McAfee Secure

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle $23.86

100% Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course is developed by Amazon Professionals to help you pass the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.
  • Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 1066-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 81

Question 800

A deployed environment still does not meet the original requirement: A Windows estate contains expensive licensed products whose licensing rights differ between shared tenancy and dedicated hosts. Which missing control accounts for the continuing issue?

  1. Licensing constraints were omitted until after destination EC2 instances were chosen
  2. Application reliability still depends on one unmanaged database host and manual restores
  3. Source virtualization format was mistaken for a guarantee of target runtime compatibility
  4. Application lists omit runtime call dependencies and produce broken split-wave migrations

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the technical design error aligned with the unmet requirement. License entitlements must be assessed before migration architecture and instance selection. The appropriate correction is: Assess license portability, dedicated-host requirements and AWS License Manager before choosing targets. The control should then be tested by verifying that The proposed target design has documented permitted license use and tracked license utilization.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Application reliability still depends on one unmanaged database host and manual restores. The stated evidence instead indicates: Licensing constraints were omitted until after destination EC2 instances were chosen.

C:

Source virtualization format was mistaken for a guarantee of target runtime compatibility. The stated evidence instead indicates: Licensing constraints were omitted until after destination EC2 instances were chosen.

D:

Application lists omit runtime call dependencies and produce broken split-wave migrations. The stated evidence instead indicates: Licensing constraints were omitted until after destination EC2 instances were chosen.

Question 801

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: An ECS cluster has enough total CPU but tasks stay pending due to unsuitable placement and capacity provider configuration. Requirement B: Two Regions are deployed but customer requests stay routed to the failed primary endpoint indefinitely. Which TWO recommendations jointly satisfy requirements A and B?

  1. Configure and verify Route 53 failover records with endpoint health checks and explicit secondary routing
  2. Select an appropriate EBS gp3 volume with independently provisioned performance settings and test application throughput
  3. Configure readiness probes, deployment surge policy and graceful termination semantics
  4. Inventory unattached EBS volumes and delete or archive approved volumes after snapshot and ownership checks
  5. Review capacity provider strategy, instance-type resources and task placement requirements

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: Two Regions are deployed but customer requests stay routed to the failed primary endpoint indefinitely. DNS failover needs a health-signal and routing policy that actually switches answers. A direct acceptance check is: After a simulated endpoint failure, new DNS queries return the secondary healthy Region.

E:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: An ECS cluster has enough total CPU but tasks stay pending due to unsuitable placement and capacity provider configuration. ECS placement depends on available per-host resources and declared capacity-provider strategy. A direct acceptance check is: Pending tasks become schedulable and p95 latency improves without wasting an additional empty cluster.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This action targets a different technical need: An EC2 application needs sustained random IOPS independent of EBS volume storage-size growth. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. gp3 separates baseline volume storage size from configurable IOPS and throughput within limits; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

C:

This action targets a different technical need: An EKS service experiences 503 errors during rolling updates because pods accept traffic before dependencies initialize. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Readiness and graceful termination controls reduce errors during normal rolling changes; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

D:

This action targets a different technical need: Operations retains detached EBS volumes after instance termination and pays for unused storage for months. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. EBS storage billing continues for allocated volumes until they are deleted or otherwise changed; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 802

For the enterprise requirement "A corporation has hundreds of interdependent on-premises services and cannot establish which databases must move together", the team implemented this change: Perform application dependency discovery and group connected workloads into migration waves. Which outcome is the most meaningful acceptance test?

  1. Each proposed migration wave includes dependencies required for a functional smoke test
  2. Invoice updates arrive at consumers within the required lag and replay does not duplicate side effects
  3. A tested transfer plan shows enough effective throughput plus integrity checks for the deadline
  4. Each workload has justified retire, retain, relocate, rehost, replatform, repurchase or refactor decision

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Dependency mapping reduces migration risk by revealing the actual application interaction graph. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: A corporation has hundreds of interdependent on-premises services and cannot establish which databases must move together.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Invoice updates arrive at consumers within the required lag and replay does not duplicate side effects. However, this does not establish the required outcome: each proposed migration wave includes dependencies required for a functional smoke test.

