McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-715 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-715

Exam Name Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Security

Cisco 300-715 Bundle $25.00
300-715 Sample 1 300-715 Sample 2 300-715 Sample 3 300-715 Sample 4 300-715 Sample 5 300-715 Sample 6 300-715 Sample 7 300-715 Sample 8 300-715 Sample 9 300-715 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-715 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-715 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-715 Questions & Answers

    433 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-715 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-715 Video Course

    300-715 Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    300-715 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-715 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) exam.

Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) (300-715) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    433 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-715 Video Course

    Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 21

Question 200

A Cisco ISE operations team investigates this site issue: A campus wants finance and research roles separated across multiple VLANs and subnets without maintaining IP-specific ACLs on every access switch. What result should be documented before closing the issue?

  1. The correct server subnet or host is mapped to the intended tag and a nearby unlisted host does not inherit it.
  2. A finance endpoint is assigned the correct SGT and the supported enforcement point blocks prohibited research access.
  3. The affected endpoint's session reflects the new SGT and its enforcement matrix behavior changes accordingly.
  4. The approved printer reaches its print server and an unregistered MAC cannot access the protected network.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A finance endpoint is assigned the correct SGT and the supported enforcement point blocks prohibited research access. The required remediation is: Assign suitable Security Group Tags in ISE and apply group-based Cisco TrustSec enforcement using supported security group ACL policies. It works because trustSec labels traffic with logical security group identity so enforcement can follow roles rather than changing IP addressing.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Create a controlled static IP-to-SGT mapping for the approved server and distribute it through the supported method. The repeat risk here is different: Assign suitable Security Group Tags in ISE and apply group-based Cisco TrustSec enforcement using supported security group ACL policies. A directly relevant preventive control is: A finance endpoint is assigned the correct SGT and the supported enforcement point blocks prohibited research access.

C:

Reauthenticate the session using supported CoA or session refresh and verify the resulting TrustSec authorization. The repeat risk here is different: Assign suitable Security Group Tags in ISE and apply group-based Cisco TrustSec enforcement using supported security group ACL policies. A directly relevant preventive control is: A finance endpoint is assigned the correct SGT and the supported enforcement point blocks prohibited research access.

D:

Register the printer's endpoint MAC as an authorized internal endpoint and configure a tightly scoped MAB authorization profile. The repeat risk here is different: Assign suitable Security Group Tags in ISE and apply group-based Cisco TrustSec enforcement using supported security group ACL policies. A directly relevant preventive control is: A finance endpoint is assigned the correct SGT and the supported enforcement point blocks prohibited research access.

Question 201

At a distributed Cisco ISE deployment, a security review finds: A campus wants finance and research roles separated across multiple VLANs and subnets without maintaining IP-specific ACLs on every access switch. Which durable safeguard best prevents a recurrence?

  1. Test group-to-SGT changes with live session transitions, not only ISE policy previews.
  2. Document SGT propagation across non-TrustSec transport segments.
  3. Monitor accounting packet delivery separately from successful authentication counts.
  4. Review group membership to SGT mappings and enforcement matrix whenever business roles change.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Review group membership to SGT mappings and enforcement matrix whenever business roles change. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: TrustSec labels traffic with logical security group identity so enforcement can follow roles rather than changing IP addressing. The ongoing acceptance check remains: A finance endpoint is assigned the correct SGT and the supported enforcement point blocks prohibited research access.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Reorder and constrain the ISE authorization rules so the intended matching condition precedes the broad fallback deny. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable. The needed response is: Review group membership to SGT mappings and enforcement matrix whenever business roles change.

B:

Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable. The needed response is: Review group membership to SGT mappings and enforcement matrix whenever business roles change.

C:

Monitor accounting packet delivery separately from successful authentication counts. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable. The needed response is: Review group membership to SGT mappings and enforcement matrix whenever business roles change.

Question 202

A security policy owner must resolve this specific case: Two Cisco TrustSec-capable devices exchange roles, but one interconnect does not carry inline Security Group Tags and role information disappears across it. Which implementation decision directly satisfies the stated requirement?

