McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-715 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-715

Exam Name Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Security

Cisco 300-715 Bundle $25.00
300-715 Sample 1 300-715 Sample 2 300-715 Sample 3 300-715 Sample 4 300-715 Sample 5 300-715 Sample 6 300-715 Sample 7 300-715 Sample 8 300-715 Sample 9 300-715 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-715 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-715 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-715 Questions & Answers

    433 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-715 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-715 Video Course

    300-715 Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    300-715 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-715 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) exam.

Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) (300-715) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    433 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-715 Video Course

    Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 25

Question 240

During a Cisco ISE postchange review, the following is observed: An ISE policy author makes an exception that grants full employee access whenever authentication fails, intending to help during a directory outage. Which observation would BEST verify successful remediation?

  1. Live logs show the correct staff authorization rule and allowed profile while unknown identities still match the final deny.
  2. The laboratory port matches its intended policy set and the guest SSID remains matched separately.
  3. A bad-password test stays denied, and a separate approved outage scenario receives only the documented continuity role.
  4. The known `uid` resolves to its proper directory entry while an unknown account does not authenticate.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

A bad-password test stays denied, and a separate approved outage scenario receives only the documented continuity role. The required remediation is: Change the authentication and authorization exception actions to controlled denial or strictly limited approved critical access. It works because an authentication failure is not proof of a trusted identity; an unconditional allow exception defeats the authorization barrier.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Reorder and constrain the ISE authorization rules so the intended matching condition precedes the broad fallback deny. The repeat risk here is different: Change the authentication and authorization exception actions to controlled denial or strictly limited approved critical access. A directly relevant preventive control is: A bad-password test stays denied, and a separate approved outage scenario receives only the documented continuity role.

B:

Narrow the policy-set conditions using authentic network-device group, SSID, and protocol attributes before evaluating its detailed rules. The repeat risk here is different: Change the authentication and authorization exception actions to controlled denial or strictly limited approved critical access. A directly relevant preventive control is: A bad-password test stays denied, and a separate approved outage scenario receives only the documented continuity role.

D:

Maintain per-directory schema mapping tests before identity store migrations. The repeat risk here is different: Change the authentication and authorization exception actions to controlled denial or strictly limited approved critical access. A directly relevant preventive control is: A bad-password test stays denied, and a separate approved outage scenario receives only the documented continuity role.

Question 241

A security policy owner must resolve this specific case: An ISE policy author makes an exception that grants full employee access whenever authentication fails, intending to help during a directory outage. What should be incorporated into the change checklist?

  1. Verify authorization-profile attributes and NAD support for each contractor access method.
  2. Test policy-result compatibility against each actual NAD configuration.
  3. Audit EAP method availability and certificate trust before deploying new WLANs.
  4. Review exception-table actions for escalation of privilege and fail-open mistakes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Review exception-table actions for escalation of privilege and fail-open mistakes. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: An authentication failure is not proof of a trusted identity; an unconditional allow exception defeats the authorization barrier. The ongoing acceptance check remains: A bad-password test stays denied, and a separate approved outage scenario receives only the documented continuity role.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Narrow the policy-set conditions using authentic network-device group, SSID, and protocol attributes before evaluating its detailed rules. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Correct the NAD's supported VLAN availability and verify that ISE returns an attribute compatible with that platform and port. The needed response is: Review exception-table actions for escalation of privilege and fail-open mistakes.

B:

Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Correct the NAD's supported VLAN availability and verify that ISE returns an attribute compatible with that platform and port. The needed response is: Review exception-table actions for escalation of privilege and fail-open mistakes.

C:

Audit EAP method availability and certificate trust before deploying new WLANs. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Correct the NAD's supported VLAN availability and verify that ISE returns an attribute compatible with that platform and port. The needed response is: Review exception-table actions for escalation of privilege and fail-open mistakes.

Question 242

An identity and device-administration engineer evaluates: Live Logs show an Access-Accept but a switch rejects the returned VLAN because its local trunk does not permit that VLAN identifier. What is the most suitable solution within these constraints?

