McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-715 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-715

Exam Name Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Security

Cisco 300-715 Bundle $25.00
300-715 Sample 1 300-715 Sample 2 300-715 Sample 3 300-715 Sample 4 300-715 Sample 5 300-715 Sample 6 300-715 Sample 7 300-715 Sample 8 300-715 Sample 9 300-715 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-715 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-715 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-715 Questions & Answers

    433 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-715 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-715 Video Course

    300-715 Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    300-715 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-715 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) exam.

Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) (300-715) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    433 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-715 Video Course

    Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 36

Question 350

An access-security change request states: The sponsor portal allows a contractor to create accounts belonging to a more privileged guest type intended only for executive visitors. What should be incorporated into the change checklist?

  1. Reconcile event guest validity periods with portal guest types before issuing credentials.
  2. Test complete localized portal workflows after template upgrades.
  3. Include the HTTPS guest portal endpoint in PSN high-availability exercises.
  4. Review privilege inheritance in sponsor groups before exposing new guest account types.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Review privilege inheritance in sponsor groups before exposing new guest account types. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Sponsor authorization controls management of guest account types; a sponsor portal login is not an unrestricted delegation of privileged identities. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The contractor can issue only its permitted account class and an executive sponsor retains the separate class.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Review privilege inheritance in sponsor groups before exposing new guest account types. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: a newly issued visitor credential expires after the approved day and the sponsor cannot extend beyond its authorized limit. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Review privilege inheritance in sponsor groups before exposing new guest account types. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: a test client using the target language sees the correct consent, login, and rejection messages. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Review privilege inheritance in sponsor groups before exposing new guest account types. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Central guest portal web service availability is a separate dependency from the NAD's RADIUS authentication server fallback. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 351

An enterprise access-control incident describes: A campus ISE deployment shows thousands of Unknown endpoints because the Profiler service was disabled on every PSN during a maintenance change. What is the most suitable solution within these constraints?

  1. Use multiple discriminating profiler attributes and a suitably precise printer profile rather than a vendor-only classifier.
  2. Enable Profiler on suitable authorized nodes and validate the required endpoint attribute collection and profiling policies.
  3. Keep profiler-derived device categories separate from strong user authentication and use combined identity and device conditions for privileged access.
  4. Remove or disable the retired endpoint identity and verify the associated MAB policy no longer authorizes it.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Enable Profiler on suitable authorized nodes and validate the required endpoint attribute collection and profiling policies. This is appropriate because profiler classification relies on an active profiling service receiving endpoint attributes; a healthy RADIUS service alone cannot classify unknown devices. It should be verified by this evidence: A pilot printer transitions from Unknown to its expected profile after supported attributes arrive.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. In the case being tested, Review privilege inheritance in sponsor groups before exposing new guest account types. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Enable Profiler on suitable authorized nodes and validate the required endpoint attribute collection and profiling policies.

C:

Keep profiler-derived device categories separate from strong user authentication and use combined identity and device conditions for privileged access. In the case being tested, Review privilege inheritance in sponsor groups before exposing new guest account types. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Enable Profiler on suitable authorized nodes and validate the required endpoint attribute collection and profiling policies.

D:

An authorized MAC identity can outlive its physical device; deleting hardware does not revoke ISE endpoint authorization automatically. In the case being tested, Review privilege inheritance in sponsor groups before exposing new guest account types. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Enable Profiler on suitable authorized nodes and validate the required endpoint attribute collection and profiling policies.

Question 352

In a staged Cisco ISE network access rollout, the team observes: A campus ISE deployment shows thousands of Unknown endpoints because the Profiler service was disabled on every PSN during a maintenance change. Which platform distinction is decisive in this scenario?

