McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-715 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-715

Exam Name Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Security

Cisco 300-715 Bundle $25.00
300-715 Sample 1 300-715 Sample 2 300-715 Sample 3 300-715 Sample 4 300-715 Sample 5 300-715 Sample 6 300-715 Sample 7 300-715 Sample 8 300-715 Sample 9 300-715 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-715 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-715 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-715 Questions & Answers

    433 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-715 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-715 Video Course

    300-715 Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    300-715 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-715 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) exam.

Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) (300-715) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    433 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-715 Video Course

    Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 37

Question 360

A Cisco ISE operations team investigates this site issue: A company wants printers classified separately from PCs but creates one broad profiler rule based only on a common network-card manufacturer identifier. Which architectural fact determines the appropriate fix?

  1. Profiling infers endpoint type from telemetry but does not establish that a human user has authenticated.
  2. Profiling outcomes depend on observed metadata, which can change with device or network infrastructure updates.
  3. A shared MAC OUI can identify network hardware vendor but not reliably distinguish an endpoint's functional device type.
  4. A profiler classification and a manually administered identity-group membership are distinct attributes used in policy conditions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

A shared MAC OUI can identify network hardware vendor but not reliably distinguish an endpoint's functional device type. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Use multiple discriminating profiler attributes and a suitably precise printer profile rather than a vendor-only classifier. The acceptance result is: The intended printers match the specialized profile and a workstation using the same NIC vendor does not.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Keep profiler-derived device categories separate from strong user authentication and use combined identity and device conditions for privileged access. The repeat risk here is different: Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. A directly relevant preventive control is: A shared MAC OUI can identify network hardware vendor but not reliably distinguish an endpoint's functional device type.

B:

Reassess profiling data freshness after moving or replacing physical devices. The repeat risk here is different: Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. A directly relevant preventive control is: A shared MAC OUI can identify network hardware vendor but not reliably distinguish an endpoint's functional device type.

D:

A profiler classification and a manually administered identity-group membership are distinct attributes used in policy conditions. The repeat risk here is different: Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. A directly relevant preventive control is: A shared MAC OUI can identify network hardware vendor but not reliably distinguish an endpoint's functional device type.

Question 361

At a distributed Cisco ISE deployment, a security review finds: A company wants printers classified separately from PCs but creates one broad profiler rule based only on a common network-card manufacturer identifier. Which postchange outcome demonstrates correct implementation?

  1. A known workstation with an unauthorized user cannot gain payroll access solely from its profile.
  2. The intended printers match the specialized profile and a workstation using the same NIC vendor does not.
  3. A pilot printer transitions from Unknown to its expected profile after supported attributes arrive.
  4. The printer appears once in endpoint inventory and receives a consistent restricted authorization across PSNs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The intended printers match the specialized profile and a workstation using the same NIC vendor does not. The required remediation is: Use multiple discriminating profiler attributes and a suitably precise printer profile rather than a vendor-only classifier. It works because a shared MAC OUI can identify network hardware vendor but not reliably distinguish an endpoint's functional device type.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Keep profiler-derived device categories separate from strong user authentication and use combined identity and device conditions for privileged access. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Measure false-positive classifications after changing broad OUI-based rules. The needed response is: The intended printers match the specialized profile and a workstation using the same NIC vendor does not.

C:

Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Measure false-positive classifications after changing broad OUI-based rules. The needed response is: The intended printers match the specialized profile and a workstation using the same NIC vendor does not.

D:

Internal endpoint records and identity groups determine how MAB and endpoint-based rules resolve an observed MAC. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Measure false-positive classifications after changing broad OUI-based rules. The needed response is: The intended printers match the specialized profile and a workstation using the same NIC vendor does not.

Question 362

An ISE administrator troubleshoots the following: A company wants printers classified separately from PCs but creates one broad profiler rule based only on a common network-card manufacturer identifier. What should be added to the maintenance or security review?