  1. Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix.
  2. Assign suitable Security Group Tags in ISE and apply group-based Cisco TrustSec enforcement using supported security group ACL policies.
  3. Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable.
  4. Define an explicit critical-authentication event action and constrained access policy for loss of all authorized RADIUS servers.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable. This is appropriate because trustSec role enforcement requires a mapping from source identity to SGT; not all transit links transport the tag natively. It should be verified by this evidence: The downstream enforcement device learns the expected IP-to-SGT mapping and applies the intended group policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Assign suitable Security Group Tags in ISE and apply group-based Cisco TrustSec enforcement using supported security group ACL policies. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Define an explicit critical-authentication event action and constrained access policy for loss of all authorized RADIUS servers. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 203

A network identity engineer receives the following requirement: Two Cisco TrustSec-capable devices exchange roles, but one interconnect does not carry inline Security Group Tags and role information disappears across it. Which technical behavior is MOST relevant to this design?

  1. TrustSec labels traffic with logical security group identity so enforcement can follow roles rather than changing IP addressing.
  2. An SGT is a classification label; actual permission between groups is enforced by group-based access control policies.
  3. IBNS 2.0 authentication policy can orchestrate multiple methods; an endpoint without EAPOL support needs an alternate admission mechanism.
  4. TrustSec role enforcement requires a mapping from source identity to SGT; not all transit links transport the tag natively.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

TrustSec role enforcement requires a mapping from source identity to SGT; not all transit links transport the tag natively. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable. The acceptance result is: The downstream enforcement device learns the expected IP-to-SGT mapping and applies the intended group policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Assign suitable Security Group Tags in ISE and apply group-based Cisco TrustSec enforcement using supported security group ACL policies. In the case being tested, Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable. The necessary acceptance evidence is: TrustSec role enforcement requires a mapping from source identity to SGT; not all transit links transport the tag natively.

B:

Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix. In the case being tested, Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable. The necessary acceptance evidence is: TrustSec role enforcement requires a mapping from source identity to SGT; not all transit links transport the tag natively.

C:

Add an explicitly authorized MAB method and appropriate event-driven policy handling for devices that cannot perform 802.1X. In the case being tested, Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable. The necessary acceptance evidence is: TrustSec role enforcement requires a mapping from source identity to SGT; not all transit links transport the tag natively.

Question 204

An enterprise access-control incident describes: Two Cisco TrustSec-capable devices exchange roles, but one interconnect does not carry inline Security Group Tags and role information disappears across it. Which readback demonstrates that the actual problem was solved?

  1. The affected endpoint's session reflects the new SGT and its enforcement matrix behavior changes accordingly.
  2. A contractor-tagged pilot is blocked from payroll while an explicitly allowed HR tag succeeds.
  3. The downstream enforcement device learns the expected IP-to-SGT mapping and applies the intended group policy.
  4. A pilot identity is resolved by the intended external or internal source with a traceable authentication result.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The downstream enforcement device learns the expected IP-to-SGT mapping and applies the intended group policy. The required remediation is: Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable. It works because trustSec role enforcement requires a mapping from source identity to SGT; not all transit links transport the tag natively.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Reauthenticate the session using supported CoA or session refresh and verify the resulting TrustSec authorization. The repeat risk here is different: Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable. A directly relevant preventive control is: The downstream enforcement device learns the expected IP-to-SGT mapping and applies the intended group policy.

B:

Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix. The repeat risk here is different: Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable. A directly relevant preventive control is: The downstream enforcement device learns the expected IP-to-SGT mapping and applies the intended group policy.

D:

Audit overlapping account namespaces before modifying identity-source sequences. The repeat risk here is different: Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable. A directly relevant preventive control is: The downstream enforcement device learns the expected IP-to-SGT mapping and applies the intended group policy.

Question 205

In a staged Cisco ISE network access rollout, the team observes: Two Cisco TrustSec-capable devices exchange roles, but one interconnect does not carry inline Security Group Tags and role information disappears across it. What validation should be repeated before subsequent rollouts?

