McAfee Secure

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle $23.86

100% Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course is developed by Amazon Professionals to help you pass the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.
  • Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 1066-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 87

Question 860

For the enterprise requirement "A reporting dashboard overloads a relational database primary with read queries but still requires strongly controlled write ownership", the team implemented this change: Add supported RDS read replicas and route eventually consistent reporting reads away from the writer. Which result specifically demonstrates the fix works?

  1. Small traffic shares move to the new stack first; an error alarm redirects traffic to the proven stack
  2. Writer CPU usage decreases while lag-tolerant reporting requests use replica endpoints
  3. Records are ingested within supported throughput limits without hot-shard throttling under replayed load
  4. Clients use accelerator anycast addresses and connect to the healthy regional endpoint with improved path latency

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. RDS read replicas scale read throughput but are asynchronous relative to the primary. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: A reporting dashboard overloads a relational database primary with read queries but still requires strongly controlled write ownership.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Small traffic shares move to the new stack first; an error alarm redirects traffic to the proven stack. However, this does not establish the required outcome: writer CPU usage decreases while lag-tolerant reporting requests use replica endpoints.

C:

Records are ingested within supported throughput limits without hot-shard throttling under replayed load. However, this does not establish the required outcome: writer CPU usage decreases while lag-tolerant reporting requests use replica endpoints.

D:

Clients use accelerator anycast addresses and connect to the healthy regional endpoint with improved path latency. However, this does not establish the required outcome: writer CPU usage decreases while lag-tolerant reporting requests use replica endpoints.

Question 861

For the enterprise requirement "A central security team needs automated detections for unusual cross-account API activity and suspected credential misuse", the team implemented this change: Enable GuardDuty organization-wide with designated administrator and configured regional coverage. What observed result would demonstrate successful delivery of the requested capability?

  1. A rotation completes, the application authenticates with the new value, and old credentials are not exposed
  2. Free storage stays above emergency thresholds while capacity grows within policy rather than being oversized initially
  3. A seeded supported suspicious event generates a finding and the delegated administrator can triage it
  4. CloudFront retrieves approved objects while direct anonymous S3 URLs are rejected

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. GuardDuty consumes AWS data sources to identify suspicious behavior and report findings. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: A central security team needs automated detections for unusual cross-account API activity and suspected credential misuse.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A rotation completes, the application authenticates with the new value, and old credentials are not exposed. However, this does not establish the required outcome: a seeded supported suspicious event generates a finding and the delegated administrator can triage it.

B:

Free storage stays above emergency thresholds while capacity grows within policy rather than being oversized initially. However, this does not establish the required outcome: a seeded supported suspicious event generates a finding and the delegated administrator can triage it.

D:

CloudFront retrieves approved objects while direct anonymous S3 URLs are rejected. However, this does not establish the required outcome: a seeded supported suspicious event generates a finding and the delegated administrator can triage it.

Question 862

For the enterprise requirement "A company has shared Reserved Instances in its payer organization and wants to quantify benefit distribution across linked accounts", the team implemented this change: Analyze organization-wide RI utilization and coverage using consolidated billing reports. Which observation should be required before the change is approved?

  1. The assumed session can read the approved prefix and is denied a separate confidential prefix
  2. Eligible compute charges reflect the planned commitment discount and remaining coverage is visible
  3. Finance sees prioritized savings opportunities and can distinguish overlapping cost recommendations
  4. Shared applicable discounts and uncovered on-demand baseline are visible by linked account

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Consolidated billing can share eligible reservations across member accounts subject to sharing settings. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: A company has shared Reserved Instances in its payer organization and wants to quantify benefit distribution across linked accounts.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The assumed session can read the approved prefix and is denied a separate confidential prefix. However, this does not establish the required outcome: shared applicable discounts and uncovered on-demand baseline are visible by linked account.

B:

Eligible compute charges reflect the planned commitment discount and remaining coverage is visible. However, this does not establish the required outcome: shared applicable discounts and uncovered on-demand baseline are visible by linked account.

