Question 990
Original unofficial RHEL 10 RHCSA skill-check scenario: A maintenance session renames a NetworkManager profile while automation still references the former name. Which observation best confirms the intended outcome?
Explanation
Correct Answer
In this RHEL 10 system administration case: A maintenance session renames a NetworkManager profile while automation still references the former name. Underlying reason: Human-readable profile names can change while stable identifiers persist. The most direct, approved resolution is: Update automation to use the verified connection UUID or correct new name. Confirm it by checking: Startup tasks activate the intended profile without missing-connection errors. Sustain the fix by: Prefer verified connection IDs in persistent scripts. This is the INTENDED response for the strongest objective verification result. It is a knowledge-check explanation, not a verified hands-on Red Hat exam answer;
Incorrect Answers
`nmcli device show` reflects the approved live settings. That is not sufficient for the reported RHEL task, because human-readable profile names can change while stable identifiers persist.
`ip -6 route` shows the intended default path and external IPv6 tests succeed. That is not sufficient for the reported RHEL task, because human-readable profile names can change while stable identifiers persist.
`ip route` lists the intended default route and off-subnet tests succeed. That is not sufficient for the reported RHEL task, because human-readable profile names can change while stable identifiers persist.