McAfee Secure

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle $23.86

100% Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course is developed by Amazon Professionals to help you pass the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.
  • Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 1066-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 85

Question 840

An architecture review recommends this solution: Select an appropriate EBS gp3 volume with independently provisioned performance settings and test application throughput. The motivating situation is: An EC2 application needs sustained random IOPS independent of EBS volume storage-size growth. What principle supports the selected implementation?

  1. gp3 separates baseline volume storage size from configurable IOPS and throughput within limits
  2. DynamoDB throughput requires sufficient mode capacity and key-distribution design
  3. CloudFront Origin Shield can consolidate cache misses through an additional regional layer
  4. Load balancer health checks must match actual application readiness rather than superficial liveness

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This principle explains why the prescribed control is appropriate for the described requirement. The matching design action is: Select an appropriate EBS gp3 volume with independently provisioned performance settings and test application throughput. The expected supporting evidence is: The volume reaches measured IOPS requirements without unnecessary capacity inflation.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Capacity planning ignores demand spikes or hot keys that concentrate requests. The stated evidence instead indicates: Gp2 capacity-linked performance assumptions lead to wasteful storage growth.

C:

Misses from different edge caches repeatedly burden the same origin. The stated evidence instead indicates: Gp2 capacity-linked performance assumptions lead to wasteful storage growth.

D:

Health checks use an unrelated always-200 endpoint that does not reflect the service readiness. The stated evidence instead indicates: Gp2 capacity-linked performance assumptions lead to wasteful storage growth.

Question 841

An enterprise architecture team faces this design requirement: A company must perform recurring secure file synchronization from on-premises NAS into Amazon S3 with minimal custom scripting. Which selection is defensible under the given constraints?

  1. Use AWS DataSync agents and tasks with scheduling and integrity validation
  2. Use AWS Transfer Family with a supported SFTP endpoint and appropriate identity and S3 permissions
  3. Use AWS DMS full load plus change data capture with compatible schema and monitored replication task
  4. Perform application dependency discovery and group connected workloads into migration waves

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

AWS DataSync automates supported file and object movement with verification features. The required architecture outcome is: A company must perform recurring secure file synchronization from on-premises NAS into Amazon S3 with minimal custom scripting. Validate this choice by checking that Eligible file changes are transferred and verified by a scheduled DataSync task.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Partners are forced to replace SFTP clients with AWS SDK calls without business approval. The specific problem here is that homegrown scripts do not handle incremental transfer, scheduling and verification consistently.

C:

One-time offline export cannot satisfy the narrow write-freeze window. The specific problem here is that homegrown scripts do not handle incremental transfer, scheduling and verification consistently.

D:

Application lists omit runtime call dependencies and produce broken split-wave migrations. The specific problem here is that homegrown scripts do not handle incremental transfer, scheduling and verification consistently.

Question 842

For the enterprise requirement "An organization has a COBOL mainframe workflow that requires staged modernization rather than a blind VM copy", the team implemented this change: Assess the COBOL and batch-job dependencies, then evaluate AWS Transform for mainframe and supported vendor replatforming paths. What would most directly validate the implementation?

  1. Replicated servers boot in AWS test VPCs with verified application functionality before cutover
  2. The Enterprise Support team uploads the approved data during its reserved session and matches end-to-end source and destination checksums
  3. A pilot demonstrates the chosen mainframe transformation path and acceptable business results
  4. A tested transfer plan shows enough effective throughput plus integrity checks for the deadline

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Mainframe migrations need purpose-built assessment and conversion or replatform planning. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: An organization has a COBOL mainframe workflow that requires staged modernization rather than a blind VM copy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Replicated servers boot in AWS test VPCs with verified application functionality before cutover. However, this does not establish the required outcome: a pilot demonstrates the chosen mainframe transformation path and acceptable business results.

B:

The Enterprise Support team uploads the approved data during its reserved session and matches end-to-end source and destination checksums. However, this does not establish the required outcome: a pilot demonstrates the chosen mainframe transformation path and acceptable business results.

D:

A tested transfer plan shows enough effective throughput plus integrity checks for the deadline. However, this does not establish the required outcome: a pilot demonstrates the chosen mainframe transformation path and acceptable business results.

Question 843

A deployed environment still does not meet the original requirement: A brittle order-processing script has nested retries and no durable checkpoint between separate workflow steps. What design flaw is the best match for the reported condition?

  1. Metrics and logs are not organized into actionable per-service operational signals
  2. Only instance host metrics exist and individual container bottlenecks cannot be isolated
  3. Untracked imperative orchestration repeats previous side effects after transient failures
  4. Uncorrelated logs hide where the end-to-end latency accumulates

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the technical design error aligned with the unmet requirement. State machines improve auditability when state transitions and idempotency are designed. The appropriate correction is: Move the suitable multi-step orchestration into Step Functions with named states, bounded retries and error paths. The control should then be tested by verifying that A retry resumes the failed state without independently rerunning successful steps and errors are visible in execution history.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Metrics and logs are not organized into actionable per-service operational signals. The stated evidence instead indicates: Untracked imperative orchestration repeats previous side effects after transient failures.