C:

Finance sees prioritized savings opportunities and can distinguish overlapping cost recommendations. However, this does not establish the required outcome: shared applicable discounts and uncovered on-demand baseline are visible by linked account.

Question 863

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: A compliance dataset is rarely accessed after 90 days but must remain recoverable with several-hour retrieval tolerance. Requirement B: A high-traffic EC2 service must release a risky version while keeping a rapid rollback path and without terminating all healthy targets at once. Choose TWO remedies that meet A and B respectively.

  1. Scale ECS services or EC2 Auto Scaling from queue depth and processing time metrics
  2. Configure S3 lifecycle transitions to a suitable archival storage class and test retrieval times
  3. Configure Route 53 failover routing with suitable health checks and a tested secondary target
  4. Publish a Lambda version and configure weighted alias routing with deployment alarms
  5. Use CodeDeploy blue-green deployment with alternate load balancer target groups and rollback alarms

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: A compliance dataset is rarely accessed after 90 days but must remain recoverable with several-hour retrieval tolerance. Lifecycle transitions reduce storage expense only if retrieval and minimum-duration constraints fit. A direct acceptance check is: Objects transition after the configured age and can be restored within the business retrieval target.

E:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: A high-traffic EC2 service must release a risky version while keeping a rapid rollback path and without terminating all healthy targets at once. Blue-green deployment separates old and new environments to support safe traffic shifting. A direct acceptance check is: Requests switch to the replacement environment only after health tests pass, and rollback returns traffic to old targets.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action targets a different technical need: A queue-backed worker fleet is underloaded overnight but still runs a fixed large number of instances. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Queue-driven scaling aligns paid worker capacity with outstanding workload; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

C:

This action targets a different technical need: A public application must divert DNS traffic away from an endpoint when health checks show it has failed. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. DNS failover requires health-aware routing and realistic expectations for cached answers; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

D:

This action targets a different technical need: A Lambda-backed API team wants to expose only ten percent of traffic to a new function revision before promoting it. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Lambda aliases support weighted traffic between published versions with monitored promotion; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 864

A deployed environment still does not meet the original requirement: An order-processing system uses synchronous downstream calls and fails completely whenever one notification provider is slow. What original architectural gap most directly explains the failure?

  1. Local instance disks are wrongly used as a shared durable POSIX file system
  2. A non-Kubernetes orchestrator was chosen despite strict Kubernetes extension compatibility requirements
  3. One-time offline export cannot satisfy the narrow write-freeze window
  4. Tight synchronous coupling propagates a noncritical downstream failure to the primary transaction

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the technical design error aligned with the unmet requirement. Event-driven boundaries isolate failure but require idempotency and message-delivery governance. The appropriate correction is: Redesign notifications into event-driven processing using EventBridge or SQS with idempotent consumers. The control should then be tested by verifying that Orders complete independently of notification delays, while consumers process retries and duplicate deliveries safely.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Local instance disks are wrongly used as a shared durable POSIX file system. The stated evidence instead indicates: Tight synchronous coupling propagates a noncritical downstream failure to the primary transaction.

B:

A non-Kubernetes orchestrator was chosen despite strict Kubernetes extension compatibility requirements. The stated evidence instead indicates: Tight synchronous coupling propagates a noncritical downstream failure to the primary transaction.

C:

One-time offline export cannot satisfy the narrow write-freeze window. The stated evidence instead indicates: Tight synchronous coupling propagates a noncritical downstream failure to the primary transaction.

Question 865

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: A latency-sensitive global TCP application requires fast traffic steering to healthy regional application load balancers using static anycast addresses. Requirement B: Security analysts need one cross-account aggregation view of prioritized findings without requesting console access in every workload account. Which TWO controls should be used together for these separate scenarios?

