McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-715 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-715

Exam Name Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Security

Cisco 300-715 Bundle $25.00
300-715 Sample 1 300-715 Sample 2 300-715 Sample 3 300-715 Sample 4 300-715 Sample 5 300-715 Sample 6 300-715 Sample 7 300-715 Sample 8 300-715 Sample 9 300-715 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-715 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-715 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-715 Questions & Answers

    433 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-715 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-715 Video Course

    300-715 Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    300-715 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-715 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) exam.

Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) (300-715) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    433 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-715 Video Course

    Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 27

Question 260

An enterprise access-control incident describes: A captive portal advertises an IP address that does not match its public certificate, and mobile clients display a certificate identity warning before login. What validation should be repeated before subsequent rollouts?

  1. Track portal certificate expiration and FQDN changes in guest-service maintenance.
  2. Test CWA login-to-authorization transition separately from portal form submission.
  3. Document access methods and initial authentication triggers for each guest connection type.
  4. Require sponsor attestation and expiration for visits to controlled facilities.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Track portal certificate expiration and FQDN changes in guest-service maintenance. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Portal trust depends on certificate hostname and chain validation; successful RADIUS redirection alone does not make the HTTPS identity trusted. The ongoing acceptance check remains: A pilot guest loads the portal without a TLS name mismatch and cannot be redirected to an untrusted duplicate endpoint.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Successful portal credential validation does not itself change an already authorized NAD session without the required update mechanism. The repeat risk here is different: Portal trust depends on certificate hostname and chain validation; successful RADIUS redirection alone does not make the HTTPS identity trusted. A directly relevant preventive control is: Track portal certificate expiration and FQDN changes in guest-service maintenance.

C:

Allow only the portal's approved HTTPS destination and essential DNS or DHCP bootstrap traffic in the limited-access redirect ACL. The repeat risk here is different: Portal trust depends on certificate hostname and chain validation; successful RADIUS redirection alone does not make the HTTPS identity trusted. A directly relevant preventive control is: Track portal certificate expiration and FQDN changes in guest-service maintenance.

D:

A hotspot's acceptance step does not prove a sponsor approved a named visitor or checked their eligibility. The repeat risk here is different: Portal trust depends on certificate hostname and chain validation; successful RADIUS redirection alone does not make the HTTPS identity trusted. A directly relevant preventive control is: Track portal certificate expiration and FQDN changes in guest-service maintenance.

Question 261

A Cisco ISE operations team investigates this site issue: A branch controller is configured for local web authentication while the design assumes ISE Central WebAuth will serve all credential entry pages. What should the team change before declaring this work complete?

  1. Design a supported resilient guest portal service path using healthy PSNs and corresponding redirect-hostname resolution and availability checks.
  2. Use the intended portal FQDN, valid HTTPS certificate, and DNS record reachable by the guest clients.
  3. Correct and validate approved guest contact information and notification delivery before resetting and securely reissuing the credential.
  4. Align the NAD's supported local-versus-central web authentication method with the portal design and ISE authorization results.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Align the NAD's supported local-versus-central web authentication method with the portal design and ISE authorization results. This is appropriate because local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. It should be verified by this evidence: The test browser reaches the intended portal host and its credentials are evaluated by the defined authentication component.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. The needed response is: Align the NAD's supported local-versus-central web authentication method with the portal design and ISE authorization results.

B:

Portal trust depends on certificate hostname and chain validation; successful RADIUS redirection alone does not make the HTTPS identity trusted. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. The needed response is: Align the NAD's supported local-versus-central web authentication method with the portal design and ISE authorization results.

C:

A test client using the target language sees the correct consent, login, and rejection messages. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. The needed response is: Align the NAD's supported local-versus-central web authentication method with the portal design and ISE authorization results.

Question 262

At a distributed Cisco ISE deployment, a security review finds: A branch controller is configured for local web authentication while the design assumes ISE Central WebAuth will serve all credential entry pages. What underlying Cisco ISE dependency explains this result?

  1. Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback.
  2. Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection.
  3. A non-802.1X guest can start the web-authentication sequence from MAB and then transition to credentialed portal authentication.
  4. Self-registration and approval are distinct workflow stages; successful form submission should not automatically grant controlled network privileges.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Align the NAD's supported local-versus-central web authentication method with the portal design and ISE authorization results. The acceptance result is: The test browser reaches the intended portal host and its credentials are evaluated by the defined authentication component.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Include both denied and approved sponsor paths in portal acceptance tests. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 263

An ISE administrator troubleshoots the following: A branch controller is configured for local web authentication while the design assumes ISE Central WebAuth will serve all credential entry pages. Which measurable outcome proves the intended behavior?

  1. A test visitor accepts the AUP and receives the limited guest role without being asked for a personal password.
  2. The test browser reaches the intended portal host and its credentials are evaluated by the defined authentication component.
  3. A test guest without a supplicant receives a limited web redirect and completes the supported guest authentication.
  4. An unapproved visitor remains restricted and the same approved visitor gains only the authorized guest role.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The test browser reaches the intended portal host and its credentials are evaluated by the defined authentication component. The required remediation is: Align the NAD's supported local-versus-central web authentication method with the portal design and ISE authorization results. It works because local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. In the case being tested, Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. The necessary acceptance evidence is: The test browser reaches the intended portal host and its credentials are evaluated by the defined authentication component.