  1. Measure false-positive classifications after changing broad OUI-based rules.
  2. Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews.
  3. Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes.
  4. Test DHCP probe reachability for every routed access VLAN.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Measure false-positive classifications after changing broad OUI-based rules. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: A shared MAC OUI can identify network hardware vendor but not reliably distinguish an endpoint's functional device type. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The intended printers match the specialized profile and a workstation using the same NIC vendor does not.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Measure false-positive classifications after changing broad OUI-based rules. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Measure false-positive classifications after changing broad OUI-based rules. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Measure false-positive classifications after changing broad OUI-based rules. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Enable and validate an appropriate profiling collection method for network-device discovery attributes, such as supported RADIUS or SNMP data. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 363

A network identity engineer receives the following requirement: A newly introduced medical device model is incorrectly tagged as a generic Windows machine because a new custom profiler condition is shadowed by an older more-general policy. What is the most appropriate next configuration or repair?

  1. Review profiling policy conditions and certainty factors so the received phone attributes match the intended device profile.
  2. Keep profiler-derived device categories separate from strong user authentication and use combined identity and device conditions for privileged access.
  3. Provide a supported DHCP probe input path, such as an appropriately configured helper or mirrored traffic source, for that site.
  4. Tune profiling rule conditions and supported classification priorities so the device matches the intended specialized endpoint profile.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Tune profiling rule conditions and supported classification priorities so the device matches the intended specialized endpoint profile. This is appropriate because multiple profiling policies may match overlapping attributes; specificity, confidence, and evaluation design determine the useful classification. It should be verified by this evidence: A test medical device receives the designated device type while a normal PC retains its original classification.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Monitor Profiler service health and identity counts after node-role changes. In the case being tested, Measure false-positive classifications after changing broad OUI-based rules. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Tune profiling rule conditions and supported classification priorities so the device matches the intended specialized endpoint profile.

B:

Keep profiler-derived device categories separate from strong user authentication and use combined identity and device conditions for privileged access. In the case being tested, Measure false-positive classifications after changing broad OUI-based rules. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Tune profiling rule conditions and supported classification priorities so the device matches the intended specialized endpoint profile.

C:

Provide a supported DHCP probe input path, such as an appropriately configured helper or mirrored traffic source, for that site. In the case being tested, Measure false-positive classifications after changing broad OUI-based rules. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Tune profiling rule conditions and supported classification priorities so the device matches the intended specialized endpoint profile.

Question 364

An enterprise access-control incident describes: A newly introduced medical device model is incorrectly tagged as a generic Windows machine because a new custom profiler condition is shadowed by an older more-general policy. What is the key technical principle in this situation?

  1. Profiling outcomes depend on observed metadata, which can change with device or network infrastructure updates.
  2. Multiple profiling policies may match overlapping attributes; specificity, confidence, and evaluation design determine the useful classification.
  3. Profiler classification relies on an active profiling service receiving endpoint attributes; a healthy RADIUS service alone cannot classify unknown devices.
  4. A DHCP probe can classify endpoint behavior only when it observes relevant DHCP discovery or option data.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Multiple profiling policies may match overlapping attributes; specificity, confidence, and evaluation design determine the useful classification. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Tune profiling rule conditions and supported classification priorities so the device matches the intended specialized endpoint profile. The acceptance result is: A test medical device receives the designated device type while a normal PC retains its original classification.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Reassess profiling data freshness after moving or replacing physical devices. The repeat risk here is different: Measure false-positive classifications after changing broad OUI-based rules. A directly relevant preventive control is: Multiple profiling policies may match overlapping attributes; specificity, confidence, and evaluation design determine the useful classification.

C:

Review privilege inheritance in sponsor groups before exposing new guest account types. The repeat risk here is different: Measure false-positive classifications after changing broad OUI-based rules. A directly relevant preventive control is: Multiple profiling policies may match overlapping attributes; specificity, confidence, and evaluation design determine the useful classification.