  1. Apply a targeted Organizations service control policy denying prohibited CloudTrail disablement actions in affected OUs
  2. Use AWS Global Accelerator with endpoint groups and regional health-based routing
  3. Configure Security Hub delegated administrator and member account aggregation or finding aggregation as supported
  4. Configure a Config aggregator with organization or account sources and appropriate delegated read access
  5. Configure redundant site-to-site VPN tunnels as the tested backup to the Direct Connect path

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: A latency-sensitive global TCP application requires fast traffic steering to healthy regional application load balancers using static anycast addresses. Global Accelerator provides stable global anycast addresses and network-level endpoint health routing. A direct acceptance check is: Clients retain accelerator anycast IPs and are directed to a healthy regional endpoint when one Region fails.

C:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: Security analysts need one cross-account aggregation view of prioritized findings without requesting console access in every workload account. Security Hub delegated administration centralizes findings while each source account retains its own resources. A direct acceptance check is: The delegated account receives findings from participating member accounts and permitted Regions.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action targets a different technical need: A multi-account organization must prevent member accounts from disabling mandatory CloudTrail trails even when local administrators hold broad IAM policies. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Service control policies set permission ceilings for member account principals and cannot grant access themselves; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

D:

This action targets a different technical need: Governance wants one AWS Config compliance view from many accounts and Regions. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. AWS Config aggregators consolidate configuration and compliance data without changing source resources; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

E:

This action targets a different technical need: A company uses Direct Connect for normal hybrid traffic but needs encrypted emergency connectivity if carrier circuits fail. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. A tested secondary encrypted tunnel path can carry critical traffic while primary private connectivity is unavailable; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 866

An architecture review recommends this solution: Apply a targeted Organizations service control policy denying prohibited CloudTrail disablement actions in affected OUs. The motivating situation is: A multi-account organization must prevent member accounts from disabling mandatory CloudTrail trails even when local administrators hold broad IAM policies. Why does this approach fit the stated design constraints?

  1. Organization-level Config rules continuously evaluate configuration and can launch controlled remediations
  2. IAM Access Analyzer analyzes resource-based policies for external access outside the chosen trust zone
  3. Service control policies set permission ceilings for member account principals and cannot grant access themselves
  4. EventBridge cross-account routing requires rules and resource-based permissions

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This principle explains why the prescribed control is appropriate for the described requirement. The matching design action is: Apply a targeted Organizations service control policy denying prohibited CloudTrail disablement actions in affected OUs. The expected supporting evidence is: An administrator's disable request is denied while an authorized central management path remains available.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Per-account one-off inspections do not continuously evaluate drift across accounts. The stated evidence instead indicates: Local identity permissions were incorrectly treated as overriding organizational guardrails.

B:

Resource policies were never checked for access beyond the organization's trust boundary. The stated evidence instead indicates: Local identity permissions were incorrectly treated as overriding organizational guardrails.

D:

Events remain confined to local account buses because cross-account bus authorization is absent. The stated evidence instead indicates: Local identity permissions were incorrectly treated as overriding organizational guardrails.

Question 867

An enterprise architecture team faces this design requirement: An organization needs a central security team to administer Inspector or GuardDuty for member accounts without using the management account daily. What design change should the team implement?

  1. Configure the applicable AWS Organizations delegated administrator in a dedicated security account
  2. Use distinct AWS Organizations organizational units and apply targeted service control policies per OU
  3. Deploy an AWS Control Tower landing zone and Account Factory-based governance with planned organizational units
  4. Introduce a centrally managed translation or proxy layer with nonoverlapping service endpoints rather than directly peering overlapping networks

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Service-specific delegated administration provides controlled cross-account security operations. The required architecture outcome is: An organization needs a central security team to administer Inspector or GuardDuty for member accounts without using the management account daily. Validate this choice by checking that The delegated administrator can manage enrolled member security coverage within its supported scope.

Incorrect Answers

B:

All accounts share one indiscriminate service-control policy despite different risk profiles. The specific problem here is that management-account-only operations were mistaken for necessary daily centralized security administration.

C:

New accounts are assembled by ad hoc scripts with inconsistent security baselines. The specific problem here is that management-account-only operations were mistaken for necessary daily centralized security administration.

D:

Overlapping network prefixes make ordinary VPC peering route selection ambiguous. The specific problem here is that management-account-only operations were mistaken for necessary daily centralized security administration.

