Question 670
An identity and device-administration engineer evaluates: A senior network operator must enter privileged EXEC mode on specific routers, but a generic TACACS+ shell profile gives every user the same low privilege level. What should the team change before declaring this work complete?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Configure an appropriate TACACS+ shell profile and role-based policy condition for the authorized administrator group. This is appropriate because tACACS+ authorization profiles can return shell privilege attributes independently from allowed command sets. It should be verified by this evidence: The senior operator receives the intended supported privilege, while a junior operator remains restricted.
Incorrect Answers
Configure an appropriate TACACS+ shell profile and role-based policy condition for the authorized administrator group. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Enable the supported ISE Device Administration service on intended PSNs and verify licensing and matching NAD configuration. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.
Configure an appropriate TACACS+ shell profile and role-based policy condition for the authorized administrator group. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: ISE identifies the network device that sends a TACACS+ request; an unregistered or mismatched source may fail device validation before authorization. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.
Configure an appropriate TACACS+ shell profile and role-based policy condition for the authorized administrator group. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Separate device-admin and endpoint network-access policy ownership. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.