McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-715 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-715

Exam Name Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Security

Cisco 300-715 Bundle $25.00
300-715 Sample 1 300-715 Sample 2 300-715 Sample 3 300-715 Sample 4 300-715 Sample 5 300-715 Sample 6 300-715 Sample 7 300-715 Sample 8 300-715 Sample 9 300-715 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-715 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-715 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-715 Questions & Answers

    433 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-715 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-715 Video Course

    300-715 Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    300-715 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-715 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) exam.

Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) (300-715) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    433 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-715 Video Course

    Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 28

Question 270

During a Cisco ISE postchange review, the following is observed: A security team wants visitors to acknowledge acceptable use without creating individual guest passwords but deploys a credentialed account portal that insists on login. Which platform distinction is decisive in this scenario?

  1. A captive portal cannot load when preauthentication policy blocks the resources needed to resolve or reach it.
  2. A hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication.
  3. A non-802.1X guest can start the web-authentication sequence from MAB and then transition to credentialed portal authentication.
  4. Portal language selection and localized message resources determine the user-facing flow beyond the first landing page.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Use an appropriately controlled Hotspot Guest portal with an acceptable-use acknowledgement and the approved temporary-access authorization. The acceptance result is: A test visitor accepts the AUP and receives the limited guest role without being asked for a personal password.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Allow only the portal's approved HTTPS destination and essential DNS or DHCP bootstrap traffic in the limited-access redirect ACL. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

A hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

A hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: a test client using the target language sees the correct consent, login, and rejection messages. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 271

A security policy owner must resolve this specific case: A security team wants visitors to acknowledge acceptable use without creating individual guest passwords but deploys a credentialed account portal that insists on login. Which acceptance test would directly establish the desired state?

  1. A test visitor accepts the AUP and receives the limited guest role without being asked for a personal password.
  2. A test guest without a supplicant receives a limited web redirect and completes the supported guest authentication.
  3. A new guest is redirected to the intended ISE portal and receives permitted internet access only after completing the guest flow.
  4. A test request stays pending until the sponsor approves it, after which limited visitor access becomes available.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

A test visitor accepts the AUP and receives the limited guest role without being asked for a personal password. The required remediation is: Use an appropriately controlled Hotspot Guest portal with an acceptable-use acknowledgement and the approved temporary-access authorization. It works because a hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result. In the case being tested, a hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. The necessary acceptance evidence is: A test visitor accepts the AUP and receives the limited guest role without being asked for a personal password.

C:

Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility. In the case being tested, a hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. The necessary acceptance evidence is: A test visitor accepts the AUP and receives the limited guest role without being asked for a personal password.

D:

The offered option specifies “A test request stays pending until the sponsor approves it, after which limited visitor access becomes available”. The question requires “A test visitor accepts the AUP and receives the limited guest role without being asked for a personal password”: a hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. These are not equivalent responses to the stated requirement.

Question 272

A network identity engineer receives the following requirement: A security team wants visitors to acknowledge acceptable use without creating individual guest passwords but deploys a credentialed account portal that insists on login. Which governance step most directly targets the root cause?

  1. Document which device presents login pages for each SSID and switch configuration.
  2. Validate CWA authorization attributes on each wireless controller model and firmware.
  3. Test email or SMS guest invitations whenever the notification provider changes.
  4. Choose guest portal type according to explicit identification and compliance requirements.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Choose guest portal type according to explicit identification and compliance requirements. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: A hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. The ongoing acceptance check remains: A test visitor accepts the AUP and receives the limited guest role without being asked for a personal password.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. The repeat risk here is different: a hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. A directly relevant preventive control is: Choose guest portal type according to explicit identification and compliance requirements.

B:

Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result. The repeat risk here is different: a hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. A directly relevant preventive control is: Choose guest portal type according to explicit identification and compliance requirements.

C:

The approved guest receives the expected onboarding notification and uses it within the account's valid window. The repeat risk here is different: a hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. A directly relevant preventive control is: Choose guest portal type according to explicit identification and compliance requirements.

Question 273

A campus and branch network operator reports: Guest browsers are successfully redirected but a captive portal service becomes unreachable when one PSN is taken down; the redirect URL points at that single node. Which change is justified by the observed evidence?