  1. Profiling outcomes depend on observed metadata, which can change with device or network infrastructure updates.
  2. Profiler classification relies on an active profiling service receiving endpoint attributes; a healthy RADIUS service alone cannot classify unknown devices.
  3. Multiple profiling policies may match overlapping attributes; specificity, confidence, and evaluation design determine the useful classification.
  4. Accounting messages provide ongoing network session attributes used for endpoint visibility; Access-Accept alone does not supply all session history.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Profiler classification relies on an active profiling service receiving endpoint attributes; a healthy RADIUS service alone cannot classify unknown devices. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Enable Profiler on suitable authorized nodes and validate the required endpoint attribute collection and profiling policies. The acceptance result is: A pilot printer transitions from Unknown to its expected profile after supported attributes arrive.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Reassess profiling data freshness after moving or replacing physical devices. The repeat risk here is different: Review privilege inheritance in sponsor groups before exposing new guest account types. A directly relevant preventive control is: Profiler classification relies on an active profiling service receiving endpoint attributes; a healthy RADIUS service alone cannot classify unknown devices.

C:

Measure false-positive classifications after changing broad OUI-based rules. The repeat risk here is different: Review privilege inheritance in sponsor groups before exposing new guest account types. A directly relevant preventive control is: Profiler classification relies on an active profiling service receiving endpoint attributes; a healthy RADIUS service alone cannot classify unknown devices.

D:

Enable RADIUS accounting on supported NADs and validate arrival of start, stop, and interim session attributes where configured. The repeat risk here is different: Review privilege inheritance in sponsor groups before exposing new guest account types. A directly relevant preventive control is: Profiler classification relies on an active profiling service receiving endpoint attributes; a healthy RADIUS service alone cannot classify unknown devices.

Question 353

An identity and device-administration engineer evaluates: A campus ISE deployment shows thousands of Unknown endpoints because the Profiler service was disabled on every PSN during a maintenance change. Which acceptance test would directly establish the desired state?

  1. The selected phones match the phone profile while unrelated endpoints remain outside it.
  2. The endpoint history shows the new access switch context and the correct site-specific authorization result.
  3. A printer lease request reaches the profiler input and expected DHCP attributes appear on the endpoint record.
  4. A pilot printer transitions from Unknown to its expected profile after supported attributes arrive.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A pilot printer transitions from Unknown to its expected profile after supported attributes arrive. The required remediation is: Enable Profiler on suitable authorized nodes and validate the required endpoint attribute collection and profiling policies. It works because profiler classification relies on an active profiling service receiving endpoint attributes; a healthy RADIUS service alone cannot classify unknown devices.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes. The needed response is: A pilot printer transitions from Unknown to its expected profile after supported attributes arrive.

B:

Reassess profiling data freshness after moving or replacing physical devices. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes. The needed response is: A pilot printer transitions from Unknown to its expected profile after supported attributes arrive.

C:

Provide a supported DHCP probe input path, such as an appropriately configured helper or mirrored traffic source, for that site. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes. The needed response is: A pilot printer transitions from Unknown to its expected profile after supported attributes arrive.

Question 354

A campus and branch network operator reports: A campus ISE deployment shows thousands of Unknown endpoints because the Profiler service was disabled on every PSN during a maintenance change. Which governance step most directly targets the root cause?

  1. Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes.
  2. Use known-device inventories as acceptance samples for infrastructure upgrades.
  3. Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews.
  4. Monitor accounting delivery independently of successful authentication totals.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Profiler classification relies on an active profiling service receiving endpoint attributes; a healthy RADIUS service alone cannot classify unknown devices. The ongoing acceptance check remains: A pilot printer transitions from Unknown to its expected profile after supported attributes arrive.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The offered option specifies “Use known-device inventories as acceptance samples for infrastructure upgrades”. The question requires “Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes”: Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes. These are not equivalent responses to the stated requirement.

C:

Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Select appropriate supported probes and validate their actual endpoint attributes against representative device samples. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 355

An access-security change request states: New VoIP phones remain in the generic endpoint group even though ISE has received their vendor and CDP attributes from access switches. Which change is justified by the observed evidence?