  1. Change the authentication and authorization exception actions to controlled denial or strictly limited approved critical access.
  2. Reorder and constrain the ISE authorization rules so the intended matching condition precedes the broad fallback deny.
  3. Use a supported session reauthentication or RADIUS CoA after the endpoint identity and profile classification change.
  4. Correct the NAD's supported VLAN availability and verify that ISE returns an attribute compatible with that platform and port.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct the NAD's supported VLAN availability and verify that ISE returns an attribute compatible with that platform and port. This is appropriate because iSE returns the logical authorization result, but the network access device must be able to enforce its physical VLAN or ACL settings. It should be verified by this evidence: The switch applies the returned VLAN and the client reaches only the authorized segment.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Correct the NAD's supported VLAN availability and verify that ISE returns an attribute compatible with that platform and port. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Change the authentication and authorization exception actions to controlled denial or strictly limited approved critical access. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Correct the NAD's supported VLAN availability and verify that ISE returns an attribute compatible with that platform and port. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Reorder and constrain the ISE authorization rules so the intended matching condition precedes the broad fallback deny. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Correct the NAD's supported VLAN availability and verify that ISE returns an attribute compatible with that platform and port. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Use a supported session reauthentication or RADIUS CoA after the endpoint identity and profile classification change. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 243

A campus and branch network operator reports: Live Logs show an Access-Accept but a switch rejects the returned VLAN because its local trunk does not permit that VLAN identifier. Which platform distinction is decisive in this scenario?

  1. ISE selects a policy set by its condition; an overly broad match routes authentications to the wrong policy even with correct credentials.
  2. Authentication establishes identity, whereas ordered authorization policy selects an access result based on conditions; rule precedence is decisive.
  3. ISE returns the logical authorization result, but the network access device must be able to enforce its physical VLAN or ACL settings.
  4. Event-driven IBNS 2.0 control policy governs how authentication state changes after RADIUS events; a static VLAN command alone does not define transitions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

ISE returns the logical authorization result, but the network access device must be able to enforce its physical VLAN or ACL settings. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Correct the NAD's supported VLAN availability and verify that ISE returns an attribute compatible with that platform and port. The acceptance result is: The switch applies the returned VLAN and the client reaches only the authorized segment.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Narrow the policy-set conditions using authentic network-device group, SSID, and protocol attributes before evaluating its detailed rules. In the case being tested, Correct the NAD's supported VLAN availability and verify that ISE returns an attribute compatible with that platform and port. The necessary acceptance evidence is: ISE returns the logical authorization result, but the network access device must be able to enforce its physical VLAN or ACL settings.

B:

Reorder and constrain the ISE authorization rules so the intended matching condition precedes the broad fallback deny. In the case being tested, Correct the NAD's supported VLAN availability and verify that ISE returns an attribute compatible with that platform and port. The necessary acceptance evidence is: ISE returns the logical authorization result, but the network access device must be able to enforce its physical VLAN or ACL settings.

D:

Inspect the IBNS 2.0 event and action mapping for reauthentication and apply a supported CoA-triggered session transition. In the case being tested, Correct the NAD's supported VLAN availability and verify that ISE returns an attribute compatible with that platform and port. The necessary acceptance evidence is: ISE returns the logical authorization result, but the network access device must be able to enforce its physical VLAN or ACL settings.

Question 244

A Cisco ISE operations team investigates this site issue: Live Logs show an Access-Accept but a switch rejects the returned VLAN because its local trunk does not permit that VLAN identifier. Which acceptance test would directly establish the desired state?

  1. A bad-password test stays denied, and a separate approved outage scenario receives only the documented continuity role.
  2. The switch applies the returned VLAN and the client reaches only the authorized segment.
  3. Live logs show the correct staff authorization rule and allowed profile while unknown identities still match the final deny.
  4. The live log identifies the corporate SSID rule and the client receives the expected VLAN while guest clients remain isolated.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The switch applies the returned VLAN and the client reaches only the authorized segment. The required remediation is: Correct the NAD's supported VLAN availability and verify that ISE returns an attribute compatible with that platform and port. It works because iSE returns the logical authorization result, but the network access device must be able to enforce its physical VLAN or ACL settings.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Change the authentication and authorization exception actions to controlled denial or strictly limited approved critical access. The repeat risk here is different: Correct the NAD's supported VLAN availability and verify that ISE returns an attribute compatible with that platform and port. A directly relevant preventive control is: The switch applies the returned VLAN and the client reaches only the authorized segment.