B:

Only instance host metrics exist and individual container bottlenecks cannot be isolated. The stated evidence instead indicates: Untracked imperative orchestration repeats previous side effects after transient failures.

D:

Uncorrelated logs hide where the end-to-end latency accumulates. The stated evidence instead indicates: Untracked imperative orchestration repeats previous side effects after transient failures.

Question 844

An enterprise architecture team faces this design requirement: Finance needs engineering costs apportioned by team using tags rather than guessed from account totals. Which selection is defensible under the given constraints?

  1. Analyze organization-wide RI utilization and coverage using consolidated billing reports
  2. Require tightly scoped role trust and a scoped session policy or condition that limits the assumed-role credentials
  3. Activate standardized cost allocation tags and enforce tagging through governance processes
  4. Set up AWS Cost Anomaly Detection with relevant monitors and alert subscriptions

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Cost allocation tags must be activated before they appear in billing cost analytics. The required architecture outcome is: Finance needs engineering costs apportioned by team using tags rather than guessed from account totals. Validate this choice by checking that Cost and Usage Reports or Cost Explorer show tagged team spend after activation and reporting delay.

Incorrect Answers

A:

RI purchases are evaluated only in the purchasing account without considering shared billing treatment. The specific problem here is that resource tags were never activated as billing cost allocation dimensions.

B:

An overly broad assumed-role session is not constrained to the vendor's assigned resources. The specific problem here is that resource tags were never activated as billing cost allocation dimensions.

D:

Static budgets cannot explain or detect each atypical spend pattern promptly. The specific problem here is that resource tags were never activated as billing cost allocation dimensions.

Question 845

A deployed environment still does not meet the original requirement: Production maintenance requires an explicit approval and tracked change record before automation updates EC2 systems. Which failure mechanism should the team correct?

  1. Teams purchase more RIs independently without measuring existing shared coverage
  2. Administrators run sensitive maintenance scripts with no enforced approval or trail
  3. Config findings are left as unactioned notifications while risky drift remains exposed
  4. Service-specific Health notifications are not routed into incident processes

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the technical design error aligned with the unmet requirement. Controlled automation separates approval from execution and preserves traceability. The appropriate correction is: Gate a least-privilege Systems Manager Automation runbook with an aws:approve step and retain change approval and execution records. The control should then be tested by verifying that Unauthorized execution is blocked and approved changes have associated audit evidence.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Teams purchase more RIs independently without measuring existing shared coverage. The stated evidence instead indicates: Administrators run sensitive maintenance scripts with no enforced approval or trail.

C:

Config findings are left as unactioned notifications while risky drift remains exposed. The stated evidence instead indicates: Administrators run sensitive maintenance scripts with no enforced approval or trail.

D:

Service-specific Health notifications are not routed into incident processes. The stated evidence instead indicates: Administrators run sensitive maintenance scripts with no enforced approval or trail.

Question 846

An enterprise architecture team faces this design requirement: Hundreds of virtual machines require orchestrated recovery into AWS after a primary on-premises site failure. Which architecture decision best meets that precise requirement?

  1. Place an SQS queue between submission and processing, with appropriately scaled consumers and DLQ policy
  2. Adopt an Aurora Global Database topology where supported and rehearse cross-Region failover or switchover
  3. Use AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery with supported source replication and recovery drills
  4. Use distinct AWS Organizations organizational units and apply targeted service control policies per OU

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports block-level replication and automated recovery launches. The required architecture outcome is: Hundreds of virtual machines require orchestrated recovery into AWS after a primary on-premises site failure. Validate this choice by checking that A drilled failover boots recoverable instances and meets tested recovery objectives and dependency order.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Synchronous request-to-database coupling loses or rejects work whenever the database is unavailable. The specific problem here is that backup images exist but no continuously replicated recovery environment or launch plan is configured.

B:

A single-Region Aurora cluster lacks a suitable crossregional disaster recovery target. The specific problem here is that backup images exist but no continuously replicated recovery environment or launch plan is configured.

D:

All accounts share one indiscriminate service-control policy despite different risk profiles. The specific problem here is that backup images exist but no continuously replicated recovery environment or launch plan is configured.

Question 847

For the enterprise requirement "A legacy database must meet high transactional availability and can accept conversion to an Aurora-compatible engine", the team implemented this change: Modernize to an appropriately configured Amazon Aurora cluster with multi-AZ storage and tested failover. What should operations verify instead of relying on configuration alone?