  1. Enable Profiler on suitable authorized nodes and validate the required endpoint attribute collection and profiling policies.
  2. Refresh supported profiling attributes from the new NAD and re-evaluate the endpoint's classification and applicable authorization conditions.
  3. Review profiling policy conditions and certainty factors so the received phone attributes match the intended device profile.
  4. Enable supported RADIUS Change of Authorization on the NAD and send a scoped session update after profiling changes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Review profiling policy conditions and certainty factors so the received phone attributes match the intended device profile. This is appropriate because a profiling policy combines endpoint attribute evidence and confidence thresholds; collecting data is not the same as satisfying a profile rule. It should be verified by this evidence: The selected phones match the phone profile while unrelated endpoints remain outside it.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Review privilege inheritance in sponsor groups before exposing new guest account types. In the case being tested, Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Review profiling policy conditions and certainty factors so the received phone attributes match the intended device profile.

B:

Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews. In the case being tested, Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Review profiling policy conditions and certainty factors so the received phone attributes match the intended device profile.

D:

Enable supported RADIUS Change of Authorization on the NAD and send a scoped session update after profiling changes. In the case being tested, Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Review profiling policy conditions and certainty factors so the received phone attributes match the intended device profile.

Question 356

During a Cisco ISE postchange review, the following is observed: New VoIP phones remain in the generic endpoint group even though ISE has received their vendor and CDP attributes from access switches. What mechanism governs this authentication or management outcome?

  1. A profiling policy combines endpoint attribute evidence and confidence thresholds; collecting data is not the same as satisfying a profile rule.
  2. Multiple profiling policies may match overlapping attributes; specificity, confidence, and evaluation design determine the useful classification.
  3. Profiler classification relies on an active profiling service receiving endpoint attributes; a healthy RADIUS service alone cannot classify unknown devices.
  4. CoA packet support and action semantics vary among NADs; ISE's classification alone cannot overcome an unsupported device action.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

A profiling policy combines endpoint attribute evidence and confidence thresholds; collecting data is not the same as satisfying a profile rule. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Review profiling policy conditions and certainty factors so the received phone attributes match the intended device profile. The acceptance result is: The selected phones match the phone profile while unrelated endpoints remain outside it.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Measure false-positive classifications after changing broad OUI-based rules. The repeat risk here is different: Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes. A directly relevant preventive control is: A profiling policy combines endpoint attribute evidence and confidence thresholds; collecting data is not the same as satisfying a profile rule.

C:

Review privilege inheritance in sponsor groups before exposing new guest account types. The repeat risk here is different: Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes. A directly relevant preventive control is: A profiling policy combines endpoint attribute evidence and confidence thresholds; collecting data is not the same as satisfying a profile rule.

D:

CoA packet support and action semantics vary among NADs; ISE's classification alone cannot overcome an unsupported device action. The repeat risk here is different: Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes. A directly relevant preventive control is: A profiling policy combines endpoint attribute evidence and confidence thresholds; collecting data is not the same as satisfying a profile rule.

Question 357

A security policy owner must resolve this specific case: New VoIP phones remain in the generic endpoint group even though ISE has received their vendor and CDP attributes from access switches. What is the strongest evidence that this requirement is met?

  1. A test medical device receives the designated device type while a normal PC retains its original classification.
  2. The selected phones match the phone profile while unrelated endpoints remain outside it.
  3. The endpoint history shows the new access switch context and the correct site-specific authorization result.
  4. The printer appears once in endpoint inventory and receives a consistent restricted authorization across PSNs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The selected phones match the phone profile while unrelated endpoints remain outside it. The required remediation is: Review profiling policy conditions and certainty factors so the received phone attributes match the intended device profile. It works because a profiling policy combines endpoint attribute evidence and confidence thresholds; collecting data is not the same as satisfying a profile rule.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. The needed response is: The selected phones match the phone profile while unrelated endpoints remain outside it.

C:

Reassess profiling data freshness after moving or replacing physical devices. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. The needed response is: The selected phones match the phone profile while unrelated endpoints remain outside it.

D:

Internal endpoint records and identity groups determine how MAB and endpoint-based rules resolve an observed MAC. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. The needed response is: The selected phones match the phone profile while unrelated endpoints remain outside it.