C:

Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result. In the case being tested, Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. The necessary acceptance evidence is: The test browser reaches the intended portal host and its credentials are evaluated by the defined authentication component.

D:

A hotspot's acceptance step does not prove a sponsor approved a named visitor or checked their eligibility. In the case being tested, Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. The necessary acceptance evidence is: The test browser reaches the intended portal host and its credentials are evaluated by the defined authentication component.

Question 264

An access-security change request states: A branch controller is configured for local web authentication while the design assumes ISE Central WebAuth will serve all credential entry pages. Which ongoing practice is most appropriate for this failure mode?

  1. Document which device presents login pages for each SSID and switch configuration.
  2. Track portal certificate expiration and FQDN changes in guest-service maintenance.
  3. Choose guest portal type according to explicit identification and compliance requirements.
  4. Audit existing guest identities before sponsor-driven account extension.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Document which device presents login pages for each SSID and switch configuration. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The test browser reaches the intended portal host and its credentials are evaluated by the defined authentication component.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Portal trust depends on certificate hostname and chain validation; successful RADIUS redirection alone does not make the HTTPS identity trusted. The repeat risk here is different: Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. A directly relevant preventive control is: Document which device presents login pages for each SSID and switch configuration.

C:

A hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. The repeat risk here is different: Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. A directly relevant preventive control is: Document which device presents login pages for each SSID and switch configuration.

D:

Guest management includes account lifecycle operations; repeated new identities fragment history and can bypass intended access limits. The repeat risk here is different: Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. A directly relevant preventive control is: Document which device presents login pages for each SSID and switch configuration.

Question 265

An enterprise access-control incident describes: A user passes guest login but remains trapped at the captive portal because the NAD never applies the new post-login policy. Which response most directly corrects the described failure?

  1. Use the intended portal FQDN, valid HTTPS certificate, and DNS record reachable by the guest clients.
  2. Enable and validate the supported RADIUS CoA or reauthentication process that replaces the temporary redirect result.
  3. Align the NAD's supported local-versus-central web authentication method with the portal design and ISE authorization results.
  4. Configure the guest registration process to require the intended sponsor approval gate before credentialed access.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Enable and validate the supported RADIUS CoA or reauthentication process that replaces the temporary redirect result. This is appropriate because successful portal credential validation does not itself change an already authorized NAD session without the required update mechanism. It should be verified by this evidence: The guest receives the intended post-authentication internet-only role after login, with the redirect ACL removed.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Portal trust depends on certificate hostname and chain validation; successful RADIUS redirection alone does not make the HTTPS identity trusted. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Successful portal credential validation does not itself change an already authorized NAD session without the required update mechanism. The needed response is: Enable and validate the supported RADIUS CoA or reauthentication process that replaces the temporary redirect result.

C:

Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Successful portal credential validation does not itself change an already authorized NAD session without the required update mechanism. The needed response is: Enable and validate the supported RADIUS CoA or reauthentication process that replaces the temporary redirect result.

D:

The permitted extension is visible in the account record and login succeeds only inside the revised window. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Successful portal credential validation does not itself change an already authorized NAD session without the required update mechanism. The needed response is: Enable and validate the supported RADIUS CoA or reauthentication process that replaces the temporary redirect result.

Question 266

In a staged Cisco ISE network access rollout, the team observes: A user passes guest login but remains trapped at the captive portal because the NAD never applies the new post-login policy. Which statement best explains why the correct response works?

  1. Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback.
  2. A captive portal cannot load when preauthentication policy blocks the resources needed to resolve or reach it.
  3. Guest types can express different lifecycle and access requirements even when the portal technology is shared.
  4. Successful portal credential validation does not itself change an already authorized NAD session without the required update mechanism.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Successful portal credential validation does not itself change an already authorized NAD session without the required update mechanism. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Enable and validate the supported RADIUS CoA or reauthentication process that replaces the temporary redirect result. The acceptance result is: The guest receives the intended post-authentication internet-only role after login, with the redirect ACL removed.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Successful portal credential validation does not itself change an already authorized NAD session without the required update mechanism. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Successful portal credential validation does not itself change an already authorized NAD session without the required update mechanism. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Allow only the portal's approved HTTPS destination and essential DNS or DHCP bootstrap traffic in the limited-access redirect ACL. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Successful portal credential validation does not itself change an already authorized NAD session without the required update mechanism. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Test accounts receive their respective allowed durations and access restrictions, with no accidental conference-account extension. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 267

An identity and device-administration engineer evaluates: A user passes guest login but remains trapped at the captive portal because the NAD never applies the new post-login policy. Which observation would BEST verify successful remediation?