C:

A tested transfer plan shows enough effective throughput plus integrity checks for the deadline. However, this does not establish the required outcome: each proposed migration wave includes dependencies required for a functional smoke test.

D:

Each workload has justified retire, retain, relocate, rehost, replatform, repurchase or refactor decision. However, this does not establish the required outcome: each proposed migration wave includes dependencies required for a functional smoke test.

Question 803

For the enterprise requirement "A customer-facing Lambda API has unacceptable first-request latency after inactive periods despite low average invocation cost", the team implemented this change: Configure provisioned concurrency for selected published function aliases with suitable demand planning. Which observation should be required before the change is approved?

  1. Each registered consumer receives an independent read-throughput path and lag falls during peak events
  2. Pending tasks become schedulable and p95 latency improves without wasting an additional empty cluster
  3. Cold-start spikes fall for provisioned requests and concurrency utilization stays within budget
  4. Database failover restarts service within the tested objective after a zone loss

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Lambda provisioned concurrency keeps selected execution environments initialized to reduce startup latency. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: A customer-facing Lambda API has unacceptable first-request latency after inactive periods despite low average invocation cost.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Each registered consumer receives an independent read-throughput path and lag falls during peak events. However, this does not establish the required outcome: cold-start spikes fall for provisioned requests and concurrency utilization stays within budget.

B:

Pending tasks become schedulable and p95 latency improves without wasting an additional empty cluster. However, this does not establish the required outcome: cold-start spikes fall for provisioned requests and concurrency utilization stays within budget.

D:

That evidence is associated with a separate architecture requirement: A mission-critical RDS instance is single-AZ and routine maintenance causes extended application downtime. It does not prove that this case was remediated. The relevant observation must be: Cold-start spikes fall for provisioned requests and concurrency utilization stays within budget. The associated design principle is: Lambda provisioned concurrency keeps selected execution environments initialized to reduce startup latency.

Question 804

For the enterprise requirement "Business records must remain tamper-resistant during the retention period even if a security administrator compromises a backup account", the team implemented this change: Configure protected AWS Backup Vault Lock compliance settings with appropriate retention and access governance. Which result specifically demonstrates the fix works?

  1. A regional drill scales warm standby to full capacity within the stated recovery time and data tolerance
  2. Failure of one Region does not interrupt healthy remaining regional capacity under synthetic load
  3. An unauthorized attempt to delete a protected recovery point is denied before retention expires
  4. The released image digest is present in each target Region before workloads attempt recovery

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Backup Vault Lock compliance controls can enforce retained recovery-point immutability. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: Business records must remain tamper-resistant during the retention period even if a security administrator compromises a backup account.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A regional drill scales warm standby to full capacity within the stated recovery time and data tolerance. However, this does not establish the required outcome: an unauthorized attempt to delete a protected recovery point is denied before retention expires.

B:

Failure of one Region does not interrupt healthy remaining regional capacity under synthetic load. However, this does not establish the required outcome: an unauthorized attempt to delete a protected recovery point is denied before retention expires.

D:

The released image digest is present in each target Region before workloads attempt recovery. However, this does not establish the required outcome: an unauthorized attempt to delete a protected recovery point is denied before retention expires.

Question 805

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: A noncritical archive service has a 24-hour RTO and may restore its configuration and data from protected backups. Requirement B: An AWS KMS-encrypted data key is shared with a role but decrypts still fail because the key's resource policy grants no access. Which TWO recommendations jointly satisfy requirements A and B?

  1. Evaluate AWS Shield Advanced with supported resource protection and runbooks alongside layered edge controls
  2. Maintain a pilot-light copy of the essential data and core services and automate remaining capacity restoration
  3. Evaluate Compute Savings Plans at a supported commitment level for the stable baseline
  4. Implement a tested backup-and-restore disaster recovery pattern with documented recovery runbooks
  5. Update the KMS key policy or grants alongside the principal's IAM permissions as required

Explanation

Correct Answers

D:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: A noncritical archive service has a 24-hour RTO and may restore its configuration and data from protected backups. Backup-and-restore DR suits longer RTO targets when restore execution is practiced. A direct acceptance check is: A restore drill meets the 24-hour recovery target with verified data integrity and access.

E:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: An AWS KMS-encrypted data key is shared with a role but decrypts still fail because the key's resource policy grants no access. KMS key authorization depends on the owning key policy as well as applicable principal policies. A direct acceptance check is: The authorized role decrypts the designated ciphertext while an unrelated role remains denied.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action targets a different technical need: A revenue-critical public endpoint requires proactive DDoS response coordination and protected eligible application resources. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Shield Advanced adds advanced DDoS protection and response support for supported resources; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

B:

This action targets a different technical need: A legacy application has a few-hour RTO but cannot justify running the complete secondary stack continuously. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Pilot light retains critical replicated services while reconstructing additional capacity during recovery; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

C:

This action targets a different technical need: A steady service has predictable cross-family compute usage and seeks discounts without binding to one EC2 instance family. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Compute Savings Plans discount eligible compute spending with an hourly commitment; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 806

An architecture review recommends this solution: Configure S3 lifecycle transitions to a suitable archival storage class and test retrieval times. The motivating situation is: A compliance dataset is rarely accessed after 90 days but must remain recoverable with several-hour retrieval tolerance. Why is this architecture appropriate for the described workload?

  1. Spot Instances optimize interruptible capacity costs when jobs tolerate reclaim events
  2. Lifecycle transitions reduce storage expense only if retrieval and minimum-duration constraints fit
  3. S3 Intelligent-Tiering can move eligible objects among access tiers based on access frequency
  4. Global Accelerator accelerates supported TCP/UDP applications without serving as an HTTP content cache

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This principle explains why the prescribed control is appropriate for the described requirement. The matching design action is: Configure S3 lifecycle transitions to a suitable archival storage class and test retrieval times. The expected supporting evidence is: Objects transition after the configured age and can be restored within the business retrieval target.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The workload uses only on-demand capacity despite safe restart or checkpoint semantics. The stated evidence instead indicates: Objects remain indefinitely in higher-cost storage despite a proven low-access retention pattern.

C:

Fixed hot storage is retained for every object because teams cannot forecast access patterns. The stated evidence instead indicates: Objects remain indefinitely in higher-cost storage despite a proven low-access retention pattern.

D:

Region-specific public IPs and DNS routing do not provide the needed global anycast transport optimization. The stated evidence instead indicates: Objects remain indefinitely in higher-cost storage despite a proven low-access retention pattern.

Question 807

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: Two Regions must retain independently encrypted object replicas to meet recovery requirements during a source Region failure. Requirement B: A public API has repeated abusive requests from a single source network but normal distributed traffic should continue. Which TWO controls should be used together for these separate scenarios?

  1. Evaluate AWS Shield Advanced with supported resource protection and runbooks alongside layered edge controls
  2. Scale ECS services or EC2 Auto Scaling from queue depth and processing time metrics
  3. Configure a suitable RDS cross-Region read replica where supported and rehearse replica promotion and endpoint changes
  4. Configure S3 replication rules with correct versioning and KMS permissions for destination encrypted objects
  5. Add AWS WAF rate-based rules scoped to the API's web ACL with suitable action and monitoring

Explanation

Correct Answers

D:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: Two Regions must retain independently encrypted object replicas to meet recovery requirements during a source Region failure. S3 encrypted object replication needs versioning and appropriate replication-role KMS authorization. A direct acceptance check is: Eligible new source objects replicate with appropriate destination encryption and remain readable during source outage.

E:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: A public API has repeated abusive requests from a single source network but normal distributed traffic should continue. WAF rate-based rules can limit excessive HTTP request patterns by aggregation key. A direct acceptance check is: The abusive source crosses its request threshold and is blocked without blocking allowed sample traffic.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action targets a different technical need: A revenue-critical public endpoint requires proactive DDoS response coordination and protected eligible application resources. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Shield Advanced adds advanced DDoS protection and response support for supported resources; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

B:

This action targets a different technical need: A queue-backed worker fleet is underloaded overnight but still runs a fixed large number of instances. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Queue-driven scaling aligns paid worker capacity with outstanding workload; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

C:

This action targets a different technical need: A read-heavy reporting application needs an up-to-date secondary regional database copy that can be promoted in a disaster. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Cross-Region read replicas are asynchronous and may require explicit promotion in recovery; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 808

A deployed environment still does not meet the original requirement: Branch offices retain file shares locally but need backup and tiered cloud-backed storage without replacing every client. Which underlying cause should be investigated first?