D:

Provide a supported DHCP probe input path, such as an appropriately configured helper or mirrored traffic source, for that site. The repeat risk here is different: Measure false-positive classifications after changing broad OUI-based rules. A directly relevant preventive control is: Multiple profiling policies may match overlapping attributes; specificity, confidence, and evaluation design determine the useful classification.

Question 365

In a staged Cisco ISE network access rollout, the team observes: A newly introduced medical device model is incorrectly tagged as a generic Windows machine because a new custom profiler condition is shadowed by an older more-general policy. What result should be documented before closing the issue?

  1. The intended printers match the specialized profile and a workstation using the same NIC vendor does not.
  2. A known workstation with an unauthorized user cannot gain payroll access solely from its profile.
  3. A test medical device receives the designated device type while a normal PC retains its original classification.
  4. A printer lease request reaches the profiler input and expected DHCP attributes appear on the endpoint record.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

A test medical device receives the designated device type while a normal PC retains its original classification. The required remediation is: Tune profiling rule conditions and supported classification priorities so the device matches the intended specialized endpoint profile. It works because multiple profiling policies may match overlapping attributes; specificity, confidence, and evaluation design determine the useful classification.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Measure false-positive classifications after changing broad OUI-based rules. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews. The needed response is: A test medical device receives the designated device type while a normal PC retains its original classification.

B:

Keep profiler-derived device categories separate from strong user authentication and use combined identity and device conditions for privileged access. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews. The needed response is: A test medical device receives the designated device type while a normal PC retains its original classification.

D:

Provide a supported DHCP probe input path, such as an appropriately configured helper or mirrored traffic source, for that site. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews. The needed response is: A test medical device receives the designated device type while a normal PC retains its original classification.

Question 366

An identity and device-administration engineer evaluates: A newly introduced medical device model is incorrectly tagged as a generic Windows machine because a new custom profiler condition is shadowed by an older more-general policy. Which durable safeguard best prevents a recurrence?

  1. Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices.
  2. Use known-device inventories as acceptance samples for infrastructure upgrades.
  3. Review endpoint identity groups against profiler labels during periodic access certification.
  4. Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Multiple profiling policies may match overlapping attributes; specificity, confidence, and evaluation design determine the useful classification. The ongoing acceptance check remains: A test medical device receives the designated device type while a normal PC retains its original classification.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

The offered option specifies “Use known-device inventories as acceptance samples for infrastructure upgrades”. The question requires “Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews”: Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews. These are not equivalent responses to the stated requirement.

C:

Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: a profiler classification and a manually administered identity-group membership are distinct attributes used in policy conditions. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 367

An ISE administrator troubleshoots the following: A printer moves from one campus to another and ISE retains stale endpoint network context, causing the policy to treat its old location as current. Which implementation decision directly satisfies the stated requirement?

  1. Enable Profiler on suitable authorized nodes and validate the required endpoint attribute collection and profiling policies.
  2. Refresh supported profiling attributes from the new NAD and re-evaluate the endpoint's classification and applicable authorization conditions.
  3. Keep profiler-derived device categories separate from strong user authentication and use combined identity and device conditions for privileged access.
  4. Use the supported session identifiers and correct NAD context to target only the intended endpoint during CoA.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Refresh supported profiling attributes from the new NAD and re-evaluate the endpoint's classification and applicable authorization conditions. This is appropriate because endpoint identity and current location attributes can become stale between observed network sessions. It should be verified by this evidence: The endpoint history shows the new access switch context and the correct site-specific authorization result.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Review privilege inheritance in sponsor groups before exposing new guest account types. In the case being tested, Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Refresh supported profiling attributes from the new NAD and re-evaluate the endpoint's classification and applicable authorization conditions.

C:

Keep profiler-derived device categories separate from strong user authentication and use combined identity and device conditions for privileged access. In the case being tested, Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Refresh supported profiling attributes from the new NAD and re-evaluate the endpoint's classification and applicable authorization conditions.

D:

CoA actions are applied to a session; overly broad or ambiguous identifiers can modify the wrong authenticated connection. In the case being tested, Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Refresh supported profiling attributes from the new NAD and re-evaluate the endpoint's classification and applicable authorization conditions.

