Question 710
Original unofficial RHEL 10 RHCSA skill-check scenario: A client mounts an NFS share but gets permission denied for an account whose local UID differs from the server's ownership. Which observation best confirms the intended outcome?
Explanation
Correct Answer
In this RHEL 10 system administration case: A client mounts an NFS share but gets permission denied for an account whose local UID differs from the server's ownership. Underlying reason: NFS file access depends on server export policy and identity semantics. The most direct, approved resolution is: Check export controls and consistent identity mappings before changing file modes broadly. Confirm it by checking: The authorized identity can access the export while unauthorized access is blocked. Sustain the fix by: Standardize identity expectations across NFS clients. This is the INTENDED response for the strongest objective verification result. It is a knowledge-check explanation, not a verified hands-on Red Hat exam answer;
Incorrect Answers
Mount succeeds when the server export is available and authorized. That is not sufficient for the reported RHEL task, because NFS file access depends on server export policy and identity semantics.
The expected path triggers the mount and the service sees the required files. That is not sufficient for the reported RHEL task, because NFS file access depends on server export policy and identity semantics.
`findmnt` shows the separate volume as the directory's source. That is not sufficient for the reported RHEL task, because NFS file access depends on server export policy and identity semantics.