Question 358

A network identity engineer receives the following requirement: New VoIP phones remain in the generic endpoint group even though ISE has received their vendor and CDP attributes from access switches. Which recurring operational control would reduce this risk?

  1. Use known-device inventories as acceptance samples for infrastructure upgrades.
  2. Review authorization designs for overreliance on inferred device identity.
  3. Review endpoint identity groups against profiler labels during periodic access certification.
  4. Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: A profiling policy combines endpoint attribute evidence and confidence thresholds; collecting data is not the same as satisfying a profile rule. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The selected phones match the phone profile while unrelated endpoints remain outside it.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The offered option specifies “Use known-device inventories as acceptance samples for infrastructure upgrades”. The question requires “Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices”: Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. These are not equivalent responses to the stated requirement.

B:

Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Provide a supported DHCP probe input path, such as an appropriately configured helper or mirrored traffic source, for that site. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: a profiler classification and a manually administered identity-group membership are distinct attributes used in policy conditions. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 359

A campus and branch network operator reports: A company wants printers classified separately from PCs but creates one broad profiler rule based only on a common network-card manufacturer identifier. Which administrative action BEST addresses this specific situation?

  1. Use multiple discriminating profiler attributes and a suitably precise printer profile rather than a vendor-only classifier.
  2. Review profiling policy conditions and certainty factors so the received phone attributes match the intended device profile.
  3. Tune profiling rule conditions and supported classification priorities so the device matches the intended specialized endpoint profile.
  4. Enable and validate an appropriate profiling collection method for network-device discovery attributes, such as supported RADIUS or SNMP data.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Use multiple discriminating profiler attributes and a suitably precise printer profile rather than a vendor-only classifier. This is appropriate because a shared MAC OUI can identify network hardware vendor but not reliably distinguish an endpoint's functional device type. It should be verified by this evidence: The intended printers match the specialized profile and a workstation using the same NIC vendor does not.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes. In the case being tested, Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Use multiple discriminating profiler attributes and a suitably precise printer profile rather than a vendor-only classifier.

C:

Measure false-positive classifications after changing broad OUI-based rules. In the case being tested, Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Use multiple discriminating profiler attributes and a suitably precise printer profile rather than a vendor-only classifier.

D:

Enable and validate an appropriate profiling collection method for network-device discovery attributes, such as supported RADIUS or SNMP data. In the case being tested, Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Use multiple discriminating profiler attributes and a suitably precise printer profile rather than a vendor-only classifier.

Question 360

A Cisco ISE operations team investigates this site issue: A company wants printers classified separately from PCs but creates one broad profiler rule based only on a common network-card manufacturer identifier. Which architectural fact determines the appropriate fix?

  1. Profiling infers endpoint type from telemetry but does not establish that a human user has authenticated.
  2. Profiling outcomes depend on observed metadata, which can change with device or network infrastructure updates.
  3. A shared MAC OUI can identify network hardware vendor but not reliably distinguish an endpoint's functional device type.
  4. A profiler classification and a manually administered identity-group membership are distinct attributes used in policy conditions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

A shared MAC OUI can identify network hardware vendor but not reliably distinguish an endpoint's functional device type. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Use multiple discriminating profiler attributes and a suitably precise printer profile rather than a vendor-only classifier. The acceptance result is: The intended printers match the specialized profile and a workstation using the same NIC vendor does not.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Keep profiler-derived device categories separate from strong user authentication and use combined identity and device conditions for privileged access. The repeat risk here is different: Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. A directly relevant preventive control is: A shared MAC OUI can identify network hardware vendor but not reliably distinguish an endpoint's functional device type.

B:

Reassess profiling data freshness after moving or replacing physical devices. The repeat risk here is different: Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. A directly relevant preventive control is: A shared MAC OUI can identify network hardware vendor but not reliably distinguish an endpoint's functional device type.

D:

A profiler classification and a manually administered identity-group membership are distinct attributes used in policy conditions. The repeat risk here is different: Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. A directly relevant preventive control is: A shared MAC OUI can identify network hardware vendor but not reliably distinguish an endpoint's functional device type.