  1. Allow only the portal's approved HTTPS destination and essential DNS or DHCP bootstrap traffic in the limited-access redirect ACL.
  2. Design a supported resilient guest portal service path using healthy PSNs and corresponding redirect-hostname resolution and availability checks.
  3. Select an explicit guest authorization profile restricted by authenticated guest identity, network access type, and permitted destinations.
  4. Correct and validate approved guest contact information and notification delivery before resetting and securely reissuing the credential.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Design a supported resilient guest portal service path using healthy PSNs and corresponding redirect-hostname resolution and availability checks. This is appropriate because central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. It should be verified by this evidence: A fresh test guest reaches a functioning portal after the planned PSN outage and completes login.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Allow only the portal's approved HTTPS destination and essential DNS or DHCP bootstrap traffic in the limited-access redirect ACL. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. The needed response is: Design a supported resilient guest portal service path using healthy PSNs and corresponding redirect-hostname resolution and availability checks.

C:

Web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. The needed response is: Design a supported resilient guest portal service path using healthy PSNs and corresponding redirect-hostname resolution and availability checks.

D:

A test client using the target language sees the correct consent, login, and rejection messages. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. The needed response is: Design a supported resilient guest portal service path using healthy PSNs and corresponding redirect-hostname resolution and availability checks.

Question 274

A Cisco ISE operations team investigates this site issue: Guest browsers are successfully redirected but a captive portal service becomes unreachable when one PSN is taken down; the redirect URL points at that single node. What mechanism governs this authentication or management outcome?

  1. A hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication.
  2. Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection.
  3. Account provisioning and guest notification are separate stages; a valid account does not guarantee credential delivery.
  4. Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Design a supported resilient guest portal service path using healthy PSNs and corresponding redirect-hostname resolution and availability checks. The acceptance result is: A fresh test guest reaches a functioning portal after the planned PSN outage and completes login.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: a hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: the approved guest receives the expected onboarding notification and uses it within the account's valid window. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 275

At a distributed Cisco ISE deployment, a security review finds: Guest browsers are successfully redirected but a captive portal service becomes unreachable when one PSN is taken down; the redirect URL points at that single node. What is the strongest evidence that this requirement is met?

  1. The test browser reaches the intended portal host and its credentials are evaluated by the defined authentication component.
  2. A new guest is redirected to the intended ISE portal and receives permitted internet access only after completing the guest flow.
  3. A fresh test guest reaches a functioning portal after the planned PSN outage and completes login.
  4. A newly issued visitor credential expires after the approved day and the sponsor cannot extend beyond its authorized limit.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

A fresh test guest reaches a functioning portal after the planned PSN outage and completes login. The required remediation is: Design a supported resilient guest portal service path using healthy PSNs and corresponding redirect-hostname resolution and availability checks. It works because central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Local WebAuth presents authentication handling through the NAD, whereas Central WebAuth uses an ISE-hosted portal with RADIUS redirection. In the case being tested, Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. The necessary acceptance evidence is: A fresh test guest reaches a functioning portal after the planned PSN outage and completes login.

B:

Return a supported Central WebAuth authorization profile with the required redirect URL and redirect ACL, then verify WLC feature compatibility. In the case being tested, Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. The necessary acceptance evidence is: A fresh test guest reaches a functioning portal after the planned PSN outage and completes login.

D:

A newly issued visitor credential expires after the approved day and the sponsor cannot extend beyond its authorized limit. In the case being tested, Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. The necessary acceptance evidence is: A fresh test guest reaches a functioning portal after the planned PSN outage and completes login.

Question 276

An ISE administrator troubleshoots the following: Guest browsers are successfully redirected but a captive portal service becomes unreachable when one PSN is taken down; the redirect URL points at that single node. Which recurring operational control would reduce this risk?

  1. Track portal certificate expiration and FQDN changes in guest-service maintenance.
  2. Include the HTTPS guest portal endpoint in PSN high-availability exercises.
  3. Validate CWA authorization attributes on each wireless controller model and firmware.
  4. Require contact confirmation for guest invitation and credential resets.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Include the HTTPS guest portal endpoint in PSN high-availability exercises. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. The ongoing acceptance check remains: A fresh test guest reaches a functioning portal after the planned PSN outage and completes login.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Portal trust depends on certificate hostname and chain validation; successful RADIUS redirection alone does not make the HTTPS identity trusted. The repeat risk here is different: Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. A directly relevant preventive control is: Include the HTTPS guest portal endpoint in PSN high-availability exercises.

C:

Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result. The repeat risk here is different: Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. A directly relevant preventive control is: Include the HTTPS guest portal endpoint in PSN high-availability exercises.

D:

The guest receives a newly issued credential through the verified contact method and the old credential is revoked. The repeat risk here is different: Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. A directly relevant preventive control is: Include the HTTPS guest portal endpoint in PSN high-availability exercises.

Question 277

A network identity engineer receives the following requirement: A visitor authenticates on the portal yet gains employee network access because a broad post-auth rule matches the same network device group. Which administrative action BEST addresses this specific situation?