Question 868

A deployed environment still does not meet the original requirement: A steady service has predictable cross-family compute usage and seeks discounts without binding to one EC2 instance family. What explains why the stated requirement was not met?

  1. One abrupt DNS change replaced every consumer endpoint with no controlled canary or rollback
  2. The CDN forwards every request to origin due to ineffective cache keys or caching headers
  3. The workload uses only on-demand capacity despite safe restart or checkpoint semantics
  4. Stable compute baseline is paid at on-demand rates without analyzed commitments

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the technical design error aligned with the unmet requirement. Compute Savings Plans discount eligible compute spending with an hourly commitment. The appropriate correction is: Evaluate Compute Savings Plans at a supported commitment level for the stable baseline. The control should then be tested by verifying that Actual eligible usage receives commitment coverage while variable spikes remain flexible.

Incorrect Answers

A:

One abrupt DNS change replaced every consumer endpoint with no controlled canary or rollback. The stated evidence instead indicates: Stable compute baseline is paid at on-demand rates without analyzed commitments.

B:

The CDN forwards every request to origin due to ineffective cache keys or caching headers. The stated evidence instead indicates: Stable compute baseline is paid at on-demand rates without analyzed commitments.

C:

The workload uses only on-demand capacity despite safe restart or checkpoint semantics. The stated evidence instead indicates: Stable compute baseline is paid at on-demand rates without analyzed commitments.

Question 869

For the enterprise requirement "A customer database needs a near-real-time cross-Region read replica and an established disaster recovery promotion procedure", the team implemented this change: Adopt an Aurora Global Database topology where supported and rehearse cross-Region failover or switchover. What should operations verify instead of relying on configuration alone?

  1. Accepted messages remain durable during database downtime and are eventually processed when consumers recover
  2. Replica lag and promotion tests meet defined RPO and RTO targets during planned and simulated events
  3. The assumed session can read the approved prefix and is denied a separate confidential prefix
  4. Draining all nodes in one zone still leaves enough healthy replicas serving traffic from others

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Aurora Global Database supports low-latency crossregional replication with explicit recovery operations. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: A customer database needs a near-real-time cross-Region read replica and an established disaster recovery promotion procedure.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Accepted messages remain durable during database downtime and are eventually processed when consumers recover. However, this does not establish the required outcome: replica lag and promotion tests meet defined RPO and RTO targets during planned and simulated events.

C:

The assumed session can read the approved prefix and is denied a separate confidential prefix. However, this does not establish the required outcome: replica lag and promotion tests meet defined RPO and RTO targets during planned and simulated events.

D:

Draining all nodes in one zone still leaves enough healthy replicas serving traffic from others. However, this does not establish the required outcome: replica lag and promotion tests meet defined RPO and RTO targets during planned and simulated events.

Question 870

An enterprise architecture team faces this design requirement: Order processing must survive transient database outages without permanently losing accepted incoming work. What should the solutions architect recommend?

  1. Place an SQS queue between submission and processing, with appropriately scaled consumers and DLQ policy
  2. Enable EventBridge event-bus archive and replay for eligible matching events
  3. Deploy organization-managed AWS Config rules and targeted auto-remediation through approved Systems Manager Automation
  4. Adopt an Aurora Global Database topology where supported and rehearse cross-Region failover or switchover

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Durable queues decouple intake availability from downstream processing failures. The required architecture outcome is: Order processing must survive transient database outages without permanently losing accepted incoming work. Validate this choice by checking that Accepted messages remain durable during database downtime and are eventually processed when consumers recover.

Incorrect Answers

B:

No archive or retention mechanism was configured before the subscriber outage. The specific problem here is that synchronous request-to-database coupling loses or rejects work whenever the database is unavailable.

C:

Per-account one-off inspections do not continuously evaluate drift across accounts. The specific problem here is that synchronous request-to-database coupling loses or rejects work whenever the database is unavailable.

D:

A single-Region Aurora cluster lacks a suitable crossregional disaster recovery target. The specific problem here is that synchronous request-to-database coupling loses or rejects work whenever the database is unavailable.