Question 368

An access-security change request states: A printer moves from one campus to another and ISE retains stale endpoint network context, causing the policy to treat its old location as current. Which technical behavior is MOST relevant to this design?

  1. Profiler classification relies on an active profiling service receiving endpoint attributes; a healthy RADIUS service alone cannot classify unknown devices.
  2. A shared MAC OUI can identify network hardware vendor but not reliably distinguish an endpoint's functional device type.
  3. Endpoint identity and current location attributes can become stale between observed network sessions.
  4. A DHCP probe can classify endpoint behavior only when it observes relevant DHCP discovery or option data.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Endpoint identity and current location attributes can become stale between observed network sessions. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Refresh supported profiling attributes from the new NAD and re-evaluate the endpoint's classification and applicable authorization conditions. The acceptance result is: The endpoint history shows the new access switch context and the correct site-specific authorization result.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Review privilege inheritance in sponsor groups before exposing new guest account types. The repeat risk here is different: Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews. A directly relevant preventive control is: Endpoint identity and current location attributes can become stale between observed network sessions.

B:

Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. The repeat risk here is different: Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews. A directly relevant preventive control is: Endpoint identity and current location attributes can become stale between observed network sessions.

D:

Provide a supported DHCP probe input path, such as an appropriately configured helper or mirrored traffic source, for that site. The repeat risk here is different: Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews. A directly relevant preventive control is: Endpoint identity and current location attributes can become stale between observed network sessions.

Question 369

During a Cisco ISE postchange review, the following is observed: A printer moves from one campus to another and ISE retains stale endpoint network context, causing the policy to treat its old location as current. Which readback demonstrates that the actual problem was solved?

  1. The selected phones match the phone profile while unrelated endpoints remain outside it.
  2. A test medical device receives the designated device type while a normal PC retains its original classification.
  3. A test CoA request is delivered and acknowledged without opening unrestricted network paths.
  4. The endpoint history shows the new access switch context and the correct site-specific authorization result.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The endpoint history shows the new access switch context and the correct site-specific authorization result. The required remediation is: Refresh supported profiling attributes from the new NAD and re-evaluate the endpoint's classification and applicable authorization conditions. It works because endpoint identity and current location attributes can become stale between observed network sessions.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Reassess profiling data freshness after moving or replacing physical devices. The needed response is: The endpoint history shows the new access switch context and the correct site-specific authorization result.

B:

Track classifier overlap and confidence thresholds in profiler change reviews. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Reassess profiling data freshness after moving or replacing physical devices. The needed response is: The endpoint history shows the new access switch context and the correct site-specific authorization result.

C:

RADIUS Access-Request direction and CoA initiation direction are different communications; successful authentication does not prove CoA reachability. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Reassess profiling data freshness after moving or replacing physical devices. The needed response is: The endpoint history shows the new access switch context and the correct site-specific authorization result.

Question 370

A security policy owner must resolve this specific case: A printer moves from one campus to another and ISE retains stale endpoint network context, causing the policy to treat its old location as current. What validation should be repeated before subsequent rollouts?

  1. Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices.
  2. Review authorization designs for overreliance on inferred device identity.
  3. Test profile-change CoA and session-target resolution during IoT onboarding.
  4. Reassess profiling data freshness after moving or replacing physical devices.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Reassess profiling data freshness after moving or replacing physical devices. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Endpoint identity and current location attributes can become stale between observed network sessions. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The endpoint history shows the new access switch context and the correct site-specific authorization result.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Reassess profiling data freshness after moving or replacing physical devices. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Regression-test profiler rules with representative phones and non-phone devices. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Reassess profiling data freshness after moving or replacing physical devices. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Provide a supported DHCP probe input path, such as an appropriately configured helper or mirrored traffic source, for that site. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Reassess profiling data freshness after moving or replacing physical devices. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Enable supported RADIUS Change of Authorization on the NAD and send a scoped session update after profiling changes. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.