  1. Partners connect over SFTP and transferred objects appear in assigned bucket prefixes
  2. Isolated handlers scale according to request demand and meet p95 latency and authorization targets
  3. Separate analysts query approved lake datasets without direct access to the legacy ETL host
  4. A controlled writer failure maintains recoverable transactional access after cluster endpoint reconnection

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Aurora offers managed high availability features for supported relational engines. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: A legacy database must meet high transactional availability and can accept conversion to an Aurora-compatible engine.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Partners connect over SFTP and transferred objects appear in assigned bucket prefixes. However, this does not establish the required outcome: a controlled writer failure maintains recoverable transactional access after cluster endpoint reconnection.

B:

Isolated handlers scale according to request demand and meet p95 latency and authorization targets. However, this does not establish the required outcome: a controlled writer failure maintains recoverable transactional access after cluster endpoint reconnection.

C:

Separate analysts query approved lake datasets without direct access to the legacy ETL host. However, this does not establish the required outcome: a controlled writer failure maintains recoverable transactional access after cluster endpoint reconnection.

Question 848

An enterprise architecture team faces this design requirement: Operations retains detached EBS volumes after instance termination and pays for unused storage for months. Which proposed change addresses the stated constraint most directly?

  1. Inventory unattached EBS volumes and delete or archive approved volumes after snapshot and ownership checks
  2. Analyze transfer usage in CUR and network metrics; redesign unnecessary cross-AZ chatty application flows
  3. Enable supported Container Insights telemetry for task and service performance diagnostics
  4. Collect proper monitoring and evaluate AWS Compute Optimizer recommendations with SLO tests

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

EBS storage billing continues for allocated volumes until they are deleted or otherwise changed. The required architecture outcome is: Operations retains detached EBS volumes after instance termination and pays for unused storage for months. Validate this choice by checking that Approved orphaned volumes stop generating storage costs while protected volumes remain recoverable.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Workload service calls repeatedly cross paid network boundaries without quantified need. The specific problem here is that unattached volumes are treated as free merely because they are not mounted.

C:

Only instance host metrics exist and individual container bottlenecks cannot be isolated. The specific problem here is that unattached volumes are treated as free merely because they are not mounted.

D:

Instances remain oversized based only on purchase history rather than performance evidence. The specific problem here is that unattached volumes are treated as free merely because they are not mounted.

Question 849

For the enterprise requirement "A headquarters requires a resilient private link to workloads in two Regions and must avoid routing all traffic over the public internet", the team implemented this change: Provision redundant Direct Connect connections and a Direct Connect gateway associated with appropriate transit or virtual private gateways. What observed result would demonstrate successful delivery of the requested capability?

  1. Accepted messages remain durable during database downtime and are eventually processed when consumers recover
  2. A simulated Direct Connect failure moves approved routes to VPN tunnels and restore reverses route preference
  3. Both circuits carry permitted private routes, and a deliberate single-circuit outage retains connectivity
  4. Consumer instances reach only the approved PrivateLink service while unrelated provider subnets remain unreachable

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Independent Direct Connect circuits and correctly associated gateways improve hybrid-path resiliency. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: A headquarters requires a resilient private link to workloads in two Regions and must avoid routing all traffic over the public internet.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Accepted messages remain durable during database downtime and are eventually processed when consumers recover. However, this does not establish the required outcome: both circuits carry permitted private routes, and a deliberate single-circuit outage retains connectivity.

B:

A simulated Direct Connect failure moves approved routes to VPN tunnels and restore reverses route preference. However, this does not establish the required outcome: both circuits carry permitted private routes, and a deliberate single-circuit outage retains connectivity.

D:

Consumer instances reach only the approved PrivateLink service while unrelated provider subnets remain unreachable. However, this does not establish the required outcome: both circuits carry permitted private routes, and a deliberate single-circuit outage retains connectivity.

Question 850

For the enterprise requirement "A shared API must protect downstream capacity during a request spike without losing monitoring of throttled clients", the team implemented this change: Define API Gateway throttling limits and usage or monitoring controls that match allowed request rates. Which observation should be required before the change is approved?

  1. Terminating all instances in one zone leaves healthy targets and Auto Scaling replaces lost capacity
  2. New DNS lookups return the secondary endpoint after a primary health check changes to unhealthy
  3. Hot session lookups avoid repeated database queries and failure recovery preserves acceptable service behavior
  4. Excess requests return expected throttling responses while permitted traffic continues under peak simulation

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. API Gateway throttle controls bound request rates but callers should handle 429 responses. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: A shared API must protect downstream capacity during a request spike without losing monitoring of throttled clients.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Terminating all instances in one zone leaves healthy targets and Auto Scaling replaces lost capacity. However, this does not establish the required outcome: excess requests return expected throttling responses while permitted traffic continues under peak simulation.

B:

New DNS lookups return the secondary endpoint after a primary health check changes to unhealthy. However, this does not establish the required outcome: excess requests return expected throttling responses while permitted traffic continues under peak simulation.

C:

Hot session lookups avoid repeated database queries and failure recovery preserves acceptable service behavior. However, this does not establish the required outcome: excess requests return expected throttling responses while permitted traffic continues under peak simulation.