible Enterprise Support customers to bring storage to an AWS transfer site; AWS Snowball Edge is no longer available to new customers. The appropriate correction is: Reserve an AWS Data Transfer Terminal session and bring compatible encrypted storage to upload through its high-bandwidth AWS connection. The control should then be tested by verifying that The Enterprise Support team uploads the approved data during its reserved session and matches end-to-end source and destination checksums.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Manual one-time disk copying cannot keep hundreds of moving workloads synchronized until cutover. The stated evidence instead indicates: The migration plan assumes a new AWS Snowball Edge device can still be ordered even though new-customer ordering is unavailable.

B:

Mainframe batch and transaction semantics were treated as if they were ordinary Linux workloads. The stated evidence instead indicates: The migration plan assumes a new AWS Snowball Edge device can still be ordered even though new-customer ordering is unavailable.

D:

Dedicated EC2 servers remain the scaling bottleneck for stateless containerized workloads. The stated evidence instead indicates: The migration plan assumes a new AWS Snowball Edge device can still be ordered even though new-customer ordering is unavailable.

Question 797

For the enterprise requirement "A mature EC2 service wants to reduce response latency and CPU cost by moving to Graviton while preserving custom native dependencies", the team implemented this change: Benchmark supported arm64 builds on Graviton instance families and deploy only after compatibility validation. Which observation should be required before the change is approved?

  1. p95 latency and unit costs improve in a representative arm64 canary with all native libraries working
  2. Hot session lookups avoid repeated database queries and failure recovery preserves acceptable service behavior
  3. File-system throughput reaches target under representative concurrent processing without exhausted credits
  4. Free storage stays above emergency thresholds while capacity grows within policy rather than being oversized initially

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Graviton migration requires compatible architecture builds and representative workload benchmarking. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: A mature EC2 service wants to reduce response latency and CPU cost by moving to Graviton while preserving custom native dependencies.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Hot session lookups avoid repeated database queries and failure recovery preserves acceptable service behavior. However, this does not establish the required outcome: p95 latency and unit costs improve in a representative arm64 canary with all native libraries working.

C:

File-system throughput reaches target under representative concurrent processing without exhausted credits. However, this does not establish the required outcome: p95 latency and unit costs improve in a representative arm64 canary with all native libraries working.

D:

Free storage stays above emergency thresholds while capacity grows within policy rather than being oversized initially. However, this does not establish the required outcome: p95 latency and unit costs improve in a representative arm64 canary with all native libraries working.

Question 798

An enterprise architecture team faces this design requirement: An Application Load Balancer intermittently forwards traffic to unhealthy containers after their readiness endpoint fails. What design change should the team implement?

  1. Inventory unattached EBS volumes and delete or archive approved volumes after snapshot and ownership checks
  2. Correct target group health checks and deployment deregistration timing based on actual readiness semantics
  3. Design a supported Multi-AZ deployment with reconnection handling and execute maintenance drills
  4. Configure and verify Route 53 failover records with endpoint health checks and explicit secondary routing

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Load balancer health checks must match actual application readiness rather than superficial liveness. The required architecture outcome is: An Application Load Balancer intermittently forwards traffic to unhealthy containers after their readiness endpoint fails. Validate this choice by checking that Unhealthy containers leave active target selection promptly while healthy targets continue receiving requests.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Unattached volumes are treated as free merely because they are not mounted. The specific problem here is that health checks use an unrelated always-200 endpoint that does not reflect the service readiness.

C:

The application is exposed to one database host or zonal compute failure. The specific problem here is that health checks use an unrelated always-200 endpoint that does not reflect the service readiness.

D:

Passive regional copies exist without health-driven endpoint selection. The specific problem here is that health checks use an unrelated always-200 endpoint that does not reflect the service readiness.

Question 799

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: Critical backups must be scheduled consistently across many application accounts and retained by policy. Requirement B: A company has shared Reserved Instances in its payer organization and wants to quantify benefit distribution across linked accounts. Which TWO architecture changes cover both acceptance criteria?

  1. Use distinct AWS Organizations organizational units and apply targeted service control policies per OU
  2. Analyze organization-wide RI utilization and coverage using consolidated billing reports
  3. Use AWS Organizations backup policies with verified account opt-in, vaults and access controls
  4. Configure Security Hub delegated administrator and member account aggregation or finding aggregation as supported
  5. Model expected service usage in AWS Pricing Calculator and compare results against historical billing trends

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: A company has shared Reserved Instances in its payer organization and wants to quantify benefit distribution across linked accounts. Consolidated billing can share eligible reservations across member accounts subject to sharing settings. A direct acceptance check is: Shared applicable discounts and uncovered on-demand baseline are visible by linked account.

C:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: Critical backups must be scheduled consistently across many application accounts and retained by policy. Organization backup policies support common baseline definitions but still require functioning target configuration. A direct acceptance check is: Eligible accounts create scheduled recovery points according to policies and restores are tested.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action targets a different technical need: Legal and nonproduction workloads require different organizational guardrails but must share central billing. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Organizational units help assign governance boundaries to related member accounts; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

D:

This action targets a different technical need: Security analysts need one cross-account aggregation view of prioritized findings without requesting console access in every workload account. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Security Hub delegated administration centralizes findings while each source account retains its own resources; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

E:

This action targets a different technical need: Capacity planners need a monthly cost forecast that reflects a new Region and expected usage growth before deployment. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Architecture forecasts require explicit usage assumptions rather than extrapolation without design changes; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 800

A deployed environment still does not meet the original requirement: A Windows estate contains expensive licensed products whose licensing rights differ between shared tenancy and dedicated hosts. Which missing control accounts for the continuing issue?

  1. Licensing constraints were omitted until after destination EC2 instances were chosen
  2. Application reliability still depends on one unmanaged database host and manual restores
  3. Source virtualization format was mistaken for a guarantee of target runtime compatibility
  4. Application lists omit runtime call dependencies and produce broken split-wave migrations

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the technical design error aligned with the unmet requirement. License entitlements must be assessed before migration architecture and instance selection. The appropriate correction is: Assess license portability, dedicated-host requirements and AWS License Manager before choosing targets. The control should then be tested by verifying that The proposed target design has documented permitted license use and tracked license utilization.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Application reliability still depends on one unmanaged database host and manual restores. The stated evidence instead indicates: Licensing constraints were omitted until after destination EC2 instances were chosen.

C:

Source virtualization format was mistaken for a guarantee of target runtime compatibility. The stated evidence instead indicates: Licensing constraints were omitted until after destination EC2 instances were chosen.

D:

Application lists omit runtime call dependencies and produce broken split-wave migrations. The stated evidence instead indicates: Licensing constraints were omitted until after destination EC2 instances were chosen.