  1. The test browser reaches the intended portal host and its credentials are evaluated by the defined authentication component.
  2. A test guest without a supplicant receives a limited web redirect and completes the supported guest authentication.
  3. The guest receives the intended post-authentication internet-only role after login, with the redirect ACL removed.
  4. The guest receives a newly issued credential through the verified contact method and the old credential is revoked.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The guest receives the intended post-authentication internet-only role after login, with the redirect ACL removed. The required remediation is: Enable and validate the supported RADIUS CoA or reauthentication process that replaces the temporary redirect result. It works because successful portal credential validation does not itself change an already authorized NAD session without the required update mechanism.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. In the case being tested, Successful portal credential validation does not itself change an already authorized NAD session without the required update mechanism. The necessary acceptance evidence is: The guest receives the intended post-authentication internet-only role after login, with the redirect ACL removed.

B:

Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result. In the case being tested, Successful portal credential validation does not itself change an already authorized NAD session without the required update mechanism. The necessary acceptance evidence is: The guest receives the intended post-authentication internet-only role after login, with the redirect ACL removed.

D:

The guest receives a newly issued credential through the verified contact method and the old credential is revoked. In the case being tested, Successful portal credential validation does not itself change an already authorized NAD session without the required update mechanism. The necessary acceptance evidence is: The guest receives the intended post-authentication internet-only role after login, with the redirect ACL removed.

Question 268

A campus and branch network operator reports: A user passes guest login but remains trapped at the captive portal because the NAD never applies the new post-login policy. What should be incorporated into the change checklist?

  1. Test CWA login-to-authorization transition separately from portal form submission.
  2. Choose guest portal type according to explicit identification and compliance requirements.
  3. Validate CWA authorization attributes on each wireless controller model and firmware.
  4. Audit existing guest identities before sponsor-driven account extension.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Test CWA login-to-authorization transition separately from portal form submission. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Successful portal credential validation does not itself change an already authorized NAD session without the required update mechanism. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The guest receives the intended post-authentication internet-only role after login, with the redirect ACL removed.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. The repeat risk here is different: Successful portal credential validation does not itself change an already authorized NAD session without the required update mechanism. A directly relevant preventive control is: Test CWA login-to-authorization transition separately from portal form submission.

C:

Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result. The repeat risk here is different: Successful portal credential validation does not itself change an already authorized NAD session without the required update mechanism. A directly relevant preventive control is: Test CWA login-to-authorization transition separately from portal form submission.

D:

Guest management includes account lifecycle operations; repeated new identities fragment history and can bypass intended access limits. The repeat risk here is different: Successful portal credential validation does not itself change an already authorized NAD session without the required update mechanism. A directly relevant preventive control is: Test CWA login-to-authorization transition separately from portal form submission.

Question 269

An access-security change request states: A security team wants visitors to acknowledge acceptable use without creating individual guest passwords but deploys a credentialed account portal that insists on login. What is the most suitable solution within these constraints?

  1. Use the intended portal FQDN, valid HTTPS certificate, and DNS record reachable by the guest clients.
  2. Use an appropriately controlled Hotspot Guest portal with an acceptable-use acknowledgement and the approved temporary-access authorization.
  3. Select an explicit guest authorization profile restricted by authenticated guest identity, network access type, and permitted destinations.
  4. Use a sponsor-approval or fully sponsored guest workflow and enforce the approval status before enabling the guest authorization result.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use an appropriately controlled Hotspot Guest portal with an acceptable-use acknowledgement and the approved temporary-access authorization. This is appropriate because a hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. It should be verified by this evidence: A test visitor accepts the AUP and receives the limited guest role without being asked for a personal password.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Portal trust depends on certificate hostname and chain validation; successful RADIUS redirection alone does not make the HTTPS identity trusted. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: a hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. The needed response is: Use an appropriately controlled Hotspot Guest portal with an acceptable-use acknowledgement and the approved temporary-access authorization.

C:

Web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: a hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. The needed response is: Use an appropriately controlled Hotspot Guest portal with an acceptable-use acknowledgement and the approved temporary-access authorization.

D:

A hotspot's acceptance step does not prove a sponsor approved a named visitor or checked their eligibility. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: a hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. The needed response is: Use an appropriately controlled Hotspot Guest portal with an acceptable-use acknowledgement and the approved temporary-access authorization.

Question 270

During a Cisco ISE postchange review, the following is observed: A security team wants visitors to acknowledge acceptable use without creating individual guest passwords but deploys a credentialed account portal that insists on login. Which platform distinction is decisive in this scenario?

  1. A captive portal cannot load when preauthentication policy blocks the resources needed to resolve or reach it.
  2. A hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication.
  3. A non-802.1X guest can start the web-authentication sequence from MAB and then transition to credentialed portal authentication.
  4. Portal language selection and localized message resources determine the user-facing flow beyond the first landing page.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Use an appropriately controlled Hotspot Guest portal with an acceptable-use acknowledgement and the approved temporary-access authorization. The acceptance result is: A test visitor accepts the AUP and receives the limited guest role without being asked for a personal password.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Allow only the portal's approved HTTPS destination and essential DNS or DHCP bootstrap traffic in the limited-access redirect ACL. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

A hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

A hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: a test client using the target language sees the correct consent, login, and rejection messages. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.