C:

Reorder and constrain the ISE authorization rules so the intended matching condition precedes the broad fallback deny. The repeat risk here is different: Correct the NAD's supported VLAN availability and verify that ISE returns an attribute compatible with that platform and port. A directly relevant preventive control is: The switch applies the returned VLAN and the client reaches only the authorized segment.

D:

Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. The repeat risk here is different: Correct the NAD's supported VLAN availability and verify that ISE returns an attribute compatible with that platform and port. A directly relevant preventive control is: The switch applies the returned VLAN and the client reaches only the authorized segment.

Question 245

At a distributed Cisco ISE deployment, a security review finds: Live Logs show an Access-Accept but a switch rejects the returned VLAN because its local trunk does not permit that VLAN identifier. Which governance step most directly targets the root cause?

  1. Test policy-set selection on each NAD and access medium before enabling broad changes.
  2. Verify authorization-profile attributes and NAD support for each contractor access method.
  3. Test essential control-plane exceptions before enforcing closed mode at scale.
  4. Test policy-result compatibility against each actual NAD configuration.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Test policy-result compatibility against each actual NAD configuration. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: ISE returns the logical authorization result, but the network access device must be able to enforce its physical VLAN or ACL settings. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The switch applies the returned VLAN and the client reaches only the authorized segment.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Change the authentication and authorization exception actions to controlled denial or strictly limited approved critical access. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility. The needed response is: Test policy-result compatibility against each actual NAD configuration.

B:

Narrow the policy-set conditions using authentic network-device group, SSID, and protocol attributes before evaluating its detailed rules. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility. The needed response is: Test policy-result compatibility against each actual NAD configuration.

C:

Select a supported 802.1X host mode such as multi-domain when one voice endpoint and one data endpoint must authenticate separately. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility. The needed response is: Test policy-result compatibility against each actual NAD configuration.

Question 246

A security policy owner must resolve this specific case: A guest wireless SSID is configured for Central Web Authentication, but the WLC returns a normal Access-Accept without redirect attributes and users never reach the guest portal. Which change is justified by the observed evidence?

  1. Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility.
  2. Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result.
  3. Use an appropriately controlled Hotspot Guest portal with an acceptable-use acknowledgement and the approved temporary-access authorization.
  4. Enable an approved self-registered guest portal with the intended verification and approval policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility. This is appropriate because central Web Authentication relies on ISE-selected RADIUS redirect attributes and a NAD that can redirect unauthenticated web traffic. It should be verified by this evidence: A new guest is redirected to the intended ISE portal and receives permitted internet access only after completing the guest flow.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: a hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Self-registration permits a guest to initiate account creation; sponsor-created workflows are a different ownership model. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 247

A network identity engineer receives the following requirement: A guest wireless SSID is configured for Central Web Authentication, but the WLC returns a normal Access-Accept without redirect attributes and users never reach the guest portal. What mechanism governs this authentication or management outcome?

  1. Central Web Authentication relies on ISE-selected RADIUS redirect attributes and a NAD that can redirect unauthenticated web traffic.
  2. A hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication.
  3. Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection.
  4. Self-registration and approval are distinct workflow stages; successful form submission should not automatically grant controlled network privileges.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Central Web Authentication relies on ISE-selected RADIUS redirect attributes and a NAD that can redirect unauthenticated web traffic. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility. The acceptance result is: A new guest is redirected to the intended ISE portal and receives permitted internet access only after completing the guest flow.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. In the case being tested, Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Central Web Authentication relies on ISE-selected RADIUS redirect attributes and a NAD that can redirect unauthenticated web traffic.