  1. Audit segmentation matrix cells instead of assuming tagging alone denies traffic.
  2. Test group-to-SGT changes with live session transitions, not only ISE policy previews.
  3. Document SGT propagation across non-TrustSec transport segments.
  4. Treat MAB as exception-based admission and migrate devices to stronger authentication when capable.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Document SGT propagation across non-TrustSec transport segments. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: TrustSec role enforcement requires a mapping from source identity to SGT; not all transit links transport the tag natively. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The downstream enforcement device learns the expected IP-to-SGT mapping and applies the intended group policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Create a controlled static IP-to-SGT mapping for the approved server and distribute it through the supported method. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix. The needed response is: Document SGT propagation across non-TrustSec transport segments.

B:

Reorder and constrain the ISE authorization rules so the intended matching condition precedes the broad fallback deny. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix. The needed response is: Document SGT propagation across non-TrustSec transport segments.

D:

Use a supported session reauthentication or RADIUS CoA after the endpoint identity and profile classification change. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix. The needed response is: Document SGT propagation across non-TrustSec transport segments.

Question 206

At a distributed Cisco ISE deployment, a security review finds: An administrator assigns SGTs correctly, but a policy matrix still allows a contractor tag to reach the payroll server tag because no restrictive cell was created. What should the team change before declaring this work complete?

  1. Create a controlled static IP-to-SGT mapping for the approved server and distribute it through the supported method.
  2. Assign suitable Security Group Tags in ISE and apply group-based Cisco TrustSec enforcement using supported security group ACL policies.
  3. Reduce the MAB role to least privilege and supplement admission with profiling, port context, or stronger supported controls where feasible.
  4. Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix. This is appropriate because an SGT is a classification label; actual permission between groups is enforced by group-based access control policies. It should be verified by this evidence: A contractor-tagged pilot is blocked from payroll while an explicitly allowed HR tag succeeds.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Create a controlled static IP-to-SGT mapping for the approved server and distribute it through the supported method. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Assign suitable Security Group Tags in ISE and apply group-based Cisco TrustSec enforcement using supported security group ACL policies. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Reduce the MAB role to least privilege and supplement admission with profiling, port context, or stronger supported controls where feasible. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 207

An ISE administrator troubleshoots the following: An administrator assigns SGTs correctly, but a policy matrix still allows a contractor tag to reach the payroll server tag because no restrictive cell was created. What underlying Cisco ISE dependency explains this result?

  1. An SGT is a classification label; actual permission between groups is enforced by group-based access control policies.
  2. TrustSec role enforcement requires a mapping from source identity to SGT; not all transit links transport the tag natively.
  3. An active NAD session may retain its initial tag until its RADIUS authorization state is refreshed.
  4. RADIUS authentication exchanges grant access, while accounting records session start, stop, and interim usage events when configured.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

An SGT is a classification label; actual permission between groups is enforced by group-based access control policies. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix. The acceptance result is: A contractor-tagged pilot is blocked from payroll while an explicitly allowed HR tag succeeds.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable. In the case being tested, Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix. The necessary acceptance evidence is: An SGT is a classification label; actual permission between groups is enforced by group-based access control policies.

C:

Reauthenticate the session using supported CoA or session refresh and verify the resulting TrustSec authorization. In the case being tested, Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix. The necessary acceptance evidence is: An SGT is a classification label; actual permission between groups is enforced by group-based access control policies.

D:

Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. In the case being tested, Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix. The necessary acceptance evidence is: An SGT is a classification label; actual permission between groups is enforced by group-based access control policies.

Question 208

An access-security change request states: An administrator assigns SGTs correctly, but a policy matrix still allows a contractor tag to reach the payroll server tag because no restrictive cell was created. Which measurable outcome proves the intended behavior?