  1. Local instance disks are wrongly used as a shared durable POSIX file system
  2. Repeated uncached database work dominates response latency and compute expense
  3. A direct S3 SDK rewrite was imposed on workloads that cannot change their file interface
  4. Dedicated EC2 servers remain the scaling bottleneck for stateless containerized workloads

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the technical design error aligned with the unmet requirement. Storage Gateway helps bridge supported on-premises storage protocols to AWS-backed storage. The appropriate correction is: Evaluate AWS Storage Gateway file or volume gateway mode against existing file protocol and caching requirements. The control should then be tested by verifying that Local clients retain supported file access while selected data is persisted to eligible AWS storage.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Local instance disks are wrongly used as a shared durable POSIX file system. The stated evidence instead indicates: A direct S3 SDK rewrite was imposed on workloads that cannot change their file interface.

B:

Repeated uncached database work dominates response latency and compute expense. The stated evidence instead indicates: A direct S3 SDK rewrite was imposed on workloads that cannot change their file interface.

D:

Dedicated EC2 servers remain the scaling bottleneck for stateless containerized workloads. The stated evidence instead indicates: A direct S3 SDK rewrite was imposed on workloads that cannot change their file interface.

Question 809

An enterprise architecture team faces this design requirement: Dozens of overprovisioned EC2 instances need evidence-based CPU and memory sizing recommendations before changing families. What is the most appropriate design for this workload?

  1. Establish a Transit Gateway peering attachment and add the appropriate static routes in both Transit Gateway route tables
  2. Model expected service usage in AWS Pricing Calculator and compare results against historical billing trends
  3. Use Compute Optimizer and validate monitoring data before right-sizing eligible instances
  4. Analyze commitments then purchase an appropriate Compute Savings Plan based on supported usage coverage

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Compute Optimizer uses resource metrics and recommendations but must be checked against workload SLOs. The required architecture outcome is: Dozens of overprovisioned EC2 instances need evidence-based CPU and memory sizing recommendations before changing families. Validate this choice by checking that Tested resized instances meet p95 latency goals while recommended savings are observed.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The architecture assumes that Transit Gateway peering automatically propagates interregional routes. The specific problem here is that instances were resized from average CPU alone despite memory or traffic constraints.

B:

Previous-month charges were presented as accurate forecasts for an expanded future footprint. The specific problem here is that instances were resized from average CPU alone despite memory or traffic constraints.

D:

On-demand usage was left wholly uncommitted despite predictable baseline compute consumption. The specific problem here is that instances were resized from average CPU alone despite memory or traffic constraints.

Question 810

A deployed environment still does not meet the original requirement: An Application Load Balancer intermittently forwards traffic to unhealthy containers after their readiness endpoint fails. What was most likely overlooked in the original design?

  1. The application is exposed to one database host or zonal compute failure
  2. Health checks use an unrelated always-200 endpoint that does not reflect the service readiness
  3. Administrators run sensitive maintenance scripts with no enforced approval or trail
  4. Kubernetes deployment treats process startup as adequate evidence of request readiness

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the technical design error aligned with the unmet requirement. Load balancer health checks must match actual application readiness rather than superficial liveness. The appropriate correction is: Correct target group health checks and deployment deregistration timing based on actual readiness semantics. The control should then be tested by verifying that Unhealthy containers leave active target selection promptly while healthy targets continue receiving requests.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The application is exposed to one database host or zonal compute failure. The stated evidence instead indicates: Health checks use an unrelated always-200 endpoint that does not reflect the service readiness.

C:

Administrators run sensitive maintenance scripts with no enforced approval or trail. The stated evidence instead indicates: Health checks use an unrelated always-200 endpoint that does not reflect the service readiness.

D:

Kubernetes deployment treats process startup as adequate evidence of request readiness. The stated evidence instead indicates: Health checks use an unrelated always-200 endpoint that does not reflect the service readiness.