C:

Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. In the case being tested, Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Central Web Authentication relies on ISE-selected RADIUS redirect attributes and a NAD that can redirect unauthenticated web traffic.

D:

Include both denied and approved sponsor paths in portal acceptance tests. In the case being tested, Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Central Web Authentication relies on ISE-selected RADIUS redirect attributes and a NAD that can redirect unauthenticated web traffic.

Question 248

An enterprise access-control incident describes: A guest wireless SSID is configured for Central Web Authentication, but the WLC returns a normal Access-Accept without redirect attributes and users never reach the guest portal. What is the strongest evidence that this requirement is met?

  1. The guest reaches only the isolated internet service while an employee still matches the employee authorization policy.
  2. A fresh test guest reaches a functioning portal after the planned PSN outage and completes login.
  3. The contractor can issue only its permitted account class and an executive sponsor retains the separate class.
  4. A new guest is redirected to the intended ISE portal and receives permitted internet access only after completing the guest flow.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A new guest is redirected to the intended ISE portal and receives permitted internet access only after completing the guest flow. The required remediation is: Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility. It works because central Web Authentication relies on ISE-selected RADIUS redirect attributes and a NAD that can redirect unauthenticated web traffic.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD. The repeat risk here is different: Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility. A directly relevant preventive control is: A new guest is redirected to the intended ISE portal and receives permitted internet access only after completing the guest flow.

B:

Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. The repeat risk here is different: Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility. A directly relevant preventive control is: A new guest is redirected to the intended ISE portal and receives permitted internet access only after completing the guest flow.

C:

Review privilege inheritance in sponsor groups before exposing new guest account types. The repeat risk here is different: Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility. A directly relevant preventive control is: A new guest is redirected to the intended ISE portal and receives permitted internet access only after completing the guest flow.

Question 249

In a staged Cisco ISE network access rollout, the team observes: A guest wireless SSID is configured for Central Web Authentication, but the WLC returns a normal Access-Accept without redirect attributes and users never reach the guest portal. Which recurring operational control would reduce this risk?

  1. Validate CWA authorization attributes on each wireless controller model and firmware.
  2. Include the HTTPS guest portal endpoint in PSN high-availability exercises.
  3. Track portal certificate expiration and FQDN changes in guest-service maintenance.
  4. Classify guest identity assurance and verify contact methods before granting sensitive visitor access.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Validate CWA authorization attributes on each wireless controller model and firmware. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Central Web Authentication relies on ISE-selected RADIUS redirect attributes and a NAD that can redirect unauthenticated web traffic. The ongoing acceptance check remains: A new guest is redirected to the intended ISE portal and receives permitted internet access only after completing the guest flow.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result. The needed response is: Validate CWA authorization attributes on each wireless controller model and firmware.

C:

Portal trust depends on certificate hostname and chain validation; successful RADIUS redirection alone does not make the HTTPS identity trusted. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result. The needed response is: Validate CWA authorization attributes on each wireless controller model and firmware.

D:

An unverified sample does not receive a verified-guest role and a successfully verified account follows the approved process. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result. The needed response is: Validate CWA authorization attributes on each wireless controller model and firmware.

Question 250

At a distributed Cisco ISE deployment, a security review finds: A wired guest port has no supplicant and Central WebAuth never starts because the switch waits only for EAPOL frames and sends no RADIUS request. Which administrative action BEST addresses this specific situation?

  1. Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility.
  2. Enable and validate the supported RADIUS CoA or reauthentication process that replaces the temporary redirect result.
  3. Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result.
  4. Check the guest-account notification method, contact address, and message delivery configuration after validating account creation.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result. This is appropriate because a non-802.1X guest can start the web-authentication sequence from MAB and then transition to credentialed portal authentication. It should be verified by this evidence: A test guest without a supplicant receives a limited web redirect and completes the supported guest authentication.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Successful portal credential validation does not itself change an already authorized NAD session without the required update mechanism. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Test accounts receive their respective allowed durations and access restrictions, with no accidental conference-account extension. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.