  1. The affected endpoint's session reflects the new SGT and its enforcement matrix behavior changes accordingly.
  2. A contractor-tagged pilot is blocked from payroll while an explicitly allowed HR tag succeeds.
  3. A finance endpoint is assigned the correct SGT and the supported enforcement point blocks prohibited research access.
  4. A test wireless session generates a matching accounting start and stop tied to its authenticated identity.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A contractor-tagged pilot is blocked from payroll while an explicitly allowed HR tag succeeds. The required remediation is: Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix. It works because an SGT is a classification label; actual permission between groups is enforced by group-based access control policies.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Reauthenticate the session using supported CoA or session refresh and verify the resulting TrustSec authorization. The repeat risk here is different: Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix. A directly relevant preventive control is: A contractor-tagged pilot is blocked from payroll while an explicitly allowed HR tag succeeds.

C:

Assign suitable Security Group Tags in ISE and apply group-based Cisco TrustSec enforcement using supported security group ACL policies. The repeat risk here is different: Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix. A directly relevant preventive control is: A contractor-tagged pilot is blocked from payroll while an explicitly allowed HR tag succeeds.

D:

Monitor accounting packet delivery separately from successful authentication counts. The repeat risk here is different: Configure the intended source-SGT to destination-SGT permission using a suitable SGACL in the TrustSec policy matrix. A directly relevant preventive control is: A contractor-tagged pilot is blocked from payroll while an explicitly allowed HR tag succeeds.

Question 209

During a Cisco ISE postchange review, the following is observed: An administrator assigns SGTs correctly, but a policy matrix still allows a contractor tag to reach the payroll server tag because no restrictive cell was created. Which ongoing practice is most appropriate for this failure mode?

  1. Monitor SGACL policy download and version consistency across NADs.
  2. Audit segmentation matrix cells instead of assuming tagging alone denies traffic.
  3. Review group membership to SGT mappings and enforcement matrix whenever business roles change.
  4. Alert on ISE node time drift and authoritative NTP reachability.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Audit segmentation matrix cells instead of assuming tagging alone denies traffic. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: An SGT is a classification label; actual permission between groups is enforced by group-based access control policies. The ongoing acceptance check remains: A contractor-tagged pilot is blocked from payroll while an explicitly allowed HR tag succeeds.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Reauthenticate the session using supported CoA or session refresh and verify the resulting TrustSec authorization. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Create a controlled static IP-to-SGT mapping for the approved server and distribute it through the supported method. The needed response is: Audit segmentation matrix cells instead of assuming tagging alone denies traffic.

C:

Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Create a controlled static IP-to-SGT mapping for the approved server and distribute it through the supported method. The needed response is: Audit segmentation matrix cells instead of assuming tagging alone denies traffic.

D:

Alert on ISE node time drift and authoritative NTP reachability. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Create a controlled static IP-to-SGT mapping for the approved server and distribute it through the supported method. The needed response is: Audit segmentation matrix cells instead of assuming tagging alone denies traffic.

Question 210

In a staged Cisco ISE network access rollout, the team observes: An external application server cannot perform TrustSec authentication, yet it must be classified into a known application-server security group. Which response most directly corrects the described failure?

  1. Assign suitable Security Group Tags in ISE and apply group-based Cisco TrustSec enforcement using supported security group ACL policies.
  2. Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable.
  3. Restore AD-aware DNS resolution and reachable domain-controller discovery from the PSN, then retry the supported domain join.
  4. Create a controlled static IP-to-SGT mapping for the approved server and distribute it through the supported method.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Create a controlled static IP-to-SGT mapping for the approved server and distribute it through the supported method. This is appropriate because static IP-to-SGT assignment supplies classification for eligible assets that cannot dynamically obtain an SGT via network access authentication. It should be verified by this evidence: The correct server subnet or host is mapped to the intended tag and a nearby unlisted host does not inherit it.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Create a controlled static IP-to-SGT mapping for the approved server and distribute it through the supported method. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Assign suitable Security Group Tags in ISE and apply group-based Cisco TrustSec enforcement using supported security group ACL policies. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Create a controlled static IP-to-SGT mapping for the approved server and distribute it through the supported method. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Create a controlled static IP-to-SGT mapping for the approved server and distribute it through the supported method. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Separate initial-node bootstrap rights from production policy-administration privileges. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.