  1. Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result.
  2. Use an appropriately controlled Hotspot Guest portal with an acceptable-use acknowledgement and the approved temporary-access authorization.
  3. Select an explicit guest authorization profile restricted by authenticated guest identity, network access type, and permitted destinations.
  4. Verify the portal selection, authorization result, and required NAD CoA/reauthentication transition for the current guest SSID.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Select an explicit guest authorization profile restricted by authenticated guest identity, network access type, and permitted destinations. This is appropriate because web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD. It should be verified by this evidence: The guest reaches only the isolated internet service while an employee still matches the employee authorization policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure the intended MAB-initiated guest Central WebAuth workflow with a restricted redirect authorization result. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD. The needed response is: Select an explicit guest authorization profile restricted by authenticated guest identity, network access type, and permitted destinations.

B:

A hotspot flow can grant defined guest access on acknowledgement, whereas credentialed guest portals require account authentication. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD. The needed response is: Select an explicit guest authorization profile restricted by authenticated guest identity, network access type, and permitted destinations.

D:

Include both denied and approved sponsor paths in portal acceptance tests. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD. The needed response is: Select an explicit guest authorization profile restricted by authenticated guest identity, network access type, and permitted destinations.

Question 278

An enterprise access-control incident describes: A visitor authenticates on the portal yet gains employee network access because a broad post-auth rule matches the same network device group. Which architectural fact determines the appropriate fix?

  1. Web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD.
  2. Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback.
  3. A captive portal cannot load when preauthentication policy blocks the resources needed to resolve or reach it.
  4. Portal language selection and localized message resources determine the user-facing flow beyond the first landing page.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Select an explicit guest authorization profile restricted by authenticated guest identity, network access type, and permitted destinations. The acceptance result is: The guest reaches only the isolated internet service while an employee still matches the employee authorization policy.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Allow only the portal's approved HTTPS destination and essential DNS or DHCP bootstrap traffic in the limited-access redirect ACL. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: a test client using the target language sees the correct consent, login, and rejection messages. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 279

In a staged Cisco ISE network access rollout, the team observes: A visitor authenticates on the portal yet gains employee network access because a broad post-auth rule matches the same network device group. Which postchange outcome demonstrates correct implementation?

  1. A fresh test guest reaches a functioning portal after the planned PSN outage and completes login.
  2. A pilot guest loads the portal without a TLS name mismatch and cannot be redirected to an untrusted duplicate endpoint.
  3. The guest reaches only the isolated internet service while an employee still matches the employee authorization policy.
  4. A test visitor on the actual isolated SSID loads the portal while ISE management remains inaccessible.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The guest reaches only the isolated internet service while an employee still matches the employee authorization policy. The required remediation is: Select an explicit guest authorization profile restricted by authenticated guest identity, network access type, and permitted destinations. It works because web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. In the case being tested, Web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD. The necessary acceptance evidence is: The guest reaches only the isolated internet service while an employee still matches the employee authorization policy.

B:

Portal trust depends on certificate hostname and chain validation; successful RADIUS redirection alone does not make the HTTPS identity trusted. In the case being tested, Web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD. The necessary acceptance evidence is: The guest reaches only the isolated internet service while an employee still matches the employee authorization policy.

D:

A test visitor on the actual isolated SSID loads the portal while ISE management remains inaccessible. In the case being tested, Web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD. The necessary acceptance evidence is: The guest reaches only the isolated internet service while an employee still matches the employee authorization policy.

Question 280

An identity and device-administration engineer evaluates: A visitor authenticates on the portal yet gains employee network access because a broad post-auth rule matches the same network device group. What should be added to the maintenance or security review?

  1. Test portal reachability from the guest's restricted preauthentication network.
  2. Document access methods and initial authentication triggers for each guest connection type.
  3. Test negative guest-to-internal access paths after any policy reordering.
  4. Include both denied and approved sponsor paths in portal acceptance tests.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Test negative guest-to-internal access paths after any policy reordering. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The guest reaches only the isolated internet service while an employee still matches the employee authorization policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The offered option specifies “Test portal reachability from the guest's restricted preauthentication network”. The question requires “Test negative guest-to-internal access paths after any policy reordering”: Web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD. These are not equivalent responses to the stated requirement.

B:

Allow only the portal's approved HTTPS destination and essential DNS or DHCP bootstrap traffic in the limited-access redirect ACL. The repeat risk here is different: Web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD. A directly relevant preventive control is: Test negative guest-to-internal access paths after any policy reordering.

D:

Include both denied and approved sponsor paths in portal acceptance tests. The repeat risk here is different: Web authentication verifies a guest principal; a separately evaluated authorization rule determines the access scope returned to the NAD. A directly relevant preventive control is: Test negative guest-to-internal access paths after any policy reordering.